John P Osborne
University of Bath
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John P Osborne.
Epilepsia | 2010
John P Osborne; Andrew L Lux; Stuart W Edwards; Eleanor Hancock; Anthony L. Johnson; Colin Kennedy; Richard Newton; Christopher M Verity; Finbar J. O'Callaghan
Purpose:u2002 To examine the underlying etiology of infantile spasms from the United Kingdom Infantile Spasms Study (UKISS), using the pediatric adaptation of ICD 10.
Epilepsia | 2011
Fjk O'Callaghan; Andrew L Lux; K. Darke; Stuart W Edwards; Eleanor Hancock; Anthony L. Johnson; Colin Kennedy; Richard Newton; Christopher M Verity; John P Osborne
Purpose:u2002 Infantile spasms is a severe infantile seizure disorder. Several factors affect developmental outcome, especially the underlying etiology of the spasms. Treatment also affects outcome. Both age at onset of spasms and lead time to treatment (the time from onset of spasms to start of treatment) may be important. We investigated these factors.
Journal of Medical Genetics | 1991
David W Webb; John P Osborne
Non-penetrance has not been reported in tuberous sclerosis when modern non-invasive investigations have been performed. We report a four generation family in which there was a subject with minimal expression and another with non-penetrance between a great grandfather and his great grandson. This situation highlights the need for full investigation of children of tuberous sclerosis patients before counselling a low recurrence risk for the disease.
Brain & Development | 2001
Eleanor Hancock; John P Osborne; Phillip Milner
BACKGROUNDnWest syndrome is an age dependent syndrome, which includes a peculiar type of epileptic seizure (infantile spasms), usually hypsarrhythmia and in the majority psychomotor retardation. Despite huge advances in medicine it still remains a poorly understood entity and although with newer imaging techniques we are more often able to elicit the underlying causes of these spasms, still little is known about their pathophysiological basis and treatment remains problematic.nnnOBJECTIVESnTo compare the effects of single pharmaceutical therapies used to treat infantile spasms in terms of long-term psychomotor development, subsequent epilepsy, control of the spasms and side effects.nnnMETHODSnA search of the central trials register of the Cochrane Epilepsy Group, medline database, embase database and the reference lists of all retrieved articles was undertaken. Correspondence with colleagues and drug companies and appeals at international conferences were also undertaken to try and discover unpublished data. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the medical treatment of infantile spasms were included. Data was then extracted independently by the three reviewers and analysed using the RevMan software package.nnnMAIN RESULTSnWe found ten small RCTs on the pharmacological treatment of infantile spasms. No unpublished trials were discovered. These ten studies looked at just 335 patients treated with a total of eight different pharmaceutical agents. Overall methodology of the studies was poor, partly because of ethical dilemmas such as giving placebo injections to children. No study considered the effects of treatment on long-term psychomotor development or onset of other seizure types. One small study found vigabatrin to be more efficacious in stopping infantile spasms in a group of patients with tuberous sclerosis than hydrocortisone. One underpowered study showed a trend for vigabatrin to be more efficacious than placebo in stopping infantile spasms, another two equally underpowered studies suggested adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) to be more efficacious than low-dose prednisone. It was not possible to compare reduction in the number of spasms between the different treatments because of differences in methods of analysis. Overall, only nine patients were reported to have been withdrawn from the trial treatments due to side effects and two deaths were reported.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThere is still little evidence available on the optimum treatment for infantile spasms. Further trials with larger number of patients, and longer follow-up are required.
Lancet Neurology | 2017
Finbar J. O'Callaghan; Stuart W Edwards; Fabienne Dietrich Alber; Eleanor Hancock; Anthony L. Johnson; Colin Kennedy; Marcus Likeman; Andrew L Lux; Mark T. Mackay; Andrew A. Mallick; Richard Newton; Melinda Nolan; Ronit Pressler; Dietz Rating; Bernhard Schmitt; Christopher M Verity; John P Osborne
BACKGROUNDnInfantile spasms constitutes a severe infantile epilepsy syndrome that is difficult to treat and has a high morbidity. Hormonal therapies or vigabatrin are the most commonly used treatments. We aimed to assess whether combining the treatments would be more effective than hormonal therapy alone.nnnMETHODSnIn this multicentre, open-label randomised trial, 102 hospitals (Australia [three], Germany [11], New Zealand [two], Switzerland [three], and the UK [83]) enrolled infants who had a clinical diagnosis of infantile spasms and a hypsarrhythmic (or similar) EEG no more than 7 days before enrolment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by a secure website to receive hormonal therapy with vigabatrin or hormonal therapy alone. If parents consented, there was an additional randomisation (1:1) of type of hormonal therapy used (prednisolone or tetracosactide depot). Block randomisation was stratified for hormonal treatment and risk of developmental impairment. Parents and clinicians were not masked to therapy, but investigators assessing electro-clinical outcome were masked to treatment allocation. Minimum doses were prednisolone 10 mg four times a day or intramuscular tetracosactide depot 0·5 mg (40 IU) on alternate days with or without vigabatrin 100 mg/kg per day. The primary outcome was cessation of spasms, which was defined as no witnessed spasms on and between day 14 and day 42 from trial entry, as recorded by parents and carers in a seizure diary. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with The International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN), number 54363174, and the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EUDRACT), number 2006-000788-27.nnnFINDINGSnBetween March 7, 2007, and May 22, 2014, 766 infants were screened and, of those, 377 were randomly assigned to hormonal therapy with vigabatrin (186) or hormonal therapy alone (191). All 377 infants were assessed for the primary outcome. Between days 14 and 42 inclusive no spasms were witnessed in 133 (72%) of 186 patients on hormonal therapy with vigabatrin compared with 108 (57%) of 191 patients on hormonal therapy alone (difference 15·0%, 95% CI 5·1-24·9, p=0·002). Serious adverse reactions necessitating hospitalisation occurred in 33 infants (16 on hormonal therapy alone and 17 on hormonal therapy with vigabatrin). The most common serious adverse reaction was infection occurring in five infants on hormonal therapy alone and four on hormonal therapy with vigabatrin. There were no deaths attributable to treatment.nnnINTERPRETATIONnHormonal therapy with vigabatrin is significantly more effective at stopping infantile spasms than hormonal therapy alone. The 4 week period of spasm cessation required to achieve a primary clinical response to treatment suggests that the effect seen might be sustained, but this needs to be confirmed at the 18 month follow-up.nnnFUNDINGnThe Castang Foundation, Bath Unit for Research in Paediatrics, National Institute of Health Research, the Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, the BRONNER-BENDUNG Stifung/Gernsbach, and University Childrens Hospital Zurich.
Epilepsy Research | 2006
Andrew L. Lux; John P Osborne
Studying infantile spasms is challenging because there are so many aspects of variation that introduce potential bias. These might relate to the many underlying etiologies, and variations in clinical semiology and electroencephalographic features that relate more to age or timing of investigation than to the underlying epilepsy or seizures type. New gene defects associated with the CDKL5/STK9 and ARX genes are associated with infantile spasms, but these illustrate that, when studying neurodevelopmental outcomes, it is necessary to deal also with heterogeneity at the level of genotype-phenotype correlation. We discuss these design issues with consideration of data from the United Kingdom infantile spasms study (UKISS)--in which neurodevelopmental outcomes show evidence of an interaction between underlying etiologic classification and randomised treatment--and with consideration to proposals on study design from the recent consensus statement of the West Delphi group. In the continual debate about whether we should lump or split when studying epilepsy syndromes, we propose the adoption of study designs using valid and consistent methods that permit both lumping and splitting.
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology | 2013
Choong Yi Fong; John P Osborne; Stuart W Edwards; Cheryl Hemingway; Eleanor Hancock; Anthony L. Johnson; Colin Kennedy; Rachel Kneen; Marcus Likeman; Andrew L Lux; S.R. Mordekar; Velayutham Murugan; Richard Newton; Michael Pike; Michael Quinn; Stefan Spinty; Grace Vassallo; Christopher M Verity; Andrea Whitney; Finbar J. O'Callaghan
We aimed to investigate the relationship between movement disorders, changes on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and vigabatrin therapy in children with infantile spasms.
Science | 1997
Marjon van Slegtenhorst; Ronald de Hoogt; C. J. Hermans; Mark Nellist; Bart Janssen; Senno Verhoef; Dick Lindhout; Ans van den Ouweland; Dicky Halley; Janet Young; Mari-Wyn Burley; S. Jeremiah; Karen Woodward; Joseph Nahmias; Margaret Fox; Rosemary Ekong; John P Osborne; Jonathan Wolfe; Sue Povey; Russell G. Snell; Jeremy Peter Cheadle; Alistair C. Jones; Maria Tachataki; David Ravine; Julian Roy Sampson; Mary Pat Reeve; Paul G. Richardson; Friederike Wilmer; Cheryl Munro; Trevor Hawkins
Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Genes, Clinical Features and Therapeutics | 2010
Finbar J. O'Callaghan; John P Osborne
Archive | 2006
K. F. Darke; Stuart W Edwards; Eleanor Hancock; Anthony L. Johnson; Colin Kennedy; Andrew L Lux; Richard Newton; Finbar J. O'Callaghan; Christopher M Verity; John P Osborne