John P. Plastaras

An evidence based review of proton beam therapy: The report of ASTRO’s emerging technology committee

Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a novel method for treating malignant disease with radiotherapy. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the state of the science of PBT and arrive at a recommendation for the use of PBT. The emerging technology committee of the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) routinely evaluates new modalities in radiotherapy and assesses the published evidence to determine recommendations for the society as a whole. In 2007, a Proton Task Force was assembled to evaluate the state of the art of PBT. This report reflects evidence collected up to November 2009. Data was reviewed for PBT in central nervous system tumors, gastrointestinal malignancies, lung, head and neck, prostate, and pediatric tumors. Current data do not provide sufficient evidence to recommend PBT in lung cancer, head and neck cancer, GI malignancies, and pediatric non-CNS malignancies. In hepatocellular carcinoma and prostate cancer and there is evidence for the efficacy of PBT but no suggestion that it is superior to photon based approaches. In pediatric CNS malignancies PBT appears superior to photon approaches but more data is needed. In large ocular melanomas and chordomas, we believe that there is evidence for a benefit of PBT over photon approaches. PBT is an important new technology in radiotherapy. Current evidence provides a limited indication for PBT. More robust prospective clinical trials are needed to determine the appropriate clinical setting for PBT.

Cell Cycle–Dependent and Schedule-Dependent Antitumor Effects of Sorafenib Combined with Radiation

The antineoplastic drug sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) is a multikinase inhibitor that targets the serine-threonine kinase B-Raf as well as several tyrosine kinases. Given the numerous molecular targets of sorafenib, there are several potential anticancer mechanisms of action, including induction of apoptosis, cytostasis, and antiangiogenesis. We observed that sorafenib has broad activity in viability assays in several human tumor cell lines but selectively induces apoptosis in only some lines. Sorafenib was found to decrease Mcl-1 levels in most cell lines tested, but this decrease did not correlate with apoptotic sensitivity. Sorafenib slows cell cycle progression and prevents irradiated cells from reaching and accumulating at G2-M. In synchronized cells, sorafenib causes a reversible G1 delay, which is associated with decreased levels of cyclin D1, Rb, and phosphorylation of Rb. Although sorafenib does not affect intrinsic radiosensitivity using in vitro colony formation assays, it significantly reduces colony size. In HCT116 xenograft tumor growth delay experiments in mice, sorafenib alters radiation response in a schedule-dependent manner. Radiation treatment followed sequentially by sorafenib was found to be associated with the greatest tumor growth delay. This study establishes a foundation for clinical testing of sequential fractionated radiation followed by sorafenib in gastrointestinal and other malignancies.

Real-time study of prostate intrafraction motion during external beam radiotherapy with daily endorectal balloon.

PURPOSE To prospectively investigate intrafraction prostate motion during radiofrequency-guided prostate radiotherapy with implanted electromagnetic transponders when daily endorectal balloon (ERB) is used. METHODS AND MATERIALS Intrafraction prostate motion from 24 patients in 787 treatment sessions was evaluated based on three-dimensional (3D), lateral, cranial-caudal (CC), and anterior-posterior (AP) displacements. The mean percentage of time with 3D, lateral, CC, and AP prostate displacements>2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 mm in 1 minute intervals was calculated for up to 6 minutes of treatment time. Correlation between the mean percentage time with 3D prostate displacement>3 mm vs. treatment week was investigated. RESULTS The percentage of time with 3D prostate movement>2, 3, and 4 mm increased with elapsed treatment time (p<0.05). Prostate movement>5 mm was independent of elapsed treatment time (p=0.11). The overall mean time with prostate excursions>3 mm was 5%. Directional analysis showed negligible lateral prostate motion; AP and CC motion were comparable. The fraction of time with 3D prostate movement>3 mm did not depend on treatment week of (p>0.05) over a 4-minute mean treatment time. CONCLUSIONS Daily endorectal balloon consistently stabilizes the prostate, preventing clinically significant displacement (>5 mm). A 3-mm internal margin may sufficiently account for 95% of intrafraction prostate movement for up to 6 minutes of treatment time. Directional analysis suggests that the lateral internal margin could be further reduced to 2 mm.

A Study to Quantify the Effectiveness of Daily Endorectal Balloon for Prostate Intrafraction Motion Management

PURPOSE To quantify intrafraction prostate motion between patient groups treated with and without daily endorectal balloon (ERB) employed during prostate radiotherapy and establish the effectiveness of the ERB. METHODS Real-time intrafraction prostate motion from 29 non-ERB (1,061 sessions) and 30 ERB (1,008 sessions) patients was evaluated based on three-dimensional (3D), left, right, cranial, caudal, anterior, and posterior displacements. The average percentage of time with 3D and unidirectional prostate displacements >2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 mm in 1-min intervals was calculated for up to 6 min of treatment time. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov method was used to evaluate the intrafraction prostate motion pattern between both groups. RESULTS Large 3D motion (up to 1 cm or more) was only observed in the non-ERB group. The motion increased as a function of elapsed time for displacements >2-8 mm for the non-ERB group and >2-4 mm for the ERB group (p < 0.05). The percentage time distributions between the two groups were significantly different for motion >5 mm (p < 0.05). The 3D symmetrical internal margin (IM) can be reduced from 5 to 3 mm (40% reduction), whereas the asymmetrical IM can be reduced from 3 to 2 mm (33% reduction) in cranial, caudal, anterior, and posterior for 6 min of treatment, when ERB is used. Beyond 6 min, the symmetrical 3D and asymmetrical cranial, caudal, anterior, and posterior IMs can be reduced from 9, 4, 7, 7, and 8 to 5, 2, 5, 3, and 4 mm, respectively (up to 57% reduction). CONCLUSION The percentage of time that the prostate was displaced in any direction was less in the ERB group for almost all magnitudes of motion considered. The directional analysis shows that the ERB reduced IMs in almost all directions, especially the anterior-posterior direction.

Validation and toxicity of PI3K/Akt pathway inhibition by HIV protease inhibitors in humans

PurposeActivation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway in tumors leads to radiation resistance, and inhibition of this pathway radiosensitizes tumors in laboratory models. Several first-generation human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (HPIs) inhibit Akt activation and are radiosensitizers. In order to validate a biomarker of Akt activity in anticipation of clinical trials using HPIs combined with radiotherapy, we sought to determine whether Akt activation was inhibited in leukocytes of HIV+ patients that were already taking these agents. Methods and MaterialsPeripheral blood mononuclear cells from HIV+ patients either taking radiosensitizing HPIs (nelfinavir, saquinavir, amprenavir) or not were analyzed by Western blotting for phospho-Akt. In order to determine whether these radiosensitizing HPIs increase the toxicity of radiotherapy, we performed a retrospective cohort study of HIV+ cancer patients treated with radiation and compared patients on radiosensitizing HPIs to controls not taking these agents. ResultsPatients taking these “active” radiosensitizing protease inhibitors had low levels of phospho-Akt compared to HIV+ patients taking either no medications or other anti-retroviral regimens. We found no significant differences in acute toxicities or in the ability to finish radiation treatment between 14 patients taking radiosensitizing HPIs and the 28 controls. ConclusionsThese results demonstrate the proof of principle that HPIs can inhibit Akt activation in patients taking normally prescribed anti-retroviral doses and are not associated with excessive toxicity. Radiosensitizing HPIs are excellent candidates for Phase I clinical trials as radiation sensitizers, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells can be used as a drug activity biomarker for Akt pathway inhibition.

Stage migration in planning PET/CT scans in patients due to receive radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION This study examined rates of tumor progression in treatment-naive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as determined by repeat treatment-planning fluorine-18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT). METHODS AND MATERIALS This study assessed patients who underwent PET/CT simulation for NSCLC stage II/III, radiation-naive, nonmetastatic NSCLC. It compared planning PET/CT with previous PET/CT images. Patients were analyzed for change in stage, treatment intent, or both. Progression was defined as a change in TNM status leading to upstaging, and standardized uptake value (SUV) velocity was defined as [(SUVscan2 - SUVscan1)/interscan interval in days]. RESULTS Of 149 consecutive patients examined between April 2009 and April 2011, 47 had prior PET/CT scans and were included. The median age was 68 years. New nodal disease or metastatic disease was identified in 24 (51%) of 47 patients. Fourteen (30%) had evidence of extrathoracic metastatic disease; the remaining 10 (21%) had new nodal disease that required substantial alteration of treatment fields. At a scan interval of 20 days, the rate of upstaging was 17%. SUV velocity was analyzed in the subset of patients who had their studies on the identical PET/CT scanner (n = 14). Nonupstaged patients had a mean SUV velocity of 0.074 units per day, compared with 0.11 units per day in patients that were upstaged by their second PET/CT scan (P = .020). CONCLUSION Radiation treatment planning with hybrid PET/CT scans repeated within 120 days of an initial staging PET/CT scan identified significant upstaging in more than half of patients. For a subset of patients who underwent both scans on the same instrument, SUV velocity predicts upstaging, and the difference between those upstaged and those not was statistically significant.

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and paclitaxel have cooperative in vivo effects against glioblastoma multiforme cells

Tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) in conjunction with microtubule-targeting agents may be a promising novel anticancer treatment strategy. In vitro studies have suggested that relatively low concentrations of TRAIL enhance the lethality of paclitaxel (Taxol) against human cancer cells. The increased efficacy may be due to the triggering of caspase activation, resulting in mitotic checkpoint abrogation and catastrophe. We show here that wild-type p53 protects cells from caspase-dependent death induced by this therapeutic combination in vitro. We have now also developed an imaging-based model system to test the in vivo efficacy of combined TRAIL and Taxol, in which tumor growth and treatment response can be monitored noninvasively and in real-time. We further utilize bioluminescence, F18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, and microscale computed tomography imaging to confirm the effects of combined treatment on tumors. These studies together provide the first in vivo confirmation that combined TRAIL plus paclitaxel results in better tumor control compared with either TRAIL or paclitaxel alone, and with no discernable increased normal tissue toxicity in the mouse. Interestingly, the in vivo antitumor response elicited by combined treatment was not affected by the p53 status of the tumor cells. These preclinical observations together suggest the therapeutic potential of combining TRAIL plus paclitaxel in cancer treatment, and support further preclinical and future clinical testing. [Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12):3285–95]

A dosimetric comparison of proton and photon therapy in unresectable cancers of the head of pancreas

PURPOSE Uncontrolled local growth is the cause of death in ∼ 30% of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancers. The addition of standard-dose radiotherapy to gemcitabine has been shown to confer a modest survival benefit in this population. Radiation dose escalation with three-dimensional planning is not feasible, but high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been shown to improve local control. Still, dose-escalation remains limited by gastrointestinal toxicity. In this study, the authors investigate the potential use of double scattering (DS) and pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy in limiting dose to critical organs at risk. METHODS The authors compared DS, PBS, and IMRT plans in 13 patients with unresectable cancer of the pancreatic head, paying particular attention to duodenum, small intestine, stomach, liver, kidney, and cord constraints in addition to target volume coverage. All plans were calculated to 5500 cGy in 25 fractions with equivalent constraints and normalized to prescription dose. All statistics were by two-tailed paired t-test. RESULTS Both DS and PBS decreased stomach, duodenum, and small bowel dose in low-dose regions compared to IMRT (p < 0.01). However, protons yielded increased doses in the mid to high dose regions (e.g., 23.6-53.8 and 34.9-52.4 Gy for duodenum using DS and PBS, respectively; p < 0.05). Protons also increased generalized equivalent uniform dose to duodenum and stomach, however these differences were small (<5% and 10%, respectively; p < 0.01). Doses to other organs-at-risk were within institutional constraints and placed no obvious limitations on treatment planning. CONCLUSIONS Proton therapy does not appear to reduce OAR volumes receiving high dose. Protons are able to reduce the treated volume receiving low-intermediate doses, however the clinical significance of this remains to be determined in future investigations.

Daily Isocenter Correction With Electromagnetic-Based Localization Improves Target Coverage and Rectal Sparing During Prostate Radiotherapy

PURPOSE To evaluate dosimetric consequences of daily isocenter correction during prostate cancer radiation therapy using the Calypso 4D localization system. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data were analyzed from 28 patients with electromagnetic transponders implanted in their prostates for daily target localization and tracking. Treatment planning isocenters were recorded based on the values of the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral axes. Isocenter location obtained via alignment with skin tattoos was compared with that obtained via the electromagnetic localization system. Daily isocenter shifts, based on the isocenter location differences between the two alignment methods in each spatial axis, were calculated for each patient over their entire course. The mean isocenter shifts were used to determine dosimetric consequences of treatment based on skin tattoo alignments alone. RESULTS The mean SD of the percentages of treatment days with shifts beyond 0.5 cm for vertical, longitudinal and lateral shifts were 62% 28%, 35% 26%, and 38% 21%, respectively. If daily electromagnetic localization was not used, the excess in prescribed dose delivered to 70% of the rectum was 10 Gy and the deficit in prescribed dose delivered to 95% of the planning target volume was 10 Gy. The mean isocenter shift was not associated with the volumes of the prostate, rectum, or bladder, or with patient body mass index. CONCLUSIONS Daily isocenter localization can reduce the treatment dose to the rectum. Correcting for this variability could lead to improved dose delivery, reduced side effects, and potentially improved treatment outcomes.

Role of PI3K/Akt signaling in TRAIL- and radiation-induced gastrointestinal apoptosis.

Activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway is associated with tumorigenesis and resistance to apoptosis and ionizing radiation (IR). We sought to characterize the effects of physiologic and genetic manipulation of Akt signaling on IR-induced gastrointestinal (GI) apoptosis in mice. PI3K/Akt signaling is stimulated by insulin. We evaluated the time course of Akt stimulation by insulin and found it overlapped with protection from apoptosis induced by TRAIL (TNF-alpha Related Apoptosis Inducing Ligand) in cell lines. Mice were treated with insulin and glucose, and the kinetics of in vivo Akt stimulation were determined by phospho-Akt (S473) (P-Akt) immunofluorescence in the gut. Irradiation of mice by 5 Gy at 30 min after insulin/glucose administration induced apoptosis in the crypts of the ileum and colon after 6 hrs, but induced little apoptosis in the liver or esophagus. Pre-treatment with insulin and glucose did not significantly alter levels of IR-induced apoptosis in the gut. IR alone led to sustained increases in P-Akt in the gut at 6 hrs, a protective response that may have precluded additional protection from insulin/glucose. In Akt1 -/- mice, there was significantly more apoptosis in ileum crypts of irradiated mice compared to Akt1 +/+ mice, suggesting a role for the pathway in the GI tract in response to IR. Taken together, modulation of the PI3K/Akt pathway may sensitize or protect against cancer therapies in both tumor and normal tissues.