John Pløen

High-dose chemoradiotherapy and watchful waiting for distal rectal cancer: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND Abdominoperineal resection is the standard treatment for patients with distal T2 or T3 rectal cancers; however, the procedure is extensive and mutilating, and alternative treatment strategies are being investigated. We did a prospective observational trial to assess whether high-dose radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy followed by observation (watchful waiting) was successful for non-surgical management of low rectal cancer. METHODS Patients with primary, resectable, T2 or T3, N0-N1 adenocarcinoma in the lower 6 cm of the rectum were given chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions to tumour, 50 Gy in 30 fractions to elective lymph node volumes, 5 Gy endorectal brachytherapy boost, and oral tegafur-uracil 300 mg/m(2)) every weekday for 6 weeks. Endoscopies and biopsies of the tumour were done at baseline, throughout the course of treatment (weeks 2, 4, and 6), and 6 weeks after the end of treatment. We allocated patients with complete clinical tumour regression, negative tumour site biopsies, and no nodal or distant metastases on CT and MRI 6 weeks after treatment to the observation group (watchful waiting). We referred all other patients to standard surgery. Patients under observation were followed up closely with endoscopies and selected-site biopsies, with surgical resection given for local recurrence. The primary endpoint was local tumour recurrence 1 year after allocation to the observation group. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00952926. Enrolment is closed, but follow-up continues for secondary endpoints. FINDINGS Between Oct 20, 2009, and Dec 23, 2013, we enrolled 55 patients. Patients were recruited from three surgical units throughout Denmark and treated in one tertiary cancer centre (Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark). Of 51 patients who were eligible, 40 had clinical complete response and were allocated to observation. Median follow-up for local recurrence in the observation group was 23·9 months (IQR 15·3-31·0). Local recurrence in the observation group at 1 year was 15·5% (95% CI 3·3-26·3). The most common acute grade 3 adverse event during treatment was diarrhoea, which affected four (8%) of 51 patients. Sphincter function in the observation group was excellent, with 18 (72%) of 25 patients at 1 year and 11 (69%) of 16 patients at 2 years reporting no faecal incontinence at all and a median Jorge-Wexner score of 0 (IQR 0-0) at all timepoints. The most common late toxicity was bleeding from the rectal mucosa; grade 3 bleeding was reported in two (7%) in 30 patients at 1 year and one (6%) of 17 patients at 2 years. There were no unexpected serious adverse reactions or treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION High-dose chemoradiotherapy and watchful waiting might be a safe alternative to abdominoperineal resection for patients with distal rectal cancer. FUNDING CIRRO-The Lundbeck Foundation Center for Interventional Research in Radiation Oncology and The Danish Council for Strategic Research.

Radiation Dose-Response Model for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy

PURPOSE Preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is part of the standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancers. Tumor regression at the time of operation is desirable, but not much is known about the relationship between radiation dose and tumor regression. In the present study we estimated radiation dose-response curves for various grades of tumor regression after preoperative CRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 222 patients, treated with consistent chemotherapy and radiation therapy techniques, were considered for the analysis. Radiation therapy consisted of a combination of external-beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy. Response at the time of operation was evaluated from the histopathologic specimen and graded on a 5-point scale (TRG1-5). The probability of achieving complete, major, and partial response was analyzed by ordinal logistic regression, and the effect of including clinical parameters in the model was examined. The radiation dose-response relationship for a specific grade of histopathologic tumor regression was parameterized in terms of the dose required for 50% response, D50,i, and the normalized dose-response gradient, γ50,i. RESULTS A highly significant dose-response relationship was found (P=.002). For complete response (TRG1), the dose-response parameters were D50,TRG1=92.0 Gy (95% confidence interval [CI] 79.3-144.9 Gy), γ50,TRG1=0.982 (CI 0.533-1.429), and for major response (TRG1-2) D50,TRG1&2=72.1 Gy (CI 65.3-94.0 Gy), γ50,TRG1&2=0.770 (CI 0.338-1.201). Tumor size and N category both had a significant effect on the dose-response relationships. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated a significant dose-response relationship for tumor regression after preoperative CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer for tumor dose levels in the range of 50.4-70 Gy, which is higher than the dose range usually considered.

Dose-Effect Relationship in Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Radiation Doses

PURPOSE Locally advanced rectal cancer represents a major therapeutic challenge. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy is considered standard, but little is known about the dose-effect relationship. The present study represents a dose-escalation phase III trial comparing 2 doses of radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS The inclusion criteria were resectable T3 and T4 tumors with a circumferential margin of ≤5 mm on magnetic resonance imaging. The patients were randomized to receive 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to the tumor and pelvic lymph nodes (arm A) or the same treatment supplemented with an endorectal boost given as high-dose-rate brachytherapy (10 Gy in 2 fractions; arm B). Concomitant chemotherapy, uftoral 300 mg/m2 and L-leucovorin 22.5 mg/d, was added to both arms on treatment days. The primary endpoint was complete pathologic remission. The secondary endpoints included tumor response and rate of complete resection (R0). RESULTS The study included 248 patients. No significant difference was found in toxicity or surgical complications between the 2 groups. Based on intention to treat, no significant difference was found in the complete pathologic remission rate between the 2 arms (18% and 18%). The rate of R0 resection was different in T3 tumors (90% and 99%; P=.03). The same applied to the rate of major response (tumor regression grade, 1+2), 29% and 44%, respectively (P=.04). CONCLUSIONS This first randomized trial comparing 2 radiation doses indicated that the higher dose increased the rate of major response by 50% in T3 tumors. The endorectal boost is feasible, with no significant increase in toxicity or surgical complications.

Phase II marker-driven trial of panitumumab and chemotherapy in KRAS wild-type biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND Combination chemotherapy has proven beneficial in biliary tract cancer and further improvements may be achieved by individualizing treatment based on biomarkers and by adding biological agents. We report the effect of chemotherapy with panitumumab as first-line therapy for KRAS wild-type irresectable biliary tract cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2, and panitumumab 6 mg/kg i.v. every 2 weeks followed by two daily administrations of capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 in 7 days. RESULTS During 22 months, 46 patients were included in a single institution. The primary end point, fraction of progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, was 31/42 [74%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 58% to 84%]. Forty-two patients had measurable disease. Response rate was 33% and disease control rate 86%. Median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI 6.7-8.7 months) and median overall survival was 10.0 months (95% CI 7.4-12.7 months). Toxicity was manageable including eight cases of epidermal growth factor receptor-related skin adverse events of grade 2 or more. CONCLUSIONS Marker-driven patient selection is feasible in the systemic treatment of biliary tract cancer. Combination chemotherapy with panitumumab in patients with KRAS wild-type tumors met the efficacy criteria for future testing in a randomized trial.BACKGROUND Combination chemotherapy has proven beneficial in biliary tract cancer and further improvements may be achieved by individualizing treatment based on biomarkers and by adding biological agents. We report the effect of chemotherapy with panitumumab as first-line therapy for KRAS wild-type irresectable biliary tract cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2), and panitumumab 6 mg/kg i.v. every 2 weeks followed by two daily administrations of capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) in 7 days. RESULTS During 22 months, 46 patients were included in a single institution. The primary end point, fraction of progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, was 31/42 [74%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 58% to 84%]. Forty-two patients had measurable disease. Response rate was 33% and disease control rate 86%. Median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI 6.7-8.7 months) and median overall survival was 10.0 months (95% CI 7.4-12.7 months). Toxicity was manageable including eight cases of epidermal growth factor receptor-related skin adverse events of grade 2 or more. CONCLUSIONS Marker-driven patient selection is feasible in the systemic treatment of biliary tract cancer. Combination chemotherapy with panitumumab in patients with KRAS wild-type tumors met the efficacy criteria for future testing in a randomized trial.

The prognostic value of lymph node metastases and tumour regression grade in rectal cancer patients treated with long-course preoperative chemoradiotherapy

Objective  The purpose of the present study was to investigate the impact of tumour regression and the post‐treatment lymph node status on the prognosis of rectal cancer treated by preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

EGF61A>G polymorphism as predictive marker of clinical outcome to first-line capecitabine and oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND The purpose of the present study was to investigate polymorphisms related to the metabolism of fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin, thymidylate synthase (TS) and excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1) 118, in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX). We also investigated the importance of the EGF61A>G polymorphism, which holds a functional influence on the tyrosine kinase receptor regulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included 68 patients treated with first-line XELOX. Polymorphism analyses were carried out on pretreatment blood samples. Response was evaluated according to the RECIST. Survival analysis was described by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank testing. RESULTS The overall response rate was 38% and the median overall survival 19.4 months. A favorable outcome was seen in patients with the EGF61A/G genotype compared with the combined group of A/A and G/G, with response rates of 57% and 18%, respectively (P = 0.001). There was a significantly different progression-free survival (P = 0.018) in favor of the A/G group. The TS and ERCC1 genotypes failed to provide any significant impact on the outcome. CONCLUSION Polymorphism analysis of a simple blood sample is a feasible approach to biomarker analysis and the EGF61A>G polymorphism may influence the effect of first-line XELOX. Consequently, this marker deserves further investigation.

Phase II trial of temsirolimus alone and in combination with irinotecan for KRAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: Outcome and results of KRAS mutational analysis in plasma

Abstract Background. Patients with chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer and KRAS mutations have no effective treatment option. The present study evaluated the efficacy of temsirolimus in chemotherapy refractory mCRC with KRAS mutations. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate if resistance to temsirolimus could be reversed by the addition of irinotecan. Finally, we analyzed pre-treatment blood samples for KRAS mutations to investigate the association between quantitative measures of KRAS mutated alleles and clinical outcome. Material and methods. Patients received weekly temsirolimus 25 mg until progression. Thereafter patients were treated with combination therapy comprising biweekly irinotecan 180 mg/m2 and weekly temsirolimus. A polymerase chain reaction method was used to quantify the KRAS mutated alleles in plasma (pKRAS). Results. Sixty-four patients were included. Treatment was well tolerated. Thirty-eight percent achieved stable disease on monotherapy and 63% on combination therapy. Four and eight patients had a minimal response, respectively. Median overall survival was 160 days. Median time to progression was 45 and 84 days, respectively. The concordance between KRAS status in tumor and plasma was 82%. All patients with tumor reduction had low levels of pKRAS. Patients with high pKRAS had a 77% risk of early progression on monotherapy compared to 43% in patients with lower levels. Multivariate survival analysis confirmed that pKRAS was a strong prognostic factor. Conclusion. Temsirolimus has limited efficacy in chemotherapy resistant KRAS mutant disease, but plasma KRAS quantification is a strong predictor of outcome.

Tumour hypoxia imaging with 18F-fluoroazomycinarabinofuranoside PET/CT in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of 18F-fluoroazomycinarabinofuranoside (18F-FAZA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Materials and methodsThe study included 14 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Before chemoradiotherapy, PET/CT with 18F-FAZA was performed with static 15 min images 2 h after injection of 18F-FAZA. Attenuation correction was obtained with a low-dose CT, and a contrast-enhanced CT was performed immediately after the PET scan. Results18F-FAZA uptake [mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmean) and (SUVmax)] was significantly higher in rectal tumours than in both muscles (P<0.003) and normal intestinal walls (P<5×10−5). The tumour to muscle (T/M) ratios ranged from 1.19 to 3.05 with a mean of 1.97, whereas the tumour to intestinal wall (T/I) ratios had values of 1.73–5.81 with a mean of 2.83. Intense activity accumulating in the bladder produced obvious scattered activity, which spread into the surrounding tissue. Tumour volumes excluding scatter were therefore determined, in which the SUVmax and SUVmean were also significantly higher than in both muscles (P<0.004) and normal intestinal walls (P<2×10−5) and had T/M ratios of 1.19–2.72 with a mean of 1.85 and T/I ratios of 1.71–5.40 with a mean of 2.67. The individual SUVmax, SUVmean, T/M and T/I values were significantly higher in the entire tumour volume compared with the tumour volume adjusted for scatter from the urinary bladder (P<0.005), although the absolute differences were small. Conclusion18F-FAZA PET/CT is feasible for visualization of hypoxia in patients with rectal cancer, but scattered activity from the urinary bladder should be taken into consideration.

Selection of colon cancer patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy by preoperative CT scan.

Abstract Objective: Preoperative staging is essential to plan correct treatment of colon cancer and calls for objective, accurate methods for the introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which represents a new treatment option. Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography (CT) in local staging of colon cancer correlated with histopathological parameters, including criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy. Material and methods. A total of 74 included patients had preoperative CT scans and surgical resection of their colon tumors. Tumor stage (T-stage), extramural tumor invasion (ETI), nodal stage (N-stage), extramural venous invasion (EVI) and the distance from tumor to nearest retroperitoneal fascia (DRF) were retrospectively assessed on the CT scan and compared blindly with the results of the pathological examination, including evaluation of the criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy. Advanced tumors were defined as T3 with ETI ≥5 mm or T4. Results. Sixty-nine percent of the tumors were correctly T-staged by CT, 7% were overstaged and 24% were understaged. As to correct recognition of ETI on the CT scan, the observer was 73% accurate compared with histology (70% sensitivity (95% CI: 53–82%), 78% specificity (95% CI: 60–90%), 81% positive predictive value (PPV) (95% CI: 63–91%) and 66% negative predictive value (NPV) (95% CI: 49–80%). N-stage, EVI and DRF had poor accuracy: 53%, 53% and 64%. All patients with advanced tumors on CT fulfilled the criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy. Positive predictive value: 100% (95% CI: 88–100%). Conclusion. CT has a potential in the preoperative selection of advanced tumors suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy without overtreatment of low-risk patients.

Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: No Benefit From Adding a Brachytherapy Boost

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Mature data on tumor control and survival are presented from a randomized trial of the addition of a brachytherapy boost to long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between March 2005 and November 2008, 248 patients with T3-4N0-2M0 rectal cancer were prospectively randomized to either long-course preoperative CRT (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, per oral tegafur-uracil and L-leucovorin) alone or the same CRT schedule plus a brachytherapy boost (10 Gy in 2 fractions). The primary trial endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) at the time of surgery; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and freedom from locoregional failure. RESULTS Results for the primary endpoint have previously been reported. This analysis presents survival data for the 224 patients in the Danish part of the trial. In all, 221 patients (111 control arm, 110 brachytherapy boost arm) had data available for analysis, with a median follow-up time of 5.4 years. Despite a significant increase in tumor response at the time of surgery, no differences in 5-year OS (70.6% vs 63.6%, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.24, P=.34) and PFS (63.9% vs 52.0%, HR=1.22, P=.32) were observed. Freedom from locoregional failure at 5 years were 93.9% and 85.7% (HR=2.60, P=.06) in the standard and in the brachytherapy arms, respectively. There was no difference in the prevalence of stoma. Explorative analysis based on stratification for tumor regression grade and resection margin status indicated the presence of response migration. CONCLUSIONS Despite increased pathologic tumor regression at the time of surgery, we observed no benefit on late outcome. Improved tumor regression does not necessarily lead to a relevant clinical benefit when the neoadjuvant treatment is followed by high-quality surgery.