John R. Cook

Transferability of economic evaluations across jurisdictions: ISPOR good research practices task force report

ABSTRACT A growing number of jurisdictions now request economic data in support of their decision-making procedures for the pricing and/or reimbursement of health technologies. Because more jurisdictions request economic data, the burden on study sponsors and researchers increases. There are many reasons why the cost-effectiveness of health technologies might vary from place to place. Therefore, this report of an ISPOR Good Practices Task Force reviews what national guidelines for economic evaluation say about transferability, discusses which elements of data could potentially vary from place to place, and recommends good research practices for dealing with aspects of transferability, including strategies based on the analysis of individual patient data and based on decision-analytic modeling.

Cholesterol reduction yields clinical benefits: meta-analysis including recent trials

BACKGROUND Previous meta-analyses reported by Gould et al found significant decreases of 15% in the risk for coronary heart disease (CHD)-related mortality and 11 % in risk for all-cause mortality per decrease of 10% in total cholesterol (TC) level. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of reducing cholesterol on clinical events after including data from recent clinical trials. METHODS Using a literature search (MeSH key terms, including: bezafibrate, coronary disease, efficacy, gemfibrozil, hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, hypercholesterolemia, niacin [nicotinic acids], randomized controlled trials, and treatment outcome; years: 1999-2005), we identified trials published in English that assessed the effects of lipid-modifying therapies on CHD end points, including CHD-related death, myocardial infarction, and angina pectoris. We also included all studies from the previously published meta-analysis. Using the same analytic approach as previously, we determined the effects of net absolute reductions (1 mmol/L [38.7 mg/dL]) in TC and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) on the relative risks (RRs) for all-cause mortality, CHD-related mortality, any CHD event (mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction), and non-CHD-related mortality. RESULTS We included 62 studies involving 216,616 patients, including 126,474 from 24 randomized controlled trials the findings of which were published since the previous meta-analysis (1998). Among all patients, for every 1-mmol/L decrease in TC, there was a 17.5 reduction in RR for all-cause mortality; 24.5 %, for CHD-related mortality; and 29.5% for any CHD event. Corresponding reductions for every 1-mmol/L decrease in LDL-C were 15.6%, 28.0%, and 26.6%, respectively. Similar relationships were observed in patients without CHD. No significant relationship was found between lipid reduction and non-CHD-related mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS The results from the present analysis support conclusions from previous meta-analyses that cholesterol lowering is clinically beneficial in patients with CHD or at elevated CHD risk. These results also support the previous finding that non-CHD-related mortality is unrelated to lipid reductions.

Costs and effects of enalapril therapy in patients with symptomatic heart failure: An economic analysis of the studies of left ventricular dysfunction (SOLVD) treatment trial

The clinical results of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Treatment Trial have been published previously, but no evaluation of cost-effectiveness based on the primary data has been reported. The authors used a decision analytic model based on primary data from SOLVD to estimate years of survival (overall, by New York Heart Association Class, and quality-adjusted) and to estimate costs of nonfatal hospitalizations, ambulatory care, therapy with enalapril, and deaths. Clinical and resource utilization data were derived from participants in SOLVD, and cost data were derived from the United States. Therapy with enalapril during the approximate 48-month follow-up period in SOLVD resulted in a gain of 0.16 year of life and savings of dollars 718. During the patients lifetime, a survival benefit of 0.40 year, a cost per year of life saved of dollars 80, and a cost per quality-adjusted life year of dollars 115 with the use of enalapril were projected. The results indicated a net savings and gain in life expectancy during the SOLVD treatment trial. The lifetime projection suggests that therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, such as enalapril, is extremely attractive when compared with many commonly used interventions in patients with cardiovascular disease or heart failure.

Efficacy of a pentavalent rotavirus vaccine in reducing rotavirus-associated health care utilization across three regions (11 countries)

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of a human-bovine reassortant pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV) on health care encounters in nearly 70 000 subjects randomized in three regions - Europe, the United States, and Latin America/the Caribbean - in the Rotavirus Efficacy and Safety Trial (REST). METHODS Healthy 6- to 12-week-old infants received 3 doses of PRV or placebo at 4- to 10-week intervals. The exact binomial method for ratios of Poisson counts was used to evaluate the effect of PRV on the rate of rotavirus-related hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits involving rotavirus G-types 1-4 occurring > or =14 days after the third dose of vaccine for up to 2 years. RESULTS In fully vaccinated infants, reductions in rotavirus-associated hospitalizations and ED visits were 94.7% (95% CI: 90.9, 96.9) in Europe, 94.9% (95% CI: 84.0, 98.9) in the United States, and 90.0% (95% CI: 29.4, 99.8) in the Latin American/Caribbean regions. CONCLUSIONS PRV reduced hospitalizations and ED visits within each region in REST. Results were consistent across regions and across the overall study cohort.

Modeling the Long-Term Outcomes and Costs of HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Using HIV RNA Levels: Application to a Clinical Trial

A model was developed to gain insight into the potential clinical and economic impact of antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected patients. Observed HIV RNA levels and CD4 cell counts are used in the model to estimate the probability that an individual progresses from asymptomatic infection to the first AIDS-defining illness and death and to estimate the total net cost of care and long-term cost-effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy. The model was applied to patients in a clinical trial (Merck protocol 035) that compared the surrogate marker response to triple therapy with indinavir (IDV; 800 mg every 8 hr) plus zidovudine (ZDV; 200 mg every 8 hr) plus lamivudine (3TC; 150 mg twice a day) to double therapy with ZDV+3TC. The model projected that for an individual without AIDS who received triple therapy the progression to AIDS and death would be delayed more than for a patient who received double therapy with ZDV+3TC if no other treatment options were offered. Because of this delay in disease progression, the total discounted cost over the initial 5-year period was projected to be

What do international pharmacoeconomic guidelines say about economic data transferability

5100 lower for patients who received triple therapy compared with double therapy if suppression with triple therapy lasts up to 3 years. If suppression with triple therapy lasts up to 5 years, costs were projected to be higher with the triple combination, but 81% of the cost is offset by lower disease costs as a result of fewer patients progressing to AIDS. Over 20 years, total discounted cost was projected to be higher for the triple-therapy regimen primarily because of a longer estimated survival time. At 20 years, the incremental cost per life-year gained by adding IDV to a ZDV+3TC regimen was estimated at

Use of an angular transformation for ratio estimation in cost-effectiveness analysis

13,229, which is well within the range of other widely accepted medical interventions.

Economic impact of GPIIB/IIIA blockade after high-risk angioplasty: Results from the restore trial

OBJECTIVES The objectives of this article were to assess the positions of the various national pharmacoeconomic guidelines on the transferability (or lack of transferability) of clinical and economic data and to review the methods suggested in the guidelines for addressing issues of transferability. METHODS A review of existing national pharmacoeconomic guidelines was conducted to assess recommendations on the transferability of clinical and economic data, whether there are important differences between countries, and whether common methodologies have been suggested to address key transferability issues. Pharmacoeconomic guidelines were initially identified through the ISPOR Web site. In addition, those national guidelines not included in the ISPOR Web site, but known to us, were also considered. RESULTS Across 27 sets of guidelines, baseline risk and unit costs were uniformly considered to be of low transferability, while treatment effect was classified as highly transferable. Results were more variable for resource use and utilities, which were considered to have low transferability in 63% and 45% of cases, respectively. There were some differences between older and more recent guidelines in the treatment of transferability issues. CONCLUSIONS A growing number of jurisdictions are using guidelines for the economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. The recommendations in existing guidelines regarding the transferability of clinical and economic data are quite diverse. There is a case for standardization in dealing with transferability issues. One important step would be to update guidelines more frequently.

Effect of lovastatin on cardiovascular resource utilization and costs in the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) ☆

Economic evaluations of medical technologies involve a consideration of both costs and clinical benefits, and an increasing number of clinical studies include a specific objective of assessing cost-effectiveness. These studies measure the trade-off between costs and benefits using the cost-effectiveness ratio (CE ratio), which is defined as the net incremental cost per unit of benefit provided by the candidate therapy. In this paper we review the statistical methods which have been proposed for estimating 95 per cent confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios. We show that the use of an angular transformation of the standardized ratio stabilizes the variance of the estimated CE ratio, and provides a clearer interpretation of study results. An estimate of the 95 per cent confidence interval for the CE ratio in the transformed scale is easily made using the jack-knife or bootstrap. The available methods are compared using data from a long term study of mortality in patients with congestive heart failure.

Cost-effectiveness of ezetimibe coadministration in statin-treated patients not at cholesterol goal: application to Germany, Spain and Norway.

OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to assess the impact of GPIIb/IIIa blockade with tirofiban on costs during the initial hospitalization and at 30 days among patients undergoing high-risk coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND GPIIb/IIIa blockers are a new class of compounds that have been shown in clinical studies to prevent complications after high-risk angioplasty. METHODS The RESTORE trial was a multinational, blinded placebo-controlled study of 2,197 patients randomized to tirofiban or placebo following coronary angioplasty. This economic assessment was a prospective substudy of the RESTORE trial, and included 1,920 patients enrolled in the U.S. Costs were estimated for the U.S. cohort based on their utilization of healthcare resources and on costs measured directly in 820 U.S. patients at 30 sites. RESULTS There was a 36% difference in the rate of the composite event of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and revascularization at two days between tirofiban and placebo (8% vs. 12%, p = 0.002). This difference was attributed to a reduction in nonfatal MI, repeat angioplasty, coronary surgery and stent placement. These clinical benefits followed a similar trend at 30 days, with a 16% reduction in the composite event (p = 0.10). In-hospital cost, including professional and study drug costs, was