John R. Petrie
University of Glasgow
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John R. Petrie.
Diabetes Care | 2010
Michael R. MacDonald; Dean T. Eurich; Sumit R. Majumdar; James Lewsey; Sai Bhagra; Pardeep S. Jhund; Mark C. Petrie; John J.V. McMurray; John R. Petrie; Finlay A. McAlister
OBJECTIVE Diabetes and heart failure commonly coexist, and prior studies have suggested better outcomes with metformin than other antidiabetic agents. We designed this study to determine whether this association reflects a beneficial effect of metformin or a harmful effect of other agents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We performed a case-control study nested within the U.K. General Practice Research Database cohort in which diagnoses were assigned by each patients primary care physician. Case subjects were patients 35 years or older, newly diagnosed with both heart failure and diabetes after January 1988, and who died prior to October 2007. Control subjects were matched to case subjects based on age, sex, clinic site, calendar year, and duration of follow-up. Analyses were adjusted for comorbidities, A1C, renal function, and BMI. RESULTS The duration of concurrent diabetes and heart failure was 2.8 years (SD 2.6) in our 1,633 case subjects and 1,633 control subjects (mean age 78 years, 53% male). Compared with patients who were not exposed to antidiabetic drugs, the current use of metformin monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio 0.65 [0.48–0.87]) or metformin with or without other agents (0.72 [0.59–0.90]) was associated with lower mortality; however, use of other antidiabetic drugs or insulin was not associated with all-cause mortality. Conversely, the use of ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (0.55 [0.45–0.68]) and β-blockers (0.76 [0.61–0.95]) were associated with reduced mortality. CONCLUSIONS Our results confirm the benefits of trial-proven anti-failure therapies in patients with diabetes and support the use of metformin-based strategies to lower glucose.
American Journal of Cardiology | 2010
Josie Evans; Alex S. F. Doney; Matlooba A. AlZadjali; Simon Ogston; John R. Petrie; Andrew D. Morris; Allan D. Struthers; Aaron K.F. Wong; Chim C. Lang
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) plus chronic heart failure (CHF) is a common but lethal combination and therapeutic options are limited. Metformin is perceived as being relatively contraindicated in this context, although mounting evidence indicates that it may be beneficial. This study was carried out to investigate the use of metformin therapy for treating patients with DM and CHF in a large population-based cohort study. The Health Informatics Centre-dispensed prescribing database for the population of Tayside, Scotland (population ∼400,000) was linked to the Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland (DARTS) information system. Patients with DM and incident CHF from 1994 to 2003 receiving oral hypoglycemic agents but not insulin were identified. Cox regression was used to assess differences in all-cause mortality rates between patients prescribed metformin and patients prescribed sulfonylureas with adjustment for co-morbidities and other therapies. Four hundred twenty-two study subjects (mean ± SD 75.4 ± 0.5 years of age, 46.2% women) were identified: metformin monotherapy (n = 68, mean age 75.5 ± 1.1 years, 48.5% women), sulfonylurea monotherapy (n = 217, mean age 76.7 ± 0.7 years, 45.2% women), and combination (n = 137, mean age, 73.4 ± 0.7 years, 46.7% women). Fewer deaths occurred in metformin users, alone or in combination with sulfonylureas, compared to the sulfonylurea monotherapy cohort at 1 year (0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.96) and over long-term follow up (0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.88). In conclusion, this large observational data suggest that metformin may be beneficial in patients with CHF and DM. These findings need to be verified by a prospective clinical trial.
BMJ | 2008
J. J. F. Belch; A MacCuish; I Campbell; Stuart M. Cobbe; Roy Taylor; Robin Prescott; Robert Lee; J Bancroft; S MacEwan; James Shepherd; Peter W. Macfarlane; Arthur Morris; R. T. Jung; C Kelly; Alan Connacher; Nr Peden; A Jamieson; David Matthews; G Leese; John McKnight; I O'Brien; Colin Semple; John R. Petrie; D Gordon; Stuart D. Pringle; Ronald S. MacWalter
Objective To determine whether aspirin and antioxidant therapy, combined or alone, are more effective than placebo in reducing the development of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Design Multicentre, randomised, double blind, 2×2 factorial, placebo controlled trial. Setting 16 hospital centres in Scotland, supported by 188 primary care groups. Participants 1276 adults aged 40 or more with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and an ankle brachial pressure index of 0.99 or less but no symptomatic cardiovascular disease. Interventions Daily, 100 mg aspirin tablet plus antioxidant capsule (n=320), aspirin tablet plus placebo capsule (n=318), placebo tablet plus antioxidant capsule (n=320), or placebo tablet plus placebo capsule (n=318). Main outcome measures Two hierarchical composite primary end points of death from coronary heart disease or stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, or amputation above the ankle for critical limb ischaemia; and death from coronary heart disease or stroke. Results No evidence was found of any interaction between aspirin and antioxidant. Overall, 116 of 638 primary events occurred in the aspirin groups compared with 117 of 638 in the no aspirin groups (18.2% v 18.3%): hazard ratio 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.26). Forty three deaths from coronary heart disease or stroke occurred in the aspirin groups compared with 35 in the no aspirin groups (6.7% v 5.5%): 1.23 (0.79 to 1.93). Among the antioxidant groups 117 of 640 (18.3%) primary events occurred compared with 116 of 636 (18.2%) in the no antioxidant groups (1.03, 0.79 to 1.33). Forty two (6.6%) deaths from coronary heart disease or stroke occurred in the antioxidant groups compared with 36 (5.7%) in the no antioxidant groups (1.21, 0.78 to 1.89). Conclusion This trial does not provide evidence to support the use of aspirin or antioxidants in primary prevention of cardiovascular events and mortality in the population with diabetes studied. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN53295293.
JAMA | 2015
Shona Livingstone; Daniel Levin; Helen C. Looker; Robert S. Lindsay; Sarah H. Wild; Nicola Joss; Graham P. Leese; Peter Leslie; Rory J. McCrimmon; Wendy Metcalfe; John McKnight; Andrew D. Morris; Donald Pearson; John R. Petrie; Sam Philip; Naveed Sattar; Jamie P. Traynor; Helen M. Colhoun
IMPORTANCE Type 1 diabetes has historically been associated with a significant reduction in life expectancy. Major advances in treatment of type 1 diabetes have occurred in the past 3 decades. Contemporary estimates of the effect of type 1 diabetes on life expectancy are needed. OBJECTIVE To examine current life expectancy in people with and without type 1 diabetes in Scotland. We also examined whether any loss of life expectancy in patients with type 1 diabetes is confined to those who develop kidney disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective cohort of all individuals alive in Scotland with type 1 diabetes who were aged 20 years or older from 2008 through 2010 and were in a nationwide register (n=24,691 contributing 67,712 person-years and 1043 deaths). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Differences in life expectancy between those with and those without type 1 diabetes and the percentage of the difference due to various causes. RESULTS Life expectancy at an attained age of 20 years was an additional 46.2 years among men with type 1 diabetes and 57.3 years among men without it, an estimated loss in life expectancy with diabetes of 11.1 years (95% CI, 10.1-12.1). Life expectancy from age 20 years was an additional 48.1 years among women with type 1 diabetes and 61.0 years among women without it, an estimated loss with diabetes of 12.9 years (95% CI, 11.7-14.1). Even among those with type 1 diabetes with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 or higher, life expectancy was reduced (49.0 years in men, 53.1 years in women) giving an estimated loss from age 20 years of 8.3 years (95% CI, 6.5-10.1) for men and 7.9 years (95% CI, 5.5-10.3) for women. Overall, the largest percentage of the estimated loss in life expectancy was related to ischemic heart disease (36% in men, 31% in women) but death from diabetic coma or ketoacidosis was associated with the largest percentage of the estimated loss occurring before age 50 years (29.4% in men, 21.7% in women). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Estimated life expectancy for patients with type 1 diabetes in Scotland based on data from 2008 through 2010 indicated an estimated loss of life expectancy at age 20 years of approximately 11 years for men and 13 years for women compared with the general population without type 1 diabetes.
European Heart Journal | 2008
Michael R. MacDonald; Mark C. Petrie; Nathaniel M. Hawkins; John R. Petrie; Miles Fisher; Robert S. McKelvie; David Aguilar; Henry Krum; John J.V. McMurray
Chronic heart failure (HF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) commonly coexist. Each condition increases the likelihood of developing the other, and when they occur together in the same patient the risk of morbidity and mortality increases markedly. We discuss the epidemiological overlap and consider the complex patho-physiological pathways linking the two diseases. The treatment of each condition is made more problematic by the presence of the other. We review the evidence-based treatment strategies and discuss the common problems faced by physicians when treating patients with both conditions. This article forms a comprehensive overview of a fascinating intersection between two common diseases.
PLOS Medicine | 2012
Shona Livingstone; Helen C. Looker; Eleanor J. Hothersall; Sarah H. Wild; Robert S. Lindsay; John Chalmers; Stephen J. Cleland; Graham P. Leese; John McKnight; Andrew D. Morris; Donald Pearson; Norman R. Peden; John R. Petrie; Sam Philip; Naveed Sattar; Frank Sullivan; Helen M. Colhoun
Helen Colhoun and colleagues report findings from a Scottish registry linkage study regarding contemporary risks for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality among individuals diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.
Atherosclerosis | 1998
Naveed Sattar; John R. Petrie; Alan J. Jaap
There is accumulating evidence that elevated plasma triglycerides and related abnormalities constitute an independent cardiovascular risk factor. Although the pathogenetic basis for the apparent relationship between elevated triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and CAD is still uncertain, evidence is accumulating to suggest that endothelial dysfunction is involved. There is evidence to suggest that triglyceride-rich particles may be directly damaging to the endothelium; this may be principally via oxidative mechanisms. Triglyceride-rich particles can cross the endothelial barrier and enter the arterial wall, thus placing them in a position to promote direct endothelial damage. These particles stimulate endothelial expression of adhesion molecules and the prothrombotic factor PAI-1. By reducing LDL size and HDL cholesterol concentrations, thereby further increasing the endothelial oxidative burden, triglyceride-rich particles may indirectly promote endothelial dysfunction. In addition, free fatty acids, which are the major substrates for endogenous synthesis of triglyceride-rich particles, are also potentially damaging to the endothelium. This occurs via oxidative stress, by facilitating transfer of LDL across the endothelium, and by enhancing toxicity of triglyceride-rich particles. Finally, there is recent strong evidence to suggest that increased postprandial circulating concentrations of triglyceride-rich particles and remnant particles may be deleterious to the endothelium.
Clinical Science | 2009
Aaron K.F. Wong; Jacqueline Howie; John R. Petrie; Chim C. Lang
AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) is a heterotrimetric enzyme that is expressed in many tissues, including the heart and vasculature, and plays a central role in the regulation of energy homoeostasis. It is activated in response to stresses that lead to an increase in the cellular AMP/ATP ratio caused either by inhibition of ATP production (i.e. anoxia or ischaemia) or by accelerating ATP consumption (i.e. muscle contraction or fasting). In the heart, AMPK activity increases during ischaemia and functions to sustain ATP, cardiac function and myocardial viability. There is increasing evidence that AMPK is implicated in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. A principle mode of AMPK activation is phosphorylation by upstream kinases [e.g. LKB1 and CaMK (Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase], which leads to direct effects on tissues and phosphorylation of various downstream kinases [e.g. eEF2 (eukaryotic elongation factor 2) kinase and p70 S6 kinase]. These upstream and downstream kinases of AMPK have fundamental roles in glucose metabolism, fatty acid oxidation, protein synthesis and tumour suppression; consequently, they have been implicated in cardiac ischaemia, arrhythmias and hypertrophy. Recent mechanistic studies have shown that AMPK has an important role in the mechanism of action of MF (metformin), TDZs (thiazolinediones) and statins. Increased understanding of the beneficial effects of AMPK activation provides the rationale for targeting AMPK in the development of new therapeutic strategies for cardiometabolic disease.
Hypertension | 2000
Stephen J. Cleland; John R. Petrie; Michael Small; Henry L. Elliott; John M. C. Connell
A primary defect in the vascular action of insulin may be a key intermediate mechanism that links endothelial dysfunction with reduced insulin-mediated cellular glucose uptake in metabolic and cardiovascular disorders. The present study was designed to characterize more fully the relations between insulin action and endothelial function in male patients with essential hypertension (H, n=9) or type 2 diabetes (D, n=9) along with healthy control subjects (C) matched for age, body mass index, and lipid profile. They attended for measurement of whole-body insulin sensitivity (MCR) by the hyperinsulinemic clamp technique (day 1) and forearm vasoreactivity in response to intra-arterial infusions of insulin/glucose (day 2) and N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) and norepinephrine (day 3) by bilateral venous-occlusion plethysmography. Results expressed as mean+/-SE MCR (mL/kg per minute) were 7.22+/-0. 99 (C), 6.32+/-0.78 (H), and 5.06+/-0.53 (D). Insulin/glucose-mediated vasodilation (IGMV) was 17.1+/-5.6% (C), 17. 2+/-5.5% (H), and 12.3+/-6.4% (D). L-NMMA vasoconstriction (LNV) was 37.9+/-5.1% (C), 37.5+/-2.3% (H), and 33.6+/-2.8% (D). There were no significant differences among groups for these parameters. Pooled correlation analyses revealed associations between MCR and IGMV (r=0. 46, P<0.05), MCR and LNV (r=0.44, P<0.05), and IGMV and LNV (r=0.52, P<0.01). This study supports functional coupling between insulin action (both metabolic and vascular) and basal endothelial nitric oxide production in humans.
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology | 1998
Stephen J. Cleland; John R. Petrie; Shinichiro Ueda; Henry L. Elliott; John M. C. Connell
1. Metabolic disorders, such as obesity and non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disorders, such as essential hypertension, congestive cardiac failure and atherosclerosis, have two features in common, namely relative resistance to insulin‐mediated glucose uptake and vascular endothelial dysfunction.