John R. Ward

Pulmonary disease during the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with low dose pulse methotrexate

Methotrexate therapy has been effective in the treatment of RA with short term experience suggesting little serious adverse reactions. Our review of 168 patients receiving methotrexate has identified nine patients with probable or possible methotrexate-induced pulmonary toxicity, giving a prevalence of 5% and an incidence of 3.9 per 100 patients per year. No clinical or laboratory features showed an association that could potentially predict the development of pulmonary disease. All patients experienced complete recovery with supportive care and/or corticosteroid therapy. Clinical monitoring for this complication is warranted in all patients receiving long term methotrexate therapy for RA.

Early Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease: III. Outcome and Prognostic Indicators in Early Scleroderma (Systemic Sclerosis)

Scleroderma, or systemic sclerosis, varies widely in its presentation and course. Many patients with scleroderma have a disease course of 10 to 20 years [1-4], but some patients experience a rapidly progressive form of disease characterized by early organ failure and death. Of 91 patients studied retrospectively by Lally and colleagues [3], 16 developed renal or cardiorespiratory failure (or both) an average of 15.8 months after the onset of symptoms; 11 of these 16 patients died. Retrospective assessments are inherently weighted toward the selection of patients with a longer disease duration, and patients experiencing early death or rapidly progressive disease may be under-represented. A few clinical studies and therapeutic trials have targeted patients with a disease duration of less than 5 years [3-5]; however, additional prospective information on the course and prognosis of patients with early scleroderma is needed to make appropriate risk/benefit decisions about potentially toxic therapies. Recently, a prospective study was done in 410 patients with early undifferentiated or early defined connective tissue disease [6]. Selecting 48 patients with early scleroderma from this cohort, we analyzed short-term outcomes and identified some features occurring within the first year of disease that may be useful in distinguishing patients at high risk for an unfavorable outcome. Methods The Cooperative Systematic Studies of the Rheumatic Diseases Program is funded under a National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases contract through the Coordinating Center at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, and includes 10 centers participating in the study of early undifferentiated connective tissue disease. Outpatients and inpatients seen at participating centers were eligible for the study if they met diagnostic criteria for rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus, or poly/dermatomyositis [7-10] and had experienced symptoms for less than 1 year. Patients who had features of a connective tissue disease, including Raynaud phenomenon, unexplained polyarthritis, or 3 of 11 findings characteristic of connective tissue disease, but who did not meet established criteria for a specific connective tissue disease were classified as having undifferentiated connective tissue disease. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at follow-up intervals of 1, 3, and 5 years. Details on data collection and on the clinical and laboratory features of the patients with early undifferentiated connective tissue disease have been described previously [6, 11]. Enrollment for the study began in July 1982 and was completed in June 1987. Survival status was confirmed through at least 5 years after symptom onset in all cases except one (patient lost to follow-up after 1.6 years). A diagnosis of scleroderma was made in 52 patients (in 46 within 1 year of symptom onset and in 6 within 4 years of symptom onset). Four of these patients (including 2 of 6 diagnosed after the baseline evaluation) developed overlap syndromes during the 5-year follow-up period and were excluded from the study, leaving 48 patients for analysis. Deaths and causes of death were reported to the Coordinating Center; every possible effort was made to confirm the cause of death through hospital records and autopsy reports from the participating centers. Five patients died at home, on the way to the hospital, or shortly after arrival at the hospital. Sclerodermatous skin findings on physical examination were categorized as follows: sclerodactyly (involvement distal to the metacarpophalangeal joints); acrosclerosis (involvement distal to elbows and knees); or generalized or diffuse scleroderma. A skin score was not determined. Physical findings for each organ system were recorded as a yes or no response to a list of abnormal findings. Twelve cardiorespiratory signs were assessed on the baseline physical examination: These included the presence or absence of rales, wheezes, pleural or pericardial rubs, pleural effusion, systolic or diastolic murmurs, abnormal second heart sounds, cardiomegaly, arrhythmia, dependent edema, and tachycardia (pulse 100 beats/min). All patients had routine hematology and biochemical laboratory tests. Many patients also had a determination of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (Westergren method) (n = 47), pulmonary function tests (n = 43), an electrocardiogram (n = 40), a chest radiograph (n = 40), and the Schirmer test. Serum specimens from all patients were analyzed for serologic markers of rheumatic disease at the Centers for Disease Control [11]. In addition, frozen serum specimens from 45 of the 48 patients with scleroderma were analyzed at Specialty Laboratories, Inc. (Santa Monica, California): Interleukin-2 levels were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); soluble interleukin-2 receptor levels by ELISA; and neopterin levels by radioimmunoassay; anti-Scl-70 antibody levels by ELISA; and anticentromere antibody titer by immunofluorescence assay. Lung diffusing capacity was considered to be abnormal if it was less than 70% of the predicted diffusing capacity. Chest radiographs were considered to be abnormal if infiltrates, effusions, pleural thickening, or heart enlargement was present. Electrocardiograms were considered to be abnormal if evidence of arrhythmia, heart block, ventricular enlargement, repolarization abnormalities, significant shift in axis, or infarction was found. For the purposes of our study, nonspecific ST or T-wave abnormalities were not considered to be abnormal. Baseline clinical, laboratory, and other features of patients with early death were compared with those of survivors. Mean values were compared using the Student t-test. Comparisons between dichotomous variables were done using chi-square distribution with Yates correction. Life-table analyses using Kaplan-Meier survival estimation [12] and Mantel-Haenszel statistics [13] were done to predict survival rates for the group of patients with early scleroderma and the various subgroups generated by stratification based on selected variables. Variables were evaluated using univariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis for their ability to predict survival [14]. The variables found to be most significant, as determined by univariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis, and for which less than 10% of data were missing, were then evaluated by multivariate Cox analysis with stepwise regression modeling. We did not apply the Bonferroni correction to our results; however, because of the many variables compared, we defined statistical significance by a probability level of 0.01. Results Forty-eight patients with scleroderma were enrolled in the study. One patient was lost to follow-up 1.6 years after symptom onset, and the data gathered on her were used only in the survival and Cox analyses. During the 5-year follow-up period, 15 of the 47 evaluable patients with early scleroderma died. Kaplan-Meier estimation yielded overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years after symptom onset of 92%, 75%, and 68%, respectively (Figure 1). Five patients died within 1 year of symptom onset. The cohort of patients with scleroderma accounted for 41% of all early deaths recorded for the entire study population of 410 patients. The causes of death are summarized in Table 1. Multiorgan involvement was frequently observed at the time of death, although pulmonary or cardiac system failure (or both) was thought to be the immediate cause of death in 8 of the 15 patients who died. Renal crisis was substantiated or suspected in 4 of the patients who died. The time from symptom onset to death was similar for those dying of renal causes (21 11 months) and those dying of cardiopulmonary causes (25 17 months). Table 1. Suspected Immediate Causes of Death, Average Age at Death, and Survival in Patients with Early Scleroderma* Figure 1. Cumulative survival probabilities: Kaplan-Meier survival curve with Greenwood confidence limits from onset of symptoms for the 48 early scleroderma patients. Clinical Features In Table 2, baseline characteristics of patients who died within 5 years after symptom onset are compared with those of the survivors. Twelve of the 15 (80%) patients who died had at least one abnormal cardiopulmonary sign at baseline compared with 13 of 32 (41%) survivors (P = 0.03). Among individual cardiopulmonary findings, resting heart rate was significantly different between survivors (79 13 beats/min; range, 50 to 110 beats/min) and patients who died (93 12 beats/min; range, 70 to 120 beats/min) (P = 0.001). Baseline blood pressure was similar in the subgroups (survivors: 120 17/76 12 mm Hg; patients who died: 127 27/78 16 mm Hg; P > 0.3), as was the frequency of chest radiographic, pulmonary function, and electrocardiographic abnormalities (P = 0.09). Table 2. Baseline Features of Patients with Early Scleroderma Who Survived and of Those Who Died* Chest pain, dyspnea, orthopnea, dependent edema, cough, and wheezing were common complaints; 57% of the entire group had at least one symptom. Dyspnea was the most common single cardiorespiratory complaint (36%). No significant difference in frequency of cardiopulmonary symptoms was detected between those who died and those who survived. Ninety-two percent of our patients developed skin involvement within 1 year of symptom onset, implying that patients with gradual-onset scleroderma were not included in our study. Four of the 48 patients did not have diagnosable scleroderma at their first visit, but they did develop skin disease within 3 years of follow-up (or within 4 years of disease onset). At entry, two patients had Raynaud phenomenon only and two were diagnosed with undifferentiated connective tissue disease. When baseline variables for these 4 patients with intermediate-onset scleroderma were compared with those of the remaining 44 patients with earlier-onset disease, no significant differences were

Patient non-compliance within the context of seeking medical care for arthritis☆

Abstract The present study reveals that patients who subjectively experience a long wait when coming to see the doctor, particularly those who feel irritated over this situation tend to be poor compliers with regard to taking medications and continuing to come to the doctor as advised. Likewise, those who feel the doctor spends too little time with them, who perceive the doctor to be more businesslike than personal in the treatment relationship or who lack faith in the treatment regimen tend to be poor compliers. Collectively, these findings indicate that compliance is related to the patients perception of temporal, relational, and treatment factors within the context of seeking medical help. The practical implication of these findings suggests that efforts to reduce prolonged waiting as well as efforts to personalize the treatment relationship and help patients overcome discouragement and pessimism may prove to be worthwhile investments on the part of those treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In any case, each of these factors needs further investigation under controlled conditions to more carefully determine their direct effects on compliance when some of the variables mentioned in this study are altered towards securing more compliant behavior.

Role of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs versus cytotoxic agents in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are used to modify or alter the rheumatoid arthritis disease process. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs do not demonstrate the characteristic analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory actions of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, since weeks or months of treatment are required before clinical benefit is observed. Although they have not been proved to delay, prevent, or reverse articular damage, therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, when successful, is associated with decreased pain and joint swelling and improved function. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and cytotoxic agents should not be considered as routine treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Before disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy is implemented, an optimal basic program of physical therapy, rest, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be implemented, and it must be documented that the patient still has sufficient disease to justify the costs, risks, and benefits of these treatments. Drugs that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are preferred over nonapproved drugs. Hydroxychloroquine, parenteral gold salts, oral gold, D-penicillamine, and the cytotoxic drug azathioprine are the FDA-approved disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for use in rheumatoid arthritis. Many, not all, rheumatologists would employ hydroxychloroquine as the first-choice disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in patients who have early, mild, and nonerosive disease; treatment should be continued for six months before being abandoned for lack of efficacy, and appropriate ophthalmologic examination every four to six months is indicated. An alternative would be auranofin, whose efficacy approaches that of parenteral gold, yet may be safer. For patients who have severe active rheumatoid arthritis, especially with erosive changes, parenteral gold salts are usually a first choice. D-penicillamine is also effective in controlling the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, but serious toxicity may occur. Azathioprine might be considered a competitor to D-penicillamine, although the FDA approval restricts its use to patients who have failed gold therapy. Two cytotoxic drugs that are not FDA approved are methotrexate and cyclophosphamide. Methotrexate can be very effective, but its side effects, particularly pulmonary and hepatic, must be carefully monitored. Cyclophosphamide is generally considered too toxic for use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, although it may be helpful in patients with systemic rheumatoid vasculitis or patients who have failed all other therapies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Second-Line Antirheumatic Drugs in the Elderly with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Post Hoc Analysis of Three Controlled Trials

This study assessed the relative efficacy and toxicity of second‐line antirheumatic drugs in patients 65 years of age or older compared to younger counterparts. The results of three prospective, double‐blind, parallel, randomized, multicenter trials were reanalyzed, stratifying outcomes by intervention and patient age. Efficacy was assessed by categorizing patient responses as follows: important improvement, no meaningful change, or progressive disease. Toxicity was analyzed by comparing withdrawal rates due to adverse effects. The three trials compared the following treatments: (1) d‐penicillamine 10–12 mg/day versus azathioprine 1.25‐1.5 mg/kg/day; (2) gold sodium thiomalate 50 mg intramuscularly weekly versus auranofin 6 mg/day versus placebo; and (3) pulse oral methotrexate 7.5–15.0 mg weekly versus placebo. At baseline, 103 patients age 65 or older were similar to 485 patients less than 65 years of age, with the exception of disease duration in all studies and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in one study. For patients completing each study, efficacy outcomes based on age were not significantly different. Withdrawal rates due to adverse drug reactions were also not significantly different.

Uses and abuses of analysis of covariance in clinical trials

Measurement of improvement in clinical trials in chronic diseases commonly compares baseline data to endpoint values by performing t-tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA) on raw gains or percentage changes. This procedure can be misleading and the use of an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) should be considered. Properly used, ANCOVA increases statistical power in a clinical trial. However, its advantage over t-tests can be nullified by small numbers of patients, violations of assumptions, and incorrect application of the techniques. An evaluation of ANCOVA in chronic disease studies is given, with examples of its strengths and weaknesses as seen in several drug trials in the rheumatic diseases. Recommendations on its use and a decision tree for the nonstatistician are provided.

Chlorambucil therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: Clinical experience in 28 patients and literature review

Our clinical experience in 28 patients receiving chlorambucil for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the reports on chlorambucil therapy are reviewed. Our study population and other reports generally represent patients with severe RA who had either failed to improve or developed significant toxicity during previous treatment with conventional slow acting anti-rheumatic drugs (SAARDs). Seventy-two percent of patients had a significant clinical improvement during chlorambucil therapy and reports of complete remission are given, although the incidence of remission is unknown. Hematologic complications are often reported, but appeared more frequently in our experience than previously reported. Hematologic toxicity required that chlorambucil be discontinued in the majority of our cases. Two deaths from suspected drug induced malignancies are reported. Although chlorambucil appears to be effective in the control of active RA, the potential for drug induced toxicity and malignancies may outweigh the benefit of continued use of this experimental therapy in RA.

Liver histology in patients receiving low dose pulse methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

The liver histology of 52 patients treated with intermittent low dose pulse methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis was evaluated using a modification of the Roenigk grading system. Patients studied had had an average of 3.2 years of treatment or had received 1.7 g methotrexate. No patient had cirrhosis; 15 (29%) patients had evidence of mild fibrosis. Histological abnormalities were not predicted by liver function test changes, with the exception that hypoalbuminaemia occurred in 60% of those with grade IV (modified criteria) findings. The need for liver biopsy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexate before two years or 1500 mg of treatment has not been established. Whether serial liver biopsies will be needed beyond this time has yet to be determined.

Effects of indomethacin, cyclosporin, cyclophosphamide, and placebo on collagen-induced arthritis of mice

The long term effects of indomethacin, cyclosporin, cyclophosphamide, and placebo on collagen-induced arthritis in mice were tested under two different treatment protocols. A prophylactic experiment examined the effects of the daily drug administration for 180 days beginning one day before the first collagen injection. Under this dosage schedule, cyclophosphamide and cyclosporin decreased the severity of arthritis, while indomethacin did not. A therapeutic protocol examined the effects of these same drugs when daily administration was delayed until the animals had active disease at 78 days after the first collagen injection. Under this protocol, all three drugs reduced the progression of disease. In both protocols, the most significant suppression of arthritis was seen in animals receiving cyclophosphamide which was associated with a decrease in anti-collagen antibody levels. Collagen-induced arthritis in mice should be further investigated as a model to study the long term effects of “slow-acting” anti-rheumatic drugs.

Spontaneous nasal septal perforation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

SummaryNasal septal perforation is known to be associated with various traumatic and disease states, yet spontaneous nasal septal perforation (SNSP) is relatively rare. SNSP has been reported in three patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and we report an additional seven patients with SNSP and RA, four of whom were seronegative and none of whom had Raynauds, in contrast to those reported previously. Manifestations of overt infectious, neoplastic or granulomatous disease have not been found in our seven patients over several years of close follow-up. We have identified no obvious pathogenesis or specific etiology for SNSP. We suggest that SNSP may represent an unusual manifestation of RA previously not well recognized.