John Rietbergen

Complications of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies of the prostate: evaluation of complication rates and risk factors within a population-based screening program

OBJECTIVES Screening for prostate cancer to reduce the mortality and morbidity from this disease has become an important issue in recent years. Of all procedures used to diagnose prostate cancer, biopsy of the prostate is the cause of most complications. To evaluate the safety of the screening procedure, we have studied the complications and risk factors for complications within the screened population of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam section. METHODS Between June 1994 and July 1996, 1687 transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies were performed after screening 6198 men through prostate-specific antigen level, digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasonography. RESULTS From these 1687 biopsies, 302 cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed. Mild complications such as hematuria and hematospermia were reported frequently with rates of 23.6% and 45.3%, respectively. More severe complications were far less frequently seen. Fever, usually of low grade, was seen after 4.2% of biopsies. Seven men (0.4%) were admitted to a hospital after biopsy. Risk factors for complications could not be identified. CONCLUSIONS Review of the literature concerning transrectal biopsies of the prostate shows that the complication rates within this screened population are comparable to those reported within referred patients. The admittance rate is slightly lower. Transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsy of the prostate is a safe procedure for the diagnosis of prostate cancer within the general population; however, identification of risk factors for complications might further improve the safety of the screening procedure.

Short-term outcomes of the prospective multicentre ‘Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance’ study

Study Type – Therapy (prospective cohort)
Level of Evidence 2b

THE CHANGING PATTERN OF PROSTATE CANCER AT THE TIME OF DIAGNOSIS: CHARACTERISTICS OF SCREEN DETECTED PROSTATE CANCER IN A POPULATION BASED SCREENING STUDY

PURPOSE We describe the clinical and pathological features of prostate cancer diagnosed through serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in a population based randomized screening study. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between November 1993 and June 1997, 20,632 volunteers 55 to 76 years old were included in the study. In the screening arm 9,776 men underwent digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and serum PSA determination. Biopsies were taken if the digital rectal examination and/or transrectal ultrasound findings were abnormal or if PSA was 4 ng/ml or greater. A total of 2,262 men underwent biopsy and 474 cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed. RESULTS The pretreatment data were complete in 459 men, of whom 78% had clinically organ confined disease. Bone or lymph node metastases were seen in 8 cases (1.7%). Of 172 men who underwent radical prostatectomy 2 had lymph node metastases. Overall 66.3% of men treated with radical prostatectomy had organ confined disease. CONCLUSIONS Comparison of the characteristics of prostate cancer detected through screening of the general population with those in a population based cohort of men in which there was no organized screening revealed stage reduction, primarily with regard to number of metastatic cases. Whether this stage reduction will lead to a decrease in disease specific mortality remains unknown until the study is completed and the end point of prostate cancer specific mortality is evaluated.

Predictors for biopsy outcome in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam region)

In the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC, Rotterdam region), men aged 55–74 years are screened for prostate cancer by prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) sampling, digital rectal examination (DRE), and transrectal ultrasound investigation (TRUS). All men with a PSA ≥4 ng/ml and/or a suspicious DRE and/or a suspicious TRUS are biopsied.

Prospective Evaluation Plan for Randomised Trials of Prostate Cancer Screening

To enable pooled analyses of continuing and planned randomised trials of prostate cancer screening, guidelines for minimal data required for such analyses were developed in the recent meeting of the International Prostate Screening Trial Evaluation Group (IPSTEG). The aim of the pooled analysis with data on individual level will be: Estimation of the effect of screening on prostate cancer mortality with greater precision than individual studies Assessment of optimal screening procedures and interval Identification of subgroups within the populations that might receive most benefit from screening Evaluation of the quality of life effects and cost effectiveness of screening. All studies included in the combined analysis share a common core protocol with minimum data requirements. The protocol allows, however, adaptation of the procedures to local circumstances within defined options It should be noted that the process is continuing and the protocol is subject to evaluation and revision in the meetings of the IPSTEG on a regular basis. It should be noted that the process continuing and the protocol is subject evaluation and revision in the meetings the IPSTEG on a regular basis.

The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC): An Update

Screening for prostate cancer is controversial. While in some parts of the world screening is practised as a healthcare policy, it is strongly rejected in other areas, because solid evidence of effectiveness of screening combined with early treatment with respect to lowering the mortality of prostate cancer has not been shown. It is for this reason that a large European study is installed to establish or rule out the value of screening for this frequent disease. The present paper presents the goal of the study and elaborates on the value of presently available screening tests. Preliminary results with respect to the first round of screening in the Rotterdam area relating to 32,000 randomized men are presented. Evidence of effectiveness of screening through other studies and mechanisms is discussed.

REPEAT SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER AFTER 1-YEAR FOLLOWUP IN 984 BIOPSIED MEN: CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF DETECTED CANCER

PURPOSE We describe the yield of a repeat examination and biopsy procedure 1 year after initial biopsy was negative. We also assessed the parameters responsible for the failure to diagnose these cancers at the primary screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS We screened 8,103 men randomized to the screening arm of the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer using prostate specific antigen measurement, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound. At the primary screening biopsy of 1,875 men was positive for prostate cancer in 374. Of the remaining 1,501 men 984 underwent repeat screening. RESULTS Biopsy at repeat screening diagnosed prostate cancer in 49 of 442 men (11%), a rate significantly lower than the 19.9% true positive biopsy rate at the primary screening. Pathological characteristics of the tumors diagnosed were not significantly different in the 2 groups. However, prostate volume in men diagnosed with prostate cancer was significantly greater at repeat versus primary screening (mean 42.6 versus 34.9 cc, p = 0.003). The clinical characteristics were more favorable because of an increased proportion of stage T1C tumors. Prostate volume in men with stage T1C cancer was significantly greater than in those with palpable or visible tumors in whom prostate specific antigen values were in the same range. CONCLUSIONS The most important factor responsible for the failure to diagnose these cancers at the primary screening was significantly greater prostate volume. Tumor characteristics were not significantly different in the groups. If prostate cancer screening were to become a routine health care policy, efforts would have to be made to improve the chances of diagnosing prostate cancer in larger prostates by repeat biopsy or by increasing the number of cores obtained.

HISTOPATHOLOGICAL PROSTATE CANCER CHARACTERISTICS AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AFTER POPULATION BASED SCREENING

PURPOSE Although early detection of prostate cancer by prostate specific antigen based screening results in a shift towards more clinically organ confined tumors, changes in prostate cancer characteristics after radical prostatectomy are less clear. MATERIALS AND METHODS We studied 121 totally embedded radical prostatectomy specimens that were obtained from consecutive participants of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer who were systematically screened and treated surgically. In each specimen pathological stage, Gleason score and proportion of high grade cancer (Gleason pattern 4 or 5) were determined. Lymph node status at operation, stage and grade were compared to a historical series of 72 surgical procedures performed for clinically localized prostate cancer at our hospital before the introduction of serum prostate specific antigen as a diagnostic tool. RESULTS Although none of the screen detected cases had positive lymph nodes at surgery, operation was discontinued in 13 (18%) of the 72 historical cases because of positive lymph nodes. Compared with the remaining 59 historical prostatectomy specimens, the screen detected specimens showed a definite increase in the frequency of pathologically organ confined tumors and a relative decrease in Gleason score 8 to 10 tumors. However, 60% of screen detected tumors contained areas with high grade cancer (Gleason pattern 4 or 5) and 50% had a Gleason score of 7. The relative amount of high grade cancer in each tumor was related to volume (Kruskal-Wallis test p <0. 001). CONCLUSIONS Screening for prostate cancer leads to an increase in surgical treatment for relatively small tumors that have a higher probability of being organ confined. Although the frequency of positive lymph nodes at operation decreases dramatically and the proportion of organ confined tumors after surgery increases, there is a shift from Gleason 8 to 10 tumors towards lower grade tumors at radical prostatectomy. Still, judged by the high frequency of focal dedifferentiation in screen detected tumors, most of them and surgically treated tumors are likely to be clinically important. The relatively large accumulation of these tumors in the Gleason 7 category is a concern because it could lead to a decrease in the clinical usefulness of the Gleason score system.

Comparison of pathologic characteristics of T1c and non-Tic cancers detected in a population-based screening study, the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer

In recent years the introduction of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determination as a screening tool for early detection of prostate cancer in asymptomatic men has led to a markedly increased detection of prostate cancers that are neither palpable nor visible with transrectal ultrasonography (stage Tlc). In this preliminary study we assessed pathologic features and aspects that are indicative of clinical significance in T1c tumors and tumors with palpable or visible lesions (non-Tlc tumors). Between June 1994 and December 1995, 51 consecutive radical prostatectomies were performed on screened participants in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). After determination of pathologic stage and Gleason score, morphometric analysis was performed to determine tumor volume. Radical prostatectomy specimens were divided into three mutually exclusive subsets: T1c tumors, non-Tlc tumors with preoperative PSA levels below 4 ng/ml, and non-Tlc tumors with PSA levels equal to or greater than 4 ng/ml. These subsets were compared for differences in the distribution of tumor volume, pathologic stage, and Gleason score. An arbitrarily constructed categorization model was used to assess clinical significance. In all, 17 (33%) of the patients had clinical stage T1c disease. In our categorization model, 88% of the T1c tumors fit the criteria for clinically significant tumors. T1c tumors, however, were significantly smaller (P < 0.01) and were more likely to be organ-confined (P = 0.01) as compared with non-T1c tumors in patients with an elevated preoperative serum PSA level. In contrast, tumors detected at preoperative PSA levels of < 4 ng/ml had comparably the lowest pathologic stages and tumor volumes in our series. In our categorization model, 42% of these tumors fit the criteria for minimal tumor. This group of radical prostatectomies was therefore most likely to harbor clinically insignificant cancer, a finding that was consistent in two other categorization models derived from earlier reports. T1c tumors comprise a large fraction of the tumors found in population-based screening. As judged by their pathologic characteristics, T1c tumors are clinically significant tumors. The over-all low pathologic stage and Gleason score of these tumors make these patients excellent candidates for curative treatment by radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. In contrast, some concern should be raised on the detection of tumors at low serum PSA levels by means of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound alone, since a substantial proportion of these tumors could be considered clinically insignificant. Long-term follow-up, however, is necessary to substantiate this view.

Comparison of prostate-specific antigen corrected for total prostate volume and transition zone volume in a population-based screening study

OBJECTIVES To compare the discriminatory potential between prostate cancer and benign conditions of the prostate in a population-based screening study, of serum prostate-specific antigen levels (PSA) and PSA corrected for both the total prostate volume (PSA-D) and the transition zone volume (PSA-T). METHODS In a randomized population-based screening study (Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer), in which 10,865 men have been screened, the biopsy results of 1202 men with PSA levels of 4 ng/mL or more were evaluated. Planimetric and prolate ellipsoid volumes of the total prostate as well as of the transition zone were measured. The measured volumes were compared with the volumes of 57 radical prostatectomy specimens through Spearmans rank correlation coefficient and agreement tests. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done of sensitivity and specificity of biopsy indications through PSA and PSA corrected for the volumes measured with transrectal ultrasound. RESULTS In the 1202 men studied, 361 cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed. Both PSA-D and PSA-T showed a significantly higher area under the ROC curve (0.77 and 0.79, respectively) than PSA alone (area 0.65). There was no significant difference between PSA-D and PSA-T. The use of a PSA-D threshold value of 0. 10 ng/mL/cc would have avoided 28% of biopsies at the cost of 10% of detectable cancers. A PSA-D threshold of 0.15 ng/mL/cc would have avoided 73.8% of biopsies at the cost of not diagnosing 43.8% of detectable cancers. CONCLUSIONS The planimetrically obtained prostate volume showed a more favorable agreement with the radical prostatectomy volume than the prolate ellipsoid volume. The discriminatory potential of the corrected PSA value is better at predicting the results of needle biopsy of the prostate when compared with PSA alone. The use of the transition zone volume for this correction results in a higher discriminatory potential when compared to the use of the total prostate volume; however, the observed difference was not statistically significant.