John Rublein

Lopinavir/ritonavir induces the hepatic activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP1A2 but inhibits the hepatic and intestinal activity of CYP3A as measured by a phenotyping drug cocktail in healthy volunteers

Objective: The effect of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) administration on cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme activity was quantified using a phenotyping biomarker cocktail. Changes in CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A, CYP1A2, N-acetyltransferase-2 (NAT-2), and xanthine oxidase (XO) activities were evaluated using warfarin (WARF) + vitamin K, omeprazole (OMP), intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) midazolam (MDZ), and caffeine (CAF). Design: Open-label, multiple-dose, pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers. Methods: Subjects (n = 14) simultaneously received PO WARF 10 mg, vitamin K 10 mg, OMP 40 mg, CAF 2 mg/kg, and IV MDZ 0.025 mg/kg on days (D) 1 and 14, and PO MDZ 5 mg on D2 and D15. LPV/r (400/100 mg twice daily) was administered on D4-17. CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 activities were quantified by S-WARF AUC0-inf and OMP/5-hydroxy OMP ratio, respectively. CYP1A2, NAT-2, and XO activities were quantified by urinary CAF metabolite ratios. Hepatic and intestinal + hepatic CYP3A activities were quantified by IV (CL) and PO (CL/F) MDZ clearance, respectively. Results: After LPV/r therapy, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP1A2 activity increased by 29%, 100%, and 43% (P = 0.001, 0.046, and 0.001), respectively. No changes were seen in NAT-2 or XO activity. Hepatic and intestinal + hepatic CYP3A activity decreased by 77% (P < 0.001) and 92% (P = 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: LPV/r therapy results in modest induction of CYP1A2 and CYP2C9 and potent induction of CYP2C19 activity. Increasing doses of concomitant medications metabolized by these enzymes may be necessary. LPV/r inhibited intestinal CYP3A to a greater extent than hepatic CYP3A activity. Doses of concomitant CYP3A substrates should be reduced when combined with LPV/r, although intravenously administered compounds may require less of a relative dose reduction than orally administered compounds.

A medication self-management program to improve adherence to HIV therapy regimens.

This study examined whether a self-management intervention based on feedback of adherence performance and principles of social cognitive theory improves adherence to antiretroviral dosing schedules. Forty-three individuals with HIV/AIDS who were starting or switching to a new protease inhibitor regimen were randomly assigned to be in a medication self-management program or usual care control group. The self-management program included skills development exercises, three monthly visits for medication consultations, and monthly feedback of adherence performance using electronic monitors on medication bottles. Participants also completed a 40-item questionnaire that measured self-efficacy to take medications, on schedule, in a variety of situations. Logistic regression analysis indicated that individuals in the self-management group were significantly more likely to take 80% or more of their doses each week than individuals in the control group (n=29, OR=7.8, 95% CI=2.2-28.1). Self-management training with feedback of adherence performance is a potentially useful model for improving adherence to complex regimens in HIV/AIDS care.

HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for human immunodeficiency virus‐1 (HIV‐1) and prophylactic therapy for opportunistic infections have increased survival. Adverse effects of HAART include lipid profile alterations, diabetes mellitus, and fat redistribution. These metabolic and physical changes are called the HIV‐associated lipodystrophy syndrome. A link to protease inhibitors has been suggested, and more recently to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and factors related to duration of HIV‐1 infection itself.

A randomized study of emtricitabine and lamivudine in stably suppressed patients with HIV

Background: Once daily (QD) dosing facilitates regimen simplification and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Emtricitabine (FTC) QD is a newly approved nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor compared in this study to twice daily lamivudine (3TC BID). Methods: Controlled, open label equivalence trial of 440 HIV-1-infected patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA stably suppressed on a regimen of 3TC 150 mg BID, stavudine or zidovudine, and a protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Patients were randomized to continue their current regimen or replace 3TC with FTC 200 mg QD. If HIV-1 RNA levels were ⩽ £ 400 copies/ml at 48 weeks in Protocol 303, patients could continue on FTC in Protocol 350. The primary analysis was based on virologic failure and response defined by plasma HIV-1 RNA suppression below 400 copies/ml. Results: At baseline, the mean CD4 cell count was 525 (FTC) and 533 × 106 cells/l (3TC). At week 48 in Protocol 303, the probability of virologic failure was low, 7% (FTC) and 8% (3TC), and the probability of sustained viral suppression at week 48 was equivalent between treatment arms at both the 50 and 400 copies/ml thresholds. The mean increase in CD4+ T-cell percentage was 2.5% (FTC) and 1.7% (3TC). In Protocol 350, the probability of virologic failure was 11% after 4 years on FTC-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Conclusion: In stably suppressed patients, 200 mg emtricitabine QD was equivalent to 150 mg lamivudine BID. Emtricitabine-containing HAART was associated with a high rate of sustained virologic suppression during 4 years of follow-up.

Single Versus Combined Antibiotic Therapy for Gram-Negative Infections

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the available clinical data regarding single versus combination antimicrobial therapy for treatment of gram-negative infections, focusing on the more recent data in predominantly nonneutropenic hosts. In vitro and in vivo data regarding various antimicrobial combinations are also discussed. DATA SOURCES Clinical trials, review articles, and meta-analyses were identified from a MEDLINE search (1960–July 2003). Special attention was given to clinical outcome trials performed since 1989. Search terms included gram-negative infections, drug synergism, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, monotherapy, combination therapy, carbapenems, β-lactams, cefepime, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones. DATA SYNTHESIS Although most of the studies were not randomized, double-blind, or controlled, the most recent literature indicates that monotherapy with agents that are active against isolated organisms, including P. aeruginosa, may be appropriate for most patients. Efficacy outcomes, including mortality, did not significantly differ in most studies comparing single and combination therapies. Some trials suggest that combination therapy may be preferred in neutropenic patients and those with pseudomonal infections. CONCLUSIONS Hospitalized patients with gram-negative infections are often treated with combination antimicrobial agents; however, some of the recently available data, although limited, suggest that administration of monotherapy is a feasible alternative in certain patient populations.

HIV Infection: Point-of-Care Testing

OBJECTIVE To review the data regarding point-of-care testing for the diagnosis of HIV infection in the US. DATA SOURCES English-language literature was identified via MEDLINE (1980—August 2003) using key words such as rapid HIV tests and HIV antibody testing. Textbooks and other pertinent resources were also reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION All articles identified through the data sources above were evaluated and reviewed if pertinent to the objective. DATA SYNTHESIS The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has announced an effort to expand currently recommended strategies to prevent new infections with HIV. The cornerstone of this initiative is the availability of the new rapid test for antibodies to HIV (OraQuick Rapid HIV-1 Antibody Test, OraSure Technologies, Bethlehem, PA). The effectiveness, sensitivity, and specificity of this test have been evaluated in a number of cross-sectional studies using previously or simultaneously performed HIV enzyme immunoassays with Western blot confirmation as a reference standard. Although there are several limitations to consider, results of these studies suggest that this test has comparable ability to detect HIV antibodies to other commercially available tests. CONCLUSIONS The OraQuick test is simple enough to be performed in many settings including those that facilitate achievement of the goals outlined by the CDC. Availability of this test should have a dramatic impact on HIV detection and prevention strategies.

Effect of omeprazole on the plasma concentrations of indinavir when administered alone and in combination with ritonavir.

PURPOSE The effects of omeprazole on indinavir when administered alone or in combination with ritonavir were evaluated. METHODS Fourteen men and women age 18-55 years not infected with human immunodeficiency virus who met study qualifications were randomized to receive placebo, 20 mg of omeprazole, or 40 mg of omeprazole daily. After seven days, the single-dose pharmacokinetic profile of an 800-mg dose of indinavir alone or in combination with 200 mg of ritonavir was evaluated. Study participants received each of four study regimens in one of four randomly assigned orders. Blood samples were collected, and plasma indinavir and ritonavir concentrations were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS The coadministration of 20 or 40 mg of omeprazole with indinavir significantly reduced the mean indinavir area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) from 30.0 mg x hr/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.9-41.1 mg x hr/L) to 19.7 mg x hr/L (95% CI, 14.6-26.8 mg x hr/L) or 16.0 mg x hr/L (95% CI, 11.8-21.7 mg x hr/L), respectively (p < 0.002). The addition of 200 mg of ritonavir to 800 mg of indinavir in combination with 40 mg of omeprazole significantly increased the mean indinavir AUC from 30.0 mg x hr/L (95% CI, 21.9-41.1 mg x hr/L) to 46.6 mg x hr/L (95% CI, 34.0-63.8 mg x hr/L), but it did not significantly affect mean omeprazole concentrations (p < or = 0.02). CONCLUSION The AUC of indinavir was substantially decreased in healthy volunteers who received omeprazole 20 or 40 mg daily for seven days before the administration of a single 800-mg dose of indinavir. Concomitant administration of ritonavir 200 mg with indinavir in participants receiving omeprazole led to a significant increase in the AUC of indinavir.

Treatment of Tick-Borne Diseases

OBJECTIVE: To review the data regarding the pharmacotherapy of Lyme disease, Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF), and the human ehrlichioses. DATA SOURCES: English-language literature was identified via MEDLINE (1966–January 2002) using the keywords Lyme disease, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and ehrlichiosis. Textbooks and other pertinent resources were also reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles identified through the data sources above were evaluated and reviewed if pertinent to the objective. DATA SYNTHESIS: Tick-borne diseases are the most common vector-transmitted diseases in North America. Each disease causes significant morbidity and, in the case of RMSF, mortality if patients go untreated. If the disease syndromes are recognized early and treatment is initiated, complications are greatly reduced. Doxycycline is active against each of the causative organisms, simplifying empiric treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Effective pharmacotherapy exists to treat each of these diseases, assuming diagnosis is made quickly. The β-lactam and tetracycline antibiotics appear to be the most effective therapy for Lyme disease. The tetracyclines, but not the β-lactams, are effective for RMSF and the human ehrlichioses. Since Borrelia burgdorferi and the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent are becoming more common coinfecting pathogens, tetracycline or doxycycline should be considered the drugs of choice for patients from endemic areas where exposure to both pathogens may have occurred. Doxycycline is the preferred agent because of decreased frequency of administration and adverse effects.

Discontinuation Rates for Protease Inhibitor Regimens Containing Ritonavir 600 mg versus Ritonavir 400 mg Plus Saquinavir 400 mg

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study was performed to determine whether twice-daily ritonavir 400 mg plus twice-daily saquinavir 400 mg (ritonavir 400/saquinavir 400) was better tolerated than ritonavir 600 mg twice daily (ritonavir 600). A secondary objective was to determine whether the rate of discontinuation due to therapeutic failure differed between the two ritonavir regimens. DESIGN: The study was a retrospective chart review. Data collected included ritonavir dose; length of ritonavir therapy; reason for discontinuation; HIV-1 RNA prior to and at discontinuation of ritonavir therapy; CD4+ count; and antiretroviral therapy prior to, concomitant with, and initiated after ritonavir therapy. SETTING: Patient charts were reviewed in a university teaching hospital clinic. PATIENTS: Patients were identified through a search of the pharmacy database from December 18, 1995, to December 18, 1997. Patients were >18 years old, but not restricted by gender or race. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were frequency of discontinuation of ritonavir due to intolerance or due to lack of therapeutic efficacy. RESULTS: The search identified 116 patients, including 57 patients taking ritonavir 400/saquinavir 400 and 54 patients taking ritonavir 600. Five patients on other ritonavir regimens were excluded. Significantly fewer patients receiving ritonavir 400/saquinavir 400 (14%) discontinued ritonavir due to intolerance compared with ritonavir 600 (37%; p = 0.002). Discontinuations due to therapeutic failure were not significantly different: 8.8% for ritonavir 400/saquinavir 400 and 7.4% for ritonavir 600, despite the fact that ritonavir/saquinavir therapy followed another protease inhibitor in 41 patients (73.2%) compared with 12 patients (24.5%) for ritonavir 600 (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ritonavir 400/saquinavir 400 is better tolerated than ritonavir 600.