Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John S. Casko is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John S. Casko.


American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 1995

Intrusion anchorage potential of teeth versus rigid endosseous implants: A clinical and radiographic evaluation

Thomas E. Southard; Michael J. Buckley; James D. Spivey; Kenneth E. Krizan; John S. Casko

The purpose of this study was to compare the intrusion anchorage potential of teeth to osseointegrated titanium implants. Titanium implants were surgically placed unilaterally in a healed mandibular fourth premolar extraction site in eight adult mongrel dogs. The implants were surgically uncovered 3 months later and second stage abutments with soldered edgewise brackets secured. Edgewise brackets were also placed on the ipsilateral third premolars and on the contralateral third and fourth premolars. Segmental edgewise arch wires were placed between the implant and the third premolar and between the contralateral third and fourth premolars. Intrusion arch wire bends (v-bends) just mesial to the implant and the fourth premolar brackets were adjusted to apply a 50 to 60 gm intrusive force to the third premolars, bilaterally. Seven weeks later this force was increased to approximately 100 gm. Force levels were monitored biweekly for a total period of 16 weeks. Superimposition of initial and final periapical radiographs with bone markers demonstrated that for each dog the implant remained immobile and the third premolar on the implant anchor side was intruded in a curved path. On the contralateral side of the arch the dental anchor (fourth premolar) underwent an adverse reactive tip-back movement, and the third premolar was not intruded. We conclude that rigid endosseous implants are superior to dental anchorage for orthodontic intrusion of teeth and offer a potential means to intrude anterior teeth in adult patients with missing posterior teeth.


American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 2000

Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery.

Andrew Shelly; Thomas E. Southard; Karin A. Southard; John S. Casko; Jane R. Jakobsen; Kirk L. Fridrich; John Mergen

Our purpose was to investigate the impact of mandibular advancement surgery on profile esthetics and to attempt to define guidelines that could be of value to the clinician in predicting profile esthetic change. The sample consisted of 34 patients who had been treated with a combination of orthodontics and mandibular advancement surgery without genioplasty. Initial (pretreatment) and final (posttreatment) cephalometric radiographs of each patient were used to produce silhouette images and to quantify skeletal changes that occurred with surgery. The images were displayed randomly to lay persons and orthodontic residents who were asked to score the esthetics of each profile. On average, after mandibular advancement surgery, B point moved forward 5.0 mm (SD = 2.6 mm) and downward 4.7 mm (SD = 3.1 mm), and the ANB angle decreased 3.0 degrees (SD = 1.6 degrees ) Graphical analysis and results of paired t tests revealed that for patients with an initial ANB angle >/= 6 degrees, a consistent improvement in profile esthetics was seen following surgery (P </=.001). This represented, on average, about a 45% improvement in esthetics. For patients with an initial ANB angle < 6 degrees, an improvement in profile esthetics after surgery was seen about half the time but poorer esthetics were equally likely. These results underscore the importance of using the ANB angle as a skeletal guideline when deciding whether to treat patients with mandibular advancement surgery. If improved profile esthetics are a desired outcome, an initial ANB angle of at least 6 degrees is recommended.


American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 2003

Transverse molar movements during growth

Steve D. Marshall; Deborah V. Dawson; Karin A. Southard; Adam Lee; John S. Casko; Thomas E. Southard

The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in molar crown torque and intermolar arch width from the time of permanent first molar eruption to early adulthood. Molar crown torque and intermolar arch width were measured in 36 untreated subjects with Class I occlusion from the Iowa Facial Growth Study at approximate ages 7.5, 10.3, 12.9, 16.5, and 26.4 years. On average, the mandibular first and second molars uprighted buccally by 5.0 degrees and 7.5 degrees, respectively. Mandibular first and second molar intermolar width increased by 2.2 and 0.78 mm, respectively. On average, maxillary first and second molars uprighted lingually by 3.3 degrees and 5.9 degrees, respectively. Maxillary first and second intermolar width increased by 2.8 and 2.0 mm, respectively. Results of statistical analysis by the Wilcoxon signed rank test indicate that (1) maxillary molars erupt with buccal crown torque and upright with age, whereas mandibular molars erupt with lingual crown torque and upright with age (P <.01), and (2) molar crown torque changes are accompanied by concurrent increases in maxillary and mandibular intermolar width (P <.01).


American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 1998

Prediction of mandibular growth rotation: Assessment of the Skieller, Björk, and Linde-Hansen method

Laurel R. Leslie; Thomas E. Southard; Karin A. Southard; John S. Casko; Jane R. Jakobsen; Elizabeth A. Tolley; Stephen L. Hillis; Chris Carolan; Mark Logue

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the method proposed by Skieller, Björk, and Linde-Hansen in 1984 to predict mandibular growth rotation. Our sample consisted of 40 randomly selected, untreated, adolescent subjects representative of the patient population generally encountered in orthodontic practice. The four independent variables identified in the Skieller study as having the highest predictive value (mandibular inclination, intermolar angle, shape of the lower border of the mandible, and inclination of the symphysis) were identified on initial lateral cephalograms. The proposed regression equations were applied and predicted mandibular rotations obtained. Final lateral cephalograms made 6 years after the initial profile radiographs were superimposed and actual mandibular rotation recorded. The observed and predicted rotations were compared and regression analyses performed to determine the amount of variability in observed values accounted for by the four variables individually and in combination. Only 5.6% of the variability in mandibular growth rotation could be accounted for using the four variables individually. Only 9% of the variability could be accounted for with a combination of the variables. In addition, we performed a Monte Carlo analysis, which mirrored the Skieller analysis but used random numbers instead of actual cephalometric data, to determine if the Skieller results may simply have capitalized on chance. Using the same forward stepwise selection procedure with a rejection level of P >.1, we found after 5000 simulations that a mean of 84% and a median of 94% of mandibular growth rotation variability could be accounted for using meaningless data in the Skieller analysis. This result was comparable to the Skieller value of 86%. In conclusion, information derived from pretreatment lateral cephalograms using the Skieller, Björk, and Linde-Hansen method does not permit clinically useful predictions to be made in a general population relative to the direction of future mandibular growth rotation.


American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 1989

Treatment of a dental deep bite in a patient with vertical excess and excessive gingival display

John S. Casko; Kenneth M. Eberle; Bradley J. Hoppens

The purpose of this report is to demonstrate the importance of developing an individualized treatment plan and treatment mechanics based on the patients specific dental, skeletal, and profile problems. A case report is presented outlining the diagnosis and treatment planning for a patient who had a 100% deep bite combined with vertical facial excess and an excessive maxillary gingival display.


American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 1999

Treatment of a Class III malocclusion with maxillary constriction and an anterior functional shift

John Mergen; Andrew Shelly; Gregory Christensen; John S. Casko

This case was chosen by the CDABO student case selection committee for publication in the AJO/DO.


American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 1997

Soldered implant attachments

Paul J. Helpard; John S. Casko; Robert L. Schneider; Thomas E. Southard

D e n t a l implants are increasingly used as a source of orthodontic anchorage. They may be placed solely for that purpose or used first for anchorage and then as prosthetic abutments. Several methods have been described for attaching orthodontic brackets to dental implants. Roberts 1 suggests forming a loop in the orthodontic wire and securing it to the implant with the cover screw of a transcutaneous post, and Higuchi and Slack 2 reported attaching the bracket to a composite crown. Shapiro and Kokich 3 embedded an orthodontic bracket in the buccal surface of a cast semiprecious crown, as did Stean. 4 We have found that soldering the orthodontic bracket directly to the second stage nonrotating gold


American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 1998

Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs

John S. Casko; James L. Vaden; Vincent G. Kokich; Joseph Damone; R.Don James; Thomas J. Cangialosi; Michael L. Riolo; Stephen E. Owens; Eldon D. Bills


American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 2005

Buccal corridors and smile esthetics

Theodore Moore; Karin A. Southard; John S. Casko; Fang Qian; Thomas E. Southard


American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 2003

Retained deciduous mandibular molars in adults: a radiographic study of long-term changes

Daniel W Sletten; Blair M Smith; Karin A. Southard; John S. Casko; Thomas E. Southard

Collaboration


Dive into the John S. Casko's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

André V. Ritter

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge