John V. Cox

Irinotecan plus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND The combination of fluorouracil and leucovorin has until recently been standard therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan prolongs survival in patients with colorectal cancer that is refractory to treatment with fluorouracil and leucovorin. In a multicenter trial, we compared a combination of irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin with bolus doses of fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. A third group of patients received irinotecan alone. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive irinotecan (125 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously), fluorouracil (500 mg per square meter as an intravenous bolus), and leucovorin (20 mg per square meter as an intravenous bolus) weekly for four weeks every six weeks; fluorouracil (425 mg per square meter as an intravenous bolus) and leucovorin (20 mg per square meter as an intravenous bolus) daily for five consecutive days every four weeks; or irinotecan alone (125 mg per square meter intravenously) weekly for four weeks every six weeks. End points included progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS Of 683 patients, 231 were assigned to receive irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin; 226 to receive fluorouracil and leucovorin; and 226 to receive irinotecan alone. In an intention-to-treat analysis, as compared with treatment with fluorouracil and leucovorin, treatment with irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 7.0 vs. 4.3 months; P=0.004), a higher rate of confirmed response (39 percent vs. 21 percent, P<0.001), and longer overall survival (median, 14.8 vs. 12.6 months; P=0.04). Results for irinotecan alone were similar to those for fluorouracil and leucovorin. Grade 3 (severe) diarrhea was more common during treatment with irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin than during treatment with fluorouracil and leucovorin, but the incidence of grade 4 (life-threatening) diarrhea was similar in the two groups (<8 percent). Grade 3 or 4 mucositis, grade 4 neutropenia, and neutropenic fever were less frequent during treatment with irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin. Adding irinotecan to the regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin did not compromise the quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Weekly treatment with irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin is superior to a widely used regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival.

Comparison of Oral Capecitabine Versus Intravenous Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin as First-Line Treatment in 605 Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Phase III Study

PURPOSE To compare the response rate, efficacy parameters, and toxicity profile of oral capecitabine with bolus intravenous (IV) fluorouracil plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We prospectively randomized 605 patients to treatment with oral capecitabine for 14 days every 3 weeks or 5-FU/LV by rapid IV injection daily for 5 days in 4-week cycles. RESULTS The overall objective tumor response rate among all randomized patients was significantly higher in the capecitabine group (24.8%) than in the 5-FU/LV group (15.5%; P =.005). In the capecitabine and 5-FU/LV groups, median times to disease progression were 4.3 and 4.7 months (log-rank P =.72), median times to treatment failure were 4.1 and 3.1 months (P =.19), and median overall survival times were 12.5 and 13.3 months (P =.974), respectively. Capecitabine, compared with bolus 5-FU/LV treatment, produced a significantly lower incidence (P <.0002) of diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea, and alopecia. Patients treated with capecitabine also displayed lower incidences of grade 3/4 stomatitis and grade 3/4 neutropenia (P <.0001) leading to significantly less neutropenic fever/sepsis. Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (P <.00001) and grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia were the only toxicities more frequently associated with capecitabine than with 5-FU/LV treatment. CONCLUSION Oral capecitabine was more active than 5-FU/LV in the induction of objective tumor responses. Time to disease progression and survival were at least equivalent for capecitabine compared with the 5-FU/LV arm. Capecitabine also demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits over bolus 5-FU/LV in terms of tolerability.

Phase II Study of Oral Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE To determine the safety and efficacy of capecitabine (Xeloda; Roche Laboratories, Nutley, NJ) in patients with metastatic or unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-two patients were treated with oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) administered twice daily (2,500 mg/m(2)/d) as intermittent therapy in 3-week cycles consisting of 2 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week without treatment. Tumor lesions were assessed by computed tomography scan or physical examination at 6-week intervals (after every two cycles). Adverse events were monitored continuously during treatment and for 28 days after the last dose of study drug. RESULTS Ten (24%) of 42 patients experienced a clinical benefit response (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.1% to 39.5%) as evidenced by improvement in pain intensity, analgesic consumption, and/or Karnofsky performance status. Three (7.3%) of the 41 patients with measurable disease had an objective response (partial). The median time to objective response was 85 days (range, 47 to 91 days) and duration of response was 208, 260, and 566 days for the three responding patients. One patient with nonmeasurable but assessable disease had improved residual disease with a positive clinical benefit response, for a total of four responses among the 42 assessable patients, for an overall response rate of 9.5% (90% CI, 3.3% to 20.5%). Capecitabine was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION Treatment with capecitabine resulted in clinically significant beneficial effects on tumor-related symptoms and yielded objective response activity in patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. These results together with its generally tolerable safety profile and the added advantage of oral administration provide the basis for further evaluating capecitabine as a single agent or in combination with other treatment modalities in this patient population.

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as second-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III noninferiority study

BACKGROUND To demonstrate the noninferiority of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after prior irinotecan-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 627 patients were randomly assigned to receive XELOX (n = 313) or FOLFOX-4 (n = 314) following disease progression/recurrence or intolerance to irinotecan-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS PFS for XELOX was noninferior to FOLFOX-4 [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.14] in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Median PFS was 4.7 months with XELOX versus 4.8 months with FOLFOX-4. The robustness of the primary analysis was supported by multivariate and subgroup analyses. Median overall survival in the ITT population was 11.9 months with XELOX versus 12.5 months with FOLFOX-4 (HR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.86-1.21). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 50% of XELOX- and 65% of FOLFOX-4-treated patients. Whereas grade 3/4 neutropenia (35% versus 5% with XELOX) and febrile neutropenia (4% versus < 1%) were more common with FOLFOX-4, grade 3/4 diarrhea (19% versus 5% with FOLFOX-4) and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (4% versus < 1%) were more common with XELOX. CONCLUSION XELOX is noninferior to FOLFOX-4 when administered as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

The frequency of anemia and iron deficiency in the runner

The current consensus is that runners commonly experience a mild anemia influenced by iron deficiency. We compared hematologic parameters of 72 (35 males and 37 females) runners with 48 (27 males and 21 females) nonrunners and assessed the impact of iron supplementation. Male runners had lower hemoglobin (Hb) values than male nonrunners (14.8 vs 15.3 g.dl-1) (P less than 0.05) regardless of iron usage. Female runners had higher (P = 0.05) Hb values than female controls (13.5 vs 12.8 g.dl-1). Female runners off iron had Hbs similar to controls off iron (P = 0.30). Iron parameters (total serum iron, TSI; total iron-binding capacity, TIBC; percent saturation of the TIBC, %sat TIBC; and serum ferritin) of runners vs controls, runners vs runners (on or off iron), and nonrunners vs nonrunners (on or off iron) were comparable except 1) male runners off iron had lower (P less than 0.05) %sat TIBC values (26%) than male runners on iron (34%) and 2) female runners taking iron had ferritin values (32 ng.ml-1) similar to those of female nonrunners taking iron (39 ng.ml-1) but higher (P less than 0.05) than their counterparts off iron (15 and 15 ng.ml-1, respectively). This study concludes that running affects Hb in a variable manner and suggests that the runners iron status is similar to that of the general population.

Principles of Safe Practice Using an Oncology EHR System for Chemotherapy Ordering, Preparation, and Administration, Part 1 of 2

An outline of broad principles that should be considered when integrating an electronic health record, and in particular, a chemotherapy ordering module, into practice.

Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) resistance identified by K-ras mutation in patients with progressive colon cancer after treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)

OBJECTIVE To determine the prognostic role of a K-ras mutation in tumor tissue of patients with refractory colon cancer who received irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11). METHODS DNA was extracted from paraffin-stored tumor tissue of 35 patients with progressive colon cancer failing treatment with 5-fluorouracil who subsequently received CPT-11 (100 mg/m2 i.v. per week x 4 weeks with 2 weeks off per course). The first exon of the K-ras gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction by using K-ras-specific primers followed by mutant enrichment sequencing. Survival differences of patients with a K-ras mutation were compared with those of patients with a normal K-ras status. RESULTS A total of 21 patients had a normal K-ras sequence and 14 patients had a K-ras mutation [GAT, n = 7; TGT, n = 3; and GCT, AGT, GTT, GAC (codon 13), n = 1 each]. Median survival of patients with a normal ras sequence from time of treatment with CPT-11 was 332 days compared with 169 days for patients with a K-ras mutation (p = 0.0036). No differences in age, sex, cancer stage, surgical treatment, or chemotherapy treatment were observed. CONCLUSION Determination of the presence of a K-ras mutation may predict survival in patients with progressive colon cancer after treatment with 5-fluorouracil who receive CPT-11.

Detection and Staging of Small Cell Lung Carcinoma with a Technetium-labeled Monoclonal Antibody A Comparison with Standard Staging Methods

Tumor-associated radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) can detect neoplasms in a variety of settings. The authors conducted a study comparing the ability to detect and stage small cell lung carcinoma by using a Tc-99m labeled monoclonal antibody (NR-LU-10 Fab) (NeoRx Corp, Seattle, WA) with standard staging methods. Standard staging included a physical examination, chest x-ray, a battery of radionuclide scans and/or computerized tomographic studies (head, abdomen, and bone), and bone marrow examination. A total of 22 comparisons were performed in 17 patients (five patients had revaluations after therapy). Fifty-four (74%) of the 73 lesions defined by standard staging were detected by the radiolabeled MoAb. Seven of eight patients (88%) classified by standard staging as having “limited stage” disease on presentation were concordantly “limited stage” by radio-immunoimaging. One patient deemed “limited stage” by standard staging was correctly upstaged (bone marrow involvement) as a result of the radiolabeled MoAb. Two patients found to have extensive disease at diagnosis were characterized as “limited stage” by the MoAb, for an overall staging accuracy of 0.88. Thirteen of 19 missed lesions were smaller than 2 cm (10 were smaller than 1 cm; 3 measured 1 to 2 cm). This comparative study shows that radioimmunoimaging by Tc-99m labeled NR-LU-10 Fab antibody is capable of complementing standard staging methods used in the evaluation of small cell lung carcinoma.

The relative value of conventional staging procedures for developing prognostic models in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Published prognostic models for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have either combined limited- and extensive-stage patients or have not included standard anatomic staging information to assess the relative value of the knowledge of specific sites and number of sites of metastases in predicting survival in extensive-stage disease. We studied 136 extensive-stage patients in whom traditional staging procedures were performed and in whom other previously demonstrated significant pretreatment variables were determined. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, when all data were included, three variables were significant: performance status (PS) (P = .0001), number of sites of metastases (P = .0010), and age (P = .0029). A prognostic algorithm was developed using these variables, which divided the patients into three distinct groups. When the anatomic staging data were omitted, the serum albumin (P = .0313) was the only variable in addition to PS (P = .0001) and age (P = .0064) that was significant. An alternative algorithm using these three variables was nearly as predictive as the original. Therefore, in extensive-stage patients, reasonable pretreatment prognostic information can be obtained without using the number or specific sites of metastases as variables once the presence of distant metastases has been demonstrated.

Radionuclide imaging of bone marrow metastases with a Tc-99m labeled monoclonal antibody to small cell lung carcinoma

The detection of metastatic disease confined to the bone marrow compartment has in the past been technically limited. We have identified excellent imaging of bone marrow metastases during the evaluation of a Tc-99m labeled monoclonal antibody (NR-LU-10 Fab) (NeoRx Corp., Seattle, WA). This occurred during a study to assess the monoclonal antibodys ability to detect sites of small cell cancer (primary and metastatic). The study by design compares areas seen by the monoclonal antibody scan with those found by standard staging methods in patients with small cell lung cancer. Standard staging included chest x-rays, bone scans, CT studies of the abdomen, and histologic examination of the bone marrow. Fifteen patients have been evaluated, four on two occasions, for a total of 19 monoclonal imaging studies. Metastasis to the marrow compartment was identified by the monoclonal imaging in all patients whose bone marrow biopsies were positive for small cell carcinoma, and it was primarily responsible for the eventual detection of extensive disease (marrow involvement) in one patient. Thus it appears that compartmental bone marrow imaging for metastatic disease is possible with immunoscintigraphy.