John W. Bishop

Comparison of the CytoRich system with conventional cervical cytology: Preliminary data on 2,032 cases from a clinical trial site

OBJECTIVE To compare the CytoRich system with conventional cervical cytology in a university medical center hospital laboratory. STUDY DESIGN The CytoRich system combines liquid preservation, selective reduction of blood/inflammation, thin-layer preparation and discrete staining. Two thousand thirty-two parallel conventional and CytoRich samples were examined as part of a multicenter trial of the CytoRich/AutoCyte systems. Same-patient conventional and CytoRich slides were submitted to separate cytotechnologists blindly. The results were compared, and all nonmatching sample pairs were reviewed again. A consensus diagnosis was derived for all cases. The initial readings of the CytoRich and conventional smears were compared with each other and with the consensus diagnosis. RESULTS Of the 148 squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) found by either method, 85% were found by CytoRich, while only 58.5% were found by conventional smear. As compared with the consensus diagnosis, CytoRich slides had 86.7% sensitivity for SIL and 99.1% specificity, while the conventional slides had 63.6% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity. Consensus review resulted in upgrading to SIL in 1.8% of conventional slides and 1.4% of CytoRich slides. The biopsy correlation results were similar for the two methods. CONCLUSION The CytoRich system affords excellent cellular presentations and superior sensitivity for SILs when compared to the conventional technique.

Time Interval Effect on Repeat Cervical Smear Results

OBJECTIVE Second cervical smears obtained at short time intervals often exhibit a lesser degree of abnormality than the first smear. We studied the effect of time interval between smears on diagnoses in two large, distinctive cohorts. STUDY DESIGN Patients with two or more satisfactory smears with at least one smear or a cervical biopsy showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or greater were selected. Patients were divided into four subsets by test intervals (days) (< or = 45, 46-90, 91-120, > 120) and compared statistically. RESULTS The distribution of differences between results for the short-interval subsets (< 120) was significantly different (P < .01) from the interval subset > 120 days. At short intervals the results revealed loss of sensitivity in the second smear as compared to the initial smear and concurrent biopsies. CONCLUSION Rapidly repeated cervical smears show poor agreement with the biopsy and may be misleading. This effect is most pronounced when the interval is < 45 days. Colposcopists should consider whether concurrent smears shortly after an abnormal smear are worth performing, given the loss of sensitivity.

Disseminated Mucosal Papilloma/condyloma Secondary to Human Papillomavirus

This report details the histopathologic findings in a woman who acquired the human papillomavirus 6/11 in her late teens and developed papilloma/condyloma of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, anogenital region, urethra, and urinary bladder. General evaluations of immune function reveal no defect, and there was no evidence of HIV infection. The morphologic expression of HPV 6/11 infection appears to be completely dependent on the mucosal epithelium affected. The complete spectrum of benign and premalignant epithelial changes induced by the human papillomavirus family-papilloma, verrucae, condyloma acuminatum, epithelial hyperplasia, and dysplasia-were present in this patient with a single papillomavirus infection. We postulate that this patient has a specific immune deficiency that limits her ability to control local infection and spread of the papillomavirus.