Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by John W. Dolan.
Journal of Chromatography A | 2002
John W. Dolan
Column temperature plays two important roles in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC): control of retention (k) and control of selectivity (a). While changes in retention as a function of temperature are ubiquitous, selectivity changes for any given solute pair are more pronounced for ionized samples and samples with more polar substituents. With many samples, column temperature can be selected in a manner that optimizes resolution. The selectivity effects observed for temperature changes in RP-HPLC generally are complementary to those observed for mobile phase strength changes, so it is often possible to improve resolution by simultaneous optimization of temperature and mobile phase percent organic or gradient steepness. Computer simulation is a powerful tool for such optimization experiments. This paper reviews the influence of temperature on chromatographic selectivity for RP-HPLC.
Journal of Chromatography A | 2017
Eva Tyteca; Mohammad Talebi; Ruth I.J. Amos; Soo Hyun Park; Maryam Taraji; Yabin Wen; Roman Szucs; Christopher A. Pohl; John W. Dolan; Paul R. Haddad
Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationships (QSRR) have the potential to speed up the screening phase of chromatographic method development as the initial exploratory experiments are replaced by prediction of analyte retention based solely on the structure of the molecule. The present study offers further proof-of-concept of localized QSRR modelling, in which the retention of any given compound is predicted using only the most chromatographically similar compounds in the available dataset. To this end, each compound in the dataset was sequentially removed from the database and individually utilized as a test analyte. In this study, we propose the retention factor k as the most relevant chromatographic similarity measure and compare it with the Tanimoto index, the most popular similarity measure based on chemical structure. Prediction error was reduced by up to 8 fold when QSRR was based only on chromatographically similar compounds rather than using the entire dataset. The study therefore shows that the design of a practically useful structural similarity index should select the same compounds in the dataset as does the k-similarity filter in order to establish accurate predictive localized QSRR models. While low average prediction errors (Mean Absolute Error (MAE)<0.5min) and slopes of the regression lines through the origin close to 1.00 were obtained using k-similarity searching, the use of the structural Tanimoto similarity index, considered as the gold standard in Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) studies, generally resulted in much higher prediction errors (MAE>1min) and significant deviations from the reference slope of 1.0. The Tanomoto similarity index therefore appears to have limited general utility in QSRR studies. Future studies therefore aim at designing a more appropriate chromatographic similarity index that can then be applied for unknown compounds (that is, compounds which have not been tested previously on the chromatographic system used, but for which the chemical structures are known).
Journal of Chromatography A | 2017
Maryam Taraji; Paul R. Haddad; Ruth I.J. Amos; Mohammad Talebi; Roman Szucs; John W. Dolan; Christopher A. Pohl
Quantitative structure-retention relationship (QSRR) models are developed to predict the retention times of analytes on five hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) stationary phases (bare silica, amine, amide, diol and zwitterionic), with a view to selecting the most suitable stationary phase(s) for the separation of these analytes. The study was conducted using six β-adrenergic agonists as target analytes. Molecular descriptors were calculated based only on chemical structures optimized using density functional theory. A genetic algorithm (GA) was then used to select the most relevant molecular descriptors and these were used to build a retention model for each stationary phase using partial least squares (PLS) regression. This model was then used to predict the retention of the test set of target analytes. This process created an optimized descriptor set which enhanced the reliability of the developed QSRR models. Finally, the QSRR models developed in the work were utilized to provide some insight into the separation mechanisms operating in the HILIC mode. Three performance criteria - mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error of prediction scaled to retention time (RMSEP), and the number of selected descriptors, were used to evaluate the developed models when applied to an external test set of six β-adrenergic agonists and showed highly predictive abilities. MAE values ranged from 13 to 25s on four of the stationary phases, with a somewhat higher error (50s) being observed for the zwitterionic phase. RMSEP values of 4.88-11.12% were recorded. Validation was performed through Y-randomization and chemical domain applicability, from which it was evident that the developed optimized GA-PLS models were robust. The high levels of accuracy, reliability and applicability of the models were to a large extent due to the optimization of the GA descriptor set and the presence of relevant structural and geometric molecular descriptors, together with descriptors based on important physicochemical properties, which establish a strong connection between retention time and meaningful chemical properties. The present strategy, while it is a pilot study, holds great promise for broader screening of HILIC stationary phases for desired separation, as well as for acquisition of information about molecular mechanisms of separation under chromatographic conditions.
Analytical Chemistry | 2017
Maryam Taraji; Paul R. Haddad; Ruth I.J. Amos; Mohammad Talebi; Roman Szucs; John W. Dolan; Christopher A. Pohl
A design-of-experiment (DoE) model was developed, able to describe the retention times of a mixture of pharmaceutical compounds in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) under all possible combinations of acetonitrile content, salt concentration, and mobile-phase pH with R2 > 0.95. Further, a quantitative structure-retention relationship (QSRR) model was developed to predict retention times for new analytes, based only on their chemical structures, with a root-mean-square error of prediction (RMSEP) as low as 0.81%. A compound classification based on the concept of similarity was applied prior to QSRR modeling. Finally, we utilized a combined QSRR-DoE approach to propose an optimal design space in a quality-by-design (QbD) workflow to facilitate the HILIC method development. The mathematical QSRR-DoE model was shown to be highly predictive when applied to an independent test set of unseen compounds in unseen conditions with a RMSEP value of 5.83%. The QSRR-DoE computed retention time of pharmaceutical test analytes and subsequently calculated separation selectivity was used to optimize the chromatographic conditions for efficient separation of targets. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to evaluate the risk of uncertainty in the models prediction, and to define the design space where the desired quality criterion was met. Experimental realization of peak selectivity between targets under the selected optimal working conditions confirmed the theoretical predictions. These results demonstrate how discovery of optimal conditions for the separation of new analytes can be accelerated by the use of appropriate theoretical tools.
Journal of Chromatography A | 2017
Maryam Taraji; Paul R. Haddad; Ruth I.J. Amos; Mohammad Talebi; Roman Szucs; John W. Dolan; Christopher A. Pohl
The development of quantitative structure retention relationships (QSRR) having sufficient accuracy to support high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method development is still a major issue. To tackle this challenge, this study presents a novel QSRR methodology to select a training set of compounds for QSRR modelling (i.e. to filter the database to identify the most appropriate compounds for the training set). This selection is based on a dual filtering strategy which combines Tanimoto similarity (TS) searching as the primary filter and retention time (tR) similarity clustering as the secondary filter, using a database of pharmaceutical compound retention times collected over a wide range of hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) systems. To employ tR similarity filtering, correlation to a molecular descriptor is used as a measure of retention time. For the retention time of a compound to be modelled a relationship between experimental chromatographic data and various molecular descriptors is calculated using a genetic algorithm-partial least squares (GA-PLS) regression. The proposed dual-filtering-based QSRR model significantly improves the retention time predictability compared to the diverse, global, and TS-based QSRR models, with an average root mean square error in prediction (RMSEP) of 11.01% over five different HILIC stationary phases. The average CPU time for implementing the proposed approach is less than 10min, which makes it quite favorable for rapid method development in HILIC. In addition, interpretation of the molecular descriptors selected by this novel approach provided some insight into the HILIC mechanism.
Analytica Chimica Acta | 2018
Maryam Taraji; Paul R. Haddad; Ruth I.J. Amos; Mohammad Talebi; Roman Szucs; John W. Dolan; Christopher A. Pohl
With an enormous growth in the application of hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC), there has also been significant progress in HILIC method development. HILIC is a chromatographic method that utilises hydro-organic mobile phases with a high organic content, and a hydrophilic stationary phase. It has been applied predominantly in the determination of small polar compounds. Theoretical studies in computer-aided modelling tools, most importantly the predictive, quantitative structure retention relationship (QSRR) modelling methods, have attracted the attention of researchers and these approaches greatly assist the method development process. This review focuses on the application of computer-aided modelling tools in understanding the retention mechanism, the classification of HILIC stationary phases, prediction of retention times in HILIC systems, optimisation of chromatographic conditions, and description of the interaction effects of the chromatographic factors in HILIC separations. Additionally, what has been achieved in the potential application of QSRR methodology in combination with experimental design philosophy in the optimisation of chromatographic separation conditions in the HILIC method development process is communicated. Developing robust predictive QSRR models will undoubtedly facilitate more application of this chromatographic mode in a broader variety of research areas, significantly minimising cost and time of the experimental work.
Journal of Chromatography A | 2017
Maryam Taraji; Paul R. Haddad; Ruth I.J. Amos; Mohammad Talebi; Roman Szucs; John W. Dolan; Christopher A. Pohl
An analysis and comparison of the use of four commonly used error measures (mean absolute error, percentage mean absolute error, root mean square error, and percentage root mean square error) for evaluating the predictive ability of quantitative structure-retention relationships (QSRR) models is reported. These error measures are used for reporting errors in the prediction of retention time of external test analytes, that is, analytes not employed during model development. The error-based validation metrics were compared using a simple descriptive statistic, the sum of squared residuals (SSR) of outliers to the edge of an error window. The comparisons demonstrate that Percentage Root Mean Squared Error of Prediction (RMSEP) provides the best estimate of the predictive ability of a QSRR model, having the lowest SSR value of 20.43.
Journal of Chromatography A | 1991
Kerry D. Nugent; John W. Dolan
Abstract A practical approach to correcting liquid chromatographic (LC) column problems is presented. Emphasis is placed on keeping contaminants that originate in the mobile phase or sample from reaching the column. Column evaluation prior to routine use and whenever chromatographic problems are observed is strongly suggested. A flowchart is presented as a guide for the isolation and correction of chromatographic problems that arise during the routine use of an LC method.
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling | 2017
Ruth I.J. Amos; Eva Tyteca; Mohammad Talebi; Paul R. Haddad; Roman Szucs; John W. Dolan; Christopher A. Pohl
Quantitative structure-retention relationship (QSRR) models are powerful techniques for the prediction of retention times of analytes, where chromatographic retention parameters are correlated with molecular descriptors encoding chemical structures of analytes. Many QSRR models contain geometrical descriptors derived from the three-dimensional (3D) spatial coordinates of computationally predicted structures for the analytes. Therefore, it is sensible to calculate these structures correctly, as any error is likely to carry over to the resulting QSRR models. This study compares molecular modeling, semiempirical, and density functional methods (both B3LYP and M06) for structure optimization. Each of the calculations was performed in a vacuum, then repeated with solvent corrections for both acetonitrile and water. We also compared Natural Bond Orbital analysis with the Mulliken charge calculation method. The comparison of the examined computational methods for structure calculation shows that, possibly due to the error inherent in descriptor creation methods, a quick and inexpensive molecular modeling method of structure determination gives similar results to experiments where structures are optimized using an expensive and time-consuming level of computational theory. Also, for structures with low flexibility, vacuum or gas phase calculations are found to be as effective as those calculations with solvent corrections added.
Journal of Chromatography B | 2003
Michael S. Alexander; Melissa M. Kiser; Travis Culley; John R Kern; John W. Dolan; James D. McChesney; Jan Zygmunt; Steve J. Bannister