Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John W. Epling is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John W. Epling.


JAMA | 2018

Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C. Grossman; Susan J. Curry; Karina W. Davidson; John W. Epling; Francisco Garcia; Matthew W. Gillman; Diane M. Harper; Alex R. Kemper; Alex H. Krist; Ann E. Kurth; C. Seth Landefeld; Carol M. Mangione; Douglas K Owens; William R. Phillips; Maureen G. Phipps; Michael Pignone; Albert L. Siu

IMPORTANCE Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. In 2016, an estimated 134,000 persons will be diagnosed with the disease, and about 49,000 will die from it. Colorectal cancer is most frequently diagnosed among adults aged 65 to 74 years; the median age at death from colorectal cancer is 68 years. OBJECTIVE To update the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for colorectal cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the effectiveness of screening with colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, computed tomography colonography, the guaiac-based fecal occult blood test, the fecal immunochemical test, the multitargeted stool DNA test, and the methylated SEPT9 DNA test in reducing the incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer or all-cause mortality; the harms of these screening tests; and the test performance characteristics of these tests for detecting adenomatous polyps, advanced adenomas based on size, or both, as well as colorectal cancer. The USPSTF also commissioned a comparative modeling study to provide information on optimal starting and stopping ages and screening intervals across the different available screening methods. FINDINGS The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk, asymptomatic adults aged 50 to 75 years is of substantial net benefit. Multiple screening strategies are available to choose from, with different levels of evidence to support their effectiveness, as well as unique advantages and limitations, although there are no empirical data to demonstrate that any of the reviewed strategies provide a greater net benefit. Screening for colorectal cancer is a substantially underused preventive health strategy in the United States. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The USPSTF recommends screening for colorectal cancer starting at age 50 years and continuing until age 75 years (A recommendation). The decision to screen for colorectal cancer in adults aged 76 to 85 years should be an individual one, taking into account the patients overall health and prior screening history (C recommendation).


JAMA | 2016

Statin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C. Grossman; Susan J. Curry; Karina W. Davidson; John W. Epling; Francisco Garcia; Matthew W. Gillman; Alex R. Kemper; Alex H. Krist; Ann E. Kurth; C. Seth Landefeld; Michael L. LeFevre; Carol M. Mangione; William R. Phillips; Douglas K Owens; Maureen G. Phipps; Michael Pignone

Importance Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, accounting for 1 of every 3 deaths among adults. Objective To update the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for lipid disorders in adults. Evidence Review The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for and treatment of dyslipidemia in adults 21 years and older; the benefits and harms of statin use in reducing CVD events and mortality in adults without a history of CVD events; whether the benefits of statin use vary by subgroup, clinical characteristics, or dosage; and the benefits of various treatment strategies in adults 40 years and older without a history of CVD events. Conclusions and Recommendations The USPSTF recommends initiating use of low- to moderate-dose statins in adults aged 40 to 75 years without a history of CVD who have 1 or more CVD risk factors (dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, or smoking) and a calculated 10-year CVD event risk of 10% or greater (B recommendation). The USPSTF recommends that clinicians selectively offer low- to moderate-dose statins to adults aged 40 to 75 years without a history of CVD who have 1 or more CVD risk factors and a calculated 10-year CVD event risk of 7.5% to 10% (C recommendation). The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of initiating statin use in adults 76 years and older (I statement).


JAMA | 2017

Screening for Obesity in Children and Adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

David C. Grossman; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Susan J. Curry; Michael J. Barry; Karina W. Davidson; Chyke A. Doubeni; John W. Epling; Alex R. Kemper; Alex H. Krist; Ann E. Kurth; C. Seth Landefeld; Carol M. Mangione; Maureen G. Phipps; Michael Silverstein; Melissa A. Simon; Chien Wen Tseng

Importance Based on year 2000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts, approximately 17% of children and adolescents aged 2 to 19 years in the United States have obesity, and almost 32% of children and adolescents are overweight or have obesity. Obesity in children and adolescents is associated with morbidity such as mental health and psychological issues, asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, orthopedic problems, and adverse cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes (eg, high blood pressure, abnormal lipid levels, and insulin resistance). Children and adolescents may also experience teasing and bullying behaviors based on their weight. Obesity in childhood and adolescence may continue into adulthood and lead to adverse cardiovascular outcomes or other obesity-related morbidity, such as type 2 diabetes. Subpopulation Considerations Although the overall rate of child and adolescent obesity has stabilized over the last decade after increasing steadily for 3 decades, obesity rates continue to increase in certain populations, such as African American girls and Hispanic boys. These racial/ethnic differences in obesity prevalence are likely a result of both genetic and nongenetic factors (eg, socioeconomic status, intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and fast food, and having a television in the bedroom). Objective To update the 2010 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for obesity in children 6 years and older. Evidence Review The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on screening for obesity in children and adolescents and the benefits and harms of weight management interventions. Findings Comprehensive, intensive behavioral interventions (≥26 contact hours) in children and adolescents 6 years and older who have obesity can result in improvements in weight status for up to 12 months; there is inadequate evidence regarding the effectiveness of less intensive interventions. The harms of behavioral interventions can be bounded as small to none, and the harms of screening are minimal. Therefore, the USPSTF concluded with moderate certainty that screening for obesity in children and adolescents 6 years and older is of moderate net benefit. Conclusions and Recommendation The USPSTF recommends that clinicians screen for obesity in children and adolescents 6 years and older and offer or refer them to comprehensive, intensive behavioral interventions to promote improvements in weight status. (B recommendation)


JAMA | 2017

Folic acid supplementation for the prevention of neural tube defects US preventive services task force recommendation statement

Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C. Grossman; Susan J. Curry; Karina W. Davidson; John W. Epling; Francisco Garcia; Alex R. Kemper; Alex H. Krist; Ann E. Kurth; C. Seth Landefeld; Carol M. Mangione; William R. Phillips; Maureen G. Phipps; Michael Pignone; Michael Silverstein; Chien Wen Tseng

Importance Neural tube defects are among the most common major congenital anomalies in the United States and may lead to a range of disabilities or death. Daily folic acid supplementation in the periconceptional period can prevent neural tube defects. However, most women do not receive the recommended daily intake of folate from diet alone. Objective To update the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on folic acid supplementation in women of childbearing age. Evidence Review In 2009, the USPSTF reviewed the effectiveness of folic acid supplementation in women of childbearing age for the prevention of neural tube defects in infants. The current review assessed new evidence on the benefits and harms of folic acid supplementation. Findings The USPSTF assessed the balance of the benefits and harms of folic acid supplementation in women of childbearing age and determined that the net benefit is substantial. Evidence is adequate that the harms to the mother or infant from folic acid supplementation taken at the usual doses are no greater than small. Therefore, the USPSTF reaffirms its 2009 recommendation. Conclusions and Recommendation The USPSTF recommends that all women who are planning or capable of pregnancy take a daily supplement containing 0.4 to 0.8 mg (400-800 µg) of folic acid. (A recommendation)


JAMA | 2017

Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C. Grossman; Susan J. Curry; Karina W. Davidson; John W. Epling; Francisco Garcia; Jessica Herzstein; Alex R. Kemper; Alex H. Krist; Ann E. Kurth; C. Seth Landefeld; Carol M. Mangione; William R. Phillips; Maureen G. Phipps; Michael Pignone; Michael Silverstein; Chien Wen Tseng

Importance Based on data from the 1990s, estimated prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the United States is 10% for mild OSA and 3.8% to 6.5% for moderate to severe OSA; current prevalence may be higher, given the increasing prevalence of obesity. Severe OSA is associated with increased all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular events, diabetes, cognitive impairment, decreased quality of life, and motor vehicle crashes. Objective To issue a new US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for OSA in asymptomatic adults. Evidence Review The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the accuracy, benefits, and potential harms of screening for OSA in asymptomatic adults seen in primary care, including those with unrecognized symptoms. The USPSTF also evaluated the evidence on the benefits and harms of treatment of OSA on intermediate and final health outcomes. Findings The USPSTF found insufficient evidence on screening for or treatment of OSA in asymptomatic adults or adults with unrecognized symptoms. Therefore, the USPSTF was unable to determine the magnitude of the benefits or harms of screening for OSA or whether there is a net benefit or harm to screening. Conclusions and Recommendation The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for OSA in asymptomatic adults. (I statement)


JAMA | 2016

Screening for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Albert L. Siu; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C. Grossman; Karina W. Davidson; John W. Epling; Francisco Garcia; Matthew W. Gillman; Alex R. Kemper; Alex H. Krist; Ann E. Kurth; C. Seth Landefeld; Carol M. Mangione; Diane M. Harper; William R. Phillips; Maureen G. Phipps; Michael Pignone

IMPORTANCE About 14% of US adults aged 40 to 79 years have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and it is the third leading cause of death in the United States. Persons with severe COPD are often unable to participate in normal physical activity due to deterioration of lung function. OBJECTIVE To update the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for COPD in asymptomatic adults. EVIDENCE REVIEW The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on whether screening for COPD in asymptomatic adults (those who do not recognize or report respiratory symptoms) improves health outcomes. The USPSTF reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of screening tools (including prescreening questionnaires and spirometry); whether screening for COPD improves the delivery and uptake of targeted preventive services, such as smoking cessation or relevant immunizations; and the possible harms of screening for and treatment of mild to moderate COPD. FINDINGS Similar to 2008, the USPSTF did not find evidence that screening for COPD in asymptomatic persons improves health-related quality of life, morbidity, or mortality. The USPSTF determined that early detection of COPD, before the development of symptoms, does not alter the course of the disease or improve patient outcomes. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for COPD in asymptomatic persons has no net benefit. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The USPSTF recommends against screening for COPD in asymptomatic adults. (D recommendation).


JAMA | 2016

Screening for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C. Grossman; Susan J. Curry; Linda Bauman; Karina W. Davidson; John W. Epling; Francisco Garcia; Jessica Herzstein; Alex R. Kemper; Alex H. Krist; Ann E. Kurth; C. Seth Landefeld; Carol M. Mangione; William R. Phillips; Maureen G. Phipps; Michael Pignone

IMPORTANCE Tuberculosis remains an important preventable disease in the United States. An effective strategy for reducing the transmission, morbidity, and mortality of active disease is the identification and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to prevent progression to active disease. OBJECTIVE To issue a current US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for LTBI. EVIDENCE REVIEW The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on screening for LTBI in asymptomatic adults seen in primary care, including evidence dating from the inception of searched databases. FINDINGS The USPSTF found adequate evidence that accurate screening tests for LTBI are available, treatment of LTBI provides a moderate health benefit in preventing progression to active disease, and the harms of screening and treatment are small. The USPSTF has moderate certainty that screening for LTBI in persons at increased risk for infection provides a moderate net benefit. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The USPSTF recommends screening for LTBI in populations at increased risk. (B recommendation).


JAMA | 2016

Screening for Lipid Disorders in Children and Adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C. Grossman; Susan J. Curry; Karina W. Davidson; John W. Epling; Francisco Garcia; Matthew W. Gillman; Alex R. Kemper; Alex H. Krist; Ann E. Kurth; C. Seth Landefeld; Michael L. LeFevre; Carol M. Mangione; William R. Phillips; Maureen G. Phipps; Michael Pignone; Albert L. Siu

IMPORTANCE Elevations in levels of total, low-density lipoprotein, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and, to a lesser extent, elevated triglyceride levels are associated with risk of cardiovascular disease in adults. OBJECTIVE To update the 2007 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for lipid disorders in children, adolescents, and young adults. EVIDENCE REVIEW The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on screening for lipid disorders in children and adolescents 20 years or younger--1 review focused on screening for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, and 1 review focused on screening for multifactorial dyslipidemia. FINDINGS Evidence on the quantitative difference in diagnostic yield between universal and selective screening approaches, the effectiveness and harms of long-term treatment and the harms of screening, and the association between changes in intermediate outcomes and improvements in adult cardiovascular health outcomes are limited. Therefore, the USPSTF concludes that the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for lipid disorders in children and adolescents 20 years or younger. (I statement).


JAMA | 2017

Screening for Preeclampsia: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C. Grossman; Susan J. Curry; Michael J. Barry; Karina W. Davidson; Chyke A. Doubeni; John W. Epling; Alex R. Kemper; Alex H. Krist; Ann E. Kurth; C. Seth Landefeld; Carol M. Mangione; William R. Phillips; Maureen G. Phipps; Michael Silverstein; Melissa A. Simon; Chien Wen Tseng

Importance Preeclampsia affects approximately 4% of pregnancies in the United States. It is the second leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide and may lead to serious maternal complications, including stroke, eclampsia, and organ failure. Adverse perinatal outcomes for the fetus and newborn include intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight, and stillbirth. Many of the complications associated with preeclampsia lead to early induction of labor or cesarean delivery and subsequent preterm birth. Subpopulation Considerations Preeclampsia is more prevalent among African American women than among white women. Differences in prevalence may be, in part, due to African American women being disproportionally affected by risk factors for preeclampsia. African American women also have case fatality rates related to preeclampsia 3 times higher than rates among white women. Inequalities in access to adequate prenatal care may contribute to poor outcomes associated with preeclampsia in African American women. Objective To update the 1996 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for preeclampsia. Evidence Review The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the accuracy of screening and diagnostic tests for preeclampsia, the potential benefits and harms of screening for preeclampsia, the effectiveness of risk prediction tools, and the benefits and harms of treatment of screen-detected preeclampsia. Findings Given the evidence that treatment can reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, and the well-established accuracy of blood pressure measurements, the USPSTF found adequate evidence that screening for preeclampsia results in a substantial benefit for the mother and infant. In addition, there is adequate evidence to bound the harms of screening for and treatment of preeclampsia as no greater than small. Therefore, the USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that there is a substantial net benefit of screening for preeclampsia in pregnant women. Conclusions and Recommendation The USPSTF recommends screening for preeclampsia in pregnant women with blood pressure measurements throughout pregnancy. (B recommendation)


JAMA | 2016

Screening for Syphilis Infection in Nonpregnant Adults and Adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C. Grossman; Susan J. Curry; Karina W. Davidson; John W. Epling; Francisco Garcia; Matthew W. Gillman; Diane M. Harper; Alex R. Kemper; Alex H. Krist; Ann E. Kurth; C. Seth Landefeld; Carol M. Mangione; William R. Phillips; Maureen G. Phipps; Michael Pignone

IMPORTANCE In 2014, 19,999 cases of syphilis were reported in the United States. Left untreated, syphilis can progress to late-stage disease in about 15% of persons who are infected. Late-stage syphilis can lead to development of inflammatory lesions throughout the body, which can lead to cardiovascular or organ dysfunction. Syphilis infection also increases the risk for acquiring or transmitting HIV infection. OBJECTIVE To update the 2004 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for syphilis infection in nonpregnant adults. Screening for syphilis in pregnant women was updated in a separate recommendation statement in 2009 (A recommendation). EVIDENCE REVIEW The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on screening for syphilis infection in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adults and adolescents, including patients coinfected with other sexually transmitted infections (such as HIV). FINDINGS The USPSTF found convincing evidence that screening for syphilis infection in asymptomatic, nonpregnant persons at increased risk for infection provides substantial benefit. Accurate screening tests are available to identify syphilis infection in populations at increased risk. Effective treatment with antibiotics can prevent progression to late-stage disease, with small associated harms, providing an overall substantial health benefit. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The USPSTF recommends screening for syphilis infection in persons who are at increased risk for infection. (A recommendation).

Collaboration


Dive into the John W. Epling's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alex H. Krist

Virginia Commonwealth University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Seth Landefeld

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge