John W. Foster

Escherichia coli acid resistance: tales of an amateur acidophile

Gastrointestinal pathogens are faced with an extremely acidic environment. Within moments, a pathogen such as Escherichia coli O157:H7 can move from the nurturing pH 7 environment of a hamburger to the harsh pH 2 milieu of the stomach. Surprisingly, certain microorganisms that grow at neutral pH have elegantly regulated systems that enable survival during excursions into acidic environments. The best-characterized acid-resistance system is found in E. coli.

DksA: A Critical Component of the Transcription Initiation Machinery that Potentiates the Regulation of rRNA Promoters by ppGpp and the Initiating NTP

Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) transcription is regulated primarily at the level of initiation from rRNA promoters. The unusual kinetic properties of these promoters result in their specific regulation by two small molecule signals, ppGpp and the initiating NTP, that bind to RNA polymerase (RNAP) at all promoters. We show here that DksA, a protein previously unsuspected as a transcription factor, is absolutely required for rRNA regulation. In deltadksA mutants, rRNA promoters are unresponsive to changes in amino acid availability, growth rate, or growth phase. In vitro, DksA binds to RNAP, reduces open complex lifetime, inhibits rRNA promoter activity, and amplifies effects of ppGpp and the initiating NTP on rRNA transcription, explaining the dksA requirement in vivo. These results expand our molecular understanding of rRNA transcription regulation, may explain previously described pleiotropic effects of dksA, and illustrate how transcription factors that do not bind DNA can nevertheless potentiate RNAP for regulation.

The stationary-phase sigma factor sigma S (RpoS) is required for a sustained acid tolerance response in virulent Salmonella typhimurium.

The acid tolerance response (ATR) of log‐phase Salmonella typhimurium is induced by acid exposures below pH 4.5 and will protect cells against more extreme acid. Two systems are evident: a transiently induced system dependent on the iron regulator Fur that provides a moderate degree of acid tolerance and a more effective sustained ATR that requires the alternate sigma factor σS encoded by rpoS. Differences between the acid responses of virulent S. typhimurium and the attenuated laboratory strain LT2 were attributed to disparate levels of RpoS caused by different translational starts. The sustained ATR includes seven newly identified acid shock proteins (ASPs) that are dependent upon σS for their synthesis. It is predicted that one or more of these ASPs is essential for the sustained system. The sustained ATR also provided cross‐protection to a variety of other environmental stresses (heat, H2O2 and osmolarity); however, adaptation to the other stresses did not provide significant acid tolerance. Therefore, in addition to starvation, acid shock serves as an important signal for inducing general stress resistance. Consistent with this model, σS proved to be induced by acid shock. Our results also revealed a connection between the transient and sustained ATR systems. Mutations in the regulator atbR are known to cause the overproduction of ten proteins, of which one or more can suppress the acid tolerance defect of an rpoS mutant. One member of the AtbR regulon, designated atrB, was found to be co‐regulated by σS and AtbR. Both regulators had a negative effect on atrB expression. The results suggest AtrB serves as a link between the sustained and transient ATR systems. When σS concentration are low, a compensatory increase in AtrB is required to engage the transiently induced, RpoS‐independent system of acid tolerance. Results also suggest different acid‐sensitive targets occur in log‐phase versus stationary‐phase cells.

Escherichia coli Glutamate- and Arginine-Dependent Acid Resistance Systems Increase Internal pH and Reverse Transmembrane Potential

Due to the acidic nature of the stomach, enteric organisms must withstand extreme acid stress for colonization and pathogenesis. Escherichia coli contains several acid resistance systems that protect cells to pH 2. One acid resistance system, acid resistance system 2 (AR2), requires extracellular glutamate, while another (AR3) requires extracellular arginine. Little is known about how these systems protect cells from acid stress. AR2 and AR3 are thought to consume intracellular protons through amino acid decarboxylation. Antiport mechanisms then exchange decarboxylation products for new amino acid substrates. This form of proton consumption could maintain an internal pH (pHi) conducive to cell survival. The model was tested by estimating the pHi and transmembrane potential (DeltaPsi) of cells acid stressed at pH 2.5. During acid challenge, glutamate- and arginine-dependent systems elevated pHi from 3.6 to 4.2 and 4.7, respectively. However, when pHi was manipulated to 4.0 in the presence or absence of glutamate, only cultures challenged in the presence of glutamate survived, indicating that a physiological parameter aside from pHi was also important. Measurements of DeltaPsi indicated that amino acid-dependent acid resistance systems help convert membrane potential from an inside negative to inside positive charge, an established acidophile strategy used to survive extreme acidic environments. Thus, reversing DeltaPsi may be a more important acid resistance strategy than maintaining a specific pHi value.

Breaking through the acid barrier: an orchestrated response to proton stress by enteric bacteria.

The ability of enteropathogens such as Salmonella and Escherichia coli to adapt and survive acid stress is fundamental to their pathogenesis. Once inside the host, these organisms encounter life-threatening levels of inorganic acid (H+) in the stomach and a combination of inorganic and organic acids (volatile fatty acids) in the small intestine. To combat these stresses, enteric bacteria have evolved elegant, overlapping strategies that involve both constitutive and inducible defense systems. This article reviews the recent progress made in understanding the pH 3 acid tolerance systems of Salmonella and the even more effective pH 2 acid resistance systems of E. coli. Focus is placed on how Salmonella orchestrates acid tolerance by modulating the activities or levels of diverse regulatory proteins in response to pH stress. The result is induction of overlapping arrays of acid shock proteins that protect the cell against acid and other environmental stresses. Most notable among these pH-response regulators are RpoS, Fur, PhoP and OmpR. In addition, we will review three dedicated acid resistance systems of E. coli, not present in Salmonella, that allow this organism to survive extreme (pH 2) acid challenge.

Low pH Adaptation and the Acid Tolerance Response of Salmonella typhimurium

Salmonella typhimurium periodically confronts acid environments during its life. These situations arise in chemically compromised ponds, soil, degradative cellular organelles, host digestive systems, and may even result from byproducts of their own metabolism. The levels of acid that are encountered range from mild to extreme. As a neutralophile, S. typhimurium prefers to grown in pH environments above pH 5.5. They can survive down to pH 4 for extended periods of time. However, the limits of endurance can be stretched if the organisms are first adapted to a moderate acid pH before exposing them to acidity below pH 4.0. This adaptation, called the acid-tolerance response (ATR), includes several log phase and stationary phase systems. Some of these systems are dependent on an alternate sigma factor for RNA polymerase called sigma s, whereas other systems are sigma s-independent. A key to the ATR is the synthesis of a series of acid shock inducible proteins (ASPs), 51 for log phase ATR and 15 for stationary phase ATR. Some of these ASPs require sigma s for their synthesis; others require the participation of the ferric uptake regulator protein Fur. Effective acid tolerance involves RecA-independent DNA repair systems, iron, and facets of fatty acid metabolism. Aspects of medium composition and carbon metabolism are also known to influence the nature of acid tolerance in this organism. In addition to aiding survival in the natural non-host environment, aspects of acid tolerance are also tied to virulence, as evidenced by the involvement of the mouse virulence locus mviA and the fact that acid-sensitive strains of S. typhimurium exhibit reduced virulence. This review summarizes these aspects of acid adaptation and includes a discussion of acid-regulated gene expression.

When protons attack: microbial strategies of acid adaptation.

Inducible tolerance to acidic and alkaline environments is recognized as an important survival strategy for many prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms. Recent developments in understanding this phenomenon include the identification of regulatory genes, specific tolerance mechanisms and genes associated with tolerance. In addition, there is significant evidence linking pH responses with virulence.

Internal pH crisis, lysine decarboxylase and the acid tolerance response of Salmonella typhimurium.

Salmonella typhimurium possesses an adaptive response to acid that increases survival during exposure to extremely low pH values. The acid tolerance response (ATR) includes both log‐phase and stationary‐phase systems. The log‐phase ATR appears to require two components for maximum acid tolerance, namely an inducible pH homeostasis system, and a series of acid‐shock proteins. We have discovered one of what appears to be a series of inducible exigency pH homeostasis systems that contribute to acid tolerance in extreme acid environments. The low pH‐inducible lysine decarboxylase was shown to contribute significantly to pH homeostasis in environments as low as pH 3.0. Under the conditions tested, both lysine decarboxylase and σs‐dependent acid‐shock proteins were required for acid tolerance but only lysine decarboxylase contributed to pH homeostasis. The cadBA operon encoding lysine decarboxylase and a lysine/cadaverine antiporter were cloned from S. typhimurium and were found to be 79% homologous to the cadBA operon from Escherichia coli. The results suggest that S. typhimurium has a variety of means of fulfilling the pH homeostasis requirement of the ATR in the form of inducible amino acid decarboxylases.

GadE (YhiE) activates glutamate decarboxylase‐dependent acid resistance in Escherichia coli K‐12

Commensal and pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli possess three inducible acid resistance systems that collaboratively protect cells against acid stress to pH 2 or below. The most effective system requires glutamate in the acid challenge media and relies on two glutamate decarboxylases (GadA and B) combined with a putative glutamate:γ‐aminobutyric acid antiporter (GadC). A complex network of regulators mediates induction of this system in response to various media, pH and growth phase signals. We report that the LuxR‐like regulator GadE (formerly YhiE) is required for expression of gadA and gadBC regardless of media or growth conditions. This protein binds directly to the 20 bp GAD box sequence found in the control regions of both loci. Two previously identified AraC‐like regulators, GadX and GadW, are only needed for gadA/BC expression under some circumstances. Overexpression of GadX or GadW will not overcome a need for GadE. However, overexpression of GadE can supplant a requirement for GadX and W. Data provided also indicate that GadX and GadE can simultaneously bind the area around the GAD box region and probably form a complex. The gadA, gadBC and gadE genes are all induced by low pH in exponential phase cells grown in minimal glucose media. The acid induction of gadA/BC results primarily from the acid induction of gadE. Constitutive expression of GadE removes most pH control over the glutamate decarboxylase and antiporter genes. The small amount of remaining pH control is governed by GadX and W. The finding that gadE mutations also diminish the effectiveness of the other two acid resistance systems suggests that GadE influences the expression of additional acid resistance components. The number of regulatory proteins (five), sigma factors (two) and regulatory feedback loops focused on gadA/BC expression make this one of the most intensively regulated systems in E. coli.

Characterization of the micro‐environment of Salmonella typhimurium–containing vacuoles within MDCK epithelial cells

Salmonella typhimurium has the capacity to enter into and multiply within epithelial cells. During the entire intracellular stage, bacteria are enclosed within a vacuole. To characterize the micro–environment of the bacteria–containing vacuoles, we have used a new method to measure the expression levels of several S. typhimurium genes in intracellular bacteria within Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cells. Our study was based on the determination of ß–galactosidase activity derived from lacZ transcriptional fusions using the highly sensitive substrate fluorescein–di–ß–D–galactoside (FDG). Expression of the iroA and mgtB genes (induced by Fe2+ and Mg2+ limitation respectively), and cadA (induced by pH 6.0 in the presence of lysine, with enhanced expression under anaerobiosis) were characterized at different post–infection times. High intracellular expression levels were detected for the iroA and mgtB genes, suggesting that the concentrations of free Fe2+ and Mg2+ in the vacuole may be low. cadA actitvity was detected only at early post–infection times (4 h), suggesting that the vacuole may have a mild–acidic pH, and oxygen and lysine present at this time. Globally, the results reported indicate that the use of a highly sensitive ß–galactosidase substrate can provide information about the micro–enviroment within which an intracellular pathogen, such as S. typhimurium, resides.