John W. Phillips

Cell electroporation is a highly efficient method for introducing restriction endonucleases into cells

Restriction endonucleases that make either blunt- or cohesive-end DNA double-strand breaks can induce chromosome aberrations. We have used cell electroporation with great success to permeabilize Chinese hamster ovary cells for the introduction of restriction enzymes. The introduction of restriction enzymes by this method resulted in extremely high frequencies (greater than 90%) of aberrant metaphase cells and also a dramatic decrease in cell survival, as measured by subsequent colony formation. Cell electroporation by itself caused no increase in aberrant chromosomes and had only a slight effect on cell survival.

Modulation of Restriction Enzyme-Induced Damage by Chemicals That Interfere with Cellular Responses to DNA Damage: A Cytogenetic and Pulsed-Field Gel Analysis

The electroporation of restriction enzymes into mammalian cells results in DNA double-strand breaks that can lead to chromosome aberrations. Four chemicals known to interfere with cellular responses to DNA damage were investigated for their effects on chromosome aberrations induced by AluI and Sau3AI; in addition, the number of DNA double-strand breaks at various times after enzyme treatment was determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor 3-aminobenzamide (3AB) dramatically increased the yield of exchanges and deletions and caused a small but transitory increase in the yield of double-strand breaks induced by the enzymes. 1-beta-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine, which can inhibit DNA repair either by direct action on DNA polymerases alpha and delta or by incorporation into DNA, potentiated aberration induction but to a lesser extent than 3AB and did not affect the amount of DNA double-strand breakage. Aphidicolin, which inhibits polymerases alpha and delta, had no effect on AluI-induced aberrations but did increase the aberration yield induced by Sau3AI. The postreplication repair inhibitor caffeine had no effect on aberration yields induced by either enzyme. Neither aphidicolin nor caffeine modulated the amount of DNA double-strand breakage as measured by PFGE. These data implicate poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and polymerases alpha and delta as important components of the cellular processes required for the normal repair of DNA double-strand breaks with blunt or cohesive ends. Comparison of these data with the effect of inhibitors on the frequency of X-ray-induced aberrations leads us to the conclusion that X-ray-induced aberrations can result from the misjoining or nonrejoining of double-strand breaks, particularly breaks with cohesive ends, but that this process accounts for only a portion of the induced aberrations.

Restriction endonucleases do not induce sister-chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster ovary cells

Bacterial restriction enzymes offer the unique opportunity to determine the biological and cytogenetic consequences of DNA double-strand breakage. To examine the role of various types of breaks in sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) formation, we used restriction enzymes with different recognition sequences and different cutting frequencies to generate DNA double-strand breaks in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The restriction enzymes were introduced by electroporation into exponentially growing cells during the second replication cycle in bromodeoxyuridine, and SCEs were analyzed at mitosis. Contrary to results reported by others, we found no increase in SCE frequency in cells exposed to restriction enzymes despite the presence of numerous cells with chromatid aberrations. These data suggest that DNA double-strand breaks do not lead to SCE formation.

Chromosomal Aberration Induction in CHO Cells by Combined Exposure to Restriction Enzymes and X-rays

The potential interaction between restriction enzyme-induced double-strand breaks (dsb) and X-ray-induced lesions in the formation of chromosomal aberrations was investigated in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Either Alu I, which induces blunt-end dsb, or Sau 3AI, which induces cohesive-end dsb, was electroporated into cells, which were irradiated with 2 Gy of X-rays immediately or 15, 30, 60, 120, or 180 min after electroporation. A significant increase in Alu I-induced chromosomal aberrations was observed when cells were irradiated with 0, 15, 30, or 60 min after enzyme exposure, but only additive effects were found when cells were irradiated 120 or 180 min after enzyme exposure. In one of three experiments, cells exposed to Sau 3AI showed a large increase in aberrations when X-irradiated 0 or 15 min after Sau 3AI exposure, and no increase at any time-points thereafter. These results indicate that restriction enzyme-induced dsb can interact with X-ray-induced lesions, resulting in a synergistic increase in chromosomal aberration formation. Furthermore, this interaction depends on both the type of dsb and the time between enzyme and X-ray exposure.

Chromosome aberration induction in Chinese hamster ovary cells by restriction enzymes with different methylation sensitivity

The isoschizomer pair MspI and HpaII were used to investigate whether the putative specificity of restriction endonucleases would be maintained when they were introduced into mammalian cells. Although both enzymes recognize the sequence CCGG, HpaII will cut only if the internal cytosine is unmethylated, whereas MspI will cut regardless of the methylation status. Cleavage results in a cohesive-end DNA double-strand break, which can lead to the formation of chromosome aberrations. Since mammalian DNA is heavily methylated, one would expect MspI to be much more effective than HpaII at inducing chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells. In fact, during G1, MspI induced a >90-fold higher number of aberrations than did HpaII. Cell cycle studies indicated that during early S there was a 30-fold increase in HpaII-induced aberrations. This increase may be due to increased accessibility of replicating hypomethylated DNA. Cells that were treated with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (AzdC) displayed only a moderate increase in HpaII-induced aberrations during G1. This observation, together with the results of restriction enzyme analysis of genomic DNA, indicated that demethylation was incomplete. The effects of AzdC on the induction of aberrations by MspI suggested that AzdC increases chromatin accessibility. Our results were consistent with the expected specificity of MspI and HpaII. Thus, it appears that restriction endonucleases can play a useful role in determining the biological consequences of DNA double-strand breaks.