Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where John Yarnold is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by John Yarnold.


Lancet Oncology | 2008

The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial

Rajiv Agrawal; E. G. A. Aird; Jane Barrett; Peter Barrett-Lee; Søren M. Bentzen; Judith M. Bliss; Janet E. Brown; John Dewar; H. J. Dobbs; Joanne Haviland; P.J. Hoskin; Penelope Hopwood; Pat A Lawton; Brian J Magee; J. Mills; D. Morgan; Julie Owen; Sandra Simmons; Georges Sumo; Mark Sydenham; Karen Venables; John Yarnold

Summary Background The international standard radiotherapy schedule for breast cancer treatment delivers a high total dose in 25 small daily doses (fractions). However, a lower total dose delivered in fewer, larger fractions (hypofractionation) is hypothesised to be at least as safe and effective as the standard treatment. We tested two dose levels of a 13-fraction schedule against the standard regimen with the aim of measuring the sensitivity of normal and malignant tissues to fraction size. Methods Between 1998 and 2002, 2236 women with early breast cancer (pT1-3a pN0-1 M0) at 17 centres in the UK were randomly assigned after primary surgery to receive 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2·0 Gy versus 41·6 Gy or 39 Gy in 13 fractions of 3·2 Gy or 3·0 Gy over 5 weeks. Women were eligible if they were aged over 18 years, did not have an immediate surgical reconstruction, and were available for follow-up. Randomisation method was computer generated and was not blinded. The protocol-specified principal endpoints were local-regional tumour relapse, defined as reappearance of cancer at irradiated sites, late normal tissue effects, and quality of life. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN59368779. Findings 749 women were assigned to the 50 Gy group, 750 to the 41·6 Gy group, and 737 to the 39 Gy group. After a median follow up of 5·1 years (IQR 4·4–6·0) the rate of local-regional tumour relapse at 5 years was 3·6% (95% CI 2·2–5·1) after 50 Gy, 3·5% (95% CI 2·1–4·3) after 41·6 Gy, and 5·2% (95% CI 3·5–6·9) after 39 Gy. The estimated absolute differences in 5-year local-regional relapse rates compared with 50 Gy were 0·2% (95% CI −1·3% to 2·6%) after 41·6 Gy and 0·9% (95% CI −0·8% to 3·7%) after 39 Gy. Photographic and patient self-assessments suggested lower rates of late adverse effects after 39 Gy than with 50 Gy, with an HR for late change in breast appearance (photographic) of 0·69 (95% CI 0·52–0·91, p=0·01). From a planned meta-analysis with the pilot trial, the adjusted estimates of α/β value for tumour control was 4·6 Gy (95% CI 1·1–8·1) and for late change in breast appearance (photographic) was 3·4 Gy (95% CI 2·3–4·5). Interpretation The data are consistent with the hypothesis that breast cancer and the dose-limiting normal tissues respond similarly to change in radiotherapy fraction size. 41·6 Gy in 13 fractions was similar to the control regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractions in terms of local-regional tumour control and late normal tissue effects, a result consistent with the result of START Trial B. A lower total dose in a smaller number of fractions could offer similar rates of tumour control and normal tissue damage as the international standard fractionation schedule of 50 Gy in 25 fractions.


The Lancet | 1999

Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial

David P. Dearnaley; Vincent Khoo; Andrew R. Norman; Lesley Meyer; Alan E. Nahum; D. Tait; John Yarnold; A. Horwich

BACKGROUND Radical radiotherapy is commonly used to treat localised prostate cancer. Late chronic side-effects limit the dose that can be given, and may be linked to the volume of normal tissues irradiated. Conformal radiotherapy allows a smaller amount of rectum and bladder to be treated, by shaping the high-dose volume to the prostate. We assessed the ability of this new technology to lessen the risk of radiation-related effects in a randomised controlled trial of conformal versus conventional radiotherapy. METHODS We recruited men with prostate cancer for treatment with a standard dose of 64 Gy in daily 2 Gy fractions. The men were randomly assigned conformal or conventional radiotherapy treatment. The primary endpoint was the development of late radiation complications (> 3 months after treatment) measured with the Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group (RTOG) score. Indicators of disease (cancer) control were also recorded. FINDINGS In the 225 men treated, significantly fewer men developed radiation-induced proctitis and bleeding in the conformal group than in the conventional group (37 vs 56% > or = RTOG grade 1, p=0.004; 5 vs 15% > or = RTOG grade 2, p=0.01). There were no differences between groups in bladder function after treatment (53 vs 59% > or = grade 1, p=0.34; 20 vs 23% > or = grade 2, p=0.61). After median follow-up of 3.6 years there was no significant difference between groups in local tumour control (conformal 78% [95% CI 66-86], conventional 83% [69-90]). INTERPRETATION Conformal techniques significantly lowered the risk of late radiation-induced proctitis after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Widespread introduction of these radiotherapy treatment methods is appropriate. Our results are the basis for dose-escalation studies to improve local tumour control.


Lancet Oncology | 2013

The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of two randomised controlled trials

Joanne Haviland; J Roger Owen; John Dewar; Rajiv Agrawal; Jane Barrett; Peter Barrett-Lee; H Jane Dobbs; Penelope Hopwood; Pat A Lawton; Brian J Magee; J. Mills; Sandra Simmons; Mark Sydenham; Karen Venables; Judith M. Bliss; John Yarnold

BACKGROUND 5-year results of the UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials suggested that lower total doses of radiotherapy delivered in fewer, larger doses (fractions) are at least as safe and effective as the historical standard regimen (50 Gy in 25 fractions) for women after primary surgery for early breast cancer. In this prespecified analysis, we report the 10-year follow-up of the START trials testing 13 fraction and 15 fraction regimens. METHODS From 1999 to 2002, women with completely excised invasive breast cancer (pT1-3a, pN0-1, M0) were enrolled from 35 UK radiotherapy centres. Patients were randomly assigned to a treatment regimen after primary surgery followed by chemotherapy and endocrine treatment (where prescribed). Randomisation was computer-generated and stratified by centre, type of primary surgery (breast-conservation surgery or mastectomy), and tumour bed boost radiotherapy. In START-A, a regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks was compared with 41·6 Gy or 39 Gy in 13 fractions over 5 weeks. In START-B, a regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks was compared with 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks. Eligibility criteria included age older than 18 years and no immediate surgical reconstruction. Primary endpoints were local-regional tumour relapse and late normal tissue effects. Analysis was by intention to treat. Follow-up data are still being collected. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN59368779. FINDINGS START-A enrolled 2236 women. Median follow-up was 9·3 years (IQR 8·0-10·0), after which 139 local-regional relapses had occurred. 10-year rates of local-regional relapse did not differ significantly between the 41·6 Gy and 50 Gy regimen groups (6·3%, 95% CI 4·7-8·5 vs 7·4%, 5·5-10·0; hazard ratio [HR] 0·91, 95% CI 0·59-1·38; p=0·65) or the 39 Gy (8·8%, 95% CI 6·7-11·4) and 50 Gy regimen groups (HR 1·18, 95% CI 0·79-1·76; p=0·41). In START-A, moderate or marked breast induration, telangiectasia, and breast oedema were significantly less common normal tissue effects in the 39 Gy group than in the 50 Gy group. Normal tissue effects did not differ significantly between 41·6 Gy and 50 Gy groups. START-B enrolled 2215 women. Median follow-up was 9·9 years (IQR 7·5-10·1), after which 95 local-regional relapses had occurred. The proportion of patients with local-regional relapse at 10 years did not differ significantly between the 40 Gy group (4·3%, 95% CI 3·2-5·9) and the 50 Gy group (5·5%, 95% CI 4·2-7·2; HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·51-1·16; p=0·21). In START-B, breast shrinkage, telangiectasia, and breast oedema were significantly less common normal tissue effects in the 40 Gy group than in the 50 Gy group. INTERPRETATION Long-term follow-up confirms that appropriately dosed hypofractionated radiotherapy is safe and effective for patients with early breast cancer. The results support the continued use of 40 Gy in 15 fractions, which has already been adopted by most UK centres as the standard of care for women requiring adjuvant radiotherapy for invasive early breast cancer. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council, UK Department of Health.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 1986

Prospective randomised trial of single and multifraction radiotherapy schedules in the treatment of painful bony metastases

P. Price; P.J. Hoskin; D. Easton; D. Austin; S. Palmer; John Yarnold

A prospective randomised trial comparing a single fraction of 8 Gy with 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions for the relief of metastatic bone pain was performed. In 28 months, 288 patients were randomised. Pain was assessed using a questionnaire completed by the patient at home on a daily basis. No difference was found in the speed of onset or duration of pain relief between the two treatment regimes, and pain relief was independent of the histology of the primary tumour.


Lancet Oncology | 2006

Effect of radiotherapy fraction size on tumour control in patients with early-stage breast cancer after local tumour excision: long-term results of a randomised trial

J Roger Owen; Anita Ashton; Judith M. Bliss; Janis Homewood; Caroline Harper; Jane Hanson; Joanne Haviland; Søren M. Bentzen; John Yarnold

BACKGROUND Standard curative schedules of radiotherapy to the breast deliver 25 fractions of 2.0 Gy over 5 weeks. In a randomised trial, we tested whether fewer, larger fractions were at least as safe and as effective as standard regimens. In this analysis, we assessed the long-term results of tumour control in the same population. METHODS In 1986-98, we randomly assigned 1410 women with invasive breast cancer (tumour stage 1-3 with a maximum of one positive node and no metastasis) who had had local tumour excision of early stage breast cancer to receive 50 Gy radiotherapy given in 25 fractions, 39 Gy given in 13 fractions, or 42.9 Gy given in 13 fractions, all given over 5 weeks. The primary endpoint was late change in breast appearance, which has been reported elsewhere. Here, we report ipsilateral tumour relapse, one of the secondary endpoints. Relapse was defined as any appearance of cancer in the irradiated breast. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS After a median follow-up of 9.7 years (IQR 7.8-11.8) for the 838 (95%) patients who survived, the risk of ipsilateral tumour relapse after 10 years was 12.1% (95% CI 8.8-15.5) in the 50 Gy group, 14.8% (11.2-18.3) in the 39 Gy group, and 9.6% (6.7-12.6) in the 42.9 Gy group (difference between 39 Gy and 42.9 Gy groups, chi2 test, p=0.027). The sensitivity of breast cancer to dose per fraction was estimated to be 4.0 Gy (95% CI 1.0-7.8), similar to that estimated for the late adverse effects in healthy tissue from breast radiotherapy. INTERPRETATION Breast cancer tissue is probably just as sensitive to fraction size as dose-limiting healthy tissues. If this finding is confirmed, radiotherapy schedules can be greatly simplified by the delivery of fewer, larger fractions without compromising effectiveness or safety, and possibly improving both.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2010

Pathogenetic mechanisms in radiation fibrosis.

John Yarnold; Marie-Catherine Vozenin Brotons

Deregulation of normal regenerative responses to physical, chemical and biological toxins in susceptible individuals leads to abnormal remodelling of extracellular matrix with pathological fibrosis. Processes deregulated after radiotherapy have much in common with processes associated with fibrotic diseases affecting the heart, skin, lungs, kidneys, gastro-intestinal tract and liver. Among the secreted factors driving fibrosis, transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1) produced by a wide range of inflammatory, mesenchymal and epithelial cells converts fibroblasts and other cell types into matrix-producing myofibroblasts. Even if required for the initiation of fibrosis, inflammation and the continued stimulus of TGFβ1 may not be needed to maintain it. After myofibroblast activation, collagen production can be perpetuated independently of TGFβ1 by autocrine induction of a cytokine called connective tissue growth factor. The role of inflammation, the origins and activation of myofibroblasts as biosynthetic cells and the downstream pathways of extracellular matrix synthesis in common fibrotic states are reviewed. Oxidative stress, hypoxia and microvascular damage are also considered, before examining the same processes in the context of radiotherapy. One of the main uncertainties is the relevance of very early events, including inflammatory responses in blood vessels, to fibrosis. Despite the power of animal models, including genetic systems, the potential contribution of research based on human tissue samples has never been greater. A closer interaction between scientists researching fibrosis and radiation oncologists holds enormous promise for therapeutic advances.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2013

aTTom: Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years in 6,953 women with early breast cancer.

R G Gray; Daniel Rea; K Handley; S. Bowden; P Perry; Helena Earl; Christopher J. Poole; T. Bates; S Chetiyawardana; John Dewar; Indrajit Fernando; R Grieve; J Nicoll; Z Rayter; Anne Robinson; A Salman; John Yarnold; S. Bathers; A Marshall; Mi Ri Lee; A C Grp

5 Background: In estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) early breast cancer, 5 years of tamoxifen reduces breast cancer death rates by about a third throughout years 0-14. It has been uncertain how 10 years of tamoxifen compares with this. METHODS During 1991-2005, 6,953 women with ER+ (n=2755), or ER untested (4198, estimated 80% ER+ if status known) invasive breast cancer from 176 UK centres were, after 5 years of tamoxifen, randomized to stop tamoxifen or continue to year 10. Annual follow-up recorded compliance, recurrence, mortality, and hospital admissions. RESULTS Allocation to continue tamoxifen reduced breast cancer recurrence (580/3468 vs 672/3485, p=0.003). This reduction was time dependent: rate ratio 0.99 during years 5-6 [95%CI 0.86-1.15], 0.84 [0.73-0.95] during years 7-9, and 0.75 [0.66-0.86] later. Longer treatment also reduced breast cancer mortality (392 vs 443 deaths after recurrence, p=0.05), rate ratio 1.03 [0.84-1.27] during years 5-9 and 0.77 [0.64-0.92] later; and overall mortality (849 vs 910 deaths, p=0.1), rate ratio 1.05 [0.90-1.22] during years 5-9 and 0.86 [0.75-0.97] later. Non-breast-cancer mortality was little affected (457 vs 467 deaths, rate ratio 0.94 [0.82-1.07]). There were 102 vs 45 endometrial cancers RR=2.20 (1.31-2.34, p<0.0001) with 37 (1.1%) vs 20 (0.6%) deaths (absolute hazard 0.5%, p=0.02). Combining the similar results of aTTom and its international counterpart ATLAS (Lancet 2013) enhances statistical significance of recurrence (p<0.0001), breast cancer mortality (p=0.002) and overall survival (p=0.005) benefits. CONCLUSIONS aTTom confirms that, in ER+ disease, continuing tamoxifen to year 10 rather than just to year 5 produces further reductions in recurrence, from year 7 onward, and breast cancer mortality after year 10. Taken together with the reduction in breast cancer deaths seen in trials of 5 years of tamoxifen vs none, these results indicate that 10 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, compared to no tamoxifen, reduces breast cancer mortality by about one third in the first 10 years following diagnosis and by a half subsequently. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION ISRCTN17222211.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 1992

A prospective randomised trial of 4 Gy or 8 Gy single doses in the treatment of metastatic bone pain

P.J. Hoskin; P. Price; D. Easton; J. Regan; D. Austin; S. Palmer; John Yarnold

270 patients with painful bone metastases requiring palliative radiotherapy were randomised to receive single fractions of 4 Gy or 8 Gy in a randomised trial. Pain scores and analgesic usage were recorded before treatment and at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Pain was assessed by patients on a 4 point graded scale using pain charts administered by a central trials office. Response was defined as an improved rating compared to the pretreatment value. Compliance with the pain chart was 72% at 4 weeks. At 4 weeks, the actual response rates were 69% for 8 Gy and 44% for 4 Gy (p less than 0.001), but there was no difference in complete response (no pain) rates at 4 weeks or duration of response between the two arms. It is concluded that 8 Gy gives a higher probability of pain relief than 4 Gy, but that 4 Gy can be an effective alternative in situations of reduced tolerance.


The Lancet | 2009

Sequential docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (TACT): an open-label, phase III, randomised controlled trial

Paul Ellis; Peter Barrett-Lee; L. Johnson; David A Cameron; Andrew M Wardley; Susan O'Reilly; Mark Verrill; Ian E. Smith; John Yarnold; Robert E. Coleman; Helena M. Earl; Peter Canney; Chris Twelves; Christopher Poole; David Bloomfield; Penelope Hopwood; Stephen Albert Johnston; M. Dowsett; John M.S. Bartlett; Ian O. Ellis; Clare Peckitt; Emma Hall; Judith M. Bliss

Summary Background Incorporation of a taxane as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer offers potential for further improvement of anthracycline-based treatment. The UK TACT study (CRUK01/001) investigated whether sequential docetaxel after anthracycline chemotherapy would improve patient outcome compared with standard chemotherapy of similar duration. Methods In this multicentre, open-label, phase III, randomised controlled trial, 4162 women (aged >18 years) with node-positive or high-risk node-negative operable early breast cancer were randomly assigned by computer-generated permuted block randomisation to receive FEC (fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 at 3-weekly intervals) for four cycles followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m2 at 3-weekly intervals) for four cycles (n=2073) or control (n=2089). For the control regimen, centres chose either FEC for eight cycles (n=1265) or epirubicin (100 mg/m2 at 3-weekly intervals) for four cycles followed by CMF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 at 4-weekly intervals) for four cycles (n=824). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT). This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN79718493. Findings All randomised patients were included in the ITT population. With a median follow-up of 62 months, disease-free survival events were seen in 517 of 2073 patients in the experimental group compared with 539 of 2089 controls (hazard ratio [HR] 0·95, 95% CI 0·85–1·08; p=0·44). 75·6% (95% CI 73·7–77·5) of patients in the experimental group and 74·3% (72·3–76·2) of controls were alive and disease-free at 5 years. The proportion of patients who reported any acute grade 3 or 4 adverse event was significantly greater in the experimental group than in the control group (p<0·0001); the most frequent events were neutropenia (937 events vs 797 events), leucopenia (507 vs 362), and lethargy (456 vs 272). Interpretation This study did not show any overall gain from the addition of docetaxel to standard anthracycline chemotherapy. Exploration of predictive biomarker-defined subgroups might have the potential to better target the use of taxane-based therapy. Funding Cancer Research UK (CRUK 01/001), Sanofi-Aventis, Pfizer, and Roche.


The Lancet | 1992

Prediction of normal-tissue tolerance to radiotherapy from in-vitro cellular radiation sensitivity.

N.G. Burnet; Reinhard Wurm; John Yarnold; John H. Peacock; J. Nyman; I. Turesson

The success of radiotherapy depends on the total radiation dose, which is limited by the tolerance of surrounding normal tissues. Since there is substantial variation among patients in normal-tissue radiosensitivity, we have tested the hypothesis that in-vitro cellular radiosensitivity is correlated with in-vitro normal-tissue responses. We exposed skin fibroblast cell lines from six radiation-treated patients to various doses of radiation and measured the proportions surviving. There was a strong relation between fibroblast sensitivity in vitro and normal-tissue reactions, especially acute effects. Assessment of radiosensitivity could lead to improved tumour cure rates by enabling radiation doses to be tailored to the individual.

Collaboration


Dive into the John Yarnold's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joanne Haviland

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Judith M. Bliss

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Donovan

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anna M. Kirby

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lone Gothard

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Navita Somaiah

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Penelope Hopwood

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Sydenham

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge