John Yates

Alendronate increases bone strength by increasing the mean degree of mineralization of bone tissue in osteoporotic women.

The mean degree of mineralization of bone (MDMB) was measured by quantitative microradiography on transiliac bone biopsies taken from 53 postmenopausal osteoporotic women who had been treated with alendronate (ALN; 10 mg/day) during 2 (9 patients) or 3 years (16 patients) or with placebo (PLA; 15 and 13 patients, respectively). In the same patients, bone mineral density (BMD) values were obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine and femoral neck at the beginning and end of treatment. Histomorphometric parameters and activation frequency of new remodeling units were also measured on the iliac biopsies. After 2 years of ALN, MDMB in compact bone was 9.3% (p = 0.0035) and in cancellous bone was 7.3% (p = 0.0009) higher, respectively, than PLA. After 3 years of ALN, MDMB in compact bone was 11.6% (p = 0.0002) and in cancellous bone was 11.4% (p = 0.0001) higher, respectively, than PLA. After 2 and 3 years of ALN, and compared with the corresponding PLA, the distribution of the degree of mineralization in compact and cancellous bone showed a clear shift toward the highest mineralization values and a decrease in the number of bone structure units having low values of mineralization. The between-group differences in MDMB were similar to those of BMD at the lumbar spine BMD (+8.7% after 2 years and +9.6% after 3 years, respectively), suggesting that MDMB augmentation probably accounted for the majority of the increase in BMD seen with ALN. The data support the hypothesis that the reduction in activation frequency caused by the antiresorptive effect of ALN is followed by a prolonged secondary mineralization that increases the percentage of bone structure units having reached a maximum degree of secondary mineralization and, through this mechanism, MDMB. That these effects contribute to improved bone strength is demonstrated by the reduction in fracture incidence previously demonstrated in these patients.

Alendronate increases degree and uniformity of mineralization in cancellous bone and decreases the porosity in cortical bone of osteoporotic women

The strength of bone is correlated with bone mass but is also influenced significantly by other factors such as structural properties of the matrix (e.g., collagen mutations) and the mineral. Changes at all levels of this organization could contribute to fracture risk. We investigated the effects of alendronate (Aln) treatment on the density of mineralization and the ultrastructure of the mineral/collagen composite, size and habitus of mineral particles in iliac cancellous bone, as well as on the porosity of iliac cortical bone from postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Twenty-four transiliac bone biopsies from Phase III Aln (10 mg/day) trials (placebo and Aln after 2 and 3 years of treatment, n = 6 per group) were studied. The mineral structure was investigated by quantitative backscattered electron imaging (qBEI) and by scanning small-angle X-ray scattering (scanning-SAXS). qBEI histograms reflect the bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD), whereas SAXS patterns characterize the size and arrangement of the mineral particles in bone. We found that: (i) the relative calcium content of osteoporotic bone was significantly lower than that of data-base controls; (ii) mineralization was significantly higher and more uniform after Aln treatment; (iii) size and habitus of the mineral particles was not different between placebo and Aln-treated groups; and (iv) the porosity of cortical bone was reduced significantly by Aln treatment. We conclude that Aln treatment increases the degree and uniformity of bone matrix mineralization without affecting the size and habitus of the mineral crystals. It also decreases the porosity of the corticalis. Together these effects may contribute to the observed reduction in fractures.

Predicting vertebral deformity using bone densitometry at various skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound

We investigated the usefulness of bone density measurements from multiple skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound for evaluating the probability of vertebral deformation. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the second metacarpal and middle phalanges using radiographic absorptiometry of hand radiographs, and at the lumbar spine using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Distal radius and proximal radius were measured using single-energy x-ray absorptiometry (SXA), expressed as bone mineral content (BMC, grams per centimeter), and as BMD (grams per square centimeter). The calcaneus was measured using both SXA (BMD) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA). Among the women in this study (mean age 74, SD = 5), 84 women developed new vertebral deformations (57 cases with one and 27 cases with two or more deformations), which were identified on serial radiographs during an average of 9 years prior to the measurements of bone density. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios for risk of deformation corresponding to a 1-SD difference in density or ultrasound, adjusted for age. All bone measurements were significantly associated with vertebral deformation, with odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) ranging from 1.40 (1.10, 1.78) for proximal radius BMD to 1.88 (1.45, 2.44) for calcaneus BMD measurements. Measurements of calcaneal BUA, calcaneal BMD, and hand BMD generally remained significant when included simultaneously with another measurement in the same model, suggesting that spine or radius BMD may not provide much additional information about risk of deformation. It appears that all of the measurements of bone density and ultrasound provide useful information regarding the probability of deformation. These findings await confirmation in a prospective study.

Weekly administration of alendronate: Rationale and plan for clinical assessment

OBJECTIVE This paper describes the rationale and supporting data for once-weekly dosing of alendronate. BACKGROUND Alendronate sodium, a bisphosphonate that potently inhibits bone resorption, has been shown to increase bone mass and substantially reduce the incidence of osteoporotic fractures, including fractures of the hip. The standard regimen of daily administration has generally been well tolerated. However, weekly administration may provide greater convenience to patients without compromising efficacy or tolerability. The pharmacokinetics of alendronate and bone remodeling theory predict similar efficacy for weekly and daily administration if the cumulative dose is the same. Bone resorption in individual remodeling units normally proceeds for approximately 2 weeks; alendronate inhibits the rate and extent of resorption. Because the half-life of residence on bone surfaces is several weeks, weekly administration of alendronate should inhibit bone resorption to an overall extent similar to that of daily dosing, thereby producing similar effects on bone mass and strength. Animal studies demonstrate that both weekly and daily parenteral administration of alendronate effectively increase bone mass and strength, but confirmation of efficacy is needed for weekly oral dosing in humans. Although daily bisphosphonates (alendronate and risedronate) elicited esophageal irritation in a canine model of gastroesophageal reflux, weekly dosing with alendronate at a higher unit dose did not. Thus, the lower frequency of weekly dosing with a higher unit dose may actually reduce the risk of upper gastrointestinal irritation compared with daily administration of a lower dose. CONCLUSIONS Current safety and efficacy data justify further investigation of once-weekly dosing of alendronate. Two positive-control, double-blind, randomized trials of osteoporosis treatment and prevention are currently being performed to assess the comparability of weekly, biweekly, and daily dosing of alendronate with regard to effects on bone density, safety, and tolerability.

Tolerability of Once-Weekly Alendronate in Patients With Osteoporosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE To compare the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract tolerability of once-weekly oral alendronate, 70 mg, and placebo. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a 12-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The first patient initiated treatment on June 5, 2000, and the last patient completed treatment on March 1, 2001. The study enrolled 450 postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis (224 took alendronate, 226 took placebo) who were ambulatory and community dwelling at 48 outpatient study centers in the United States. By design, approximately half of the patients were naive to bisphosphonates. The primary end point was upper GI tract tolerability based on the incidence of any upper GI tract adverse events. Secondary end points included the number of discontinuations due to drug-related upper GI tract adverse events and the change from baseline in bone resorption, assessed by the urinary N-telopeptide-creatinine ratio at 12 weeks. A subgroup analysis of the primary and secondary end points was performed on the patients stratified by prior bisphosphonate use. The safety and tolerability of the weekly alendronate and placebo regimens were captured as clinical and laboratory adverse events. RESULTS A total of 11% of the alendronate patients and 13% of the placebo patients reported an upper GI tract adverse event. Discontinuations due to drug-related upper GI tract adverse events occurred in 3% of alendronate patients and 1% of placebo patients. The differences between the treatment groups for the primary and secondary end points were not significant. For the primary end point, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the difference was well within the prespecified 14% comparability bound (-2.2%; 95% confidence interval, -8.3% to 3.9%). The overall incidence of upper GI tract adverse events was lower in the subgroup of patients with prior bisphosphonate exposure (8%) than in those who were bisphosphonate naive (16%). However, regardless of prior bisphosphonate exposure, the incidence of upper GI tract adverse events was similar between the alendronate and placebo patients. The urinary N-telopeptide-creatinine ratio showed a significant decrease in the alendronate patients (72% of baseline, P<.001) compared with a slight increase in the placebo patients (106% of baseline) at week 12. CONCLUSION In this 3-month study, the incidence of upper GI tract adverse events in patients treated with once-weekly alendronate, 70 mg, was comparable to that with placebo.

Rechallenge of patients who had discontinued alendronate therapy because of upper gastrointestinal symptoms

BACKGROUND There have been reports from physicians in clinical practice that up to 30% of patients taking bisphosphonate therapy develop upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms, many or most of which they assume to be related to the drug. However, in several large placebo-controlled clinical trials of bisphosphonates, the incidence of UGI symptoms has been > or =30%, even among patients receiving placebo, perhaps reflecting a high background incidence of UGI events in osteoporotic patients. OBJECTIVE To assess the relationship between alendronate treatment and UGI complaints in patients who had discontinued treatment with alendronate in clinical practice because of UGI symptoms, we compared the incidence of such events on rechallenge with alendronate or placebo. METHODS This was a multicenter, double-blind trial in which postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who had previously discontinued alendronate therapy because of a UGI adverse experience were randomized to daily treatment with either alendronate 10 mg or matching placebo (1:1 ratio) for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the cumulative incidence of discontinuations due to any UGI adverse experience. Secondary end points were the incidence of any clinical adverse experiences and the percentage change from baseline in urinary N-telopeptide adjusted for urinary creatinine at week 8. RESULTS A total of 172 women were included in the study. They were a mean of 20.9 years past menopause, ranging in age from 41 to 90 years (mean, 67.0 years); 90.7% were white. On rechallenge, 14.8% (13/88) of patients in the alendronate group and 16.7% (14/84) in the placebo group discontinued treatment because of UGI adverse experiences. CONCLUSION The results of this study suggest that many UGI adverse experiences reported during therapy with alendronate may reflect a high background incidence of UGI complaints and an increased sensitivity to detection of such complaints, rather than a causal relationship to therapy.

Relation Between Body Composition and Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover Among Early Postmenopausal Women

We studied the associations between body composition and biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption among 1600 postmenopausal women, ages 45-59. Multiple regression analyses were performed to examine the independent associations of fat mass, muscle strength (quadriceps strength), height, and whole body bone mineral content (BMC) with biochemical markers of bone formation (serum osteocalcin) and resorption (urinary type I collagen crosslinked N-telopeptides [NTX]). Per interquartile range (IQR) (the difference between 75th and 25th percentiles) increase in fat mass and whole body BMC, the mean levels of osteocalcin decreased by 3% and 13%, respectively; NTX decreased by 5 and 21%. Fat mass and whole-body BMC were also significantly associated with decreases in the average of osteocalcin and NTX Z-scores. By contrast, the mean levels of serum osteocalcin increased by 2 and 11%, respectively, per IQR increase in muscle strength and height; NTX increased by 4 (not significant) and 14%, respectively. Both muscle strength and height were significantly associated with increases in the average Z-scores. These exploratory analyses suggest that fat mass and whole-body BMC were associated with decreased bone turnover, while muscle strength and height were associated with increased bone turnover.