Jolante van Wijk

Synchronous opening of the Rio Grande rift along its entire length at 25–10 Ma supported by apatite (U-Th)/He and fission-track thermochronology, and evaluation of possible driving mechanisms

One-hundred and forty-seven new apatite (U-Th)/He (AHe) ages are presented from 32 sample locations along the flanks of the Rio Grande rift in New Mexico and Colorado. These data are combined with apatite fission-track (AFT) analyses of the same rocks and modeled together to create well-constrained cooling histories for Rio Grande rift flank shoulders. The data indicate rapid cooling due to extension from ca. 28 to 5 Ma in the Sawatch Range, ca. 28 Ma to Quaternary in the Sangre de Cristo Mountains, ca. 25 to 5 Ma in the Albuquerque Basin, and ca. 25 to 10 Ma in the southern Rio Grande rift in southern New Mexico. Rapid cooling of rift flanks followed the Oligocene ignimbrite flare-up, and the northern section of the Rio Grande rift in Colorado exhibits semicontinuous cooling since the Oligocene. Overall, however, rift flank cooling along the length of the rift was out of phase with high-volume magmatism and hence is inferred to have been driven mainly by exhumation due to faulting. Although each location preserves a unique cooling history, when combined with existing AHe data from the Gore Range in northern Colorado and the Sandia Mountains in New Mexico, together these data indicate that extension and exhumation of rift shoulders were synchronous along >850 km of the length of the Rio Grande rift from 25 to 10 Ma. These time-space constraints provide an important new data set with which to develop geodynamic models for initiation and evolution of continental rifting. Models involving northward propagation of rifting and Colorado Plateau rotation are not favored as primary mechanisms driving extension. Instead, a geodynamic model is proposed that involves upper-mantle dynamics during multistage foundering and rollback of a segment of the Farallon plate near the Laramide hinge region that extended between the Wyoming and SE New Mexico high-velocity mantle domains. The first stage of flat slab removal accompanied ca. 40–20 Ma volcanism in the San Juan and Mogollon-Datil ignimbrite centers, which initiated asthenospheric upwelling and circulation. A second stage involved a ca. 30–25 Ma detachment of remaining fragments of the Farallon slab, intensifying asthenospheric upwelling and focusing it along a N-S trend beneath Colorado and New Mexico. By 25 Ma, the North American lithosphere had become weakened critically along this narrow zone, so that extension was accelerated, resulting in the observed 25–10 Ma cooling indicated by the thermochronologic data. This developed a central graben with increased fault-related high strain rates and resulted in maximum sediment accumulation in the Rio Grande rift. Our geodynamic model thus involves Oligocene removal of parts of the Farallon slab beneath the ignimbrite centers followed by a major Oligocene–Miocene slab break that instigated the discrete N-S Rio Grande rift through focused upper-mantle convection beneath the southern Rocky Mountain–Rio Grande rift region.

Uplift prior to continental breakup: Indication for removal of mantle lithosphere?

Uplift or reduced subsidence prior to continental breakup is a key component of the rift-drift transition. This uplift causes lateral variations in the lithospheric potential energy, which can increase intraplate deviatoric tension, thereby facilitating continental rupture. There is a growing body of evidence that pre-breakup uplift is a global phenomenon characteristic of magmatic and magma-poor rifted margins. Evidence is provided by the subaerial extrusion of lava interpreted from drill logs, stratigraphic records, the presence of breakup unconformities, and the spatial extent of uplift associated with Afar (the Ethiopian-Somali plateau), which may be at the stage of rupture. Previously discussed mechanisms contributing to this uplift include phase transitions, dynamic uplift from mantle plumes, and magmatic underplated bodies. We show in this study that dynamic uplift resulting from passive upwelling asthenosphere below the rift is limited (∼200 m). Isostatic arguments suggest that removal of mantle lithosphere is a necessary and effective mechanism for uplift coincident with rupture. The combination of mantle phase transitions and a very thin mantle lid produces an excess potential energy state (as evidenced by a positive geoid anomaly) and leads to tensional forces favorable for rupture. These results underpin our proposed model for continental breakup where removal of mantle lithosphere by either detachment or formation of gravitational instabilities is a characteristic process. Observations of depth-dependent thinning and geochemical data support this model.

Magma-induced axial subsidence during final-stage rifting: Implications for the development of seaward-dipping reflectors

A consensus is emerging from studies of continental rifts and rifted margins worldwide that significant extension can be accommodated by magma intrusion prior to the development of a new ocean basin. However, the influence of loading from magma intrusion, lava extrusion, and sedimentation on plate flexure and resultant subsidence of the basin is not well understood. We address this issue by using three-dimensional flexural models constrained by geological and geophysical data from the Main Ethiopian Rift and the Afar Depression in East Africa. Model results show that axial mafic intrusions in the crust are able to cause significant downward flexure of the opening rift and that the amount of subsidence increases with decreasing plate strength accompanying progressive plate thinning and heating during continental breakup. This process contributes to the tilting of basaltic flows toward the magma injection axis, forming the typical wedge-shaped seaward-dipping reflector sequences on either side of the eventual rupture site as the new ocean basin forms.

Moving lithospheric modeling forward: Attributes of a community computer code

GS A TO DA Y | JU NE 20 15 C.M. Cooper, Washington State University, School of the Environment, P.O. Box 624812, Pullman, Washington 99164-2812, USA; Eric Mittelstaedt, University of Idaho, Dept. of Geological Sciences, 875 Perimeter Drive, MS 3022, Moscow, Idaho 838443022, USA; Claire Currie, University of Alberta, Dept. of Physics, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G7; Jolante van Wijk, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Dept. of Earth & Environmental Science, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA; Louise Kellogg, Lorraine Hwang, University of California Davis, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Computational Infrastructure for Geodynamics, 2215 Earth and Physical Sciences, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA; and Ramon Arrowsmith, Arizona State University, School of Earth & Space Exploration, P.O. Box 876004, Tempe, Arizona 85287-6004, USA

Tectonic subsidence, geoid analysis, and the Miocene-Pliocene unconformity in the Rio Grande rift, southwestern United States: Implications for mantle upwelling as a driving force for rift opening

We use tectonic subsidence patterns from wells and stratigraphic sections to describe the mid-Miocene to present tectonic subsidence history of the Rio Grande rift. Tectonic subsidence and therefore rift opening were quite fast until ca. 8 Ma, with net subsidence rates (~25–65 mm/k.y.) comparable to those of the prerupture phase of rifted continental margins. The rapid subsidence was followed by a late Miocene–early Pliocene unconformity that developed mainly along the flanks of most rift basins. The age of its associated lacuna is spatially variable but falls within 8–3 Ma (mostly 7–5 Ma) and thus is synchronous with eastward tilting of the western Great Plains (ca. 6–4 Ma). Tectonic subsidence rates either remained similar or decreased after the Miocene-Pliocene unconformity. North of 35°N, our analysis of geoid-to-elevation ratios suggests that, at present, topography of the Rio Grande rift region is compensated by a component of mantle-driven dynamic uplift. Previous work has indicated that this dynamic uplift is caused by focused vertical flow in the upper mantle resulting from slab descent and fragmentation of the Farallon slab, and Rio Grande rift opening, which affected the Rio Grande rift area beginning in the late Miocene. The spatial distribution and timing of the unconformity, as well as eastward tilting of the western Great Plains, can be explained by this dynamic mantle uplift, with contributions from variations in rift opening tectonics and climate. The focused mantle upwelling is not associated with increased rift opening rates.