Jon Henrik Laake

Potentially modifiable factors contributing to outcome from acute respiratory distress syndrome: the LUNG SAFE study

PurposeTo improve the outcome of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), one needs to identify potentially modifiable factors associated with mortality.MethodsThe large observational study to understand the global impact of severe acute respiratory failure (LUNG SAFE) was an international, multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients with severe respiratory failure, conducted in the winter of 2014 in a convenience sample of 459 ICUs from 50 countries across five continents. A pre-specified secondary aim was to examine the factors associated with outcome. Analyses were restricted to patients (93.1xa0%) fulfilling ARDS criteria on day 1–2 who received invasive mechanical ventilation.Results2377 patients were included in the analysis. Potentially modifiable factors associated with increased hospital mortality in multivariable analyses include lower PEEP, higher peak inspiratory, plateau, and driving pressures, and increased respiratory rate. The impact of tidal volume on outcome was unclear. Having fewer ICU beds was also associated with higher hospital mortality. Non-modifiable factors associated with worsened outcome from ARDS included older age, active neoplasm, hematologic neoplasm, and chronic liver failure. Severity of illness indices including lower pH, lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and higher non-pulmonary SOFA score were associated with poorer outcome. Of the 578 (24.3xa0%) patients with a limitation of life-sustaining therapies or measures decision, 498 (86.0xa0%) died in hospital. Factors associated with increased likelihood of limitation of life-sustaining therapies or measures decision included older age, immunosuppression, neoplasia, lower pH and increased non-pulmonary SOFA scores.ConclusionsHigher PEEP, lower peak, plateau, and driving pressures, and lower respiratory rate are associated with improved survival from ARDS.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02010073.

Impact of the post‐World War II generation on intensive care needs in Norway

Background: A high birth rate during the first two decades following World War II has increased the proportion of elderly people in present‐day society and, consequently, the demand for health‐care services. The impact on intensive care services may become dramatic because the age distribution of critically ill patients is skewed towards the elderly. We have used registry data and population statistics to forecast the demand for intensive care services in Norway up until the year 2025.

Excessive innate immune response and mutant D222G/N in severe A (H1N1) pandemic influenza.

AIMnExplore the role of viral factors and immune response in patients with severe pandemic pdmH1N1 illness without significant co-morbidity.nnnMATERIALSnSeven patients with pdmH1N1 influenza, bilateral chest X-rays infiltrates, requiring mechanical ventilator support were consecutively recruited. Seven age- and gender-matched healthy individuals served as controls.nnnRESULTSnFour patients were viremic, two with the mutant D222G/N pdmH1N1.Microarray analyses of peripheral blood leukocytes suggested a marked granulocytes activation, but no up-regulation of inflammatory cytokine mRNA. Patients with severe pdmH1NI had a marked systemic complement activation, and in contrast to the lack of cytokine mRNA up-regulation in blood leukocytes, plasma levels of a broad range of inflammatory mediators, including IP-10, and mediators involved in pulmonary remodelling were markedly elevated. Patients with mutant virus had particularly high IP-10 levels, and the most pronounced complement activation.nnnCONCLUSIONSnIn severe pdmH1N1, viremia was common and the D222G/N mutant was found in half of the viremic patients. Host immune response was characterized by strong activation of the innate immune system, including complement and granulocytes activation, increased serum levels of inflammation and pulmonary remodelling markers, possibly contributing to the observed tissue damage. However, few patients were included and further studies are needed to characterize the immune response in severe pdmH1N1 infection.

Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy in intensive care unit patients with increased bleeding risk or obesity. A prospective analysis of 1000 procedures

Background: Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PT) is safe and cost effective, and has become a routine method in intensive care units (ICU), but safety concerns persist for obese patients and for patients with a high risk of bleeding. In this prospective study of 1000 PTs, we have investigated whether such patient characteristics were associated with an increased procedural risk.

Scandinavian clinical practice guideline on mechanical ventilation in adults with the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

The objective of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI) task force on mechanical ventilation in adults with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is to formulate treatment recommendations based on available evidence from systematic reviews and randomised trials.

Scandinavian clinical practice guideline on fluid and drug therapy in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome

The objective of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI) task force on fluid and drug therapy in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was to provide clinically relevant, evidence‐based treatment recommendations according to standards for trustworthy guidelines.

Geo-economic variations in epidemiology, patterns of care, and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: insights from the LUNG SAFE prospective cohort study

BACKGROUNDnLittle information is available about the geo-economic variations in demographics, management, and outcomes of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to characterise the effect of these geo-economic variations in patients enrolled in the Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE).nnnMETHODSnLUNG SAFE was done during 4 consecutive weeks in winter, 2014, in a convenience sample of 459 intensive-care units in 50 countries across six continents. Inclusion criteria were admission to a participating intensive-care unit (including transfers) within the enrolment window and receipt of invasive or non-invasive ventilation. One of the trials secondary aims was to characterise variations in the demographics, management, and outcome of patients with ARDS. We used the 2016 World Bank countries classification to define three major geo-economic groupings, namely European high-income countries (Europe-High), high-income countries in the rest of the world (rWORLD-High), and middle-income countries (Middle). We compared patient outcomes across these three groupings. LUNG SAFE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02010073.nnnFINDINGSnOf the 2813 patients enrolled in LUNG SAFE who fulfilled ARDS criteria on day 1 or 2, 1521 (54%) were recruited from Europe-High, 746 (27%) from rWORLD-High, and 546 (19%) from Middle countries. We noted significant geographical variations in demographics, risk factors for ARDS, and comorbid diseases. The proportion of patients with severe ARDS or with ratios of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) to the fractional concentration of oxygen in inspired air (FiO2) less than 150 was significantly lower in rWORLD-High countries than in the two other regions. Use of prone positioning and neuromuscular blockade was significantly more common in Europe-High countries than in the other two regions. Adjusted duration of invasive mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the intensive-care unit were significantly shorter in patients in rWORLD-High countries than in Europe-High or Middle countries. High gross national income per person was associated with increased survival in ARDS; hospital survival was significantly lower in Middle countries than in Europe-High or rWORLD-High countries.nnnINTERPRETATIONnImportant geo-economic differences exist in the severity, clinician recognition, and management of ARDS, and in patients outcomes. Income per person and outcomes in ARDS are independently associated.nnnFUNDINGnEuropean Society of Intensive Care Medicine, St Michaels Hospital, University of Milan-Bicocca.

A systematic review of vasopressor blood pressure targets in critically ill adults with hypotension

PurposeClinicians must balance the risks from hypotension with the potential adverse effects of vasopressors. Experts have recommended a mean arterial pressure (MAP) target of at least 65 mmHg, and higher in older patients and in patients with chronic hypertension or atherosclerosis. We conducted a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials comparing higher vs lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy administered to hypotensive critically ill patients.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE®, EMBASE™, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of higher vs lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in critically ill hypotensive adult patients. Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility based on titles and abstracts, and they then selected full-text reports. Outcomes, subgroups, and analyses were prespecified. We used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to rate the overall confidence in the estimates of intervention effects.ResultsOf 8001 citations, we retrieved 57 full-text articles and ultimately included two randomized-controlled trials (894 patients). Higher blood pressure targets were not associated with lower mortality (relative risk [RR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.23; P = 0.54), and neither age (P = 0.17) nor chronic hypertension (P = 0.32) modified the overall effect. Nevertheless, higher blood pressure targets were associated with a greater risk of new-onset supraventricular cardiac arrhythmia (RR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.38; P < 0.01).ConclusionCurrent evidence does not support a MAP target > 70 mmHg in hypotensive critically ill adult patients requiring vasopressor therapy.RésuméObjectifLes cliniciens doivent équilibrer les risques liés à l’hypotension aux complications potentielles des vasopresseurs. Des experts ont recommandé de cibler une tension artérielle moyenne (TAM) d’au moins 65 mmHg, et une TAM plus élevée chez les patients atteints d’hypertension chronique, d’athérosclérose ou plus âgés. Nous avons réalisé une revue systématique des études randomisées contrôlées comparant des cibles de tension artérielle plus élevées à plus basses chez des patients hypotendus en état critique recevant un traitement vasopresseur.MéthodeNous avons fait des recherches dans les bases de données Medline, EMBASE et dans le registre central des études contrôlées Cochrane afin d’en extraire les études comparant des cibles de tension artérielle plus élevées ou plus basses chez des patients adultes hypotendus et en état critique recevant un traitement vasopresseur. Deux examinateurs ont évalué de façon indépendante l’éligibilité des études selon leur titre et leur résumé, puis sélectionné les articles intégraux. Les critères d’évaluation, sous-groupes et analyses étaient spécifiés au préalable. Nous avons utilisé le système GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) afin d’évaluer la confiance globale dans les estimations des effets de l’intervention.RésultatsParmi les 8001 citations, nous avons extrait 57 articles intégraux et finalement inclus deux études randomisées contrôlées (894 patients). Les cibles de tension artérielle plus élevées n’étaient pas associées à une mortalité plus basse (risque relatif [RR] 1,05; intervalle de confiance [IC] 95 %, 0,90 à 1,23; P = 0,54), et ni l’âge (P = 0,17) ni l’hypertension chronique (P = 0,32) n’ont modifié l’effet global. Cependant, les cibles de tension artérielle plus élevées étaient associées à un risque plus élevé de nouvelle apparition d’une arythmie cardiaque supraventriculaire (RR, 2,08; IC 95 %, 1,28 à 3,38; P < 0,01).ConclusionLes données probantes actuelles n’appuient pas une cible de TAM supérieure à 70 mmHg chez les patients adultes hypotendus et gravement malades nécessitant un traitement vasopresseur.

Vasopressor use following traumatic injury: protocol for a systematic review

Introduction Worldwide, traumatic casualties are projected to exceed 8 million by year 2020. Haemorrhagic shock and brain injury are the leading causes of death following trauma. While intravenous fluids have traditionally been used to support organ perfusion in the setting of haemorrhage, recent investigations have suggested that restricting fluid therapy by tolerating more severe hypotension may improve survival. However, the safety of permissive hypotension remains uncertain, particularly among patients who have suffered a traumatic brain injury. Vasopressors preferentially vasoconstrict blood vessels that supply non-vital organs and capacitance vessels, thereby mobilising the unstressed blood volume. Used as fluid-sparing adjuncts, these drugs can complement resuscitative measures by correcting hypotension without diluting clotting factors or increasing the risk for tissue oedema. Methods and analysis We will identify randomised control trials comparing early resuscitation with vasopressors versus placebo or standard care in adults following traumatic injury. Data sources will include MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, clinical trial registries and conference proceedings. Two reviewers will independently determine trial eligibility. For each included trial, we will conduct duplicate independent data extraction and risk of bias assessment. We will assess the overall quality of the data for each individual outcome using the GRADE approach. Ethics and dissemination We will report this review in accordance with the PRISMA statement. We will disseminate our findings at critical care and trauma conferences and through a publication in a peer-reviewed journal. We will also use this systematic review to create clinical guidelines (http://www.magicapp.org), which will be disseminated in a standalone publication. Trial registration number CRD42016033437.

Gender Parity in Critical Care Medicine

Clinical practice guidelines are systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. These documents inform and shape patient care around the world. In this Perspective we discuss the importance of diversity on guideline panels, the disproportionately low representation of women on critical care guideline panels, and existing initiatives to increase the representation of women in corporations, universities, and government. We propose five strategies to ensure gender parity within critical care medicine.