Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jon K. Shallop is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jon K. Shallop.


Ear and Hearing | 1999

Summary of Results Using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential

Paul J. Abbas; Carolyn J. Brown; Jon K. Shallop; Jill B. Firszt; Michelle L. Hughes; Sung H. Hong; Steven J. Staller

OBJECTIVE This study outlines a series of experiments using the neural response telemetry (NRT) system of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant to measure the electrically evoked compound action potential (EAP). The goal of this investigation was to develop a protocol that allows successful recording of the EAP in a majority of CI24M cochlear implant users. DESIGN Twenty-six postlingually deafened adults participated in this study. A series of experiments were conducted that allowed us to examine how manipulation of stimulation and recording parameters may affect the morphology of the EAP recorded using the Nucleus NRT system. RESULTS Results of this study show consistent responses on at least some electrodes from all subjects. Cross-subject and cross electrode variations in both the growth of the response and the temporal refractory properties of the response were observed. The range of stimulus and recording parameters that can be used to record the EAP with the Nucleus NRT system is described. CONCLUSIONS Using the protocol outlined in this study, it is possible to reliably record EAP responses from most subjects and for most electrodes in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users. These responses are robust and recording these responses does not require that the subject sleep or remain still. Based on these results, a specific protocol is proposed for measurement of the EAP using the NRT system of the CI24M cochlear implant. Potential clinical implications of these results are discussed.


International Journal of Audiology | 2010

Multi-site diagnosis and management of 260 patients with Auditory Neuropathy/Dys-synchrony (Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder)

Charles I. Berlin; Linda J. Hood; Thierry Morlet; Diane Wilensky; Li Li; Kelly Rose Mattingly; Jennifer Taylor-Jeanfreau; Bronya Keats; Patti St. John; Elizabeth Montgomery; Jon K. Shallop; Benjamin A. Russell; Stefan A. Frisch

Abstract Test results and management data are summarized for 260 patients with diagnoses of Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder (ANSD). Hearing aids were tried in 85 of these patients, and 49 patients tried cochlear implants. Approximately 15% reported some benefit from hearing aids for language learning, while improvement in speech comprehension and language acquisition was reported in 85% of patients who were implanted. Approximately 5% (13/260) of the total population developed normal speech and language without intervention. Patients were diagnosed at our laboratory (n=66) or referred from other sites (n=194), and all showed absent/grossly abnormal auditory brainstem responses (ABR), often ‘ringing’ cochlear microphonics, and the presence or history of otoacoustic emissions. Etiologies and co-existing conditions included genetic (n=41), peripheral neuropathies (n=20), perinatal jaundice and/or anoxia and/or prematurity (n=74). These patients comprise 10% or more of hearing impaired patients; their language acquisition trajectories are generally unpredictable from their audiograms. Sumario Se resumen los resultados de las pruebas y los datos del tratamiento de 260 pacientes con diagnóstico de Espectro de desórdenes de la Neuropatía Auditiva (ANSD). En 85 de estos pacientes se probó el uso de auxiliares auditivos y 49 pacientes recibieron un implante coclear. Aproximadamente 15% reportaron algún beneficio con los auxiliares auditivos para la adquisición del lenguaje mientras que el 85% de los que recibieron un implante reportaron una mejoría en la comprensión y la adquisición del lenguaje. Aproximadamente 5% (13/260) de la población total desarrolló lenguaje normal sin intervención. Los paciente fueron diagnosticados en nuestro laboratorio (n=66) o referidos de algún otro lado (n=194) y todos mostraron ausencia o anormalidad importante de los potenciales evocados (ABR), frecuentemente con una microfónica coclear “timbrante” y con presencia o historia de emisiones otoacústicas. La etiología o las condiciones co-existentes incluidas fueron: genéticas (n=41), neuropatías periféricas (n=20), ictericia perinatal y/o anoxia y/o prematurez (n=74). Estos pacientes representan 10% o más de los pacientes con hipoacusia; su trayectoria en el proceso de adquisición del lenguaje es generalmente impredecible a partir de sus audiogramas.


Laryngoscope | 2001

Cochlear Implants in Five Cases of Auditory Neuropathy: Postoperative Findings and Progress†

Jon K. Shallop; Ann Peterson; George W. Facer; Lee B. Fabry; Colin L. W. Driscoll

Objectives To review our experiences with some of the preoperative and postoperative findings in five children who were diagnosed with auditory neuropathy and were provided with cochlear implants. We describe changes in auditory function, which enabled these children to have significant improvement in their hearing and communication skills.


Audiology and Neuro-otology | 2008

Speech Recognition Materials and Ceiling Effects: Considerations for Cochlear Implant Programs

René H. Gifford; Jon K. Shallop; Anna Mary Peterson

Cochlear implant recipients have demonstrated remarkable increases in speech perception since US FDA approval was granted in 1984. Improved performance is due to a number of factors including improved cochlear implant technology, evolving speech coding strategies, and individuals with increasingly more residual hearing receiving implants. Despite this evolution, the same recommendations for pre- and postimplant speech recognition testing have been in place for over 10 years in the United States. To determine whether new recommendations are warranted, speech perception performance was assessed for 156 adult, postlingually deafened implant recipients as well as 50 hearing aid users on monosyllabic word recognition (CNC) and sentence recognition in quiet (HINT and AzBio sentences) and in noise (BKB-SIN). Results demonstrated that for HINT sentences in quiet, 28% of the subjects tested achieved maximum performance of 100% correct and that scores did not agree well with monosyllables (CNC) or sentence recognition in noise (BKB-SIN). For a more difficult sentence recognition material (AzBio), only 0.7% of the subjects achieved 100% performance and scores were in much better agreement with monosyllables and sentence recognition in noise. These results suggest that more difficult materials are needed to assess speech perception performance of postimplant patients – and perhaps also for determining implant candidacy.


Ear and Hearing | 2010

Evidence for the Expansion of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy

René H. Gifford; Michael F. Dorman; Jon K. Shallop; Sarah A. Sydlowski

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether a revision and/or expansion of current audiologic cochlear implant candidacy criteria is warranted. Design: The study design was a retrospective review of postoperative speech perception performance for 22 adult cochlear implant recipients who demonstrated preoperative Consonant Nucleus Consonant word recognition scores of 30% or higher in the best-aided condition. This criterion was chosen to exceed that specified by the North American clinical trial of the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system. Results: The mean preoperative best-aided monosyllabic word score for the 22 patients was 41% correct. The degree of postoperative benefit for the best postoperative condition (electric only or bimodal) ranged from 10 to 68 percentage points with a mean benefit of 27 percentage points for the electric-only condition and 40 percentage points for the bimodal condition. Statistical analyses revealed highly significant differences between preoperative-aided, implant-only, and bimodal performance on Consonant Nucleus Consonant monosyllabic word recognition performance. That is, both postoperative scores—electric only and bimodal—were significantly different from one another and from the preoperative best-aided performance. Conclusions: The current results suggest that a large-scale reassessment of manufacturer and Medicare preoperative audiologic candidacy criteria for adults is warranted to allow more hearing-impaired individuals to take advantage of the benefits offered by cochlear implantation.


Otology & Neurotology | 2005

Cochlear implant soft failures consensus development conference statement

Thomas J. Balkany; Annelle V. Hodges; Craig A. Buchman; William M. Luxford; C. H. Pillsbury; Peter S. Roland; Jon K. Shallop; Douglas D. Backous; D. Franz; J. M. Graham; Barry E. Hirsch; M. Luntz; John K. Niparko; James F. Patrick; Stacy Payne; Fred F. Telischi; Emily A. Tobey; Eric Truy; Staller Sj

COCHLEAR IMPLANT SOFT FAILURES CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENTThis Consensus Statement was prepared by a panel of experts representing the fields of otolaryngology, audiology, speech and language pathology, communication science, and engineering. Representatives to the conference were app


Ear and Hearing | 1993

Objective electrophysiological measures from cochlear implant patients.

Jon K. Shallop

ABSTRACT Various objective electrophysiological techniques have been used to supplement the behavioral measurements for cochlear implant patients. This report summarizes various studies of these measurements, including stimulus artifact, averaged electrode voltages, electrical stapedius reflexes, electrical auditory brain stem responses, electrical middle latency responses, and cortical auditory responses. These techniques have been shown to provide valuable information in the evaluation of device and electrode integrity in addition to correlated values to behavioral thresholds and comfort levels.


Laryngoscope | 1999

Neural Response Telemetry With the Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant

Jon K. Shallop; George W. Facer; Ann Peterson

Objectives: To review our intraoperative and post‐operative testing protocol for cochlear implant patients. This study describes the methodologies and applications of a new technique called neural response telemetry (NRT) for the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. NRT uses radiofrequency telemetry technology to measure the action potentials of the auditory nerve.


Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology | 1991

Prediction of behavioral threshold and comfort values for Nucleus 22-channel implant patients from electrical auditory brain stem response test results.

Jon K. Shallop; Donald W. Goin; Linda VanDyke; Robert E. Mischke

We have studied the prediction of behavioral threshold and comfort values for 11 patients who use the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant by means of the results of electrical auditory brain stem response (EABR) procedures. For prediction purposes, EABR and behavioral testing were done in the same electrode mode configuration for three specific electrodes. The results of this investigation suggest that EABR threshold current level is consistently near the behavioral comfort current level, rather than the patients behavioral threshold level.


Ear and Hearing | 2007

Clinical results of AutoNRT, a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants.

Bas van Dijk; Andrew Botros; Rolf Dieter Battmer; Klaus Begall; Norbert Dillier; Matthias Hey; Wai Kong Lai; Thomas Lenarz; Roland Laszig; Andre Morsnowski; Joachim Müller-Deile; Colleen Psarros; Jon K. Shallop; Benno Weber; Thomas Wesarg; Andrzej Zarowski; Erwin Offeciers

Objective: AutoNRT™ is the completely automatic electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measuring algorithm in the recently released Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system. AutoNRT allows clinicians to automatically record T-NRT profiles that in turn can be used as a guide for initial fitting. The algorithm consists of a pattern recognition part that judges if the traces contain an ECAP and an intelligent flow that optimizes the measurement parameters and finds the ECAP threshold (T-NRT). The objective of this study was to determine how accurate, reliable, and fast the automatic measurements are. Design: Data on more than 400 electrodes were collected as part of the multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant system. T-NRT values determined by the algorithm were compared with T-NRT determinations on the same data by different human observers. Also, the time the measurements took was analyzed. Results: In 90% of the cases, the absolute difference between the AutoNRT and the human observer determined T-NRT was less than 9 CL; the median absolute difference was 3 CL. A second experiment, in which a group of human observers were asked to analyze NRT data, showed high variability in T-NRT; in some cases, two experienced clinicians disagreed by more than 30 current levels. Compared with the group, AutoNRT performed as well as the “average” clinician, with the advantage that the AutoNRT threshold determinations are objective. Analysis of the timing data showed an average intraoperative measurement time of less than 20 sec per electrode with a standard deviation of 5 sec, suggesting that the total array of 22 electrodes can be measured intraoperatively in about 7 minutes on average. Conclusions: AutoNRT provides comparable accuracy to an average clinician but with the added benefit of significant time savings over manual recordings. This makes it a valuable tool for clinical measurement of ECAP threshold in cochlear implant recipients.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jon K. Shallop's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. H. Pillsbury

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge