Jon Poehlman
RTI International
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jon Poehlman.
Journal of Rural Health | 2007
William A. Zule; Elizabeth C. Costenbader; Curtis M. Coomes; William Meyer; Kara S. Riehman; Jon Poehlman; Wendee M. Wechsberg
CONTEXT While literature exists on sexual risks for HIV among rural populations, the specific role of stimulants in increasing these risks has primarily been studied in the context of a single drug and/or racial group. PURPOSE This study explores the use of multiple stimulants and sexual risk behaviors among individuals of different races and sexual identities in rural North Carolina. METHODS In-depth interviews were conducted with 41 individuals in 3 rural North Carolina counties between June 2004 and December 2005. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and reviewed for accuracy. Edited interviews were imported into Atlas.ti and askSam for analysis. FINDINGS Along with marijuana, stimulants-including powder cocaine, crack, and methamphetamine-were the most frequently used illicit drugs in these counties. Powder cocaine use was more closely associated with white participants, crack with African Americans, and both were more commonly used by female participants. Participants reported 3 overlapping behaviors involving stimulant use that may be associated with increased risk of HIV infection: engaging in sex while using drugs, sex trading and group sex. Nearly half of participants reported engaging in group sex activity. CONCLUSIONS HIV risk through injection appears to be low in these rural counties. However, nearly all study participants reported some form of sexual risk behavior that may increase transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. Further research is warranted focusing on the nexus between substance abuse and risky sexual behaviors.
Journal of Cancer Education | 2009
Lauren McCormack; Carla Bann; Pamela Williams-Piehota; David Driscoll; Cindy Soloe; Jon Poehlman; Tzy Mey Kuo; Kathleen N. Lohr; Stacey Sheridan; Carol E. Golin; Russell Harris; Samuel Cykert
Background. This community-based intervention study examined the effects of 2 different message strategies for presenting information about the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test. Methods. A quasi-experimental longitudinal design with 2 intervention and 1 control group. Results. Knowledge increased significantly among participants who received either version of the intervention message and remained elevated at 12 months. Presenting information in the context of other men’s health issues was associated with greater increases in knowledge relative to PSA only. Conclusions. Community-based interventions can increase knowledge about prostate cancer screening. Clinicians need to take careful account of what their patients understand and correct misperceptions.
Social Marketing Quarterly | 2013
Scott A. Damon; Jon Poehlman; Douglas J. Rupert; Peyton Williams
Carbon monoxide (CO) poisonings in the United States consistently occur when residents improperly use portable gasoline-powered generators and other tools following severe storms and power outages. However, protective behaviors—such as installing CO alarms and placing generators more than 20 feet away from indoor structures—can prevent these poisonings. This study identified knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs that lead consumers to adopt risk and protective behaviors for storm-related CO poisoning and post-storm generator use. Four focus groups (32 participants in total) were conducted with generator owners in winter and summer storm-prone areas to explore home safety, portable generator use, CO poisoning knowledge, and generator safety messages. Discussions were transcribed, and findings analyzed using an ordered meta-matrix approach. Although most generator owners were aware of CO poisoning, many were unsure what constitutes a safe location for generator operation and incorrectly stated that enclosed areas outside the home—such as attached garages, sheds, and covered porches—were safe. Convenience and access to appliances often dictated generator placement. Participants were receptive to installing CO alarms in their homes but were unsure where to place them. These findings suggest a deficit in understanding how to operate portable generators safely and a need to correct misconceptions around safe placement. In terms of behavioral price, the simple installation and maintenance of inexpensive CO alarms may be the most important strategy for ultimately protecting homes from both storm-related and other CO exposures.
Journal of Medical Internet Research | 2017
Douglas J. Rupert; Jon Poehlman; Jennifer J Hayes; Sarah E. Ray; Rebecca Moultrie
Background Virtual focus groups—such as online chat and video groups—are increasingly promoted as qualitative research tools. Theoretically, virtual groups offer several advantages, including lower cost, faster recruitment, greater geographic diversity, enrollment of hard-to-reach populations, and reduced participant burden. However, no study has compared virtual and in-person focus groups on these metrics. Objective To rigorously compare virtual and in-person focus groups on cost, recruitment, and participant logistics. We examined 3 focus group modes and instituted experimental controls to ensure a fair comparison. Methods We conducted 6 1-hour focus groups in August 2014 using in-person (n=2), live chat (n=2), and video (n=2) modes with individuals who had type 2 diabetes (n=48 enrolled, n=39 completed). In planning groups, we solicited bids from 6 virtual platform vendors and 4 recruitment firms. We then selected 1 platform or facility per mode and a single recruitment firm across all modes. To minimize bias, the recruitment firm employed different recruiters by mode who were blinded to recruitment efforts for other modes. We tracked enrollment during a 2-week period. A single moderator conducted all groups using the same guide, which addressed the use of technology to communicate with health care providers. We conducted the groups at the same times of day on Monday to Wednesday during a single week. At the end of each group, participants completed a short survey. Results Virtual focus groups offered minimal cost savings compared with in-person groups (US
Health Education Journal | 2014
Jennifer D. Uhrig; Allison L. Friedman; Jon Poehlman; Monica Scales; Ann Forsythe
2000 per chat group vs US
Health Communication | 2017
Helen W. Sullivan; Kathryn J. Aikin; Jon Poehlman
2576 per in-person group vs US
Sexually Transmitted Infections | 2011
Allison L. Friedman; A Forsythe; Jon Poehlman; S Harris; Jennifer S. Smith; Jennifer D. Uhrig
2,750 per video group). Although virtual groups did not incur travel costs, they often had higher management fees and miscellaneous expenses (eg, participant webcams). Recruitment timing did not differ by mode, but show rates were higher for in-person groups (94% [15/16] in-person vs 81% [13/16] video vs 69% [11/16] chat). Virtual group participants were more geographically diverse (but with significant clustering around major metropolitan areas) and more likely to be non-white, less educated, and less healthy. Internet usage was higher among virtual group participants, yet virtual groups still reached light Internet users. In terms of burden, chat groups were easiest to join and required the least preparation (chat = 13 minutes, video = 40 minutes, in-person = 78 minutes). Virtual group participants joined using laptop or desktop computers, and most virtual participants (82% [9/11] chat vs 62% [8/13] video) reported having no other people in their immediate vicinity. Conclusions Virtual focus groups offer potential advantages for participant diversity and reaching less healthy populations. However, virtual groups do not appear to cost less or recruit participants faster than in-person groups. Further research on virtual group data quality and group dynamics is needed to fully understand their advantages and limitations.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2008
David Driscoll; Douglas J. Rupert; Carol E. Golin; Lauren McCormack; Stacey Sheridan; Brandon Welch; Jon Poehlman
Objective: Current data on sexually transmitted disease (STD) among African Americans show significant racial/ethnic disparities. The purpose of this study was to explore knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours related to STD risk, prevention, and testing among African American adults to help inform the development of a health communication intervention to address the high rates of STDs in this community. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Four United States (US) communities with high cumulative incidence of STDs. Method: We administered a 44-item structured survey. Results: Participants were 185 sexually active heterosexual African Americans aged 18 to 45. Most participants (84.2%) had been tested for an STD at least once. Most participants (75.8%) perceived STDs to be a problem in their community, and almost all (91.2%) felt that people needed education to learn how to avoid STDs. Nonetheless, only half of participants (49.5%) agreed that they should get tested for STDs because they may be at risk. Misconceptions related to STD prevention and testing were identified. Results suggest that STDs remain highly stigmatized with concerns related to social and interpersonal consequences. Participants’ perceived personal risk was low, despite acknowledging high STD rates in their communities. Conclusion: Findings suggest that health communication may play an important role in addressing STD disparities by increasing perceptions of personal risk, minimizing STD-associated stigma, and marketing STD prevention and testing behaviours.
Military Medicine | 2011
Jon Poehlman; Michael J. Schwerin; Michael R. Pemberton; Karen Isenberg; Marian E. Lane; Kimberly R. Aspinwall
ABSTRACT Direct-to-consumer (DTC) television ads for prescription drugs are required to disclose the product’s major risks in the audio or audio and visual parts of the presentation (sometimes referred to as the “major statement”). The objective of this content analysis was to determine how the major statement of risks is presented in DTC television ads, including what risk information is presented, how easy or difficult it is to understand the risk information, and the audio and visual characteristics of the major statement. We identified 68 DTC television ads for branded prescription drugs, which included a unique major statement and that aired between July 2012 and August 2014. We used subjective and objective measures to code 50 ads randomly selected from the main sample. Major statements often presented numerous risks, usually in order of severity, with no quantitative information about the risks’ severity or prevalence. The major statements required a high school reading level, and many included long and complex sentences. The major statements were often accompanied by competing non-risk information in the visual images, presented with moderately fast-paced music, and read at a faster pace than benefit information. Overall, we discovered several ways in which the communication of risk information could be improved.
Injury Prevention | 2013
Douglas J. Rupert; Jon Poehlman; Scott A. Damon; Peyton Williams
Background African Americans (AAs) make up 12% of the US population, yet they account for about half of all reported chlamydia and syphilis cases, and 70% of gonorrhoea cases. Targeted, culturally sensitive interventions are needed to address these disparities. This study sought to explore how AAs perceive STIs in their communities, and what they feel should be done to address the problem. Methods Triads (n=31) and individual interviews (n=64) were conducted with sexually active, heterosexual AA adults, ages 18-45, in four communities with high STI incidence. Triads were segmented by age, gender, and urban/rural residence. Interviewers (gender/race-matched) used a semi-structured guide to explore awareness and importance of the STI problem in AA communities, perceptions of contributing factors and high-risk groups, and suggested solutions. Discussions were audio-taped and transcribed. A team of three analysts coded transcripts using QSR NVivo8, based on a codebook developed from identified themes. Results A total of 158 adults participated. Overall, STDs were believed or presumed to be very common in AA communities. Many had heard about the disparate STD/HIV rates on the news/TV or in school. Men were more likely to challenge this, reasoning that AAs are heterogeneous and that STIs are more likely influenced by socioeconomic status (SES) than race. Participants identified youth, low SES groups, drug addicts, Sex workers, homosexuals, and men on the down low as highest-risk groups. Promiscuity and a lack of sexual-health education, care for self/others/future, and health-care access were seen as major causes. Other contributing factors were teen pregnancy/family disintegration, gangs, drugs, school dropouts, unemployment, poverty, boredom, hopelessness, male/female ratio, partner concurrency, and the media. Overall, STIs were seen as a relatively low priority. Yet most felt that change is critical and could be promoted through music, mass media, faith-based/community/organizational, electronic and interpersonal channels. Increasing information, education, and healthcare access; and developing parenting, self-esteem boosting, and mentoring programs were suggested. Conclusions STDs among AAs are recognised as a likely consequence of many underlying social, structural and community ills, which must be addressed to reduce STD disparities. Traditional STD prevention efforts must be supported by non-traditional social/structural interventions.