Jon Teague
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jon Teague.
Nature | 2002
Helen Davies; Graham R. Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; S. M. Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J. Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A. Gusterson; Colin S. Cooper; Janet Shipley
Cancers arise owing to the accumulation of mutations in critical genes that alter normal programmes of cell proliferation, differentiation and death. As the first stage of a systematic genome-wide screen for these genes, we have prioritized for analysis signalling pathways in which at least one gene is mutated in human cancer. The RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK–MAP kinase pathway mediates cellular responses to growth signals. RAS is mutated to an oncogenic form in about 15% of human cancer. The three RAF genes code for cytoplasmic serine/threonine kinases that are regulated by binding RAS. Here we report BRAF somatic missense mutations in 66% of malignant melanomas and at lower frequency in a wide range of human cancers. All mutations are within the kinase domain, with a single substitution (V599E) accounting for 80%. Mutated BRAF proteins have elevated kinase activity and are transforming in NIH3T3 cells. Furthermore, RAS function is not required for the growth of cancer cell lines with the V599E mutation. As BRAF is a serine/threonine kinase that is commonly activated by somatic point mutation in human cancer, it may provide new therapeutic opportunities in malignant melanoma.
Nature | 2013
Ludmil B. Alexandrov; Serena Nik-Zainal; David C. Wedge; Samuel Aparicio; Sam Behjati; Andrew V. Biankin; Graham R. Bignell; Niccolo Bolli; Åke Borg; Anne Lise Børresen-Dale; Sandrine Boyault; Birgit Burkhardt; Adam Butler; Carlos Caldas; Helen Davies; Christine Desmedt; Roland Eils; Jórunn Erla Eyfjörd; John A. Foekens; Mel Greaves; Fumie Hosoda; Barbara Hutter; Tomislav Ilicic; Sandrine Imbeaud; Marcin Imielinsk; Natalie Jäger; David T. W. Jones; David Jones; Stian Knappskog; Marcel Kool
All cancers are caused by somatic mutations; however, understanding of the biological processes generating these mutations is limited. The catalogue of somatic mutations from a cancer genome bears the signatures of the mutational processes that have been operative. Here we analysed 4,938,362 mutations from 7,042 cancers and extracted more than 20 distinct mutational signatures. Some are present in many cancer types, notably a signature attributed to the APOBEC family of cytidine deaminases, whereas others are confined to a single cancer class. Certain signatures are associated with age of the patient at cancer diagnosis, known mutagenic exposures or defects in DNA maintenance, but many are of cryptic origin. In addition to these genome-wide mutational signatures, hypermutation localized to small genomic regions, ‘kataegis’, is found in many cancer types. The results reveal the diversity of mutational processes underlying the development of cancer, with potential implications for understanding of cancer aetiology, prevention and therapy.
Nature | 2007
Christopher Greenman; Philip Stephens; Raffaella Smith; Gillian L. Dalgliesh; Chris Hunter; Graham R. Bignell; Helen Davies; Jon Teague; Adam Butler; Claire Stevens; Sarah Edkins; Sarah O’Meara; Imre Vastrik; Esther Schmidt; Tim Avis; Syd Barthorpe; Gurpreet Bhamra; Gemma Buck; Bhudipa Choudhury; Jody Clements; Jennifer Cole; Ed Dicks; Simon A. Forbes; Kris Gray; Kelly Halliday; Rachel Harrison; Katy Hills; Jon Hinton; Andy Jenkinson; David Jones
Cancers arise owing to mutations in a subset of genes that confer growth advantage. The availability of the human genome sequence led us to propose that systematic resequencing of cancer genomes for mutations would lead to the discovery of many additional cancer genes. Here we report more than 1,000 somatic mutations found in 274 megabases (Mb) of DNA corresponding to the coding exons of 518 protein kinase genes in 210 diverse human cancers. There was substantial variation in the number and pattern of mutations in individual cancers reflecting different exposures, DNA repair defects and cellular origins. Most somatic mutations are likely to be ‘passengers’ that do not contribute to oncogenesis. However, there was evidence for ‘driver’ mutations contributing to the development of the cancers studied in approximately 120 genes. Systematic sequencing of cancer genomes therefore reveals the evolutionary diversity of cancers and implicates a larger repertoire of cancer genes than previously anticipated.
Cell | 2011
Philip Stephens; Christopher Greenman; Beiyuan Fu; Fengtang Yang; Graham R. Bignell; Laura Mudie; Erin Pleasance; King Wai Lau; David Beare; Lucy Stebbings; Stuart McLaren; Meng-Lay Lin; David J. McBride; Ignacio Varela; Serena Nik-Zainal; Catherine Leroy; Mingming Jia; Andrew Menzies; Adam Butler; Jon Teague; Michael A. Quail; John Burton; Harold Swerdlow; Nigel P. Carter; Laura A. Morsberger; Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue; George A. Follows; Anthony R. Green; Adrienne M. Flanagan; Michael R. Stratton
Summary Cancer is driven by somatically acquired point mutations and chromosomal rearrangements, conventionally thought to accumulate gradually over time. Using next-generation sequencing, we characterize a phenomenon, which we term chromothripsis, whereby tens to hundreds of genomic rearrangements occur in a one-off cellular crisis. Rearrangements involving one or a few chromosomes crisscross back and forth across involved regions, generating frequent oscillations between two copy number states. These genomic hallmarks are highly improbable if rearrangements accumulate over time and instead imply that nearly all occur during a single cellular catastrophe. The stamp of chromothripsis can be seen in at least 2%–3% of all cancers, across many subtypes, and is present in ∼25% of bone cancers. We find that one, or indeed more than one, cancer-causing lesion can emerge out of the genomic crisis. This phenomenon has important implications for the origins of genomic remodeling and temporal emergence of cancer. PaperClip
Nature | 2010
Erin Pleasance; R. Keira Cheetham; Philip Stephens; David J. McBride; Sean Humphray; Christopher Greenman; Ignacio Varela; Meng-Lay Lin; Gonzalo R. Ordóñez; Graham R. Bignell; Kai Ye; Julie A Alipaz; Markus J. Bauer; David Beare; Adam Butler; Richard J. Carter; Lina Chen; Anthony J. Cox; Sarah Edkins; Paula Kokko-Gonzales; Niall Anthony Gormley; Russell Grocock; Christian D. Haudenschild; Matthew M. Hims; Terena James; Mingming Jia; Zoya Kingsbury; Catherine Leroy; John Marshall; Andrew Menzies
All cancers carry somatic mutations. A subset of these somatic alterations, termed driver mutations, confer selective growth advantage and are implicated in cancer development, whereas the remainder are passengers. Here we have sequenced the genomes of a malignant melanoma and a lymphoblastoid cell line from the same person, providing the first comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from an individual cancer. The catalogue provides remarkable insights into the forces that have shaped this cancer genome. The dominant mutational signature reflects DNA damage due to ultraviolet light exposure, a known risk factor for malignant melanoma, whereas the uneven distribution of mutations across the genome, with a lower prevalence in gene footprints, indicates that DNA repair has been preferentially deployed towards transcribed regions. The results illustrate the power of a cancer genome sequence to reveal traces of the DNA damage, repair, mutation and selection processes that were operative years before the cancer became symptomatic.
Nature | 2010
Peter J. Campbell; Shinichi Yachida; Laura Mudie; Philip Stephens; Erin Pleasance; Lucy Stebbings; Laura A. Morsberger; Calli Latimer; Stuart McLaren; Meng-Lay Lin; David J. McBride; Ignacio Varela; Serena Nik-Zainal; Catherine Leroy; Mingming Jia; Andrew Menzies; Adam Butler; Jon Teague; Constance A. Griffin; John Burton; Harold Swerdlow; Michael A. Quail; Michael R. Stratton; Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue; P. Andrew Futreal
Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy with a five-year mortality of 97–98%, usually due to widespread metastatic disease. Previous studies indicate that this disease has a complex genomic landscape, with frequent copy number changes and point mutations, but genomic rearrangements have not been characterized in detail. Despite the clinical importance of metastasis, there remain fundamental questions about the clonal structures of metastatic tumours, including phylogenetic relationships among metastases, the scale of ongoing parallel evolution in metastatic and primary sites, and how the tumour disseminates. Here we harness advances in DNA sequencing to annotate genomic rearrangements in 13 patients with pancreatic cancer and explore clonal relationships among metastases. We find that pancreatic cancer acquires rearrangements indicative of telomere dysfunction and abnormal cell-cycle control, namely dysregulated G1-to-S-phase transition with intact G2–M checkpoint. These initiate amplification of cancer genes and occur predominantly in early cancer development rather than the later stages of the disease. Genomic instability frequently persists after cancer dissemination, resulting in ongoing, parallel and even convergent evolution among different metastases. We find evidence that there is genetic heterogeneity among metastasis-initiating cells, that seeding metastasis may require driver mutations beyond those required for primary tumours, and that phylogenetic trees across metastases show organ-specific branches. These data attest to the richness of genetic variation in cancer, brought about by the tandem forces of genomic instability and evolutionary selection.
Cell | 2012
Serena Nik-Zainal; Ludmil B. Alexandrov; David C. Wedge; Peter Van Loo; Christopher Greenman; Keiran Raine; David Jones; Jonathan Hinton; John D Marshall; Lucy Stebbings; Andrew Menzies; Sancha Martin; Kenric Leung; Lina Chen; Catherine Leroy; Manasa Ramakrishna; Richard Rance; King Wai Lau; Laura Mudie; Ignacio Varela; David J. McBride; Graham R. Bignell; Susanna L. Cooke; Adam Shlien; John Gamble; Ian Whitmore; Mark Maddison; Patrick Tarpey; Helen Davies; Elli Papaemmanuil
Summary All cancers carry somatic mutations. The patterns of mutation in cancer genomes reflect the DNA damage and repair processes to which cancer cells and their precursors have been exposed. To explore these mechanisms further, we generated catalogs of somatic mutation from 21 breast cancers and applied mathematical methods to extract mutational signatures of the underlying processes. Multiple distinct single- and double-nucleotide substitution signatures were discernible. Cancers with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations exhibited a characteristic combination of substitution mutation signatures and a distinctive profile of deletions. Complex relationships between somatic mutation prevalence and transcription were detected. A remarkable phenomenon of localized hypermutation, termed “kataegis,” was observed. Regions of kataegis differed between cancers but usually colocalized with somatic rearrangements. Base substitutions in these regions were almost exclusively of cytosine at TpC dinucleotides. The mechanisms underlying most of these mutational signatures are unknown. However, a role for the APOBEC family of cytidine deaminases is proposed. PaperClip
Nature | 2010
Erin Pleasance; Philip Stephens; Sarah O’Meara; David J. McBride; Alison Meynert; David Jones; Meng-Lay Lin; David Beare; King Wai Lau; Christopher Greenman; Ignacio Varela; Serena Nik-Zainal; Helen Davies; Gonzalo R. Ordóñez; Laura Mudie; Calli Latimer; Sarah Edkins; Lucy Stebbings; Lina Chen; Mingming Jia; Catherine Leroy; John Marshall; Andrew Menzies; Adam Butler; Jon Teague; Jonathon Mangion; Yongming A. Sun; Stephen F. McLaughlin; Heather E. Peckham; Eric F. Tsung
Cancer is driven by mutation. Worldwide, tobacco smoking is the principal lifestyle exposure that causes cancer, exerting carcinogenicity through >60 chemicals that bind and mutate DNA. Using massively parallel sequencing technology, we sequenced a small-cell lung cancer cell line, NCI-H209, to explore the mutational burden associated with tobacco smoking. A total of 22,910 somatic substitutions were identified, including 134 in coding exons. Multiple mutation signatures testify to the cocktail of carcinogens in tobacco smoke and their proclivities for particular bases and surrounding sequence context. Effects of transcription-coupled repair and a second, more general, expression-linked repair pathway were evident. We identified a tandem duplication that duplicates exons 3–8 of CHD7 in frame, and another two lines carrying PVT1–CHD7 fusion genes, indicating that CHD7 may be recurrently rearranged in this disease. These findings illustrate the potential for next-generation sequencing to provide unprecedented insights into mutational processes, cellular repair pathways and gene networks associated with cancer.SUMMARY Cancer is driven by mutation. Worldwide, tobacco smoking is the major lifestyle exposure that causes cancer, exerting carcinogenicity through >60 chemicals that bind and mutate DNA. Using massively parallel sequencing technology, we sequenced a small cell lung cancer cell line, NCI-H209, to explore the mutational burden associated with tobacco smoking. 22,910 somatic substitutions were identified, including 132 in coding exons. Multiple mutation signatures testify to the cocktail of carcinogens in tobacco smoke and their proclivities for particular bases and surrounding sequence context. Effects of transcription-coupled repair and a second, more general expression-linked repair pathway were evident. We identified a tandem duplication that duplicates exons 3-8 of CHD7 in-frame, and another two lines carrying PVT1-CHD7 fusion genes, suggesting that CHD7 may be recurrently rearranged in this disease. These findings illustrate the potential for next-generation sequencing to provide unprecedented insights into mutational processes, cellular repair pathways and gene networks associated with cancer.
Nature | 2011
Ignacio Varela; Patrick Tarpey; Keiran Raine; Dachuan Huang; Choon Kiat Ong; Philip Stephens; Helen Davies; David Jones; Meng-Lay Lin; Jon Teague; Graham R. Bignell; Adam Butler; Juok Cho; Gillian L. Dalgliesh; Danushka Galappaththige; Christopher Greenman; Claire Hardy; Mingming Jia; Calli Latimer; King Wai Lau; John Marshall; Stuart McLaren; Andrew Menzies; Laura Mudie; Lucy Stebbings; David A. Largaespada; Lodewyk F. A. Wessels; Stéphane Richard; Richard J. Kahnoski; John Anema
The genetics of renal cancer is dominated by inactivation of the VHL tumour suppressor gene in clear cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the commonest histological subtype. A recent large-scale screen of ∼3,500 genes by PCR-based exon re-sequencing identified several new cancer genes in ccRCC including UTX (also known as KDM6A), JARID1C (also known as KDM5C) and SETD2 (ref. 2). These genes encode enzymes that demethylate (UTX, JARID1C) or methylate (SETD2) key lysine residues of histone H3. Modification of the methylation state of these lysine residues of histone H3 regulates chromatin structure and is implicated in transcriptional control. However, together these mutations are present in fewer than 15% of ccRCC, suggesting the existence of additional, currently unidentified cancer genes. Here, we have sequenced the protein coding exome in a series of primary ccRCC and report the identification of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex gene PBRM1 (ref. 4) as a second major ccRCC cancer gene, with truncating mutations in 41% (92/227) of cases. These data further elucidate the somatic genetic architecture of ccRCC and emphasize the marked contribution of aberrant chromatin biology.
Nature | 2010
Gillian L. Dalgliesh; Kyle A. Furge; Christopher Greenman; Lina Chen; Graham R. Bignell; Adam Butler; Helen Davies; Sarah Edkins; Claire Hardy; Calli Latimer; Jon Teague; Jenny Andrews; Syd Barthorpe; Dave Beare; Gemma Buck; Peter J. Campbell; Simon A. Forbes; Mingming Jia; David Jones; Henry Knott; Chai Yin Kok; King Wai Lau; Catherine Leroy; Meng-Lay Lin; David J. McBride; Mark Maddison; Simon Maguire; Kirsten McLay; Andrew Menzies; Tatiana Mironenko
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common form of adult kidney cancer, characterized by the presence of inactivating mutations in the VHL gene in most cases, and by infrequent somatic mutations in known cancer genes. To determine further the genetics of ccRCC, we have sequenced 101 cases through 3,544 protein-coding genes. Here we report the identification of inactivating mutations in two genes encoding enzymes involved in histone modification—SETD2, a histone H3 lysine 36 methyltransferase, and JARID1C (also known as KDM5C), a histone H3 lysine 4 demethylase—as well as mutations in the histone H3 lysine 27 demethylase, UTX (KMD6A), that we recently reported. The results highlight the role of mutations in components of the chromatin modification machinery in human cancer. Furthermore, NF2 mutations were found in non-VHL mutated ccRCC, and several other probable cancer genes were identified. These results indicate that substantial genetic heterogeneity exists in a cancer type dominated by mutations in a single gene, and that systematic screens will be key to fully determining the somatic genetic architecture of cancer.