Jonas A. Nelson

Impact of Obesity on Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: Analysis of 15,937 Patients from the ACS-NSQIP Datasets

BACKGROUND Obesity is a growing epidemic in the United States (US) affecting more than 33% of adults. We aimed to use the World Health Organization (WHO) obesity stratification scheme to assess the overall risk of obese patients undergoing breast reconstruction using the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005 to 2010. STUDY DESIGN We reviewed the 2005 to 2010 ACS-NSQIP databases identifying encounters for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes including either implant-based reconstruction (immediate, delayed, and tissue expander) or autologous reconstruction (pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous [pTRAM], free TRAM, and latissimus dorsi flap with or without implant). Patients were classified and compared based on WHO obesity criteria: nonobese (body mass index [BMI] = 20 to 29.9 kg/m(2)), class I (BMI = 30 to 34.9 kg/m(2)), class II (BMI = 35 to 39.9 kg/m(2)), and class III (BMI > 40 kg/m(2)). RESULTS During the study period 15,937 breast reconstructions were performed. The majority of reconstructions were immediate reconstructions (85.0%) and implant-based (79.1%). The incidence of obesity was 27.1%, with 16.3% defined as class I obese, 6.9% defined as class II obese, and 4.0% defined as class III obese. The WHO-classified obese patients tended to have a progressively higher incidence of comorbid conditions, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (p < 0.001), longer operative times (p = 0.0001), and greater lengths of hospital stay (p = 0.0001). Progressively higher BMIs were associated with higher rates of complications, including wound (p < 0.001), medical (p < 0.001), infections (p < 0.001), major surgical (p < 0.001), graft and prosthesis loss (p < 0.001), and return to the operating room (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study characterized the effect of progressive obesity on the incidence of surgical and medical complications after breast reconstruction using a large, prospective multicenter dataset. Increasing obesity is associated with increased perioperative morbidity. Data derived from this cohort study can be used to risk-stratify patients, enhance risk counseling, and advocate for institutional reimbursement in obese patients undergoing breast reconstruction.

Breast reconstruction after breast cancer.

Learning Objectives: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the mental, emotional, and physical benefits of reconstruction in breast cancer patients. 2. Compare the most common techniques of reconstruction in patients and detail benefits and risks associated with each. 3. Outline different methods of reconstruction and identify the method considered best for the patient based on timing of the procedures, body type, adjuvant therapies, and other coexisting conditions. 4. Distinguish between some of the different flaps that can be considered for autologous reconstruction. Summary: Breast cancer is unfortunately a common disease affecting millions of women, often at a relatively young age. Reconstruction following mastectomy offers women an opportunity to mollify some of the emotional and aesthetic effects of this devastating disease. Although varying techniques of alloplastic and autologous techniques are available, all strive to achieve the same goal: the satisfactory reformation of a breast mound that appears as natural as possible without clothing and at the very least is normal in appearance under clothing. This article summarizes the various approaches to breast reconstruction and offers a balanced view of the risks and benefits of each, all of which in the end offer the opportunity for excellent and predictable results with a high degree of patient satisfaction.

Comprehensive outcome and cost analysis of free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction: an experience with 1303 flaps.

Background: Free tissue transfer is standard for postoncologic reconstruction, yet it entails a lengthy operation and significant recovery. The authors present their longitudinal experience of free tissue breast reconstructions with an emphasis on predictors of major surgical and medical complications. Methods: The authors reviewed their prospectively maintained free flap database and identified oncologic breast reconstruction patients from 2005 to 2011. Factors associated with surgical and medical complications were identified using univariate analyses and logistic regression to determine predictors of complications. Results: Complications included major immediate surgical complications [n = 34 (4.0 percent)], major delayed surgical complications [n = 54 (6.4 percent)], minor surgical complications [n = 404 (47.6 percent)], and medical complications [n = 50 (5.9 percent)]. Obesity (p = 0.034), smoking (p = 0.06), flap type (p = 0.005), and recipient vessels (p < 0.001) were associated with immediate complications. Similarly, delayed surgical complications were associated with obesity (p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p < 0.001), hypertension (p < 0.001), and prior radiation therapy (p = 0.06). Regression analysis demonstrated that flap choice (p = 0.024) was independently associated with major immediate complications, and patient comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.001) and obesity (p < 0.0001) were associated with delayed complications. Patients who developed an immediate surgical complication experienced longer hospital stays (p < 0.0001), higher operating costs (p < 0.001), and greater hospital costs (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Early major complications are related to flap selection, whereas late major complications are associated with patient comorbidities. Overall, major surgical and medical complications are associated with increased hospital length of stay and greater cost in autologous breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part I. Unilateral reconstruction

Background: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the impact of bilateral free flap breast reconstruction on the abdominal wall. This is the second installation of a two-part series. Presented here are bilateral combinations of three techniques: the muscle-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap, deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap. Methods: A blinded prospective cohort study was performed involving 234 patients. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and for 1 year postoperatively. At each encounter, patients underwent objective abdominal strength testing using the Manual Muscle Function Test and Functional Independence Measure and psychometric testing using the Short Form 36 questionnaire. At postoperative visits, patients also completed a questionnaire specific to breast reconstruction. Statistical analysis included the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Friedman, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Results: A total of 234 patients were enrolled. Of these, 157 underwent reconstruction, 82 of which were bilateral. There was a significant decline in upper (p = 0.02) and lower (p = 0.05) abdominal strength from bilateral free TRAM flaps compared with bilateral DIEP flaps. Likewise, there was a significant decline in upper (p = 0.055) and lower (p = 0.04) abdominal strength from bilateral free TRAM flaps compared with bilateral SIEA flaps. For combinations, the most muscle impairment to least was as follows: free TRAM/free TRAM, free TRAM/DIEP, DIEP/DIEP, DIEP/SIEA, and SIEA/SIEA. The free TRAM/SIEA data were not significant. Although psychometric testing showed trends, there was no significant difference among treatment groups. Conclusion: Abdominal wall strength following various combinations of bilateral free flap breast reconstruction techniques closely adheres to theoretical predictions based on the degree of surgical muscle sacrifice.

A Comparison between DIEP and Muscle-Sparing Free TRAM Flaps in Breast Reconstruction: A Single Surgeon's Recent Experience

Background: Discussions of abdominal donor-site morbidity and risk of flap loss continue to surround free flap breast reconstruction. The authors performed a head-to-head comparison of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and muscle-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps performed by a single senior surgeon at a single institution. Methods: The senior authors (J.M.S.) recent experience with DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps between July of 2006 and July of 2008 was reviewed retrospectively. The choice of flap was dictated by an intraoperative algorithm based on number, size, and location of perforator vessels. Variables assessed included intraoperative and postoperative complications. Three groups were analyzed: DIEP reconstructions, muscle-sparing free TRAM reconstructions, and bilateral reconstructions in which one of each flap type was performed. Results: Ninety-one patients underwent 123 muscle-sparing free TRAM flap reconstructions, 53 patients underwent 71 DIEP flap reconstructions, and 31 patients underwent bilateral reconstruction with one DIEP and one muscle-sparing free TRAM flap. There were no significant differences in intraoperative complications or in minor postoperative complications. There was, however, a significant increase in total major postoperative complications in the DIEP study group (DIEP = 3.9 percent, muscle-sparing free TRAM = 0 percent, p = 0.03). No significant difference was noted in hernia formation (DIEP = 0, muscle-sparing free TRAM = 4, p = 0.15). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that both of these flaps may be reliably performed with an extremely low risk of complications. The choice of flap should be made intraoperatively, based on anatomic findings on a patient-by-patient basis, so as to optimize flap survivability while minimizing donor-site morbidity to the greatest extent possible.

Breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer from the abdomen in the morbidly obese.

Background: There are national trends of increasing incidence of morbid obesity and autologous breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer from the abdomen. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of free flap breast reconstruction in the morbidly obese population. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who underwent transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous, deep inferior epigastric perforator, or superficial inferior epigastric artery flap breast reconstructions between July of 2006 and October of 2008. Data from all patients with a body mass index greater than 40 were compared with those of patients with a body mass index less than 40. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Significant findings were then analyzed in a post hoc fashion to examine trends with increasing body mass index. Results: Four hundred four patients underwent 612 free flap breast reconstructions during the study period. Twenty-five of these patients (6 percent) had a body mass index greater than 40. The morbidly obese group had significantly higher rate of total flap loss (p = 0.02), total major postoperative complications (p = 0.05), and delayed wound healing (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Free flap breast reconstruction in the morbidly obese is associated with a higher risk of total flap loss, total major postoperative complications, and delayed abdominal wound healing. However, the overall incidence of complications is low, making free tissue transfer from the abdomen an acceptable method of breast reconstruction in this patient population.

Free tissue transfer in the obese patient: an outcome and cost analysis in 1258 consecutive abdominally based reconstructions.

Background: The authors’ institution has seen an increase in obese and morbidly obese patients seeking autologous breast reconstruction. The authors provide a comprehensive outcome analysis of patients undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction. Methods: The authors identified obese patients receiving free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction. World Health Organization body mass index criteria were used: nonobese (body mass index, 20 to 29.9 kg/m2), class I (30 to 34.9 kg/m2), class II (35 to 39.9 kg/m2), and class III (>40 kg/m2). Patient comorbidities, body mass index, complications (medical and surgical), and hospital resource use were examined. Results: Eight-hundred twelve patients undergoing 1258 free tissue transfers for breast reconstruction were included. Overall, 66.5 percent (n = 540) were considered nonobese, 22.9 percent (n = 186) had class I obesity, 5.0 percent (n = 41) had class II, and 5.7 percent (n = 45) had class III. Obesity was associated with a significant increase in minor (p = 0.001) and major (p = 0.013) complications. Morbidly obese patients had significantly higher rates of total flap loss (p = 0.006) and longer operative times (p = 0.0002). Complications translated into greater cost and resource consumption (p < 0.001). Muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap experienced a significantly higher rate of hernia compared with other flaps (p = 0.02), without a difference in flap loss rate (p = 0.61). Conclusions: Increasing obesity is associated with increased perioperative risk in free abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction, which translated into greater perioperative morbidity, higher hospital cost, and increased health care resource consumption. Higher body mass index is directly related to intraoperative technical difficulty, flap loss, donor-site morbidity, and cost use. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Complications and morbidity following breast reconstruction – a review of 16,063 cases from the 2005–2010 NSQIP datasets

Abstract Post-operative complications pose a significant set-back for patients undergoing breast reconstruction. This study aims to characterize factors associated with postoperative complications following breast reconstruction using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2005–2010. The 2005-2010 ACS-NSQIP databases were reviewed, identifying encounters for CPT codes including either implant-based reconstruction (immediate, delayed, and tissue expander) or autologous reconstruction (pedicled transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous (TRAM), free TRAM, and latissimus dorsi flap with or without implant). Complications were characterized into three categories: major surgical complications, wound complications, and medical complications. During the study period 16,063 breast reconstructions were performed. Autologous reconstructions were performed in 20.7% of patients and implant-based in 79.3%. The incidence of major surgical complications was 8.4%, whereas the incidence of medical and wound complications was 1.6% and 3.5%, respectively. Independent risk factors for major surgical complications included: immediate and autologous reconstructions, obesity, smoking, previous percutaneous cardiac surgery (PCS), recent weight loss, bleeding disorder, recent surgery, ASA ≥ 3, intra-operative transfusion, and prolonged operative times. Risk factors for medical complications included: autologous reconstruction, obesity, tumor involving CNS, bleeding disorders, recent surgery, ASA ≥ 3, intra-operative transfusion, and prolonged operative times. This study characterizes the incidence of surgical and medical complications following breast reconstruction using a large, prospective multicentre dataset. Key identifiable risk factors associated with both surgical and medical morbidity included: autologous breast reconstruction, obesity, ASA ≥ 3, bleeding disorders, and prolonged operative time. Data derived from this cohort can be used to risk-stratify patients and to enhance perioperative decision-making.

Breast reconstruction modality outcome study: a comparison of expander/implants and free flaps in select patients.

Background: Choosing a breast reconstructive modality after mastectomy is a critical step involving complex decisions. The authors provide outcomes data comparing two common reconstructive modalities to assist patients and surgeons in preoperative counseling and discussions. Methods: A prospectively maintained database was queried identifying select patients undergoing expander/implant and abdominally based free flaps for breast reconstruction between 2005 and 2008. Variables evaluated included comorbidities, operations, time to reconstruction, complications, overall outcome, clinic visits, revisions, and costs. Results: One hundred forty-two patients received free flaps and 60 received expander/implants. Expander/implant patients required more procedures (p < 0.001) but had shorter overall hospital lengths of stay (p < 0.001). The two cohorts experienced a similar rate of revision (p = 0.17). Free flap patients elected to undergo nipple-areola reconstruction more frequently (p = 0.01) and were able to sooner (p < 0.0001). Patients undergoing expander/implant reconstruction had a higher rate of failure (7.3 versus 1.3 percent, p = 0.008). Free flap patients achieved a stable reconstruction significantly faster (p = 0.0005), with fewer visits (p = 0.02). Cost analysis demonstrated total cost trended toward significantly lower in the free flap cohort (p = 0.15). Reconstructive modality was the only independent factor associated with time to stable reconstruction and reconstructive failure (p < 0.001 and p = 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: The authors’ analysis revealed that free flap reconstructions required fewer procedures, had lower rates of complications and failures, had fewer clinic visits, and achieved a final, complete reconstruction faster than expander/implant reconstructions. Although autologous reconstruction is still not ideal for every patient, these findings can be used to enhance preoperative discussions when choosing a reconstructive modality. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Among 1,706 cases of abdominal wall reconstruction, what factors influence the occurrence of major operative complications?

BACKGROUND Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) poses a substantial operative challenge, often in the setting of multiple failed attempts at repair in high-risk patients. Our aim was to assess risk factors for major operative morbidity after AWR using the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) patient database. METHODS A review of the ACS-NSQIP database of outcomes from 2005 to 2010 was performed to identify patients undergoing AWR utilizing Current Procedural Terminology codes for ventral hernia repair and a concomitant component separation. Independent variables included patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and operative considerations. Major operative complication (deep wound infection, graft or prosthetic loss, or unplanned return to the operating room within 30 days) was used as our dependent variable. Stepwise, multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate patient risk factors influencing the occurrence of major operative complications. RESULTS We identified 1,706 patients with an average age of 55.9 ± 12.8 years with 30.1% undergoing concurrent intra-abdominal procedures and 57.1% undergoing mesh repair. Notable medical comorbidities included obesity (63.4%), smoking (24.9%), hypertension (53.1%), diabetes (19.9%), and anemia (22.6%). Average operative time was 211.7 ± 105.0 minutes. Regression analysis determined that prolonged operative time (odds ratio [OR], 2.7; P < .001) and American Society of Anesthesiologists >2 (OR, 1.8; P = .009) were positively associated, whereas advanced age (OR, 0.5; P = .005) was negatively associated with the occurrence of major operative complications. CONCLUSION Greater operative times and overall patient health are important prognostic factors for individuals undergoing AWR. The increased physiologic stress of a greater operative duration on patients who often have multiple comorbidities seems to play a significant role in predicting negative outcomes after AWR.