Jonathan Abrams

ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina—Summary Article A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina)

The Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians–American Society of Internal Medicine acknowledges the scientific validity of this product as a background paper and as a review that captures the levels of evidence in the management of patients with chronic stable angina as of November 17, 2002. The American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Task Force on Practice Guidelines regularly reviews existing guidelines to determine when an update or a full revision is needed. This process gives priority to areas in which major changes in text, and particularly recommendations, are merited on the basis of new understanding or evidence. Minor changes in verbiage and references are discouraged. The ACC/AHA/American College of Physicians–American Society of Internal Medicine (ACP-ASIM) Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina, which were published in June 1999, have now been updated. The full-text guideline incorporating the updated material is available on the Internet (www.acc.org or www.americanheart.org) in both a track-changes version showing the changes in the 1999 guideline in strike-out (deleted text) and highlighting …

American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines

A 29-year-old Dominican man with a history of intravenous heroin use and hepatitis C presented with a 5-day history of fever, dyspnoea, haemoptysis, pleuritic chest pain, abdominal pain, haematochezia and haematemesis. Initial physical examination was significant for scleral icterus, generalised abdominal tenderness to palpation, melaena and blood-tinged sputum. Blood cultures grew Fusobacterium species. CT scan of the chest revealed multiple bilateral cavitary features in lung fields. At the same time, a neck ultrasound performed demonstrated thrombophlebitis in the right internal jugular vein, confirming the diagnosis of ‘Lemierre’s syndrome’. Treatment was with antibiotics and supportive care for 6 weeks.

ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Summary Article A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines)

The current update of the ACC/AHA/NASPE Guidelines for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices includes several significant changes in the recommendations and in the supporting narrative portion. In this summary, we list the updated recommendations along with the respective

2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons

WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS* Stephan D. Fihn, MD, MPH, Chair†; Julius M. Gardin, MD, Vice Chair*‡; Jonathan Abrams, MD‡; Kathleen Berra, MSN, ANP*§; James C. Blankenship, MD*\; Apostolos P. Dallas, MD*†; Pamela S. Douglas, MD*‡; JoAnne M. Foody, MD*‡; Thomas C. Gerber, MD, PhD‡; Alan L. Hinderliter, MD‡; Spencer B. King III, MD*‡; Paul D. Kligfield, MD‡; Harlan M. Krumholz, MD‡; Raymond Y.K. Kwong, MD‡; Michael J. Lim, MD*\; Jane A. Linderbaum, MS, CNP-BC¶; Michael J. Mack, MD*#; Mark A. Munger, PharmD*‡; Richard L. Prager, MD#; Joseph F. Sabik, MD***; Leslee J. Shaw, PhD*‡; Joanna D. Sikkema, MSN, ANP-BC*§; Craig R. Smith, Jr, MD**; Sidney C. Smith, Jr, MD*††; John A. Spertus, MD, MPH*‡‡; Sankey V. Williams, MD*†

ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Summary Article

The current update of the ACC/AHA/NASPE Guidelines for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices includes several significant changes in the recommendations and in the supporting narrative portion. In this summary, we list the updated recommendations along with the respective 1998 recommendations, each one accompanied by a brief comment outlining the rationale for the changes, additions, or deletions. All new or revised recommendations are listed in the second column and appear in boldface type. References that support either the 1998 recommendations that have not changed or the new or revised recommendations are noted in parentheses at the end of each recommendation. The reader is referred to the full-text version of the guidelines posted on the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology (NASPE) World Wide Web sites for a more detailed exposition of the rationale for these changes. In addition to the recommendation changes listed here, this update includes an expanded section on the selection of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) that reflects the technical advances that have taken place since 1998. A brief expanded summary of pacemaker follow-up procedures is also new to these guidelines. For both of these …

Prevention Conference V Beyond Secondary Prevention : Identifying the High-Risk Patient for Primary Prevention : Noninvasive Tests of Atherosclerotic Burden : Writing Group III

Writing Group I of Prevention Conference V considered the role of routine office-based measures for assessing global risk in asymptomatic persons. With the physician-directed office risk assessment as a foundation, further risk stratification may be valuable, especially when the risk estimate is neither clearly low risk nor high risk (intermediate risk). For the intermediate-risk patient, further testing might include ≥1 noninvasive measure of atherosclerotic burden. Pathology studies have documented that levels of traditional risk factors are associated with the extent and severity of atherosclerosis. However, at every level of risk factor exposure, there is substantial variation in the amount of atherosclerosis. This variation in disease is probably due to genetic susceptibility; combinations and interactions with other risk factors, including life habits; duration of exposure to the specific level of the risk factors; and such factors as biological and laboratory variability. Thus, subclinical disease measurements, representing the end result of risk exposures, may be useful for improving coronary heart disease (CHD) risk prediction. Noninvasive tests such as carotid artery duplex scanning, electron beam–computed tomography (EBCT), ultrasound-based endothelial function studies, ankle/brachial blood pressure ratios, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques offer the potential for directly or indirectly measuring and monitoring atherosclerosis in asymptomatic persons. High-sensitivity testing for C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) may also represent a measure of atherosclerosis “burden” and may therefore be considered another potential marker of atherosclerosis disease risk. The Prevention Conference V participants considered the status of several measures of subclinical disease in CHD risk assessment. The discussion that follows is a summary of the data reviewed and discussed at Prevention Conference V. During the discussion groups at Prevention Conference V, the ankle-brachial blood pressure index (ABI) was considered as a means of predicting CHD events. The ABI is a simple, inexpensive diagnostic test for lower-extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD). …

ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina—Summary Article

The Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians–American Society of Internal Medicine acknowledges the scientific validity of this product as a background paper and as a review that captures the levels of evidence in the management of patients with chronic stable angina as of November 17, 2002. The American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Task Force on Practice Guidelines regularly reviews existing guidelines to determine when an update or a full revision is needed. This process gives priority to areas in which major changes in text, and particularly recommendations, are merited on the basis of new understanding or evidence. Minor changes in verbiage and references are discouraged. The ACC/AHA/American College of Physicians–American Society of Internal Medicine (ACP-ASIM) Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina, which were published in June 1999, have now been updated. The full-text guideline incorporating the updated material is available on the Internet (www.acc.org or www.americanheart.org) in both a track-changes version showing the changes in the 1999 guideline in strike-out (deleted text) and highlighting …

American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines

This document has been developed as a Clinical Expert Consensus Document (CECD), combining the resources of the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). It is intended to provide a perspective on the current state of management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Clinical Expert Consensus Documents are intended to inform practitioners, payers, and other interested parties of the opinion of the ACCF and the ESC concerning evolving areas of clinical practice and/or technologies that are widely available or new to the practice community. Topics chosen for coverage by expert consensus documents are so designed because the evidence base, the experience with technology, and/or the clinical practice are not considered sufficiently well developed to be evaluated by the formal American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Practice Guidelines process. Often the topic is the subject of considerable ongoing investigation. Thus, the reader should view the CECD as the best attempt of the ACC and the ESC to inform and guide clinical practice in areas where rigorous evidence may not yet be available or the evidence to date is not widely accepted. When feasible, CECDs include indications or contraindications. Some topics covered by CECDs will be addressed subsequently by the ACC/AHA Practice Guidelines Committee. The Task Force on Clinical …

American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards: A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents

This document has been developed as a Clinical Expert Consensus Document (CECD), combining the resources of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I). It is intended to provide a perspective on the current state of cardiac

Characteristics of a Contemporary Population with Angina Pectoris

To characterize a contemporary, nonhospitalized population with angina pectoris, data were obtained from a geographically diverse cohort of 5,125 outpatients with chronic stable angina cared for by 1,266 primary care physicians between September and November of 1990. Diagnosis was based on history supported by evidence for coronary artery disease (coronary angiography, old myocardial infarction, or an abnormal stress test, either alone or in combination). The mean age of the patients was 69 years and 53% were women. Seventy percent had > 1 associated illness and 64% took > 1 cardiovascular drug. Median angina frequency was approximately 2 episodes/week and increased angina frequency (p < 0.0001) was associated with decreased overall feeling of well-being. Although effort angina was present in 90% of patients, 47% also had rest angina and 35% had mental stress-evoked angina. Female gender (relative risk [RR] 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 1.16), concomitant illness (RR 1.17; CI 1.09 to 1.25), and pharmacotherapy (RR 1.14; CI 1.07 to 1.22) were associated with excess risk for rest angina. Younger age (RR 1.30; CI 1.20 to 1.41), female gender (RR 1.16; CI 1.07 to 1.26), concomitant illness (RR 1.13; CI 1.03 to 1.24), and pharmacotherapy (RR 1.28; CI 1.15 to 1.93) were associated with excess risk for mental stress angina. These data suggest that contemporary outpatients with angina are frequently women and elderly patients with high rates of associated illness, rest, and mental stress-related angina.