Jonathan B Forman

Making America work

Work. Hard work! And plenty of it. That is what has made the United States into the worlds foremost economic superpower. But while we Americans value and respect work, we are also concerned about economic justice. We like to see all workers earn a fair days pay for a fair days work. And we like having a safety net to catch those who cannot compete successfully in our labor markets. America works because of this balance between the desire to reward work and our concerns about economic justice. But according to Jon Forman, America could work even better. In Making America Work , Forman explains how current government policies influence work and work behavior and makes the case for changing government tax, welfare, Social Security, pension, and labor market policies to encourage work and promote greater economic justice. It is a clear, provocative declaration of principles and a bold prescription for policies that restore and preserve the balance of work rewards and economic justice.

Issues for Implementing Phased Retirement in Defined Benefit Plans

Abstract U.S. society is aging. The nature of work has changed from work that requires physical strength to work based on knowledge. As a result, workers are beginning to phase into retirement rather than going directly from full-time work to full retirement. From a retirement income perspective, many final-average-pay defined benefit plans have features that make phased retirement difficult at best and detrimental at worst. U.S. pension law and regulations present barriers to phased retirement if the phased retiree wants to receive a portion of available pension benefits during phased retirement. This paper examines private sector options to encourage phased retirement and to eliminate the disincentives that currently affect defined benefit plans. It offers alternative calculations of final average pay that do not penalize the part-time worker. It also demonstrates that the plan’s early retirement reduction and late retirement increase can be set to maintain actuarial equity throughout phased retirement. The paper presents benefit calculations with equal actuarial values for various payout patterns. The paper discusses the coordination between phased retirement and subsidized early retirement. Finally, the paper notes some of the changes in ERISA that will be needed to facilitate phased retirement in defined benefit plans, especially for participants who want to receive pension distributions while working part time.

The Analytics of a Single-Period Tontine

A single-period tontine is an arrangement in which a group of members contribute to an investment pool, and after a fixed period of time, the pool is distributed to those members who are still alive. The distribution is made in unequal amounts based on member death probabilities and contribution amounts. In a companion article we apply the single-period tontine to propose products that we feel have commercial potential. Here, we focus on the analytics. The analysis applies not just to single-period tontines, but also to other arrangements that can be analyzed as a sequence of single-period tontines, such as pooled annuity funds.The core of the paper is the development of formulas for the mean and variance of the random amount that a surviving member receives in a single-period tontine. We use the formulas to resolve an open question about bias in pooled annuity funds and to show practical conditions under which it can be made negligible. We show how the provider can use the formulas to manage the subscription process, determining who is allowed to participate and how much they are allowed to contribute, so that the statistics of the tontine are favorably controlled. We use the formulas to compare mixing different cohorts within a single tontine versus creating a separate tontine for each cohort, finding that mixing cohorts is better because it reduces both idiosyncratic risk and systematic risk.

Early access to occupational pension plans: Belgium vs USA. Borrowing, pledging, hardship withdrawal or early distribution

Occupational pension plans help people to maintain their living standards after retirement. This article looks at differences in the design of occupational pensions in Belgium and the USA, and more specifically, at early access. The article shows that different cultural backgrounds influence occupational pension systems. Occupational pension plans are intended to provide retirement income, and assets should therefore not be used for non-retirement purposes such as holidays Credit card debts. However, both Belgium and the USA provide mechanisms for early access. In Belgium, early access to an occupational pension plan is, in principle, prohibited. The only exception is for the purchase of real estate since this fits within the Belgian pension philosophy that retirees should not have to spend any of their retirement income on rent. It is culturally established that pensions and house ownership are inter-connected. In the USA, early access is not prohibited but it is often discouraged. Leakages from occupational pension plans must be limited, but some flexibility needs to remain. Since participation in occupational pension plans ought to be encouraged, (too many) restrictions on access may discourage individuals from making contributions to those plans. This is the reason why there is greater flexibility towards early take up in the American private pension system.

Making Federal Pension Policy Work

Abstract Millions of Americans retire while they are still productive. Of these, many will have the resources to enjoy all of their golden years. Unfortunately, many others will face economic hardships after they have exhausted their own resources but have become too frail to return to work. Part of the problem is that the current pension system is fraught with financial incentives that push ablebodied elderly workers into retirement just when they should instead be encouraged to remain in the workforce to accumulate additional retirement assets. This paper recommends a number of ways to change federal pension laws in order to encourage elderly workers to remain in the workforce. For example, this paper recommends toughening the penalty on premature distributions, repealing the minimum distribution rules, and repealing the exceptions to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act that permit retirement plans to provide early retirement incentives and subsidies. This paper also considers whether the government should require that all retirement plans be neutral as to the timing of retirement. In an age-neutral world, workers would always accrue more benefits if they kept working. Consequently, more workers would remain in the workforce, accumulating additional assets for their eventual retirement. Finally, this paper also considers how federal pension policy could help counteract the tendency of Americans to retire too early because they underestimate their life expectancies, overestimate their financial resources, and fail to understand the deleterious effects of inflation. In particular, this paper recommends that the government require that virtually all retirement plans pay at least a portion of their benefits in the form of an inflation-adjusted annuity.