Jonathan Baxter

Dynamic Repositioning of Genes in the Nucleus of Lymphocytes Preparing for Cell Division

We show that several transcriptionally inactive genes localize to centromeric heterochromatin in the nucleus of cycling but not quiescent (noncycling) primary B lymphocytes. In quiescent cells, centromeric repositioning of inactive loci was induced after mitogenic stimulation. A dynamic repositioning of selected genes was also observed in developing T cells. Rag and TdT loci were shown to relocate to centromeric domains following heritable gene silencing in primary CD4+8+ thymocytes, but not in a phenotypically similar cell line in which silencing occurred but was not heritable. Collectively, these data indicate that the spatial organization of genes in cycling and noncycling lymphocytes is different and that locus repositioning may be a feature of heritable gene silencing.

Nonequivalent nuclear location of immunoglobulin alleles in B lymphocytes

Individual B lymphocytes normally express immunoglobulin (Ig) proteins derived from single Ig heavy chain (H) and light chain (L) alleles. Allelic exclusion ensures monoallelic expression of Ig genes by each B cell to maintain single receptor specificity. Here we provide evidence that at later stages of B cell development, additional mechanisms may contribute to prioritizing expression of single IgH and IgL alleles. Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of primary splenic B cells isolated from normal and genetically manipulated mice showed that endogenous IgH, κ and λ alleles localized to different subnuclear environments after activation and had differential expression patterns. However, this differential recruitment and expression of Ig alleles was not typically seen among transformed B cell lines. These data raise the possibility that epigenetic factors help maintain the monoallelic expression of Ig.

Topoisomerase II Inactivation Prevents the Completion of DNA Replication in Budding Yeast

Type II topoisomerases are essential for resolving topologically entwined double-stranded DNA. Although anti-topoisomerase 2 (Top2) drugs are clinically important antibiotics and chemotherapies, to our knowledge, the mechanisms of cell killing by Top2 depletion and inactivation have never been directly compared. We show that depletion of Top2 protein from budding yeast cells prevents DNA decatenation during S phase. Cells complete DNA replication and enter the ensuing mitosis on schedule, suffering extensive chromosome missegregation. Cytokinesis through incompletely segregated chromosomes causes lethal DNA damage. By contrast, expression of catalytically inactive Top2 causes a stable G2 arrest requiring an intact DNA damage checkpoint. Checkpoint activation correlates with an inability to complete DNA replication, resulting in hypercatenated, gapped daughter DNA molecules. Thus, Top2 depletion and inactivation kill cells by different mechanisms, which has implications for understanding the nature of the catenation checkpoint, how DNA replication terminates, how anti-Top2 drugs work, and how new drugs might be designed.

Positive Supercoiling of Mitotic DNA Drives Decatenation by Topoisomerase II in Eukaryotes

Positive supercoiling of catenated DNA during cell division induces its enzymic decatenation to allow chromosome segregation. DNA topoisomerase II completely removes DNA intertwining, or catenation, between sister chromatids before they are segregated during cell division. How this occurs throughout the genome is poorly understood. We demonstrate that in yeast, centromeric plasmids undergo a dramatic change in their topology as the cells pass through mitosis. This change is characterized by positive supercoiling of the DNA and requires mitotic spindles and the condensin factor Smc2. When mitotic positive supercoiling occurs on decatenated DNA, it is rapidly relaxed by topoisomerase II. However, when positive supercoiling takes place in catenated plasmid, topoisomerase II activity is directed toward decatenation of the molecules before relaxation. Thus, a topological change on DNA drives topoisomerase II to decatenate molecules during mitosis, potentially driving the full decatenation of the genome.

Fork rotation and DNA precatenation are restricted during DNA replication to prevent chromosomal instability.

Significance Genome inheritance requires the complete resolution of all intertwines within parental DNA. This is facilitated by fork rotation and precatenation of the newly replicated DNA. However, the general importance and frequency of fork rotation in vivo are poorly understood. We find that the evolutionarily conserved Timeless and Tipin proteins actively inhibit fork rotation in budding yeast. In their presence, fork rotation appears restricted to hard-to-replicate fragile sites. In their absence, excessive fork rotation leads to damage accumulating in the replicated sister chromatids, especially at known yeast fragile sites. Therefore, fork rotation appears to be restricted to contexts where it is absolutely required for unwinding, and this restriction is required to prevent precatenation inducing excessive chromosomal fragility. Faithful genome duplication and inheritance require the complete resolution of all intertwines within the parental DNA duplex. This is achieved by topoisomerase action ahead of the replication fork or by fork rotation and subsequent resolution of the DNA precatenation formed. Although fork rotation predominates at replication termination, in vitro studies have suggested that it also occurs frequently during elongation. However, the factors that influence fork rotation and how rotation and precatenation may influence other replication-associated processes are unknown. Here we analyze the causes and consequences of fork rotation in budding yeast. We find that fork rotation and precatenation preferentially occur in contexts that inhibit topoisomerase action ahead of the fork, including stable protein–DNA fragile sites and termination. However, generally, fork rotation and precatenation are actively inhibited by Timeless/Tof1 and Tipin/Csm3. In the absence of Tof1/Timeless, excessive fork rotation and precatenation cause extensive DNA damage following DNA replication. With Tof1, damage related to precatenation is focused on the fragile protein–DNA sites where fork rotation is induced. We conclude that although fork rotation and precatenation facilitate unwinding in hard-to-replicate contexts, they intrinsically disrupt normal chromosome duplication and are therefore restricted by Timeless/Tipin.

Breaking up is hard to do: the formation and resolution of sister chromatid intertwines.

The absolute necessity to resolve every intertwine between the two strands of the DNA double helix provides a massive challenge to the cellular processes that duplicate and segregate chromosomes. Although the overwhelming majority of intertwines between the parental DNA strands are resolved during DNA replication, there are numerous chromosomal contexts where some intertwining is maintained into mitosis. These mitotic sister chromatid intertwines (SCIs) can be found as; short regions of unreplicated DNA, fully replicated and intertwined sister chromatids--commonly referred to as DNA catenation--and as sister chromatid linkages generated by homologous recombination-associated processes. Several overlapping mechanisms, including intra-chromosomal compaction, topoisomerase action and Holliday junction resolvases, ensure that all SCIs are removed before they can prevent normal chromosome segregation. Here, I discuss why some DNA intertwines persist into mitosis and review our current knowledge of the SCI resolution mechanisms that are employed in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, including how deregulating SCI formation during DNA replication or disrupting the resolution processes may contribute to aneuploidy in cancer.

The Causes and Consequences of Topological Stress during DNA Replication

The faithful replication of sister chromatids is essential for genomic integrity in every cell division. The replication machinery must overcome numerous difficulties in every round of replication, including DNA topological stress. Topological stress arises due to the double-stranded helical nature of DNA. When the strands are pulled apart for replication to occur, the intertwining of the double helix must also be resolved or topological stress will arise. This intrinsic problem is exacerbated by specific chromosomal contexts encountered during DNA replication. The convergence of two replicons during termination, the presence of stable protein-DNA complexes and active transcription can all lead to topological stresses being imposed upon DNA replication. Here we describe how replication forks respond to topological stress by replication fork rotation and fork reversal. We also discuss the genomic contexts where topological stress is likely to occur in eukaryotes, focusing on the contribution of transcription. Finally, we describe how topological stress, and the ways forks respond to it, may contribute to genomic instability in cells.

Principles of Meiotic Chromosome Assembly

During meiotic prophase, chromosomes organise into a series of chromatin loops emanating from a proteinaceous axis. Yet, while much is known about meiotic chromosome morphology, the mechanism of assembly, and how assembly is regulated, remain open questions. Here we combine genome-wide chromosome conformation analysis (Hi-C) with Saccharomyces cerevisiae genetics and in silico polymer modelling to elucidate the mechanisms that shape meiotic chromosomes. Entering meiosis, grid-like Hi-C interaction patterns emerge that correspond to the localisation of—and depend upon—the meiotic cohesin subunit Rec8. Such patterns fit a model of loop extrusion, where a heterogeneous population of expanding loops develop along the chromosome, with growth limited by barriers. While grid-like patterns emerge independently of chromosome synapsis, synapsis itself generates additional compaction that matures differentially depending on telomeric distance and chromosome size. Our results elucidate fundamental principles of meiotic chromosome assembly and demonstrate the essential role of cohesin within this evolutionarily conserved process.