Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jonathan Beesley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jonathan Beesley.


Nature Genetics | 2007

A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk

Angela Cox; Alison M. Dunning; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Sabapathy P. Balasubramanian; Malcolm Reed; Karen A. Pooley; Serena Scollen; Caroline Baynes; Bruce A.J. Ponder; Stephen J. Chanock; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A. Brinton; Beata Peplonska; Melissa C. Southey; John L. Hopper; Margaret McCredie; Graham G. Giles; Olivia Fletcher; Nichola Johnson; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Lorna Gibson; Stig E. Bojesen; Børge G. Nordestgaard; Christen K. Axelsson; Diana Torres; Ute Hamann; Christina Justenhoven; Hiltrud Brauch; Jenny Chang-Claude; Silke Kropp

The Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) has been established to conduct combined case-control analyses with augmented statistical power to try to confirm putative genetic associations with breast cancer. We genotyped nine SNPs for which there was some prior evidence of an association with breast cancer: CASP8 D302H (rs1045485), IGFBP3 −202 C → A (rs2854744), SOD2 V16A (rs1799725), TGFB1 L10P (rs1982073), ATM S49C (rs1800054), ADH1B 3′ UTR A → G (rs1042026), CDKN1A S31R (rs1801270), ICAM5 V301I (rs1056538) and NUMA1 A794G (rs3750913). We included data from 9–15 studies, comprising 11,391–18,290 cases and 14,753–22,670 controls. We found evidence of an association with breast cancer for CASP8 D302H (with odds ratios (OR) of 0.89 (95% confidence interval (c.i.): 0.85–0.94) and 0.74 (95% c.i.: 0.62–0.87) for heterozygotes and rare homozygotes, respectively, compared with common homozygotes; Ptrend = 1.1 × 10−7) and weaker evidence for TGFB1 L10P (OR = 1.07 (95% c.i.: 1.02–1.13) and 1.16 (95% c.i.: 1.08–1.25), respectively; Ptrend = 2.8 × 10−5). These results demonstrate that common breast cancer susceptibility alleles with small effects on risk can be identified, given sufficiently powerful studies.NOTE: In the version of this article initially published, there was an error that affected the calculations of the odds ratios, confidence intervals, between-study heterogeneity, trend test and test for association for SNP ICAM5 V301I in Table 1 (ICAM5 V301I); genotype counts in Supplementary Table 2 (ICAM5; ICR_FBCS and Kuopio studies) and minor allele frequencies, trend test and odds ratios for heterozygotes and rare homozygotes in Supplementary Table 3 (ICAM5; ICR_FBCS and Kuopio studies). The errors in Table 1 have been corrected in the PDF version of the article. The errors in supplementary information have been corrected online.


Nature Genetics | 2009

A genome-wide association study identifies a new ovarian cancer susceptibility locus on 9p22.2

Honglin Song; Susan J. Ramus; Jonathan Tyrer; Kelly L. Bolton; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Eva Wozniak; Hoda Anton-Culver; Jenny Chang-Claude; Daniel W. Cramer; Richard A. DiCioccio; Thilo Dörk; Ellen L. Goode; Marc T. Goodman; Joellen M. Schildkraut; Thomas A. Sellers; Laura Baglietto; Matthias W. Beckmann; Jonathan Beesley; Jan Blaakær; Michael E. Carney; Stephen J. Chanock; Zhihua Chen; Julie M. Cunningham; Ed Dicks; Jennifer A. Doherty; Matthias Dürst; Arif B. Ekici; David Fenstermacher; Brooke L. Fridley; Graham G. Giles

Epithelial ovarian cancer has a major heritable component, but the known susceptibility genes explain less than half the excess familial risk. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify common ovarian cancer susceptibility alleles. We evaluated 507,094 SNPs genotyped in 1,817 cases and 2,353 controls from the UK and ∼2 million imputed SNPs. We genotyped the 22,790 top ranked SNPs in 4,274 cases and 4,809 controls of European ancestry from Europe, USA and Australia. We identified 12 SNPs at 9p22 associated with disease risk (P < 10−8). The most significant SNP (rs3814113; P = 2.5 × 10−17) was genotyped in a further 2,670 ovarian cancer cases and 4,668 controls, confirming its association (combined data odds ratio (OR) = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79–0.86, Ptrend = 5.1 × 10−19). The association differs by histological subtype, being strongest for serous ovarian cancers (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.73–0.81, Ptrend = 4.1 × 10−21).


American Journal of Human Genetics | 2008

Common Breast Cancer-Predisposition Alleles Are Associated with Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

Antonis C. Antoniou; Amanda B. Spurdle; Olga M. Sinilnikova; Sue Healey; Karen A. Pooley; Rita K. Schmutzler; Beatrix Versmold; Christoph Engel; Alfons Meindl; Norbert Arnold; Wera Hofmann; Christian Sutter; Dieter Niederacher; Helmut Deissler; Trinidad Caldés; Kati Kämpjärvi; Heli Nevanlinna; Jacques Simard; Jonathan Beesley; Xiaoqing Chen; Susan L. Neuhausen; Timothy R. Rebbeck; Theresa Wagner; Henry T. Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Jeffrey N. Weitzel; Patricia A. Ganz; Mary B. Daly; Gail E. Tomlinson; Olufunmilayo I. Olopade

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer high risks of breast cancer. However, evidence suggests that these risks are modified by other genetic or environmental factors that cluster in families. A recent genome-wide association study has shown that common alleles at single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FGFR2 (rs2981582), TNRC9 (rs3803662), and MAP3K1 (rs889312) are associated with increased breast cancer risks in the general population. To investigate whether these loci are also associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, we genotyped these SNPs in a sample of 10,358 mutation carriers from 23 studies. The minor alleles of SNP rs2981582 and rs889312 were each associated with increased breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.20-1.45, p(trend) = 1.7 x 10(-8) and HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24, p(trend) = 0.02) but not in BRCA1 carriers. rs3803662 was associated with increased breast cancer risk in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20, p(trend) = 5 x 10(-5) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 combined). These loci appear to interact multiplicatively on breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers. The differences in the effects of the FGFR2 and MAP3K1 SNPs between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers point to differences in the biology of BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer tumors and confirm the distinct nature of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2009

Risk of estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer and single-nucleotide polymorphism 2q35-rs13387042

Roger L. Milne; Javier Benitez; Heli Nevanlinna; Tuomas Heikkinen; Kristiina Aittomäki; Carl Blomqvist; José Ignacio Arias; M. Pilar Zamora; Barbara Burwinkel; Claus R. Bartram; Alfons Meindl; Rita K. Schmutzler; Angela Cox; Ian W. Brock; Graeme Elliott; Malcolm Reed; Melissa C. Southey; Letitia Smith; Amanda B. Spurdle; John L. Hopper; Fergus J. Couch; Janet E. Olson; Xianshu Wang; Zachary S. Fredericksen; Peter Schürmann; Michael Bremer; Peter Hillemanns; Thilo Dörk; Peter Devilee; Christie J. van Asperen

BACKGROUND A recent genome-wide association study identified single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) 2q35-rs13387042 as a marker of susceptibility to estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. We attempted to confirm this association using the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. METHODS 2q35-rs13387042 SNP was genotyped for 31 510 women with invasive breast cancer, 1101 women with ductal carcinoma in situ, and 35 969 female control subjects from 25 studies. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by logistic regression, adjusted for study. Heterogeneity in odds ratios by each of age, ethnicity, and study was assessed by fitting interaction terms. Heterogeneity by each of invasiveness, family history, bilaterality, and hormone receptor status was assessed by subclassifying case patients and applying polytomous logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS We found strong evidence of association between rs13387042 and breast cancer in white women of European origin (per-allele OR = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09 to 1.15; P(trend) = 1.0 x 10(-19)). The odds ratio was lower than that previously reported (P = .02) and did not vary by age or ethnicity (all P > or = .2). However, it was higher when the analysis was restricted to case patients who were selected for a strong family history (P = .02). An association was observed for both ER-positive (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.17; P = 10(-15)) and ER-negative disease (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.15; P = .0003) and both progesterone receptor (PR)-positive (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.19; P = 5 x 10(-14)) and PR-negative disease (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.15; P = .00002). CONCLUSION The rs13387042 is associated with both ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer in European women.


Breast Cancer Research | 2010

HER3 and downstream pathways are involved in colonization of brain metastases from breast cancer

Leonard Da Silva; Peter T. Simpson; Chanel E. Smart; Sibylle Cocciardi; Nic Waddell; Annette Lane; Brian J. Morrison; Ana Cristina Vargas; Sue Healey; Jonathan Beesley; Pria Pakkiri; Suzanne Parry; Nyoman D. Kurniawan; Lynne Reid; Patricia Keith; Paulo Faria; Emílio Marcelo Pereira; Alena Skálová; Michael Bilous; Rosemary L. Balleine; Hongdo Do; Alexander Dobrovic; Stephen B. Fox; Marcello Franco; Brent A. Reynolds; Kum Kum Khanna; Margaret C. Cummings; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Sunil R. Lakhani

IntroductionMetastases to the brain from breast cancer have a high mortality, and basal-like breast cancers have a propensity for brain metastases. However, the mechanisms that allow cells to colonize the brain are unclear.MethodsWe used morphology, immunohistochemistry, gene expression and somatic mutation profiling to analyze 39 matched pairs of primary breast cancers and brain metastases, 22 unmatched brain metastases of breast cancer, 11 non-breast brain metastases and 6 autopsy cases of patients with breast cancer metastases to multiple sites, including the brain.ResultsMost brain metastases were triple negative and basal-like. The brain metastases over-expressed one or more members of the HER family and in particular HER3 was significantly over-expressed relative to matched primary tumors. Brain metastases from breast and other primary sites, and metastases to multiple organs in the autopsied cases, also contained somatic mutations in EGFR, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS or PIK3CA. This paralleled the frequent activation of AKT and MAPK pathways. In particular, activation of the MAPK pathway was increased in the brain metastases compared to the primary tumors.ConclusionsDeregulated HER family receptors, particularly HER3, and their downstream pathways are implicated in colonization of brain metastasis. The need for HER family receptors to dimerize for activation suggests that tumors may be susceptible to combinations of anti-HER family inhibitors, and may even be effective in the absence of HER2 amplification (that is, in triple negative/basal cancers). However, the presence of activating mutations in PIK3CA, HRAS, KRAS and NRAS suggests the necessity for also specifically targeting downstream molecules.


Clinical Cancer Research | 2008

ABCB1 (MDR 1) Polymorphisms and Progression-Free Survival among Women with Ovarian Cancer following Paclitaxel/Carboplatin Chemotherapy

Sharon E. Johnatty; Jonathan Beesley; James Paul; Sian Fereday; Amanda B. Spurdle; Penelope M. Webb; Karen Byth; Sharon Marsh; Howard L. McLeod; Paul Harnett; Robert Brown; Anna deFazio; Georgia Chenevix-Trench

Purpose: The human ABCB1 gene encodes P-glycoprotein, which transports a broad range of anticancer drugs, including paclitaxel. Although the functional consequences of ABCB1 polymorphisms have been the subject of numerous studies, few have assessed the association with clinical outcome. Experimental Design: We assessed the association between the 2677G>T/A, 3435C>T, and 1236C>T ABCB1 polymorphisms and progression-free and overall survival in 309 patients from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin and subsequently tested significant observations in an independent validation set. Results: Women who carried the minor T/A alleles at the 2677G>T/A polymorphism were significantly less likely to relapse following treatment compared with homozygote GG carriers (PLog-rank = 0.001) in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study cohort. Subgroup analyses showed that this effect was limited to cases with residual disease ≤1 cm (PLog-rank = 0.0004), not for those with residual disease >1 cm (PLog-rank = 0.3). This effect was not confirmed in an independent validation set of carboplatin/paclitaxel-treated patients (n = 278) using a higher residual disease cut point (≤2 cm). However, analysis of the unrestricted data set expanded to include docetaxel-treated patients (n = 914) did support an effect of the 2677T/A allele in patients with no macroscopic residual disease (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.04; Pone-sided = 0.039). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that there is an effect of the 2677G>T/A polymorphism on progression-free survival in ovarian cancer patients who are treated with a taxane/carboplatin, which is dependent on the extent of residual disease, with a better prognosis for patients with the 2677T/A allele and minimal residual disease.


Cancer Research | 2007

Tagging Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Cell Cycle Control Genes and Susceptibility to Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Simon A. Gayther; Honglin Song; Susan J. Ramus; Sk Kjaer; Alice S. Whittemore; Lydia Quaye; Jonathan Tyrer; Danielle Shadforth; Estrid Høgdall; Claus Høgdall; Jan Blaeker; Richard A. DiCioccio; Valerie McGuire; Penelope M. Webb; Jonathan Beesley; Adèle C. Green; David C. Whiteman; Marc T. Goodman; Galina Lurie; Michael E. Carney; Francesmary Modugno; Roberta B. Ness; Robert P. Edwards; Kirsten B. Moysich; Ellen L. Goode; Fergus J. Couch; Julie M. Cunningham; Thomas A. Sellers; Anna H. Wu; Malcolm C. Pike

High-risk susceptibility genes explain <40% of the excess risk of familial ovarian cancer. Therefore, other ovarian cancer susceptibility genes are likely to exist. We have used a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-tagging approach to evaluate common variants in 13 genes involved in cell cycle control-CCND1, CCND2, CCND3, CCNE1, CDK2, CDK4, CDK6, CDKN1A, CDKN1B, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, CDKN2C, and CDKN2D-and risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. We used a two-stage, multicenter, case-control study. In stage 1, 88 SNPs that tag common variation in these genes were genotyped in three studies from the United Kingdom, United States, and Denmark ( approximately 1,500 cases and 2,500 controls). Genotype frequencies in cases and controls were compared using logistic regression. In stage 2, eight other studies from Australia, Poland, and the United States ( approximately 2,000 cases and approximately 3,200 controls) were genotyped for the five most significant SNPs from stage 1. No SNP was significant in the stage 2 data alone. Using the combined stages 1 and 2 data set, CDKN2A rs3731257 and CDKN1B rs2066827 were associated with disease risk (unadjusted P trend = 0.008 and 0.036, respectively), but these were not significant after adjusting for multiple testing. Carrying the minor allele of these SNPs was found to be associated with reduced risk [OR, 0.91 (0.85-0.98) for rs3731257; and OR, 0.93 (0.87-0.995) for rs2066827]. In conclusion, we have found evidence that a single tagged SNP in both the CDKN2A and CDKN1B genes may be associated with reduced ovarian cancer risk. This study highlights the need for multicenter collaborations for genetic association studies.


Cancer Research | 2011

Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Loci Are Associated with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Kristen N. Stevens; Celine M. Vachon; Adam Lee; Susan L. Slager; Timothy G. Lesnick; Curtis Olswold; Peter A. Fasching; Penelope Miron; Diana Eccles; Jane Carpenter; Andrew K. Godwin; Christine B. Ambrosone; Robert Winqvist; Hiltrud Brauch; Marjanka K. Schmidt; Angela Cox; Simon S. Cross; Elinor Sawyer; Arndt Hartmann; Matthias W. Beckmann; Rud̈iger Schulz-Wendtland; Arif B. Ekici; William Tapper; Susan M. Gerty; Lorraine Durcan; Nikki Graham; Rebecca Hein; Stephan Nickels; Dieter Flesch-Janys; Judith Heinz

Triple-negative breast cancers are an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with poor survival, but there remains little known about the etiologic factors that promote its initiation and development. Commonly inherited breast cancer risk factors identified through genome-wide association studies display heterogeneity of effect among breast cancer subtypes as defined by the status of estrogen and progesterone receptors. In the Triple Negative Breast Cancer Consortium (TNBCC), 22 common breast cancer susceptibility variants were investigated in 2,980 Caucasian women with triple-negative breast cancer and 4,978 healthy controls. We identified six single-nucleotide polymorphisms, including rs2046210 (ESR1), rs12662670 (ESR1), rs3803662 (TOX3), rs999737 (RAD51L1), rs8170 (19p13.1), and rs8100241 (19p13.1), significantly associated with the risk of triple-negative breast cancer. Together, our results provide convincing evidence of genetic susceptibility for triple-negative breast cancer.


International Journal of Cancer | 2008

Consortium analysis of 7 candidate SNPs for ovarian cancer.

Susan J. Ramus; Robert A. Vierkant; Sharon E. Johnatty; Malcolm C. Pike; David Van Den Berg; Anna H. Wu; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Simon A. Gayther; Richard A. DiCioccio; Valerie McGuire; Alice S. Whittemore; Honglin Song; Douglas F. Easton; Paul Pharoah; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Stephen J. Chanock; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A. Brinton; Kathryn L. Terry; Daniel W. Cramer; Shelley S. Tworoger; Susan E. Hankinson; Andrew Berchuck; Patricia G. Moorman; Joellen M. Schildkraut; Julie M. Cunningham; Mark Liebow; Susanne K. Kjaer

The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium selected 7 candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), for which there is evidence from previous studies of an association with variation in ovarian cancer or breast cancer risks. The SNPs selected for analysis were F31I (rs2273535) in AURKA, N372H (rs144848) in BRCA2, rs2854344 in intron 17 of RB1, rs2811712 5′ flanking CDKN2A, rs523349 in the 3′ UTR of SRD5A2, D302H (rs1045485) in CASP8 and L10P (rs1982073) in TGFB1. Fourteen studies genotyped 4,624 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 8,113 controls of white non‐Hispanic origin. A marginally significant association was found for RB1 when all studies were included [ordinal odds ratio (OR) 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79–1.00) p = 0.041 and dominant OR 0.87 (95% CI 0.76–0.98) p = 0.025]; when the studies that originally suggested an association were excluded, the result was suggestive although no longer statistically significant (ordinal OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79–1.06). This SNP has also been shown to have an association with decreased risk in breast cancer. There was a suggestion of an association for AURKA, when one study that caused significant study heterogeneity was excluded [ordinal OR 1.10 (95% CI 1.01–1.20) p = 0.027; dominant OR 1.12 (95% CI 1.01–1.24) p = 0.03]. The other 5 SNPs in BRCA2, CDKN2A, SRD5A2, CASP8 and TGFB1 showed no association with ovarian cancer risk; given the large sample size, these results can also be considered to be informative. These null results for SNPs identified from relatively large initial studies shows the importance of replicating associations by a consortium approach.


PLOS Genetics | 2010

Evaluation of candidate stromal epithelial cross-talk genes identifies association between risk of serous ovarian cancer and TERT, a cancer susceptibility "Hot-Spot"

Sharon E. Johnatty; Jonathan Beesley; Xiaoqing Chen; Stuart Macgregor; David L. Duffy; Amanda B. Spurdle; Anna deFazio; Natalie Gava; Penelope M. Webb; Australian Cancer Study; Mary Anne Rossing; Jennifer A. Doherty; Mt Goodman; Galina Lurie; Pamela J. Thompson; Lynne R. Wilkens; Roberta B. Ness; Kirsten B. Moysich; Jenny Chang-Claude; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Daniel W. Cramer; Kathryn L. Terry; Susan E. Hankinson; Shelley S. Tworoger; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Hannah P. Yang; Jolanta Lissowska; Stephen J. Chanock; Paul Pharoah; Honglin Song

We hypothesized that variants in genes expressed as a consequence of interactions between ovarian cancer cells and the host micro-environment could contribute to cancer susceptibility. We therefore used a two-stage approach to evaluate common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 173 genes involved in stromal epithelial interactions in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). In the discovery stage, cases with epithelial ovarian cancer (n = 675) and controls (n = 1,162) were genotyped at 1,536 SNPs using an Illumina GoldenGate assay. Based on Positive Predictive Value estimates, three SNPs—PODXL rs1013368, ITGA6 rs13027811, and MMP3 rs522616—were selected for replication using TaqMan genotyping in up to 3,059 serous invasive cases and 8,905 controls from 16 OCAC case-control studies. An additional 18 SNPs with P per-allele<0.05 in the discovery stage were selected for replication in a subset of five OCAC studies (n = 1,233 serous invasive cases; n = 3,364 controls). The discovery stage associations in PODXL, ITGA6, and MMP3 were attenuated in the larger replication set (adj. P per-allele≥0.5). However genotypes at TERT rs7726159 were associated with ovarian cancer risk in the smaller, five-study replication study (P per-allele = 0.03). Combined analysis of the discovery and replication sets for this TERT SNP showed an increased risk of serous ovarian cancer among non-Hispanic whites [adj. ORper-allele 1.14 (1.04–1.24) p = 0.003]. Our study adds to the growing evidence that, like the 8q24 locus, the telomerase reverse transcriptase locus at 5p15.33, is a general cancer susceptibility locus.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jonathan Beesley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Georgia Chenevix-Trench

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xiaoqing Chen

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sharon E. Johnatty

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Penelope M. Webb

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amanda B. Spurdle

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jenny Chang-Claude

German Cancer Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan J. Ramus

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge