Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jonathan Benger is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jonathan Benger.


Current Opinion in Anesthesiology | 2012

Airway management outside the operating room: hazardous and incompletely studied.

T. M. Cook; Elizabeth Cordes Behringer; Jonathan Benger

Purpose of review The review examines recent knowledge regarding techniques and complications of airway management in hospitals, outside the operating room. The review does not consider airway management at the time of cardiopulmonary resuscitation as this is a separate topic. Recent findings There is a relative paucity of high-quality and interventional studies with most being observational in nature. The available data confirm the high-risk nature of airway management outside the operating room. Recent studies indicate that complications, particularly in intensive care, occur more frequently after airway placement than at the time of placement. Avoidable harm due to lack of appropriate personnel, equipment and monitoring, most notably capnography, is noted. Although airway management outside the operating room remains a high-risk procedure, the optimal organizational structure, rescue procedures, algorithms and appropriate personnel have yet to be adequately defined. Summary The notably high rate of failure of primary intubation attempts and high complication rates of airway procedures create a strong argument for increased research focus in this area of high-risk and incomplete knowledge.


Emergency Medicine Journal | 2014

The International Federation for Emergency Medicine framework for quality and safety in the emergency department

Fiona Lecky; Jonathan Benger; Suzanne Mason; Peter Cameron; Chris Walsh; Gautam Bodiwala; Simon Burns; Mike Clancy; Carmel Crock; Pat Croskerry; James Ducharme; Gregory Henry; John Heyworth; Brian R. Holroyd; Ian Higginson; Peter Jones; Arthur Kellerman; Geraldine McMahon; Elisabeth Molyneux; Patrick A Nee; Ian Sammy; Sandra M. Schneider; Michael J. Schull; Suzanne Shale; Ian G. Stiell; Ellen J. Weber

All emergency departments (EDs) have an obligation to deliver care that is demonstrably safe and of the highest possible quality. Emergency medicine is a unique and rapidly developing specialty, which forms the hub of the emergency care system and strives to provide a consistent and effective service 24 h a day, 7 days a week. The International Federation of Emergency Medicine, representing more than 70 countries, has prepared a document to define a framework for quality and safety in the ED. Following a consensus conference and with subsequent development, a series of quality indicators have been proposed. These are tabulated in the form of measures designed to answer nine quality questions presented according to the domains of structure, process and outcome. There is an urgent need to improve the evidence base to determine which quality indicators have the potential to successfully improve clinical outcomes, staff and patient experience in a cost-efficient manner—with lessons for implementation.


Emergency Medicine Journal | 2008

Atropine-resistant bradycardia due to hyperkalaemia.

T J Slade; J Grover; Jonathan Benger

Symptomatic sinus bradycardia is routinely treated in the emergency department with atropine and pacing. Two cases are presented that illustrate the importance of considering hyperkalaemia, particularly in the presence of atropine-resistant symptomatic bradycardia. The administration of calcium in such cases acts to stabilise the myocardium and resolve the bradycardia. Blood gas analysis provides a rapid estimate of serum potassium concentrations, facilitating timely treatment.


Emergency Medicine Journal | 2008

Self-inflating bag or Mapleson C breathing system for emergency pre-oxygenation?

R A Stafford; Jonathan Benger; Jerry P. Nolan

Background: A crossover study was performed in healthy volunteers to compare the efficacy of a self-inflating bag with the Mapleson C breathing system for pre-oxygenation. Method: 20 subjects breathed 100% oxygen for 3 min using each device, with a 30 min washout period. The end tidal oxygen concentration and subjective ease of breathing were compared. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in performance between the two devices, with the Mapleson C providing higher end expiratory oxygen concentrations at 3 min. The mean (SD) end expiratory oxygen concentration was 74.2 (3.8)% for the self-inflating bag (95% CI 72.4% to 75.9%) and 86.2 (3.7)% for the Mapleson C system (95% CI 84.5 to 88.0); p<0.0001. The 95% CI of the difference between the mean values for end expiratory oxygen concentration at 3 min was 10.0% to 14.2%. There was also a statistically significant difference in the subjective ease of breathing, favouring the Mapleson C system. Conclusion: The Mapleson C breathing system is more effective and subjectively easier to breathe through than a self-inflating bag when used for pre-oxygenation. However, these benefits must be weighed against the increased level of skill required and possible complications when using a Mapleson C breathing system.


Emergency Medicine Journal | 2002

The case for urban prehospital thrombolysis

Jonathan Benger

This is the first part in a debate on the benefits and disadvantages of urban prehospital thrombolysis. I put the case for prehospital thrombolyis in the urban environment and argue that it is a rational development that will save lives and reduce long term morbidity.


BMJ | 2004

Response to radiation incidents and radionuclear threats: medical treatment should be given only when safe to do so.

Jonathan Benger

EDITOR—Turai et al reviewed the medical response to radiation incidents and radionuclear threats.1 Puzzlingly, they say that providing care for a patient in a life threatening condition always has priority over decontamination from radioactive materials or those …


BMJ | 2016

Why do we shine lights in the eyes of conscious patients after head injury

Jonathan Benger

Pupil examination is a standard part of the neurological assessment of patients after head injury. The internationally recognised Advanced Trauma Life Support course teaches that Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and pupillary responses should be assessed in all patients with head injuries.1 Similarly, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that, after initial assessment in the emergency department, a patient who is normally alert (with a GCS score of 15) after head injury should have their GCS and pupils assessed half hourly for two hours, then hourly for four hours, then two hourly thereafter.2 The rationale for pupillary assessment is that changes in pupil size and reaction can indicate a rise in intracranial pressure and can help to identify the location of …


BMJ | 2016

Diagnosis by exclusion: take time to talk to patients and offer information and explanations

Jonathan Benger

Ali raises an important point regarding the implications of diagnosis by exclusion.1 The online version of his article begins “Having completed attachments in acute medicine and cardiology, I have seen quite a few patients presenting with chest pain,” an entirely reasonable statement. However, the print …


Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care | 2012

“Airway management complications during anaesthesia, in intensive care units and in emergency departments in the UK”

Nicholas M. Woodall; Jonathan Benger; Jane Harper; T. M. Cook


Emergency Medicine Journal | 2003

National Service Framework fails to address the decision time

G Lloyd; Jonathan Benger; P Kaye; S Haig; E Gilby

Collaboration


Dive into the Jonathan Benger's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fiona Lecky

University of Sheffield

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G Lloyd

Bristol Royal Infirmary

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J Grover

Great Western Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jane Harper

Royal Liverpool University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge