Jonathan E. Leeman
University of Pittsburgh
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jonathan E. Leeman.
American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Rodney E. Wegner; Jonathan E. Leeman; Peyman Kabolizadeh; Jean-Claude Rwigema; Arlan Mintz; Steven A. Burton; Dwight E. Heron
Objectives:Large brain metastases (>3 cm) present a therapeutic dilemma, as the dose delivered by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in a single fraction is limited by toxicity to adjacent tissues, resulting in suboptimal local control. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of fractionated SRS for the treatment of large brain metastases. Materials and Methods:We identified 36 patients with 37 brain metastases treated with fractionated SRS. The median SRS dose was 24 Gy (range, 12 to 27 Gy) in 2 to 5 fractions and the median treatment volume was 15.6 mL (range, 10 to 82.7 mL). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate local control and overall survival rates. Results:Of the 21 lesions with available radiographic follow-up, 6 lesions (29%) had a documented local failure, yielding an actuarial progression-free survival at 6 and 12 months of 73% and 63%, respectively. The actuarial 6-month and 1-year overall survival rates were 22% and 13%, respectively. No patients in this cohort experienced acute or late complications secondary to SRS. Conclusions:Fractionated SRS is feasible and safe in patients with large brain metastases. Local control rates appear to be improved when compared with that of single fraction SRS with a relative paucity of treatment-related toxicity.
Neuro-oncology | 2013
Jonathan E. Leeman; David A. Clump; John C. Flickinger; Arlan Mintz; Steven A. Burton; Dwight E. Heron
BACKGROUND Differentiation of tumor recurrence from radionecrosis is a critical step in the follow-up management of patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. A method that can reliably differentiate tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis using standard MR sequences would be of significant value. METHODS We analyzed the records of 49 patients with 52 brain metastases treated with SRS who subsequently underwent surgical resection of the same lesion. Forty-seven of the lesions had preoperative MRI available for review (90%), including T1 postcontrast, T2, and fluid attenuated inversion recovery sequences. Pre-SRS and preoperative lesion and edema volumes were manually contoured and measured in a blinded fashion using radiation treatment planning software. A neuropathologist analyzed samples for the presence of tumor and/or radiation necrosis. RESULTS Longer time between SRS and resection (P < .001) and a larger edema/lesion volume ratio (high T2/T1c, P = .002) were found to be predictive of radionecrosis as opposed to tumor recurrence. Using a cutoff value of 10 for the edema/lesion volume ratio, we were able to predict the presence of tumor with a positive predictive value of 92%, which increased to 100% when looking only at patients who underwent resection <18 months following SRS. CONCLUSIONS On follow-up imaging, lesions with a high edema/lesion volume ratio and lesions that progress later after SRS are more likely to contain radionecrosis. These indices may help guide clinical decision making in the context of evolving lesions after SRS for brain metastases and thereby avoid unnecessary interventions.
Radiation Oncology | 2012
Jonathan E. Leeman; David A. Clump; Rodney E. Wegner; Dwight E. Heron; Steven A. Burton; Arlan Mintz
BackgroundBrainstem metastases represent an uncommon clinical presentation that is associated with a poor prognosis. Treatment options are limited given the unacceptable risks associated with surgical resection in this location. However, without local control, symptoms including progressive cranial nerve dysfunction are frequently observed. The objective of this study was to determine the outcomes associated with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy or radiosurgery (SRT/SRS) of brainstem metastases.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 38 tumors in 36 patients treated with SRT/SRS between February 2003 and December 2011. Treatment was delivered with the Cyberknife™ or Trilogy™ radiosurgical systems. The median age of patients was 62 (range: 28–89). Primary pathologies included 14 lung, 7 breast, 4 colon and 11 others. Sixteen patients (44%) had received whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) prior to SRT/SRS; ten had received prior SRT/SRS at a different site (28%). The median tumor volume was 0.94 cm3 (range: 0.01-4.2) with a median prescription dose of 17 Gy (range: 12–24) delivered in 1–5 fractions.ResultsMedian follow-up for the cohort was 3.2 months (range: 0.4-20.6). Nineteen patients (52%) had an MRI follow-up available for review. Of these, one patient experienced local failure corresponding to an actuarial 6-month local control of 93%. Fifteen of the patients with available follow-up imaging (79%) experienced intracranial failure outside of the treatment volume. The median time to distant intracranial failure was 2.1 months. Six of the 15 patients with distant intracranial failure (40%) had received previous WBRT. The actuarial overall survival rates at 6- and 12-months were 27% and 8%, respectively. Predictors of survival included Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score, greater number of treatment fractions, and higher prescription dose. Three patients experienced acute treatment-related toxicity consisting of nausea (n = 1) and headaches (n = 2) that resolved with a short-course of dexamethasone.ConclusionSRT/SRS for brainstem metastases is safe and achieves a high rate of local control. We found higher GPA as well as greater number of treatment fractions and higher prescription dose to be correlated with improved overall survival. Despite this approach, prognosis remains poor and distant intracranial control remains an issue, even in patients previously treated with WBRT.
Frontiers in Oncology | 2015
Douglas Holt; Beant S. Gill; David A. Clump; Jonathan E. Leeman; Steven A. Burton; Nduka Amankulor; Johnathan A. Engh; Dwight E. Heron
Purpose Despite advances in multimodality management of brain metastases, local progression following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can occur. Often, surgical resection is favored, as it frequently provides immediate symptom relief as well as pathological characterization of any residual tumor. Should the pathological specimen contain viable tumor cells, further radiation therapy is an option to sterilize the tumor bed. We evaluated the use of repeat SRS (rSRS) in lieu of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) as a means of improving local control (LC) while minimizing potential toxicity and dose to the normal brain. Materials/methods A retrospective review was performed to identify patients with brain metastases who underwent SRS and then surgical resection for locally recurrent or persistent disease. From 2004 to 2014, 13 consecutive patients or 15 lesions were treated with rSRS after resection, either post-operatively to the tumor bed (n = 10, 66.6%) or after a second local recurrence (n = 5, 33.3%). LC, distant brain failure (DBF), and radiation toxicity were determined using patient records, RECIST criteria v1.1, and CTCAE v4.03. Results At a median follow-up interval of 9.0 months (range 1.8–54.9 months) from time of rSRS, five patients remain alive. Following rSRS, 13 of the 15 (86.6%) lesions were locally controlled with an estimated 100% LC at 6 months and 75% LC at 1 year. However, 11 of the 15 (73.3%) treated lesions developed DBF after rSRS with 3 of 13 patients proceeding to WBRT. Two of 15 (13.3%) resulted in either grade 2 radionecrosis with grade 3 seizures or grade 3 radionecrosis. Conclusion Repeat SRS represents a potential salvage therapy for patients with locally recurrent brain metastases, providing additional tumor control with acceptable toxicity, even in the setting of prior SRS and surgical resection. rSRS may be reasonable to use as an alternative to WBRT in this setting.
Journal of Biomedical Optics | 2012
Jong S. Kim; Jonathan E. Leeman; Larry Kagemann; Francois T.H. Yu; Xucai Chen; John J. Pacella; Joel S. Schuman; Flordeliza S. Villanueva; Kang Kim
Several in vitro and in vivo studies have established accelerated thrombolysis using ultrasound (US) induced microbubble (MB) cavitation. However, the mechanisms underlying MB mediated sonothrombolysis are still not completely elucidated. We performed three-dimensional (3-D) volumetric optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging before and after the application of contrast US to thrombus. The most dramatic reduction in clot volume was observed with US + MB + recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). Thrombus surface erosion in this group on the side of the thrombus exposed to MB and ultrasound was evident on the OCT images. This technique may assist in clarifying the mechanisms underlying sonothrombolysis, especially regarding the importance of US transducer orientation on lytic efficacy and the effects of MB cavitation on thrombus structure.
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology | 2012
Jonathan E. Leeman; Jong S. Kim; Francois T.H. Yu; Xucai Chen; Kang Kim; Jianjun Wang; Xianghui Chen; Flordeliza S. Villanueva; John J. Pacella
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology | 2014
Xucai Chen; Jonathan E. Leeman; Jianjun Wang; John J. Pacella; Flordeliza S. Villanueva
Tissue Engineering Part A | 2011
Catalin Toma; Andrew Fisher; Jianjun Wang; Xucai Chen; Michelle Grata; Jonathan E. Leeman; Brion Winston; Mehmet Kaya; Huili Fu; Linda Lavery; David Fischer; William R. Wagner; Flordeliza S. Villanueva
Circulation | 2014
Frederick Schnatz; Sneha N Parikh; Jonathan E. Leeman; Madhurmeet Singh; Flordeliza S. Villanueva; Marc A. Simon; John J. Pacella
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2013
Xianghui Chen; Francois T.H. Yu; Flordeliza S. Villanueva; Jonathan E. Leeman; Xucai Chen; Jianjun Wang; Judith Brands; Frederick Schnatz; Yili Liu; Zicheng Li; John J. Pacella