Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jonathan M. Mudge is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jonathan M. Mudge.


Genome Research | 2009

The consensus coding sequence (CCDS) project: Identifying a common protein-coding gene set for the human and mouse genomes

Kim D. Pruitt; Jennifer Harrow; Rachel A. Harte; Craig Wallin; Mark Diekhans; Donna Maglott; Steve Searle; Catherine M. Farrell; Jane Loveland; Barbara J. Ruef; Elizabeth Hart; Marie-Marthe Suner; Melissa J. Landrum; Bronwen Aken; Sarah Ayling; Robert Baertsch; Julio Fernandez-Banet; Joshua L. Cherry; Val Curwen; Michael DiCuccio; Manolis Kellis; Jennifer M. Lee; Michael F. Lin; Michael Schuster; Andrew Shkeda; Clara Amid; Garth Brown; Oksana Dukhanina; Adam Frankish; Jennifer Hart

Effective use of the human and mouse genomes requires reliable identification of genes and their products. Although multiple public resources provide annotation, different methods are used that can result in similar but not identical representation of genes, transcripts, and proteins. The collaborative consensus coding sequence (CCDS) project tracks identical protein annotations on the reference mouse and human genomes with a stable identifier (CCDS ID), and ensures that they are consistently represented on the NCBI, Ensembl, and UCSC Genome Browsers. Importantly, the project coordinates on manually reviewing inconsistent protein annotations between sites, as well as annotations for which new evidence suggests a revision is needed, to progressively converge on a complete protein-coding set for the human and mouse reference genomes, while maintaining a high standard of reliability and biological accuracy. To date, the project has identified 20,159 human and 17,707 mouse consensus coding regions from 17,052 human and 16,893 mouse genes. Three evaluation methods indicate that the entries in the CCDS set are highly likely to represent real proteins, more so than annotations from contributing groups not included in CCDS. The CCDS database thus centralizes the function of identifying well-supported, identically-annotated, protein-coding regions.


PLOS ONE | 2012

Evidence for Transcript Networks Composed of Chimeric RNAs in Human Cells

Sarah Djebali; Julien Lagarde; Philipp Kapranov; Vincent Lacroix; Christelle Borel; Jonathan M. Mudge; Cédric Howald; Sylvain Foissac; Catherine Ucla; Jacqueline Chrast; Paolo Ribeca; David Martin; Ryan R. Murray; Xinping Yang; Lila Ghamsari; Chenwei Lin; Ian Bell; Erica Dumais; Jorg Drenkow; Michael L. Tress; Josep Lluís Gelpí; Modesto Orozco; Alfonso Valencia; Nynke L. van Berkum; Bryan R. Lajoie; Marc Vidal; John A. Stamatoyannopoulos; Philippe Batut; Alexander Dobin; Jennifer Harrow

The classic organization of a gene structure has followed the Jacob and Monod bacterial gene model proposed more than 50 years ago. Since then, empirical determinations of the complexity of the transcriptomes found in yeast to human has blurred the definition and physical boundaries of genes. Using multiple analysis approaches we have characterized individual gene boundaries mapping on human chromosomes 21 and 22. Analyses of the locations of the 5′ and 3′ transcriptional termini of 492 protein coding genes revealed that for 85% of these genes the boundaries extend beyond the current annotated termini, most often connecting with exons of transcripts from other well annotated genes. The biological and evolutionary importance of these chimeric transcripts is underscored by (1) the non-random interconnections of genes involved, (2) the greater phylogenetic depth of the genes involved in many chimeric interactions, (3) the coordination of the expression of connected genes and (4) the close in vivo and three dimensional proximity of the genomic regions being transcribed and contributing to parts of the chimeric RNAs. The non-random nature of the connection of the genes involved suggest that chimeric transcripts should not be studied in isolation, but together, as an RNA network.


Mammalian Genome | 2015

Creating reference gene annotation for the mouse C57BL6/J genome assembly

Jonathan M. Mudge; Jennifer Harrow

Annotation on the reference genome of the C57BL6/J mouse has been an ongoing project ever since the draft genome was first published. Initially, the principle focus was on the identification of all protein-coding genes, although today the importance of describing long non-coding RNAs, small RNAs, and pseudogenes is recognized. Here, we describe the progress of the GENCODE mouse annotation project, which combines manual annotation from the HAVANA group with Ensembl computational annotation, alongside experimental and in silico validation pipelines from other members of the consortium. We discuss the more recent incorporation of next-generation sequencing datasets into this workflow, including the usage of mass-spectrometry data to potentially identify novel protein-coding genes. Finally, we will outline how the C57BL6/J genebuild can be used to gain insights into the variant sites that distinguish different mouse strains and species.


Molecular Biology and Evolution | 2011

The Origins, Evolution, and Functional Potential of Alternative Splicing in Vertebrates

Jonathan M. Mudge; Adam Frankish; Julio Fernandez-Banet; Tyler Alioto; Thomas Derrien; Cédric Howald; Alexandre Reymond; Roderic Guigó; Tim Hubbard; Jennifer Harrow

Alternative splicing (AS) has the potential to greatly expand the functional repertoire of mammalian transcriptomes. However, few variant transcripts have been characterized functionally, making it difficult to assess the contribution of AS to the generation of phenotypic complexity and to study the evolution of splicing patterns. We have compared the AS of 309 protein-coding genes in the human ENCODE pilot regions against their mouse orthologs in unprecedented detail, utilizing traditional transcriptomic and RNAseq data. The conservation status of every transcript has been investigated, and each functionally categorized as coding (separated into coding sequence [CDS] or nonsense-mediated decay [NMD] linked) or noncoding. In total, 36.7% of human and 19.3% of mouse coding transcripts are species specific, and we observe a 3.6 times excess of human NMD transcripts compared with mouse; in contrast to previous studies, the majority of species-specific AS is unlinked to transposable elements. We observe one conserved CDS variant and one conserved NMD variant per 2.3 and 11.4 genes, respectively. Subsequently, we identify and characterize equivalent AS patterns for 22.9% of these CDS or NMD-linked events in nonmammalian vertebrate genomes, and our data indicate that functional NMD-linked AS is more widespread and ancient than previously thought. Furthermore, although we observe an association between conserved AS and elevated sequence conservation, as previously reported, we emphasize that 30% of conserved AS exons display sequence conservation below the average score for constitutive exons. In conclusion, we demonstrate the value of detailed comparative annotation in generating a comprehensive set of AS transcripts, increasing our understanding of AS evolution in vertebrates. Our data supports a model whereby the acquisition of functional AS has occurred throughout vertebrate evolution and is considered alongside amino acid change as a key mechanism in gene evolution.


BMC Genomics | 2015

Comparison of GENCODE and RefSeq gene annotation and the impact of reference geneset on variant effect prediction

Adam Frankish; Barbara Uszczynska; Graham R. S. Ritchie; José Manuel Rodríguez González; Dmitri D. Pervouchine; Robert Petryszak; Jonathan M. Mudge; Nuno A. Fonseca; Alvis Brazma; Roderic Guigó; Jennifer Harrow

BackgroundA vast amount of DNA variation is being identified by increasingly large-scale exome and genome sequencing projects. To be useful, variants require accurate functional annotation and a wide range of tools are available to this end. McCarthy et al recently demonstrated the large differences in prediction of loss-of-function (LoF) variation when RefSeq and Ensembl transcripts are used for annotation, highlighting the importance of the reference transcripts on which variant functional annotation is based.ResultsWe describe a detailed analysis of the similarities and differences between the gene and transcript annotation in the GENCODE and RefSeq genesets. We demonstrate that the GENCODE Comprehensive set is richer in alternative splicing, novel CDSs, novel exons and has higher genomic coverage than RefSeq, while the GENCODE Basic set is very similar to RefSeq. Using RNAseq data we show that exons and introns unique to one geneset are expressed at a similar level to those common to both. We present evidence that the differences in gene annotation lead to large differences in variant annotation where GENCODE and RefSeq are used as reference transcripts, although this is predominantly confined to non-coding transcripts and UTR sequence, with at most ~30% of LoF variants annotated discordantly. We also describe an investigation of dominant transcript expression, showing that it both supports the utility of the GENCODE Basic set in providing a smaller set of more highly expressed transcripts and provides a useful, biologically-relevant filter for further reducing the complexity of the transcriptome.ConclusionsThe reference transcripts selected for variant functional annotation do have a large effect on the outcome. The GENCODE Comprehensive transcripts contain more exons, have greater genomic coverage and capture many more variants than RefSeq in both genome and exome datasets, while the GENCODE Basic set shows a higher degree of concordance with RefSeq and has fewer unique features. We propose that the GENCODE Comprehensive set has great utility for the discovery of new variants with functional potential, while the GENCODE Basic set is more suitable for applications demanding less complex interpretation of functional variants.


Genome Research | 2013

Functional transcriptomics in the post-ENCODE era

Jonathan M. Mudge; Adam Frankish; Jennifer Harrow

The last decade has seen tremendous effort committed to the annotation of the human genome sequence, most notably perhaps in the form of the ENCODE project. One of the major findings of ENCODE, and other genome analysis projects, is that the human transcriptome is far larger and more complex than previously thought. This complexity manifests, for example, as alternative splicing within protein-coding genes, as well as in the discovery of thousands of long noncoding RNAs. It is also possible that significant numbers of human transcripts have not yet been described by annotation projects, while existing transcript models are frequently incomplete. The question as to what proportion of this complexity is truly functional remains open, however, and this ambiguity presents a serious challenge to genome scientists. In this article, we will discuss the current state of human transcriptome annotation, drawing on our experience gained in generating the GENCODE gene annotation set. We highlight the gaps in our knowledge of transcript functionality that remain, and consider the potential computational and experimental strategies that can be used to help close them. We propose that an understanding of the true overlap between transcriptional complexity and functionality will not be gained in the short term. However, significant steps toward obtaining this knowledge can now be taken by using an integrated strategy, combining all of the experimental resources at our disposal.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2014

The Vertebrate Genome Annotation browser 10 years on

Jennifer Harrow; Charles A. Steward; Adam Frankish; James Gilbert; José Manuel Rodríguez González; Jane Loveland; Jonathan M. Mudge; Daniel Sheppard; Mark G. Thomas; Stephen J. Trevanion; Laurens Wilming

The Vertebrate Genome Annotation (VEGA) database (http://vega.sanger.ac.uk), initially designed as a community resource for browsing manual annotation of the human genome project, now contains five reference genomes (human, mouse, zebrafish, pig and rat). Its introduction pages have been redesigned to enable the user to easily navigate between whole genomes and smaller multi-species haplotypic regions of interest such as the major histocompatibility complex. The VEGA browser is unique in that annotation is updated via the Human And Vertebrate Analysis aNd Annotation (HAVANA) update track every 2 weeks, allowing single gene updates to be made publicly available to the research community quickly. The user can now access different haplotypic subregions more easily, such as those from the non-obese diabetic mouse, and display them in a more intuitive way using the comparative tools. We also highlight how the user can browse manually annotated updated patches from the Genome Reference Consortium (GRC).


Nature Communications | 2016

Improving GENCODE reference gene annotation using a high-stringency proteogenomics workflow.

James C. Wright; Jonathan M. Mudge; Hendrik Weisser; Mitra Barzine; José Manuel Rodríguez González; Alvis Brazma; Jyoti S. Choudhary; Jennifer Harrow

Complete annotation of the human genome is indispensable for medical research. The GENCODE consortium strives to provide this, augmenting computational and experimental evidence with manual annotation. The rapidly developing field of proteogenomics provides evidence for the translation of genes into proteins and can be used to discover and refine gene models. However, for both the proteomics and annotation groups, there is a lack of guidelines for integrating this data. Here we report a stringent workflow for the interpretation of proteogenomic data that could be used by the annotation community to interpret novel proteogenomic evidence. Based on reprocessing of three large-scale publicly available human data sets, we show that a conservative approach, using stringent filtering is required to generate valid identifications. Evidence has been found supporting 16 novel protein-coding genes being added to GENCODE. Despite this many peptide identifications in pseudogenes cannot be annotated due to the absence of orthogonal supporting evidence.


Database | 2012

The importance of identifying alternative splicing in vertebrate genome annotation

Adam Frankish; Jonathan M. Mudge; Mark G. Thomas; Jennifer Harrow

While alternative splicing (AS) can potentially expand the functional repertoire of vertebrate genomes, relatively few AS transcripts have been experimentally characterized. We describe our detailed manual annotation of vertebrate genomes, which is generating a publicly available geneset rich in AS. In order to achieve this we have adopted a highly sensitive approach to annotating gene models supported by correctly mapped, canonically spliced transcriptional evidence combined with a highly cautious approach to adding unsupported extensions to models and making decisions on their functional potential. We use information about the predicted functional potential and structural properties of every AS transcript annotated at a protein-coding or non-coding locus to place them into one of eleven subclasses. We describe the incorporation of new sequencing and proteomics technologies into our annotation pipelines, which are used to identify and validate AS. Combining all data sources has led to the production of a rich geneset containing an average of 6.3 AS transcripts for every human multi-exon protein-coding gene. The datasets produced have proved very useful in providing context to studies investigating the functional potential of genes and the effect of variation may have on gene structure and function. Database URL: http://www.ensembl.org/index.html, http://vega.sanger.ac.uk/index.html


Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 2005

Evolutionary implications of pericentromeric gene expression in humans.

Jonathan M. Mudge; Michael S. Jackson

Human pericentromeric sequences are enriched for recent sequence duplications. The continual creation and shuffling of these duplications can create novel intron-exon structures and it has been suggested that these regions have a function as gene nurseries. However, these sequences are also rich in satellite repeats which can repress transcription, and analyses of chromosomes 10 and 21 have suggested that they are transcript poor. Here, we investigate the relationship between pericentromeric duplication and transcription by analyzing the in silico transcriptional profiles within the proximal 1.5 Mb of genomic sequence on all human chromosome arms in relation to duplication status. We identify an ∼5× excess of transcripts specific to cancer and/or testis in pericentromeric duplications compared to surrounding single copy sequence, with the expression of >50% of all transcripts in duplications being restricted to these tissues. We also identify an ∼5× excess of transcripts in duplications which contain large quantities of interspersed repeats. These results indicate that the transcriptional profiles of duplicated and single copy sequences within pericentromeric DNA are distinct, suggesting that pericentromeric instability is unlikely to represent a common route for gene creation but may have a disproportionate effect upon genes whose function is restricted to the germ line.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jonathan M. Mudge's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer Harrow

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adam Frankish

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jane Loveland

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laurens Wilming

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles A. Steward

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James Gilbert

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark G. Thomas

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge