Jonathan N. Sembrano

How often is low back pain not coming from the back

Study Design. Consecutive case series cohort. Objective. To determine the relative frequencies of the spine, the sacroiliac (SI) joint, and the hip joint being the primary pain generator among patients presenting at a spine surgery clinic for low back pain (LBP). Summary of Background Data. Identification of the primary pain generator in a patient with LBP is difficult. Possible pain sources include the lumbar spine, the SI joint, and the hip joint. Their relative frequencies among patients presenting at a spine surgeon’s clinic have not been well established. Methods. Three hundred sixty-eight new patients were seen at a single spine surgeon’s clinic during a 10-month period. Of these, 289 (78.5%) complained primarily of LBP with or without leg pain. Seventy-seven had previous surgery. The remaining 200 cases were reviewed for all diagnostic tests performed, as well as the final diagnosis. Results. One hundred sixty-four (82%) had spine pathology, but only 130 (65%) had spine-only pathology, whereas 35 (17.5%) had a combination of spine plus hip and/or SI joint pathology. An additional 16 (8%) had hip and/or SI joint pathology without spine pathology. Twenty (10%) had an undefined pain source. Overall, 25 (12.5%) had hip pathology, and 29 (14.5%) had SI joint pathology. Conclusion. For patients presenting to a spine surgeon’s clinic for LBP, up to 25% of patients may have significant pain contribution from the hip or SI joints, and an additional 10% will still have an undefined pain source even after diagnostic workup. This underscores the need for clinicians to be aware of nonspinal pain generators and to appropriately pursue alternative diagnoses.

Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND Proponents of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty believe that it has potential advantages over a fixed-bearing design in terms of diminished wear and improved motion and/or function, but these advantages have not been demonstrated in a randomized clinical comparison to our knowledge. We conducted a patient-blinded, prospective, randomized clinical trial to compare mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasties of the same design. METHODS Patients between the ages of sixty and eighty-five years were prospectively randomized to receive a cruciate-substituting rotating-platform design or a fixed-bearing design with an all-polyethylene tibial component. There were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics (mean age, 72.2 years; mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score, 2.7; mean body mass index, 31.8 kg/m(2)) or preoperative clinical or radiographic measures between the groups. Routine clinical and radiographic follow-up measures included the Knee Society score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) outcome measures. RESULTS The results of 312 arthroplasties (136 with an all-polyethylene tibial component and 176 rotating-platform designs) in 273 patients were analyzed at a minimum of two years (mean, forty-two months) postoperatively. Although there was significant improvement in both groups, there was no significant difference between the groups with regard to the mean postoperative range of motion (110.9 degrees and 109.1 degrees, respectively; p = 0.21), the mean KSS clinical score (90.4 and 88.2 points; p = 0.168), or the mean KSS pain score (44.9 and 43.1 points; p = 0.108) at this follow-up point. There were ten revisions: seven because of infection, one because of patellar fracture, one because of instability, and one because of aseptic loosening. CONCLUSIONS The two designs functioned equivalently at the time of early follow-up in this low-to-moderate-demand patient group. The rotating-platform design had no significant clinical advantage over the design with the all-polyethylene tibial component.

Pediatric Pedicle Screw Placement Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography and 3-Dimensional Image-Guided Navigation

Study Design. A retrospective cohort study reporting the use of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) and image-guided navigation system for the placement of pedicle screws in pediatric compared with adult patients. Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of open pedicle screw placement in pediatric patients using intraoperative CT and 3-dimensional (3D) image-guided navigation. Summary of Background Data. Pedicle screws are widely used in children for the correction of spinal deformity. Navigation systems and intraoperative CT are now available as an adjunct to fluoroscopy and anatomic techniques for placing pedicle screws and verifying screw position. Methods. From 2007 to 2010, 984 pedicle screws were placed in a consecutive series cohort of 50 pediatric patients for spinal deformity correction with the use of intraoperative CT (O-arm, Medtronic, Inc, Louisville, CO) and a computerized navigation system (Stealth, Medtronic, Inc, Louisville, CO). The primary outcome measure for this study is redirection or removal of screw on the basis of the intraoperative CT imaging. During the study period, 1511 screws were placed in adult patients using the same image guidance system. Results. A total of 984 pedicle screws were implanted using real-time navigation, with a mean of 20 screws per patient (range: 2–34). On the basis of intraoperative CT, 35 screws (3.6%) were revised (27 redirected and 8 removed), representing a 96.4% accuracy rate. No patients returned to the operating room because of screw malposition. Of the 1511 screws placed in adult patients, 28 (1.8%) were revised intraoperatively for malposition on CT imaging, for an overall 98.2% accuracy rate. Screw revision thus was more common in the pediatric population (P = 0.008). However, the pediatric screw accuracy rate is significantly higher than the findings from a recent meta-analysis of predominantly nonnavigated screws in children, reporting a 94.9% accuracy rate (P = 0.03). Conclusion. We report 96.4% accuracy in pediatric pedicle screw placement using intraoperative CT and a 3D navigation system. This is similar to other reports and has better accuracy than a recent meta-analysis of nonnavigated screws in children.

The accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images for the assessment of pedicle screw postion

Study Design. Human cadaveric study. Objective. The objective of the study was to determine the accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images in determining pedicle screw position using open dissection as the gold standard. Summary of Background Data. Pedicle screws are widely used in the treatment of various spinal disorders. Postoperative computed tomographic scans are the imaging gold standard to detect pedicle screw malposition. However, a second procedure is necessary if such malpositioned screws have to be revised. The O-arm is an intraoperative scanner that allows revision of a screw without having to return the patient to the operating room for a separate procedure. No previous studies have looked at the accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images in determining pedicle screw position. Methods. This factorial validation study utilized 9 cadavers in a comparison of intraoperative O-arm images and the dissection gold standard. Four hundred sixteen screws were inserted using 3-dimensional image (O-arm) guidance from C2 to S1. The screw positions were randomized into 3 groups: “IN” (fully contained within the pedicle), “OUT-lateral,” or “OUT-medial.” After screw insertion, O-arm images were obtained and reviewed in a blinded fashion by 3 independent observers. Dissection identified the true position of the screws. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using dissection results as the gold standard. The interobserver reliability was also determined. Results. The overall accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, PPV, and NPV of O-arm images for the thoracic and lumbar spine were 73%, 76%, 71%, 74%, and 72%, respectively. Accuracy of surgeon perception in the cervical spine was significantly less than in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine. There was substantial interobserver agreement between the 3 readers. Conclusion. Intraoperative O-arm images accurately detect significant pedicle screw violations in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine but are less accurate for the cervical spine.

The accuracy of navigation and 3D image-guided placement for the placement of pedicle screws in congenital spine deformity.

Background: Treatment of congenital spine deformity has high surgical risk due to abnormal anatomy and dysmorphic pedicles. We hypothesized that an image-guided navigation system would result in a low rate of screw revision due to malposition. Methods: From 2007 to 2010, 142 screws were placed in 14 consecutive patients with congenital spine deformity using an intraoperative computer tomography (CT) (O-arm) and image-guided navigation system (Stealth). Mean age was 8.8 years (range, 1 to 18 y). Deformities included scoliosis (12), kyphosis (1), and spinal dysgenesis (1). Screws were placed from T2 to S1. An intraoperative CT verified screw position. Need for intraoperative screw revision is the primary outcome measure. Results: Of the 142 screws placed, 1 required revision intraoperatively due to malposition (99.3% screw accuracy rate). The screw was at L3 and was successfully redirected. There were no complications due to screw malposition. This navigated congenital screw accuracy rate (99.3%) is higher than the 94.9% accuracy rate reported for non-navigated screws in all children undergoing pedicle screw fixation in a recent systematic literature review and higher than the reported 96.4% accuracy rate for navigated pedicle screws in children. Kosmopoulos and colleagues found a lower accuracy rate (86.6%) in adult non-navigated screws (P<0.0001) and adult navigated screws (93.7%). Of note, 9 pedicles were noted on navigation to be absent. Despite the goal of bilateral screw placement at each fusion level, 31 of 173 pedicles were left unfilled due to technical impossibility based on intraoperative CT imaging. This represents an 18% screw dropout rate. Conclusions: CT-guided navigation resulted in the successful placement of 142 pedicle screws in patients with congenital deformity and altered anatomy, which represents a 99.3% screw accuracy rate. This is comparable with the screw accuracy rate of 93.7% reported for adult navigated pedicle screws. Further, navigation prevented attempts of screw placement at levels with absent or impassable pedicles. Image-guided navigation and intraoperative CT are valuable tools for the safe placement of pedicle screws in patients with significant congenital spine deformity and altered anatomy. Level of Evidence: IV, Case Series.

Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs: surgical technique.

BACKGROUND Proponents of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty believe that it has potential advantages over a fixed-bearing design in terms of diminished wear and improved motion and/or function, but these advantages have not been demonstrated in a randomized clinical comparison to our knowledge. We conducted a patient-blinded, prospective, randomized clinical trial to compare mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasties of the same design. METHODS Patients between the ages of sixty and eighty-five years were prospectively randomized to receive a cruciate-substituting rotating-platform design or a fixed-bearing design with an all-polyethylene tibial component. There were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics (mean age, 72.2 years; mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score, 2.7; mean body mass index, 31.8 kg/m2) or preoperative clinical or radiographic measures between the groups. Routine clinical and radiographic follow-up measures included the Knee Society score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) outcome measures. RESULTS The results of 312 arthroplasties (136 with an all-polyethylene tibial component and 176 rotating-platform designs) in 273 patients were analyzed at a minimum of two years (mean, forty-two months) postoperatively. Although there was significant improvement in both groups, there was no significant difference between the groups with regard to the mean postoperative range of motion (110.9° and 109.1°, respectively; p = 0.21), the mean KSS clinical score (90.4 and 88.2 points; p = 0.168), or the mean KSS pain score (44.9 and 43.1 points; p = 0.108) at this follow-up point. There were ten revisions: seven because of infection, one because of patellar fracture, one because of instability, and one because of aseptic loosening. CONCLUSIONS The two designs functioned equivalently at the time of early follow-up in this low-to-moderate-demand patient group. The rotating-platform design had no significant clinical advantage over the design with the all-polyethylene tibial component.

Comparison of Cranial Facet Joint Violation Rates Between Open and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Using Intraoperative 3-D CT (O-arm) Computer Navigation

Study Design. Retrospective study comparing cranial facet joint violation rates of open and percutaneous pedicle screws inserted using 3-dimensional image-guidance. Objective. To determine the rate of cranial facet joint violation in intraoperative computed tomography (CT) image-guided lumbar pedicle screw instrumentation and compare facet joint violation rates between CT image-guided open and percutaneous techniques. Summary of Background Data. Facet joint violation by pedicle screws can potentially result in a higher rate of adjacent segment degeneration. Reported cranial facet joint violation rates range from 7% to 100%. Intraoperative image-guidance, which has enhanced pedicle screw placement accuracy, may aid in avoiding impingement of the cranial facet joints. Methods. We reviewed 188 cases of 3-dimensional image-guided lumbar pedicle screw instrumentation from November 2006 to December 2011. The cranial screws of each construct were graded by 3 reviewers according to the Seo classification (0 = no impingement; 1 = screw head in contact/suspected to be in contact with joint; 2 = screw clearly invaded the joint) on intraoperative axial CT images. If there was a difference in evaluation, a consensus was reached to arrive at a single grade. The &khgr;2 test was used to determine significance between the open and percutaneous group (&agr; = 0.05). Results. A total of 370 screws (245 open, 125 percutaneous) were graded. Overall facet joint violation rate was 18.9% (grade 1 = 16.2%, grade 2 = 2.7%). Open technique (grade 1 = 22.4%, grade 2 = 4.1%) had a significantly higher violation rate than percutaneous technique (grade 1 = 4%, grade 2 = 0%) (P < 0.0001). There is a trend of an increasing likelihood of facet joint violation from L1 to L5. Conclusion. The use of intraoperative CT image-guidance in lumbar pedicle screw placement resulted in a facet joint violation rate at the lower end of the reported range in literature. The percutaneous technique has a significantly lower facet violation rate than the open technique. Level of Evidence: 4

An analysis of decision making and treatment in thoracolumbar metastases.

Study Design. Systematic review of literature. Objective. To determine whether surgical approach and technique to be used in thoracolumbar metastases is influenced by anatomic region of the spine. Summary of Background Data. There is a significant debate about the best surgical approach for the treatment of thoracolumbar metastasis. Methods. Two research questions below were determined through a consensus among a panel of spine experts. A systematic review of literature was conducted using Pubmed. The search terms included “spin*” and “metasta*.” This was to include the terms, “metastatic,” “metastasis,” “metastases,” “spinal,” and “spine.” Specific QuestionsIn the T2 to T5 region, what is the impact of different surgical approaches (anterior, posterior, combined anteroposterior [AP]) on local recurrence, adverse events, pain alleviation, and neurologic recovery?Within the thoracolumbar spine (T6–T10; T11–L2; and L3–L5) what is the impact of different surgical approaches on outcomes as per question one. The results of the systematic review were discussed with spine oncology experts through a modified Delphi technique to arrive at treatment recommendations. Results. From the search terms used 5176 abstracts were found. Based on the review of these abstracts, 161 were deemed acceptable. These abstracts were reviewed according to an inclusion and exclusion criteria, leaving 60 articles. These 60 articles were reviewed in detail leaving 32 articles for inclusion. There was no level I study. There was 1 level II study, 5 level III studies, and 26 level IV studies. Most of these studies selected their approach by tumor topography. The quality of evidence was very low. Conclusion. There is very low quality evidence to support the superiority of one approach over another. There is a strong recommendation for posterior or posterior-lateral approach from T2 through T5. For the T6–L5 regions of the spine we recommend either anterior, posterior, or combined anterior and posterior surgery depending on the clinical presentation, surgeon and patient preference.

Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Sacroiliac (SI) joint pain is a prevalent, underdiagnosed cause of lower back pain. SI joint fusion can relieve pain and improve quality of life in patients who have failed nonoperative care. To date, no study has concurrently compared surgical and non-surgical treatments for chronic SI joint dysfunction. Methods We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial of 148 subjects with SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis or sacroiliac joint disruptions who were assigned to either minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants (N=102) or non-surgical management (NSM, n=46). SI joint pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) were collected at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment commencement. Six-month success rates, defined as the proportion of treated subjects with a 20-mm improvement in SI joint pain in the absence of severe device-related or neurologic SI joint-related adverse events or surgical revision, were compared using Bayesian methods. Results Subjects (mean age 51, 70% women) were highly debilitated at baseline (mean SI joint VAS pain score 82, mean ODI score 62). Six-month follow-up was obtained in 97.3%. By 6 months, success rates were 81.4% in the surgical group vs. 23.9% in the NSM group (difference of 56.6%, 95% posterior credible interval 41.4-70.0%, posterior probability of superiority >0.999). Clinically important (≥15 point) ODI improvement at 6 months occurred in 75% of surgery subjects vs. 27.3% of NSM subjects. At six months, quality of life improved more in the surgery group and satisfaction rates were high. The mean number of adverse events in the first six months was slightly higher in the surgical group compared to the non-surgical group (1.3 vs. 1.0 events per subject, p=0.1857). Conclusions Six-month follow-up from this level 1 study showed that minimally invasive SI joint fusion using triangular titanium implants was more effective than non-surgical management in relieving pain, improving function and improving quality of life in patients with SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis or SI joint disruptions. Clinical relevance Minimally invasive SI joint fusion is an acceptable option for patients with chronic SI joint dysfunction due to degenerative sacroiliitis and sacroiliac joint disruptions unresponsive to non-surgical treatments.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.