Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jonathan P. Green is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jonathan P. Green.


Science | 2011

Nest Inheritance Is the Missing Source of Direct Fitness in a Primitively Eusocial Insect

Ellouise Leadbeater; Jonathan M. Carruthers; Jonathan P. Green; Neil Rosser; Jeremy Field

Fitness benefits from the inheritance of breeding resources may explain why Polistes wasps cooperate with nonrelatives. Animals that cooperate with nonrelatives represent a challenge to inclusive fitness theory, unless cooperative behavior is shown to provide direct fitness benefits. Inheritance of breeding resources could provide such benefits, but this route to cooperation has been little investigated in the social insects. We show that nest inheritance can explain the presence of unrelated helpers in a classic social insect model, the primitively eusocial wasp Polistes dominulus. We found that subordinate helpers produced more direct offspring than lone breeders, some while still subordinate but most after inheriting the dominant position. Thus, while indirect fitness obtained through helping relatives has been the dominant paradigm for understanding eusociality in insects, direct fitness is vital to explain cooperation in P. dominulus.


PLOS ONE | 2010

Unrelated Helpers in a Primitively Eusocial Wasp: Is Helping Tailored Towards Direct Fitness?

Ellouise Leadbeater; Jonathan M. Carruthers; Jonathan P. Green; Jasper van Heusden; Jeremy Field

The paper wasp Polistes dominulus is unique among the social insects in that nearly one-third of co-foundresses are completely unrelated to the dominant individual whose offspring they help to rear and yet reproductive skew is high. These unrelated subordinates stand to gain direct fitness through nest inheritance, raising the question of whether their behaviour is adaptively tailored towards maximizing inheritance prospects. Unusually, in this species, a wealth of theory and empirical data allows us to predict how unrelated subordinates should behave. Based on these predictions, here we compare helping in subordinates that are unrelated or related to the dominant wasp across an extensive range of field-based behavioural contexts. We find no differences in foraging effort, defense behaviour, aggression or inheritance rank between unrelated helpers and their related counterparts. Our study provides no evidence, across a number of behavioural scenarios, that the behaviour of unrelated subordinates is adaptively modified to promote direct fitness interests.


Animal Behaviour | 2011

Interpopulation variation in status signalling in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus

Jonathan P. Green; Jeremy Field

Contests between individuals over resources may be costly in terms of both time and energy expended and the risk of injury. Signals of status, or ‘status badges’, are thought to have evolved to minimize these costs by providing information about an individual’s fighting ability or resource-holding potential (RHP) at the start of a contest. Studies on recently established North American populations of the paper wasp Polistes dominulus have demonstrated the existence of a status badge, in the form of black clypeal patterns, and have shown that rivals attend to these patterns during competitive interactions. However, observational data from studies in this wasp’s native European range have failed to demonstrate a strong link between clypeal patterning and RHP. We undertook the first direct test of status signalling in a European population of P. dominulus, by testing receiver responses to clypeal pattern manipulations in a competitive foraging context. We found no evidence that individuals assessed rivals using the clypeal ‘badge’. We discuss possible reasons for variation in signal use between the American and European populations, including genetic drift and environmental effects of the development and transmission of the signal.


Ecology | 2015

Hemiparasitic plant impacts animal and plant communities across four trophic levels

Susan E. Hartley; Jonathan P. Green; Fergus P. Massey; Malcolm C. Press; Alan J. A. Stewart; Elizabeth A. John

Understanding the impact of species on community structure is a fundamental question in ecology. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that both subdominant species and parasites can have disproportionately large effects on other organisms. Here we report those impacts for a species that is both subdominant and parasitic, the hemiparasite Rhinanthus minor. While the impact of parasitic angiosperms on their hosts and, to a lesser degree, coexisting plant species, has been well characterized, much less is known about their effects on higher trophic levels: We experimentally manipulated field densities of the hemiparasite Rhinanthus minor in a species-rich grassland, comparing the plant and invertebrate communities in plots where it was removed, present at natural densities, or present at enhanced densities. Plots with natural and enhanced densities of R. minor had lower plant biomass than plots without the hemiparasite, but enhanced densities almost doubled the abundance of invertebrates within the plots across all trophic levels, with effects evident in herbivores, predators, and detritivores. The hemiparasite R. minor, despite being a subdominant and transient component within plant communities that it inhabits, has profound effects on four different trophic levels. These effects persist beyond the life of the hemiparasite, emphasizing its role as a keystone species in grassland communities.


Nature Communications | 2016

Variation in helper effort among cooperatively breeding bird species is consistent with Hamilton's Rule

Jonathan P. Green; Robert P. Freckleton; Ben J. Hatchwell

Investment by helpers in cooperative breeding systems is extremely variable among species, but this variation is currently unexplained. Inclusive fitness theory predicts that, all else being equal, cooperative investment should correlate positively with the relatedness of helpers to the recipients of their care. We test this prediction in a comparative analysis of helper investment in 36 cooperatively breeding bird species. We show that species-specific helper contributions to cooperative brood care increase as the mean relatedness between helpers and recipients increases. Helper contributions are also related to the sex ratio of helpers, but neither group size nor the proportion of nests with helpers influence helper effort. Our findings support the hypothesis that variation in helping behaviour among cooperatively breeding birds is consistent with Hamiltons rule, indicating a key role for kin selection in the evolution of cooperative investment in social birds.


PLOS ONE | 2015

Leaf Colour as a Signal of Chemical Defence to Insect Herbivores in Wild Cabbage (Brassica oleracea).

Jonathan P. Green; Rosie Foster; Lucas Wilkins; Daniel Osorio; Susan E. Hartley

Leaf colour has been proposed to signal levels of host defence to insect herbivores, but we lack data on herbivory, leaf colour and levels of defence for wild host populations necessary to test this hypothesis. Such a test requires measurements of leaf spectra as they would be sensed by herbivore visual systems, as well as simultaneous measurements of chemical defences and herbivore responses to leaf colour in natural host-herbivore populations. In a large-scale field survey of wild cabbage (Brassica oleracea) populations, we show that variation in leaf colour and brightness, measured according to herbivore spectral sensitivities, predicts both levels of chemical defences (glucosinolates) and abundance of specialist lepidopteran (Pieris rapae) and hemipteran (Brevicoryne brassicae) herbivores. In subsequent experiments, P. rapae larvae achieved faster growth and greater pupal mass when feeding on plants with bluer leaves, which contained lower levels of aliphatic glucosinolates. Glucosinolate-mediated effects on larval performance may thus contribute to the association between P. rapae herbivory and leaf colour observed in the field. However, preference tests found no evidence that adult butterflies selected host plants based on leaf coloration. In the field, B. brassicae abundance varied with leaf brightness but greenhouse experiments were unable to identify any effects of brightness on aphid preference or performance. Our findings suggest that although leaf colour reflects both levels of host defences and herbivore abundance in the field, the ability of herbivores to respond to colour signals may be limited, even in species where performance is correlated with leaf colour.


Behavioral Ecology | 2017

Allopreening in birds is associated with parental cooperation over offspring care and stable pair bonds across years

Elspeth Kenny; Tim R. Birkhead; Jonathan P. Green

Lay Summary Preening one’s partner is important for staying together and sharing offspring care. Grooming or preening a partner is widespread in primates and birds. We tested the idea that this behavior (allopreening) in birds plays a role in maintaining partner relationships. Bird species that allopreen were more likely to share parental duties and more likely to breed with the same partner in consecutive breeding seasons, compared to species that do not allopreen. Twitter: @ElspethKenny


Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences | 2014

Using social parasitism to test reproductive skew models in a primitively eusocial wasp

Jonathan P. Green; Michael A. Cant; Jeremy Field

Remarkable variation exists in the distribution of reproduction (skew) among members of cooperatively breeding groups, both within and between species. Reproductive skew theory has provided an important framework for understanding this variation. In the primitively eusocial Hymenoptera, two models have been routinely tested: concessions models, which assume complete control of reproduction by a dominant individual, and tug-of-war models, which assume on-going competition among group members over reproduction. Current data provide little support for either model, but uncertainty about the ability of individuals to detect genetic relatedness and difficulties in identifying traits conferring competitive ability mean that the relative importance of concessions versus tug-of-war remains unresolved. Here, we suggest that the use of social parasitism to generate meaningful variation in key social variables represents a valuable opportunity to explore the mechanisms underpinning reproductive skew within the social Hymenoptera. We present a direct test of concessions and tug-of-war models in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus by exploiting pronounced changes in relatedness and power structures that occur following replacement of the dominant by a congeneric social parasite. Comparisons of skew in parasitized and unparasitized colonies are consistent with a tug-of-war over reproduction within P. dominulus groups, but provide no evidence for reproductive concessions.


The American Naturalist | 2017

Sex Allocation Patterns across Cooperatively Breeding Birds Do Not Support Predictions of the Repayment Hypothesis

Nyil Khwaja; Ben J. Hatchwell; Robert P. Freckleton; Jonathan P. Green

The repayment hypothesis predicts that reproductive females in cooperative breeding systems overproduce the helping sex. Thanks to well-documented examples of this predicted sex ratio bias, repayment has been considered an important driver of variation in sex allocation patterns. Here we test this hypothesis using data on population brood sex ratios and facultative sex allocation from 28 cooperatively breeding bird species. We find that biased sex ratios of helpers do not correlate with production biases in brood sex ratios, contrary to predictions. We also test whether females facultatively produce the helping sex in response to a deficiency of help (i.e., when they have fewer or no helpers). Although this is observed in a few species, it is not a significant trend overall, with a mean effect size close to zero. We conclude that, surprisingly, repayment does not appear to be a widespread influence on sex ratios in cooperatively breeding birds. We discuss possible explanations for our results and encourage further examination of the repayment model.


Insectes Sociaux | 2016

Regulation of host colony activity by the social parasite Polistes semenowi

Jonathan P. Green; E. J. Almond; Jeremy Field

The productivity of social groups depends critically on effective regulation of work effort among group members. In social insect colonies, regulation of work may be decentralised or alternatively may be controlled by one or a few individuals (‘pacemakers’) within the colony. Social parasites, which usurp host colonies and replace the dominant as the principal reproductive, similarly depend on efficient regulation of work by hosts to rear parasite offspring, but few studies have explored the strategies used by parasites to achieve this. We compared the role of the social parasite Polistes semenowi in regulating host activity with that of the dominant individual on unparasitized nests of the host species, P. dominula. Dominant foundresses acted as pacemakers within unparasitized colonies, interacting frequently with colony members to initiate activity bursts and foraging trips, whereas parasites did not initiate more activity than the average colony member. Nonetheless, overall activity levels were similar in parasitized and unparasitized colonies, indicating that parasites may use other, indirect means to control the host activity. Colony activity did not change significantly following the removal of parasites or dominant host foundresses, perhaps because other individuals rapidly assumed the dominant position, or because of persistent indirect effects on colony activity. The role of P. semenowi in regulating the host activity differs strikingly from that reported for a second Polistes social parasite, P. atrimandibularis, suggesting that different Polistes social parasites may have fundamentally different social roles within host colonies, despite being closely phylogenetically related to one another.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jonathan P. Green's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge