Jonathan S. Levine
Columbia University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jonathan S. Levine.
Environmental Science & Technology | 2014
Jonathan S. Levine; David S. Goldberg; Klaus S. Lackner; Juerg Matter; Michael G. Supp; Terizhandur S. Ramakrishnan
To mitigate anthropogenically induced climate change and ocean acidification, net carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere must be reduced. One proposed option is underground CO2 disposal. Large-scale injection of CO2 into the Earths crust requires an understanding of the multiphase flow properties of high-pressure CO2 displacing brine. We present laboratory-scale core flooding experiments designed to measure CO2 endpoint relative permeability for CO2 displacing brine at in situ pressures, salinities, and temperatures. Endpoint drainage CO2 relative permeabilities for liquid and supercritical CO2 were found to be clustered around 0.4 for both the synthetic and natural media studied. These values indicate that relative to CO2, water may not be strongly wetting the solid surface. Based on these results, CO2 injectivity will be reduced and pressure-limited reservoirs will have reduced disposal capacity, though area-limited reservoirs may have increased capacity. Future reservoir-scale modeling efforts should incorporate sensitivity to relative permeability. Assuming applicability of the experimental results to other lithologies and that the majority of reservoirs are pressure limited, geologic carbon sequestration would require approximately twice the number of wells for the same injectivity.
2006 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2006 | 2006
Jonathan S. Levine; Klaus S. Lackner; Vijay Modi
Efficient and affordable energy storage technologies would enable greater use of electricity generation with low operating but high capital cost. Such generating plants must maximize their utilization to spread capital cost over as much output as possible. Without affordable storage capacity their penetration into the market is limited to base load. Intermittent solar and wind power, which at times are simply not available, suffer even more than baseline power plants from the lack of affordable storage technologies. With the exception of pumped hydro-storage, energy storage is too expensive, suffering from low energy density in storage and low round-trip efficiency. Low grade thermal storage with temperature differences of up to about 100°C could achieve storage densities far in excess of that in most pumped storage facilities while avoiding the costs associated with high temperature operations. Roundtrip efficiency, defined as the ratio of the electric output from a heat engine driven by stored thermal energy to the electric input used to drive a heat pump to store the thermal energy, can approach 100% as the heat pump and the heat engine both approach Carnot efficiency. This theoretical limit is independent of the temperature difference between the heat reservoirs. Roundtrip efficiencies of at least 70 to 80% are necessary for energy storage to be economically competitive with higher priced electricity sources. This high round trip efficiency implies that both the heat engine and the heat pump would have to operate at 85 to 90% of the efficiency of a reversible engine. The most promising practical engines for such high efficiency are based on the Stirling cycle. This paper discusses a variation of the Stirling cycle aimed at large, slow units optimized for high efficiency far in excess of the Curzon-Ahlborn efficiency, which results from maximizing the power of the engine. This tradeoff in favor of efficiency over power output demands extreme simplicity in design, as the size of the engine is far larger than that of conventional engines optimized for power throughput. The goal of the paper is to show that low-grade thermal energy storage could provide a viable alternative to regionally limited pumped hydro-storage as long as the design challenges explained in the paper can be overcome. Given the current lack of cost-effective, scalable energy storage systems, thermal storage technology could have a profound impact on future energy infrastructures.Copyright
Environmental Science & Technology | 2014
Richard S. Middleton; Andres F. Clarens; Xiaowei Liu; Jeffrey M. Bielicki; Jonathan S. Levine
Geophysical Research Letters | 2007
Jonathan S. Levine; Juerg Matter; Dave Goldberg; Ann E. Cook; Klaus S. Lackner
Greenhouse Gases-Science and Technology | 2015
Richard S. Middleton; Jonathan S. Levine; Jeffrey M. Bielicki; Hari S. Viswanathan; J. William Carey; Philip H. Stauffer
Energy Procedia | 2014
Jeffrey M. Bielicki; Richard S. Middleton; Jonathan S. Levine; Phil Stauffer
Energy Procedia | 2011
Jonathan S. Levine; Juerg Matter; David Goldberg; Klaus S. Lackner; Michael G. Supp; Terizhandur S. Ramakrishnan
Energy Procedia | 2017
Richard S. Midldeton; Jonathan S. Levine; Jeffrey M. Bielicki; Philip H. Stauffer
Energy Procedia | 2009
Jonathan S. Levine; Juerg Matter; Dave Goldberg; Klaus S. Lackner
Energy Procedia | 2014
Jeffrey M. Bielicki; Andres F. Clarens; Richard S. Middleton; Xiaowei Liu; Jonathan S. Levine; Mariana Barbosa de Carvalho; Nelson Giovanini Junior