Jonathan Tan
National University of Health Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jonathan Tan.
Global Spine Journal | 2015
Naresh Kumar; Jonathan Tan; Aye Sandar Zaw
Background The decision of operative treatment of patients with spinal metastases is dependent on the patients predicted survival. The Tokuhashi, Tomita, Bauer, and Oswestry scores have been devised for survival prediction; however, none of these systems have been evaluated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We aimed to identify prognostic factors for survival, and investigate the predictive value of these scoring systems in predicting survival of the patients with spinal metastases from NPC. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the patients treated at our institution for spinal metastases from NPC. The predicted survival according to the four scoring systems (Tokuhashi, Tomita, Bauer, and Oswestry) was calculated and labeled as A scores. These patients were then rescored by assigning NPC as a good prognostic tumor and labeled as B scores. The predicted survival of scores A and B was compared with actual survival. Potential prognostic factors of survival were investigated using univariate and stepwise multivariate Cox regression analyses. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates, log-rank tests, and Cox regression analyses were done for all scoring systems A and B. The predictive values of each scoring system were calculated using post estimation after Cox regression analyses. Results Eighty-seven patients with spinal metastases from NPC were included in the study. The median overall survival for the whole cohort was 13 months (range: 1–120 months). In multivariate analysis, general condition (p < 0.01), visceral metastases (p < 0.01), and vertebral metastases (p < 0.01) showed significant association with survival. The absolute score of all scoring systems was significantly associated with actual survival, which extended to the different prognostic subgroups of each scoring system. Log-rank test revealed that there were statistically significant differences in survival among the different prognostic groups of all scoring systems (p < 0.01). Predictive value of survival by modified Tokuhashi score was the highest among all four scoring systems. Conclusions Patients with spinal metastases from NPC have good survival prognosis. All four scoring systems could be used to prognosticate these patients with a statistically significant association with actual survival. The modified Tokuhashi score is the best in doing so.
The Spine Journal | 2014
Naresh Kumar; Jonathan Tan; Aye Sandar Zaw; Joel Louis Lim; Khin Lay Wai; Rishi Malhotra; Thomas Kwok Seng Loh; Gabriel Liu; Joseph Thambiah
Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2014
Naresh Kumar; Raymond Lam; Aye Sandar Zaw; Rishi Malhotra; Jonathan Tan; Gamaliel Tan; Tony Setiobudi
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2016
Jonathan Tan; B. T. H. Koh; C. C. Hong; S. H. Lim; S. Liang; G. W. H. Chan; W. Wang; A. Nather
The Spine Journal | 2017
Jonathan Tan; Kimberly Anne Tan; Aye Sandar Zaw; Dennis Hey; Aravind Kumar; Naresh Kumar
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2016
Jonathan Tan; B. T. H. Koh; C. C. Hong; S. H. Lim; S. Liang; G. W. H. Chan; W. Wang; A. Nather
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2017
C. C. Hong; Jonathan Tan; S. H. Lim; A. Nather
The Spine Journal | 2016
Jonathan Tan; Kimberly Anne Tan; Aye Sandar Zaw; Dennis Hey; Aravind Kumar; Naresh Kumar
The Spine Journal | 2016
Naresh Kumar; Jonathan Tan; Kimberly Anne Tan; Aye Sandar Zaw; Gabriel Tan; Aravind Kumar
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2016
Jonathan Tan; B. T. H. Koh; C. C. Hong; S. H. Lim; S. Liang; G. W. H. Chan; W. Wang; A. Nather