Jong Dal Jung

Effects of a preemptive alveolar recruitment strategy on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation with different tidal volumes in patients with normal pulmonary function test.

Background Hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation (OLV) remains a major concern. The present study compared the effect of alveolar recruitment strategy (ARS) on arterial oxygenation during OLV at varying tidal volumes (Vt) with or without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Methods In total, 120 patients undergoing wedge resection by video assisted thoracostomy were randomized into four groups comprising 30 patients each: those administered a 10 ml/kg tidal volume with or without preemptive ARS (Group H and Group H-ARS, respectively) and those administered a 6 ml/kg tidal volume and a 8 cmH2O PEEP with or without preemptive ARS (Group L and Group L-ARS, respectively). ARS was performed using pressure-controlled ventilation with a 40 cmH2O plateau airway pressure and a 15 cmH2O PEEP for at least 10 breaths until OLV began. Results Preemptive ARS significantly improved the PaO2/FiO2 ratio compared to the groups that did not receive ARS (P < 0.05). The H-ARS group showed a highest PaO2/FiO2 ratio during OLV, the L-ARS and H groups showed similarly improved arterial oxygenation, which was significantly higher than in group L (P < 0.05). The plateau airway pressure in group H-ARS was significantly higher than in group L-ARS (P < 0.05). Conclusions Preemptive ARS can improve arterial oxygenation during OLV. Furthermore, a 6 ml/kg tidal volume combined with 8 cmH2O PEEP after preemptive ARS may reduce the risk of pulmonary injury caused by high tidal volume during one-lung ventilation in patients with normal pulmonary function.

Effects of lidocaine, ketamine, and remifentanil on withdrawal response of rocuronium

Background Rocuronium has been well known to produce withdrawal response in 50-80% patients when administered intravenously. Several drugs are administered prior injection of rocuronium to prevent the withdrawal response. We compared the preventive effect of lidocaine, ketamine, and remifentanil on the withdrawal response of rocuronium. Methods A total of 120 patients undergoing various elective surgeries were enrolled. Patients were allocated into 4 groups according to the pretreatment drugs (Group N, normal saline; Groups L, lidocaine 40 mg; Group K, ketamine 0.5 mg/kg; Group R, remifentanil 1 µg/kg). Patients received drugs prepared by dilution to 3 ml volume before injection of rocuronium. Withdrawal responses after injection of rocuronium were graded on a 4-point scale. Hemodynamic changes were observed before and after administration of pretreatment drugs and after endotracheal intubation. Results Incidence of withdrawal response was significantly lower in group L (20%), group K (30%), and group R (0%), than group N (87%). Severe withdrawal response was observed in 5 of the 30 patients (17%) in group L, and in 9 of the 30 patients (30%) in group K. There was no severe withdrawal response in group R. Mean blood pressure and heart rate were significantly decreased in group R compared to other groups. Conclusions It seems that remifentanil (1 µg/kg intravenously) was the strongest and most effective in prevention of withdrawal response after rocuronium injection among the 3 drugs.

Effect on thermoregulatory responses in patients undergoing a tympanoplasty in accordance to the anesthetic techniques during PEEP: a comparison between inhalation anesthesia with desflurane and TIVA

Background It has been known that positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) increases the vasoconstriction threshold by baroreceptor unloading. We compared the effect on the thermoregulatory responses according to anesthetic techniques between an inhalation anesthesia with desflurane and a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and reminfentanil when PEEP was applied in patients undergoing tympanoplasty. Methods Forty-six patients with a scheduled tympanoplasty were enrolled and the patients were divided in two study groups. Desflurane was used as an inhalation anesthetic in group 1 (n = 22), while TIVA with propofol and remifentanil was used in group 2 (n = 24). PEEP was applied by 5 cmH2O in both groups and an ambient temperature was maintained at 22-24℃ during surgery. The core temperature and the difference of skin temperature between forearm and fingertip were monitored for about 180 minutes before and after the induction of general anesthesia. Results The final core temperature was significantly higher in group 2 (35.4 ± 0.7℃) than in group 1 (34.9 ± 0.5℃). Peripheral thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was found in 5 subjects (23%) in group 1 and in 21 subjects (88%) in group 2. The time taken for reaching the thermoregulatory vasoconstriction threshold was 151.4 ± 19.7 minutes in group 1 and 88.9 ± 14.4 minutes in group 2. Conclusions When PEEP will be applied, anesthesia with TIVA may have more advantages in core temperature preservation than an inhalation anesthesia with desflurane.

The effects of intrathecal fentanyl for spinal anesthesia in lower extremity surgery

BACKGROUND Intrathecal opioids in combination with bupivacaine has been shown to provide adequate sensory blockade and early recovery from spinal anesthesia. This study was investigated the added effects of intrathecal fentanyl 10 microgram to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. METHODS Sixty patients undergoing lower extremity surgery were into three groups. Group I received bupivacaine 10 mg (0.5%), gruop II received bupivacaine 5 mg with normal saline 1 ml, and group III received bupivacaine 5 mg with fentanyl 10 microg and normal saline 0.8 ml. RESULTS There was no significant difference between group I and group III in the peak level and duration of sensory block. But the intensity of motor blockade was decreased in group III compared with group I and side effects of spinal anesthesia with local anesthetics was decreased in group III compared with group I. In Group II, 7 patients were complained the pain during surgery. CONCLUSIONS Intrathecal fentanyl 10 microgram with bupivacaine 5 mg on spinal blockade provide reliable anesthesia for lower extremity surgery.

Thermoregulatory responses of sevoflurane, desflurane, and isoflurane during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND Core temperature decreases rapidly after the induction of general anesthesia, because the heat is redistributed to peripheral tissues. Thermoregulatory responses of volatile anesthetics have been tested, but their effects have not been directly compared. Therefore, we evaluated the thermoregulatory responses to sevoflurane, desflurane, and isoflurane. METHODS Sixty healthy patients scheduled for laparoscopic myomectomy or radical hysterectomy were allocated into three groups; Group S (sevoflurane, n = 20), Group D (desflurane, n = 20), and Group I (isoflurane, n = 20). Anesthesia was maintained with 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane, desflurane, and isoflurane in a 50/50 mixture of N2O/O2. Patients were maintained in a normovolemic and normocapnic state. The core temperature and forearm minus fingertip skin-temperature gradient (an index of peripheral vasoconstriction) were monitored after the induction of general anesthesia. RESULTS Each of the seven patients given sevoflurane, desflurane, and isoflurane vasoconstricted at a core temperature of 35.3 +/- 0.5degrees C, 33.6 +/- 0.4degrees C, and 35.2 +/- 0.4degrees C, respectively. The vasoconstriction threshold was the lowest in patients anesthetized with desflurane. The core temperature gradient (Ti-Tf) was significantly higher in patients that were anesthetized with desflurane than in those that were anesthetized with sevoflurane or isoflurane. The core temperature of desflurane was significantly lower than that of sevoflurane or isoflurane 15 minutes after the induction of anesthesia until 180 minutes of anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that the core temperature is maintained at a higher level in patients that have been anesthetized with sevoflurane or isoflurane than in those that have been anesthetized with desflurane.