Jongphil Kim

Clinical and Biological Effects of Valproic Acid as a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor on Tumor and Surrogate Tissues: Phase I/II Trial of Valproic acid and Epirubicin/FEC

Purpose: The aim was to study the biological and molecular effects of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, valproic acid, in patients with solid tumor malignancies. Experimental Design: A phase I dose escalation of valproic acid given on days 1 to 3 followed by epirubicin (day 3) was followed by a dose expansion of valproic acid combined with 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC100). Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies entailed valproic acid and epirubicin plasma levels and their interaction, the effects of valproic acid on histone acetylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and tumor cells at baseline and day 3, and baseline expression of HDAC2 and HDAC6 as therapeutic targets. Results: Forty-four patients were enrolled in the phase I part, with a disease-specific cohort expansion of 15 breast cancer patients (median age, 55 years; range, 28-66 years) receiving 120 mg/kg/day valproic acid followed by FEC100. Partial responses were seen in 9 of 41 (22%) patients during the phase I part. Objective responses were seen in 9 of 14 (64%) evaluable patients at the dose expansion with a median number of 6 administered cycles. Predominant toxicities were valproic acid–associated somnolence and epirubicin-induced myelosuppression. Valproic acid plasma levels were associated with short-term, reversible depletion of WBC and neutrophils within 48 hours. Histone acetylation in tumor samples and in PBMCs correlated with valproic acid levels and was further linked to baseline HDAC2 but not to HDAC6 expression. Conclusion: Valproic acid is a clinically relevant HDAC inhibitor, and PBMCs may serve as a surrogate for tumor histone acetylation in solid tumor malignancies. HDAC2 should be further considered as a relevant therapeutic target.

Neoadjuvant GTX Chemotherapy and IMRT-Based Chemoradiation for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

To improve the likelihood of achieving a margin‐free resection, neoadjuvant induction chemotherapy with GTX (gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine) followed by 5‐FU‐IMRT was administered to patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. The utility of computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and CA 19‐9 during diagnostic workup and assessment of response was also examined.

A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil to Tacrolimus and Methotrexate for Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis

Tacrolimus (Tac) plus methotrexate (MTX) is a standard regimen for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is sometimes used instead of MTX to minimize toxicity, despite the lack of controlled studies demonstrating efficacy. We conducted a single-center, randomized phase II trial comparing Tac + MMF to Tac + MTX. Intent-to-treat analyses included 42 patients randomized to Tac + MMF and 47 to Tac + MTX. Patient characteristics were not different between the study arms. Patients in the Tac + MMF arm were less likely to experience severe mucositis, require narcotic analgesia and parenteral nutrition, and had earlier hospital discharge. The Tac + MMF arm had the same time to neutrophil recovery, but earlier platelet recovery. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) at 100 days was similar (P = .8), but grade III-IV aGVHD was higher in the Tac + MMF arm (19% versus 4%; P = .03); this was predominantly seen in unrelated donor transplants (26% versus 4%; P = .04), and less in related donor transplants (11% versus 4%; P = n.s.). Moderate or severe chronic GVHD was similar (P = .71). There were no significant differences between the arms in relapse, nonrelapse mortality, or overall and relapse-free survivals. MMF was associated with less early toxicity than MTX but was not as effective in preventing severe aGVHD, especially in unrelated donor transplants.

Sirolimus for treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

Acute GVHD (aGVHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic allograft recipients. The best therapy for patients failing to respond, or not tolerating, systemic glucocorticoids remains undefined. We evaluated the efficacy of sirolimus in 34 patients, median age of 49 (23–67) years, with steroid-refractory (n=31) or steroid-intolerant (n=3) aGVHD. aGVHD was diagnosed at a median of 34 (7–1042) days post allografting, and confirmed by biopsy in all cases. Initial aGVHD treatment consisted of prednisone up to 2 mg/kg. Sirolimus was initiated at a median of 9 (1–255) days after glucocorticoid initiation. A sirolimus loading dose was administered to 19 (56%) of 34 patients, median 6 (3–8) mg, followed by maintenance of 1–2 mg/day to target therapeutic trough levels between 4 and 12 ng/ml. Overall response rate was 76%. Fifteen (44%) of 34 patients achieved CR, defined as complete resolution of aGVHD sustained for at least 1 month, after sirolimus initiation without additional immunosuppressive agents. CR was achieved in 11 (42%) of 31 steroid-refractory and 2 (67%) of 3 steroid-intolerant patients. Median OS after initiation of sirolimus was 5.6 months, and 1-year OS was 44% (95% CI: 27–60%). Sirolimus is effective in controlling steroid-refractory aGVHD.

Race/ethnicity affects the probability of finding an HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1 allele-matched unrelated donor and likelihood of subsequent transplant utilization

Factors relevant to finding a suitable unrelated donor and barriers to effective transplant utilization are incompletely understood. Among a consecutive series of unrelated searches (n=531), an 8/8 HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1-matched unrelated donor was available for 289 (54%) patients, 7/8 for 159 (30%) and no donor for 83 (16%). Patients of Caucasian race (P<0.0001) were more likely to find a donor. Younger age (P=0.01), Caucasian race (P=0.03), lower CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research) risk (P=0.005), and 8/8 HLA matching (P=0.005) were associated with higher odds of reaching hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In a univariate analysis of OS, finding a donor was associated with hazard ratio (HR) of 0.85 (95% CI 0.63–1.2), P=0.31. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) accounted for interaction between having a donor and survival. Patients with KPS 90–100 and a donor had significantly reduced hazard for death (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38–0.90, P=0.02). These data provide estimates of the probability to find an unrelated donor in the era of high-resolution HLA typing, and identify potentially modifiable barriers to reaching HCT. Further efforts are needed to enhance effective donor identification and transplant utilization, particularly in non-Caucasian ethnic groups.

The global severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease, determined by National Institutes of Health consensus criteria, is associated with overall survival and non-relapse mortality

Background The 2005 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on chronic graft-versus-host disease proposed major changes in the classification and grading of severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Design and Methods We aimed to study the association of the proposed chronic graft-versus-host disease classification and global severity with transplantation outcomes among a consecutive series of patients who received pharmacokinetically-targeted doses of intravenous busulfan and fludarabine conditioning followed by transplantation of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells. Results From a total cohort (n = 242) of patients surviving more than 100 days after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 181 (75% of those at risk) had some manifestations of graft-versus-host disease after day 100. Of these, at onset 13 (7%) had late acute graft-versus-host disease, 62 (34%) had classic chronic graft-versus-host disease, and 106 (59%) had the overlap subtype of chronic graft-versus-host disease. The global severity of the chronic graft-versus-host disease was mild in 25% of cases, moderate in 46%, and severe in 29%. Multivariable modeling demonstrated the independent association of global severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease with overall survival (moderate/severe versus mild; HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8–4.7, P<0.0001) and non-relapse mortality (moderate versus mild; HR 3.86, 95% CI 1.17–12.73, P=0.03, and severe versus mild (HR 10.06, 95% CI 3.07–32.97, P<0.001). The type of onset of progressive chronic graft-versus-host disease and the platelet count at the time of diagnosis of the disease were significantly associated with overall survival. The occurrence and severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease was also significantly associated with primary disease relapse. Conclusions Patients with moderate to severe chronic graft-versus-host disease, as determined by National Institutes of Health Consensus criteria, have an inferior overall survival and worse non-relapse mortality. Clinical and research advances are needed to improve the outcomes of affected patients.

Preliminary indication of survival benefit from ERCC1 and RRM1-tailored chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: evidence from an individual patient analysis.

Excision repair cross complementing 1 (ERCC1) and ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) are molecular determinants that predict sensitivity or resistance to platinum agents and gemcitabine, respectively. Tailored therapy using these molecular determinants suggested patient benefit in a previously reported phase 2 trial. Here, we report an individual patient analysis of prospectively accrued patients who were treated with the “personalized therapy” approach versus other “standard,” noncustomized approaches.

Male Breast Cancer: Management and Follow‐up Recommendations

Abstract:  National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for female breast cancer treatment and surveillance are well established, but similar guidelines on male breast cancers are less recognized. As an NCCN institution, our objective was to examine practice patterns and follow‐up for male breast cancer compared to established guidelines for female patients. After Institutional Review Board approval, a prospective breast database from 1990 to 2009 was queried for male patients. Medical records were examined for clinico‐pathological factors and follow‐up. The 5‐year survival rates with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method and Greenwood formula. Of the 19,084 patients in the database, 73 (0.4%) were male patients; 62 had complete data. One patient had bilateral synchronous breast cancer. The median age was 68.8 years (range 29–85 years). The mean/median invasive tumor size was 2.2/1.6 cm (range 0.0–10.0 cm). All cases had mastectomy (29 with axillary node dissection, 23 with sentinel lymph node biopsy only, 11 with sentinel node biopsy followed by completion axillary dissection). Lymph node involvement occurred in 25/63 (39.7%). Based on NCCN guidelines, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and radiation are indicated in 34 cases, 62 cases, and 14 cases, respectively. Only 20/34 (59%) received chemotherapy, 51/62 (82%) received hormonal therapy, and 10/14 (71%) received post‐mastectomy radiation. Median follow‐up was 26.2 months (range: 1.6–230.9 months). The 5‐year survival estimates for node positive and negative diseases were 68.5% and 87.5%, respectively (p = 0.3). Despite the rarity of male breast cancer, treatment options based on current female breast tumors produce comparable results to female breast cancer. Increased awareness and a national registry for patients could help improve outcomes and tailor treatment recommendations to the male variant.

Pharmacokinetic targeting of intravenous busulfan reduces conditioning regimen related toxicity following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia

Optimal conditioning therapy for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) remains undefined. We retrospectively compared outcomes of a consecutive series of 51 AML patients treated with oral busulfan (1 mg/kg every 6 hours for 4 days) and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg IV × 2 days) - (Bu/Cy) with 100 consecutive AML patients treated with pharmacokinetic targeted IV busulfan (AUC < 6000 μM/L*min per day × 4 days) and fludarabine (40 mg/m2 × 4 days) - (t-IV Bu/Flu). The Bu/Cy and t-IV Bu/Flu groups significantly differed according to donor relation, stem cell source, aGVHD prophylaxis, remission status, primary vs. secondary disease, median age, and % blasts prior to HCT (p < 0.01 for each). Conditioning with t-IV Bu/Flu reduced early toxicity including idiopathic pneumonia syndrome (IPS) and hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD). Additionally, the trajectory of early NRM (100 day: 16% vs. 3%, and1 year: 25% vs. 15% for Bu/Cy and t-IV Bu/Flu, respectively) favored t-IV Bu/Flu. Grade II-IV aGVHD (48% vs. 82%, p < 0.0001), as well as moderate/severe cGVHD (7% vs. 40%, p < 0.0001) differed between the Bu/Cy and t-IV Bu/Flu groups, due to the predominance of peripheral blood stem cells in the t-IV Bu/Flu group. Pharmacokinetic targeting of intravenous busulfan in combination with fludarabine is associated with reduced conditioning regimen related toxicity compared to oral busulfan and cyclophosphamide. However, multivariable analysis did not demonstrate significant differences in overall survival (p = 0.78) or non-relapse mortality (p = 0.6) according to conditioning regimen delivered.

A statewide survey of practitioners to assess knowledge and clinical practices regarding hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE This study describes practitioner knowledge and practices related to BRCA testing and management and explores how training may contribute to practice patterns. METHODS A survey was mailed to all BRCA testing providers in Florida listed in a publicly available directory. Descriptive statistics characterized participants and their responses. RESULTS Of the 87 respondents, most were community-based physicians or nurse practitioners. Regarding BRCA mutations, the majority (96%) recognized paternal inheritance and 61% accurately estimated mutation prevalence. For a 35-year-old unaffected BRCA mutation carrier, the majority followed national management guidelines. However, 65% also recommended breast ultrasonography. Fewer than 40% recognized the need for comprehensive rearrangement testing when BRACAnalysis(®) was negative in a woman at 30% risk. Finally, fewer than 15% recognized appropriate testing for a BRCA variant of uncertain significance. Responses appeared to be positively impacted by presence and type of cancer genetics training. CONCLUSIONS In our sample of providers who order BRCA testing, knowledge gaps in BRCA prevalence estimates and appropriate screening, testing, and results interpretation were identified. Our data suggest the need to increase regulation and oversight of genetic testing services at a policy level, and are consistent with case reports that reveal liability risks when genetic testing is conducted without adequate knowledge and training.