Joong-Kyung Kim

Efficacy and Safety of Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplantation: A Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND Rejection and infection can occur after kidney transplantation and are important factors in preserving graft kidney function. The use of immunosuppressant agents in transplantation is therefore important, and the question of which induction therapy should be used as an immunosuppressant is controversial. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to assess the comparative benefits and harms of various maintenance immunosuppressive induction agents in adults undergoing kidney transplantation by using a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different immunosuppressive regimens according to their safety and efficacy. METHODS CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trial registers were searched until May 2017 to identify randomized controlled trials on immunosuppression for kidney transplantation. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies involving 4484 participants were eligible for analysis. Induction and maintenance treatments were administered for 12 months. There was no evidence of differences in outcomes between therapies on all-cause mortality, graft loss, cytomegalovirus, BK virus, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and biopsy-proven acute rejection. However, compared with intravenous basiliximab (an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist [IL-2RA]), the most effective treatments to decrease biopsy-proven acute rejection were intravenous alemtuzumab and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG). The odds ratios were 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-40.78) and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.42-0.95), respectively. As a side effect, rATG was accompanied by more bacterial infection than the IL-2RA (OR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.01-2.8]). CONCLUSIONS The determination of induction in kidney transplantation is important for future prognosis of the graft kidney. Alemtuzumab and rATG exhibited lower biopsy-proven acute rejection than the IL-2RA. As a side effect, rATG produced frequent bacterial infections.

Efficacy of Ultralow-Dose Valganciclovir Chemoprophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus Infection in ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Recipients

BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection can increase morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant (KT) patients. Chemoprophylaxis with valganciclovir (VGCV) is recommended for ABO-incompatible (ABOi) KT patients as it significantly reduces CMV disease and infection. The recommended dose of VGCV for prevention of CMV in a KT recipient is 900 mg once daily, and the treatment duration is 6 months. However, because it is expensive, sufficient amounts might not be administered. METHODS We investigated whether ultralow-dose VGCV (450 mg every other day) and short dosing period (3 months) was sufficient to prevent CMV infection after ABOi KT. We retrospectively evaluated 74 adult CMV-seropositive donor/CMV-seropositive recipient (D+/R+) ABOi KT recipients from June 2009 to July 2016 who received ultralow-dose VGCV prophylaxis for 3 months. The primary outcome was occurrence of CMV infection. Secondary outcomes were leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. RESULT All patients received intravenous rituximab 200 mg once and plasmapheresis for reduction of anti-A/B antibodies and interleukin-2 antibodies before undergoing ABOi KT. Mean prophylaxis and follow-up durations were 3 and 52 months, respectively. One patient died of bacterial pneumonia. Four patients lost graft function and were undergoing hemodialysis; 3 cases were caused by antibody-mediated rejection, and 1 was due to mechanical complication after surgery. Fortunately, CMV infection did not occur in any patient. CONCLUSION Ultralow-dose VGCV is an effective prophylaxis for D+/R+ ABOi KT recipients. Especially, ultralow-dose VGCV CMV infection prevention protocol in Asian populations reduced the side effects and cost.