Jordina Llaó

Long-term comparative efficacy of cyclosporine- or infliximab-based strategies for the management of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis attacks.

Background:The short-term efficacy of infliximab (IFX) and cyclosporine A (CsA) in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (SRUC) has been recently shown to be similar, but long-term outcomes are still unclear. Moreover, the need for further rescue therapies in patients treated with IFX or CsA for SRUC has not been reported. The aims of our study were to compare short-term and long-term efficacy between 2 different strategies based on initial treatment with CsA or IFX for SRUC attacks. Patients and Methods:Between January 2005 and December 2011, all patients admitted for SRUC who required medical rescue therapy were identified from the electronic databases of 3 referral centers and grouped according to whether they received CsA or IFX as first-line rescue therapy, and retrospectively reviewed. Results:Among 50 SRUC attacks, 20 were treated with CsA as first-line rescue therapy and 30 with IFX. The CsA group had a higher proportion of patients with severe UC activity immediately before rescue therapy (P = 0.03) and a shorter median time from intravenous corticosteroids to rescue therapy (P = 0.03). A higher proportion of patients in the CsA group received second-line drug therapy (switch) as compared with the IFX group (P = 0.04). Fifteen patients (30%) were colectomized during the study period, with no between-group differences. Previous thiopurine exposure (P = 0.004; odds ratio = 6.1 [1.7–20.9]) was the only independent predictor of colectomy. Conclusions:CsA- and IFX-based strategies for SRUC seem similarly effective in preventing colectomy in the short and long term, although second-line drug therapy is more often required with CsA-based strategies.

Intravenous corticosteroids in moderately active ulcerative colitis refractory to oral corticosteroids

BACKGROUND Oral corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment for moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC). In patients who fail to respond to oral corticosteroids, attempting the intravenous route before starting rescue therapies is an alternative, although no evidence supports this strategy. AIM To evaluate clinical outcomes after a course of intravenous corticosteroids for moderate attacks of UC according to the failed oral corticosteroids or not. METHODS All episodes of active UC admitted to three university hospitals between January 2005 and December 2011 were identified and retrospectively reviewed. Only moderately active episodes treated with intravenous corticosteroids were included. Treatment outcome was compared between episodes which failed to outpatient oral corticosteroids for the index flare and those directly treated by intravenous corticosteroids. RESULTS 110 episodes were included, 45% of which failed to outpatient oral corticosteroids (median dose 60mg/day [IQR 50-60], median length of course 10days [IQR 7-17]). Initial response (defined as mild severity or inactive disease at day 7 after starting intravenous corticosteroids, without rescue therapy) was achieved in 75%, with no between-group differences (78% vs. 75%). After a median follow-up of 12months (IQR 4-24), 35% of the initial responders developed steroid-dependency and up to 13% required colectomy. Unsuccessful response to oral corticosteroids was the only factor associated with steroid-dependency in the long term (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS Intravenous corticosteroids are efficient for inducing remission in moderately active UC unresponsive to oral corticosteroids, but almost half of these patients develop early steroid-dependency. Alternative therapeutic strategies should be assessed in this clinical setting.

Improved outcome of acute severe ulcerative colitis while using early predictors of corticosteroid failure and rescue therapies

BACKGROUND AND AIM Intravenous corticosteroids remain the first line therapy for severe attacks of ulcerative colitis although up to 30-40% of patients do not respond to treatment. The availability of alternative therapies to colectomy and the knowledge of early predictors of response to corticosteroids should have improved the clinical outcomes of patients with severe refractory ulcerative colitis. The aim of the study is to describe the current need, way of use, and efficacy of rescue therapies, as well as colectomy rates in patients with severe ulcerative colitis flares. METHODS Between January 2005 and December 2011, all patients admitted in three referral centres for a severe ulcerative colitis flare who received intravenous corticosteroids were identified and clinical and biological data were accurately collected. Patients were followed-up until colectomy, death, or date of data collection. RESULTS Sixty-two flares were included. Initial efficacy of intravenous corticosteroids (mild activity or inactive disease without rescue treatment, at day 7 after starting intravenous corticosteroids) was achieved in 50% of flares, and rescue therapies were used in 27 episodes (43%). After a median follow-up of 18 months, the colectomy rate was 6.5%. Failed oral corticosteroids for the index flare were the only baseline feature that predicted the need for rescue therapy and colectomy. CONCLUSIONS There is a marked reduction in the colectomy rate and an increased use of medical rescue therapies as compared to historical series. Patients worsening while on oral corticosteroids for a moderate flare are at high risk of rescue therapy and colectomy and, therefore, should be directly treated with rescue therapies instead of attempting intravenous corticosteroids.

Serial semi-quantitative measurement of fecal calprotectin in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission

Abstract Background: Fecal calprotectin (FC) correlates with clinical and endoscopic activity in ulcerative colitis (UC), and it is a good predictor of relapse. However, its use in clinical practice is constrained by the need for the patient to deliver stool samples, and for their handling and processing in the laboratory. The availability of hand held devices might spread the use of FC in clinical practice. Objectives: To evaluate the usefulness of a rapid semi-quantitative test of FC in predicting relapse in patients with UC in remission. Materials and methods: Prospective, multicenter study that included UC patients in clinical remission for ≥6 months on maintenance treatment with mesalamine. Patients were evaluated clinically and semi-quantitative FC was measured using a monoclonal immunochromatography rapid test at baseline and every three months until relapse or 12 months of follow-up. Results: One hundred and ninety-one patients had at least one determination of FC. At the end of follow-up, 33 patients (17%) experienced clinical relapse. Endoscopic activity at baseline (p = .043) and having had at least one FC > 60 μg/g during the study period (p = .03) were associated with a higher risk of relapse during follow-up. We obtained a total of 636 semi-quantitative FC determinations matched with a three-month follow-up clinical assessment. Having undetectable FC was inversely associated with early relapse (within three months), with a negative predictive value of 98.6% and a sensitivity of 93.9%. Conclusions: Serial, rapid semi-quantitative measurement of FC may be a useful, easy and cheap monitoring tool for patients with UC in remission.

Prevalence and risk factors for colorectal adenomas in patients with ulcerative colitis

Background Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Scarce data regarding the development of adenomas in these patients are available both for normal and colitic mucosa. Objective The objective of this article is to evaluate the prevalence of adenomatous polyps and associated risk factors in patients with UC. Methods Patients with UC were identified from the databases of two tertiary referral centers. Medical, endoscopic and histologic reports were reviewed. Results A total of 403 patients were included (53% male; 33% extensive colitis) and 1065 colonoscopies (median per patient, 2) were recorded and analyzed. Seventy-four adenomas in 47 patients (11.7%) and three cases of colorectal cancer were found during a median follow-up of 6.3 years. The cumulative risk of colorectal adenoma was 4.7%, 16.7%, 23.6% and 34.4% at 10, 20, 30 and 40 years from UC diagnosis, respectively. The cumulative risk of developing metachronous colorectal adenoma was 66.7%, 87.9%, and 90.9% at 5, 10, and 15 years from first adenoma detection. Older age at UC diagnosis and longer disease duration were independent risk factors for colorectal adenoma development. Conclusions The prevalence of colorectal adenomas among UC patients seems to be higher than previously reported, although lower than in the background population.

Prognostic value of the burden of cytomegalovirus colonic reactivation evaluated by immunohistochemical staining in patients with active ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND Colonic cytomegalovirus [CMV] reactivation has been involved in steroid refractoriness in patients with active ulcerative colitis [UC]. The benefits of antiviral therapy in this clinical setting are still under debate, but the burden of viral reactivation has been associated with a poorer outcome in some studies. Our aim was to assess whether the burden of CMV reactivation measured by the number of viral inclusions by immunohistochemistry [IHC-CMV] is associated with a risk of colectomy. METHODS Biopsy sets of UC patients with positive IHC-CMV were identified from the Pathology departments of three university hospitals. All biopsies were reviewed by expert pathologists, and the maximum number of IHC-CMV-positive cells in each biopsy set was re-assessed. Epidemiological and clinical features and clinical outcomes were recorded. RESULTS Forty-six positive IHC-CMV cases with UC were included. At the time of CMV reactivation, 70% were receiving corticosteroids, 33% azathioprine, and 24% anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] agents. Thirty-two patients [70%] were treated with antiviral therapy. The median number of IHC-CMV-positive cells was 2 cells/biopsy [IQR 1-4]. Fourteen patients [30%] underwent colectomy, and 4 of them [29%] showed persistence of CMV in the surgical specimen. In the multivariate analysis, colectomy was only associated with >2 positive cells/biopsy [p = 0.048] and younger age [p = 0.023]. CONCLUSIONS The burden of CMV colonic reactivation in patients with active UC, as measured by IHC, seems to be related to the risk of colectomy, and more data is needed to understand whether antiviral therapy guided by CMV burden will alter the clinical outcome.

Short and long-term effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease: results from the ENEIDA registry

Effectiveness of vedolizumab in real world clinical practice is unknown.

Sa1224 Usefulness of a Faecal Calprotectin Rapid Semiquantitative Test in Predicting Relapse in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in Remission

DOP051 Usefulness of a faecal calprotectin rapid semiquantitative test in predicting relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission E. Garcia-Planella1, M. Manyosa2,3, M. Chaparro4, M. Barreirode-Acosta5, B. Beltran6, E. Ricart7, V. Garcia-Sanchez8, M. Esteve9, M. Piqueras10, F. Bermejo11, A. Lopez-Sanroman12, C. Taxonera12, J. Llao13, J.P. Gisbert4, E. Cabre3, E. Domenech3 *. 1Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Gastroenterology, Barcelona, Spain, 2Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol and CIBERehd, Gastroenterology Unit, Badalona, Spain, 3Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Gastroenterology, Badalona, Spain, 4Hospital La Princesa, Gastroenterology, Madrid, Spain, 5Hospital Universitario de Santiago, Gastroenterology, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 6IIS Hospital La Fe, Gastroenterology, Valencia, Spain, 7Hospital Clinic, Gastroenterology, Barcelona, Spain, 8Hospital Reina Sofia, Gastroenterology, Cordoba, Spain, 9Hospital Mutua Terrassa, Gastroenterology, Terrassa, Spain, 10Consorci Sanitari Terrassa, Gastroenterology, Terrassa, Spain, 11Hospital de Fuenlabrada, Gastroenterology, Fuenlabrada, Spain, 12Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Gastroenterology, Madrid, Spain, 13Xarxa Hospitalaria Althaia, Gastroenterology, Manresa, Spain