Jordyn T. Wallenborn

Association Between Intimate Partner Violence and Breastfeeding Duration: Results From the 2004-2014 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System:

Background: Intimate partner violence is a major public health problem that disproportionately affects women. Current literature investigating the relationship between intimate partner violence and breastfeeding is inconsistent. Research aim: This study aims to investigate the relationship between physical intimate partner violence that occurs in the preconception or prenatal period and any breastfeeding duration. Methods: Data from the retrospective, cross-sectional 2004-2014 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System were analyzed (N = 195,264). The outcome, breastfeeding duration, was categorized as never breastfed, breastfed 8 weeks or less, and breastfeed more than 8 weeks. Multinomial logistic regression was used to obtain crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Approximately 6% (n = 11,766) of survey respondents reported preconception and/or prenatal intimate partner violence, and 36.3% (n = 67,667) of women reported never breastfeeding. The odds of discontinuing breastfeeding before 8 weeks were 18% higher among women who reported experiencing abuse 12 months before pregnancy compared with women who did not report intimate partner violence (adjusted odds ratio = 1.18; 95% confidence interval [1.01, 1.37]). All other estimates showed an overlapping 95% confidence interval. Conclusion: Breastfeeding is essential in improving maternal and child health; however, women in abusive relationships may face additional barriers to breastfeeding. Further research is needed to better understand the impact of violence on breastfeeding behaviors to inform healthcare practices and interventions.

Breastfeeding after Gestational Diabetes: Does Perceived Benefits Mediate the Relationship?

Introduction. Breastfeeding is recognized as one of the best ways to decrease infant mortality and morbidity. However, women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) may have breastfeeding barriers due to the increased risk of neonatal and pregnancy complications. While the prevalence of GDM is increasing worldwide, it is important to understand the full implications of GDM on breastfeeding outcomes. The current study aims to investigate the (1) direct effect of GDM on breastfeeding duration and (2) indirect effect of GDM on breastfeeding duration through perceived benefits of breastfeeding. Methods. Prospective cohort data from the Infant Feeding and Practices Study II was analyzed (N = 4,902). Structural equation modeling estimated direct and indirect effects. Results. Perceived benefits of breastfeeding directly influenced breastfeeding duration (β = 0.392, p ≤ 0.001). GDM was not directly associated with breastfeeding duration or perceived benefits of breastfeeding. Similarly, GDM did not have an indirect effect on breastfeeding duration through perceived benefits of breastfeeding. Conclusions. Perceived benefits of breastfeeding are an important factor associated with breastfeeding duration. Maternal and child health care professionals should enhance breastfeeding education efforts.

The Role of Paternity Acknowledgment in Breastfeeding Noninitiation

Background: In the United States, less than a quarter of mothers breastfeed in accordance with national recommendations. To date, researchers have demonstrated that paternal support directly influences breastfeeding outcomes; however, healthcare practitioners may not be able to quantify a lack of support in the immediate postpartum period. Research aim: The aim is to investigate the relationship between breastfeeding noninitiation and paternity acknowledgment, a factor that can be easily identified in the immediate postpartum period. Methods: Data from the 2014 Vital Statistics Natality Birth database were analyzed. Analysis included primiparous singleton births with no health complications (N = 1,127,861). Based on the birth certificate data, paternity acknowledgment was categorized as married with paternity acknowledged, unmarried with paternity acknowledged, and unmarried without paternity acknowledged. Breastfeeding initiation was dichotomized (yes or no). Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to obtain crude and adjusted odds ratios and 99% confidence intervals (α = .01). Results: Approximately one in seven births had no paternity acknowledgment on their birth certificate. After adjusting for confounders, mothers who were not married but the paternity of the infant was acknowledged had 50% higher odds of breastfeeding noninitiation compared with mothers who were married and their infants’ paternity was acknowledged (adjusted odds ratio = 1.50, 99% confidence interval [1.47, 1.53]). Furthermore, women who were unmarried and without paternity acknowledgment had 135% higher odds of breastfeeding noninitiation compared with married women with paternity acknowledgment (adjusted odds ratio = 2.35, 99% confidence interval [2.30, 2.41]). Conclusion: Women whose births were not acknowledged by the fathers may need additional breastfeeding support from healthcare practitioners.