Joren Ten Hove

Low Rate of Dysplasia Detection in Mucosa Surrounding Dysplastic Lesions in Patients Undergoing Surveillance for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND & AIMS: When dysplastic lesions are encountered during surveillance colonoscopy of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), guidelines recommend collection of additional biopsies from the surrounding mucosa to ensure the lesion has been adequately circumscribed. We aimed to determine the rate of dysplasia in mucosa biopsies collected from tissues surrounding dysplastic lesions during IBD surveillance. METHODS: In a retrospective study, we collected endoscopy and pathology reports from 1065 patients undergoing colonoscopic surveillance for IBD from 2000 through 2015 at 3 centers in the Netherlands. We analyzed reports from all patients with dysplastic lesions from whom biopsies of surrounding mucosa were collected. Among 194 patients with 1 or more visible dysplastic lesions, mucosal biopsies were collected from tissues adjacent to 140 dysplastic lesions from 71 patients (63% male; 48% with ulcerative colitis, 42% with Crohns disease, and 10% with indeterminate colitis). RESULTS: The mean number of surrounding mucosa biopsies collected per lesion was 3.4 (range, 1–6). Dysplasia was detected in 7 biopsies surrounding 140 areas of dysplasia (5.0%) and 5 biopsies surrounding 136 areas of low‐grade dysplasia (3.7%). Dysplasia in biopsies of surrounding mucosa could be observed during 5 of 87 white light endoscopies and during 2 of 53 chromoendoscopies. In patients with dysplasia in mucosa surrounding lesions of low‐grade dysplasia, post‐resection surveillance did not reveal high‐grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Dysplasia is detected in only 5% of biopsies collected from mucosa surrounding dysplastic lesions. This observation indicates that endoscopists accurately delineate the borders of dysplastic lesions during surveillance of patients with IBD. The lack of clinical consequences from routinely collecting biopsies from areas surrounding dysplastic lesions casts doubt on the usefulness and cost‐effectiveness of this practice.

Clinical implications of low grade dysplasia found during inflammatory bowel disease surveillance: a retrospective study comparing chromoendoscopy and white-light endoscopy

Background and study aims Current guidelines recommend the use of pancolonic chromoendoscopy for surveillance of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is currently unknown whether low grade dysplasia (LGD) found using chromoendoscopy carries a similar risk of high grade dysplasia (HGD) or colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with LGD detected using white-light endoscopy (WLE). The aim of this study was to compare the risk of advanced neoplasia, a combined endpoint of HGD and CRC, during follow-up after detection of lesions containing LGD identified with either chromoendoscopy or WLE. Patients and methods A retrospective cohort was established to identify patients who underwent IBD surveillance for ulcerative colitis or colonic Crohns disease between 2000 and 2014. Subgroups were identified, based on the endoscopic technique (standard definition resolution WLE, high definition resolution WLE or chromoendoscopy). LGD detected in random biopsies was considered invisible LGD. Patients were followed until detection of advanced neoplasia, colectomy, death, or the last known surveillance colonoscopy. Results Of 1065 patients undergoing IBD surveillance, 159 patients underwent follow-up for LGD, which was visible in 133 cases and invisible in 26 cases. On follow-up, five cases of HGD and five cases of CRC were detected. The overall incidence rate of advanced neoplasia was 1.34 per 100 patient-years with a median follow-up of 4.7 years and a median time to advanced neoplasia of 3.3 years. There were no significant differences in the incidence of advanced neoplasia between chromoendoscopy-detected and WLE-detected LGD. Conclusion Advanced neoplasia was found to develop infrequently after detection of LGD in patients undergoing endoscopic surveillance for IBD. LGD lesions detected with either chromoendoscopy or WLE carry similar risks of advanced neoplasia over time.

Consecutive negative findings on colonoscopy during surveillance predict a low risk of advanced neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with long-standing colitis: results of a 15-year multicentre, multinational cohort study

Objectives Surveillance colonoscopy is thought to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with long-standing colonic IBD, but data regarding the frequency of surveillance and the findings thereof are lacking. Our aim was to determine whether consecutive negative surveillance colonoscopies adequately predict low neoplastic risk. Design A multicentre, multinational database of patients with long-standing IBD colitis without high-risk features and undergoing regular CRC surveillance was constructed. A ‘negative’ surveillance colonoscopy was predefined as a technically adequate procedure having no postinflammatory polyps, no strictures, no endoscopic disease activity and no evidence of neoplasia; a ‘positive’ colonoscopy was a technically adequate procedure that included at least one of these criteria. The primary endpoint was advanced colorectal neoplasia (aCRN), defined as high-grade dysplasia or CRC. Results Of 775 patients with long-standing IBD colitis, 44% (n=340) had >1 negative colonoscopy. Patients with consecutive negative surveillance colonoscopies were compared with those who had at least one positive colonoscopy. Both groups had similar demographics, disease-related characteristics, number of surveillance colonoscopies and time intervals between colonoscopies. No aCRN occurred in those with consecutive negative surveillance, compared with an incidence rate of 0.29 to 0.76/100 patient-years (P=0.02) in those having >1 positive colonoscopy on follow-up of 6.1 (P25–P75: 4.6–8.2) years after the index procedure. Conclusion Within this large surveillance cohort of patients with colonic IBD and no additional high-risk features, having two consecutive negative colonoscopies predicted a very low risk of aCRN occurrence on follow-up. Our findings suggest that longer surveillance intervals in this selected population may be safe.

Malignant and Nonmalignant Complications of the Rectal Stump in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background Patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) might require a subtotal colectomy with construction of an ileostomy. Due to the risk of nerve damage and pelvic sepsis, the diverted rectum is often left in situ. Evidence on long-term complications of this rectal stump is limited, particularly in patients with Crohns disease (CD). In addition to the risk of development of neoplasia, diversion proctitis is a frequently reported rectal stump associated complication. Surprisingly, clear recommendations concerning rectal stump surveillance and timing of proctectomy are lacking. Methods Through the use of a pathology database and a review of medical records, we established a cohort of IBD patients with a diverted rectum. Among these patients, long-term complications of the rectal stump were identified. Main endpoint was advanced neoplasia (carcinoma or high-grade dysplasia [HGD]) in the rectal stump. Risk factors for advanced neoplasia were identified using Cox regression modeling. In the second, prospective part of the study, a questionnaire was sent out to 165 patients with either a rectal stump in situ or who had undergone a proctectomy, in order to identify differences in patient-reported outcome measures associated with the excision of the rectal stump. Results From 530 patients with IBD and a (temporal) diversion of the rectum, we included 250 patients in whom the rectal stump was left in situ for more than 12 months. The majority of patients was female (61%) and had Crohns disease (67%). On follow-up (median 8 years), 8 carcinomas, 2 cases of high-grade dysplasia, and 7 cases of low-grade dysplasia were found with incidence rates of 3.9 and 8.5 per 1000 patient-years of follow-up for cancer and all neoplasia, respectively. The 8 cases of rectal stump cancer (RSC) were diagnosed after a median of 15 years after colectomy. A history of colorectal neoplasia was associated with advanced rectal stump neoplasia. Out of 191 patients with endoscopic follow-up, rectal stump inflammation occurred in 161 (88.5%) patients. Results of the questionnaire did not show a significant difference in quality of life between patients with and patients without a rectal stump, although the latter group reported significantly more sexual and urinary symptoms than patients with a rectal stump in situ. The majority of rectal stump patients reported rectal blood loss, but 65.5% of them were not or barely limited in daily life by their rectal stumprelated problems. Conclusion Rectal stump cancer has a low incidence rate, with patients with a history of colonic neoplasia carrying the highest risk of developing this severe complication. We observed no significant differences in quality of life between rectal stump and postproctectomy patients, but proctectomy surgery is associated with sexual and urinary complications.

High Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Associated With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background & Aims: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC, termed PSC‐IBD) are at increased risk for colorectal cancer, but their risk following a diagnosis of low‐grade dysplasia (LGD) is not well described. We aimed to determine the rate of advanced colorectal neoplasia (aCRN), defined as high‐grade dysplasia and/or colorectal cancer, following a diagnosis of indefinite dysplasia or LGD in this population. Methods: We performed a retrospective, longitudinal study of 1911 patients with colonic IBD (293 with PSC and 1618 without PSC) who underwent more than 2 surveillance colonoscopies from 2000 through 2015 in The Netherlands or the United States (9265 patient‐years of follow‐up evaluation). We collected data on clinical and demographic features of patients, as well as data from each surveillance colonoscopy and histologic report. For each surveillance colonoscopy, the severity of active inflammation was documented. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of aCRN during follow‐up evaluation. We also investigated factors associated with aCRN in patients with or without a prior diagnosis of indefinite dysplasia or LGD. Results: Patients with PSC‐IBD had a 2‐fold higher risk of developing aCRN than patients with non‐PSC IBD. Mean inflammation scores did not differ significantly between patients with PSC‐IBD (0.55) vs patients with non‐PSC IBD (0.56) (P = .89), nor did proportions of patients with LGD (21% of patients with PSC‐IBD vs 18% of patients with non‐PSC IBD) differ significantly (P = .37). However, the rate of aCRN following a diagnosis of LGD was significantly higher in patients with PSC‐IBD (8.4 per 100 patient‐years) than patients with non‐PSC IBD (3.0 per 100 patient‐years; P = .01). PSC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.01; 95% CI, 1.09–3.71), increasing age (aHR 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.05), and active inflammation (aHR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.63–3.49) were independent risk factors for aCRN. Dysplasia was more often endoscopically invisible in patients with PSC‐IBD than in patients with non‐PSC IBD. Conclusions: In a longitudinal study of almost 2000 patients with colonic IBD, PSC remained a strong independent risk factor for aCRN. Once LGD is detected, aCRN develops at a higher rate in patients with PSC and is more often endoscopically invisible than in patients with only IBD. Our findings support recommendations for careful annual colonoscopic surveillance for patients with IBD and PSC, and consideration of colectomy once LGD is detected.

Surveillance of long-standing colitis: the role of image-enhanced endoscopy.

Patients with long-standing inflammatory bowel disease of the colon are at an increased risk of developing colorectal carcinoma. Surveillance programs have been implemented with the aim of detecting neoplastic lesions in an early stage. Due to limitations of conventional white light endoscopy, several new techniques to enhance the detection of dysplastic lesions in this setting have been explored. These advanced endoscopic techniques use a variety of methods to improve visualization, such as pancolonic dye-spraying (chromoendoscopy), optical filters (narrow-band imaging) and autofluorescence of mucosal tissue (autofluorescence imaging). At present, most guidelines have adopted chromoendoscopy as the preferred method for surveillance, based on several controlled studies. It is currently unknown if widespread implementation of chromoendoscopy will lead to an improved clinical outcome. This review explores the current evidence on image-enhanced endoscopic techniques used in the detection of neoplastic lesions in patients with long standing colitis.