Jörg Beyer

European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ Cell Cancer: A Report of the Second Meeting of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): Part I

OBJECTIVES The first consensus report presented by the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG) in the year 2004 has found widespread approval by many colleagues throughout the world. In November 2006, the group met a second time under the auspices of the Department of Urology of the Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. METHODS Medical oncologists, urological surgeons, radiation oncologists as well as pathologists from several European countries reviewed and discussed the data that had emerged since the 2002 conference, and incorporated the new data into updated and revised guidelines. As for the first meeting, the methodology of evidence-based medicine (EBM) was applied. The results of the discussion were compiled by the writing committee. All participants have agreed to this final update. RESULTS The first part of the consensus paper describes the clinical presentation of the primary tumor, its treatment, the importance and treatment of testicular intraepithelial neoplasia (TIN), histological classification, staging and prognostic factors, and treatment of stage I seminoma and non-seminoma. CONCLUSIONS Whereas the vast majority of the recommendations made in 2004 remain valid 3 yr later, refinements in the treatment of early- and advanced-stage testicular cancer have emerged from clinical trials. Despite technical improvements, expert clinical skills will continue to be one of the major determinants for the prognosis of patients with germ cell cancer. In addition, the particular needs of testicular cancer survivors have been acknowledged.

Extragonadal germ cell tumors of the mediastinum and retroperitoneum: results from an international analysis.

PURPOSE To characterize the clinical and biologic features of extragonadal germ cell tumor (EGCT) and to determine the overall outcome with currently available treatment strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Of an unselected population of 635 consecutive patients treated from 1975 through 1996 at 11 cancer centers, 341 patients (54%) had primary mediastinal EGCT, and 283 patients (45%) had retroperitoneal EGCT. Five hundred twenty-four patients (83%) had a nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (GCT), and 104 patients (16%) had a seminomatous histology. RESULTS After platinum-based induction chemotherapy with or without secondary surgery, 141 patients (49%) with mediastinal nonseminomas (median follow-up, 19 months; range, 1 to 178 months) and 144 patients (63%) with retroperitoneal nonseminoma (median follow-up, 29 months; range, 1 to 203 months) are alive (P =.0006). In contrast, the overall survival rate for patients with a seminomatous EGCT is 88%, with no difference between patients with mediastinal or retroperitoneal tumor location (median follow-up, 49 months; range, 4 to 193 months; respective 70 months; range, 1 to 211 months). A significantly lower progression-free survival rate was found in seminoma patients treated with initial radiotherapy alone compared with chemotherapy. Nonseminomatous histology, presence of nonpulmonary visceral metastases, primary mediastinal GCT location, and elevated beta-human chorionic gonadotropin were independent prognostic factors for shorter survival. Hematologic malignancies (n = 17) occurred without exception in patients with primary mediastinal nonseminoma. Sixteen patients developed a metachronous testicular cancer despite the use of platinum-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Whereas patients with pure seminomatous EGCT histology have a long-term chance of cure of almost 90% irrespective of the primary tumor site, 45% of patients with mediastinal nonseminomas are alive at 5 years. This outcome is clearly inferior compared with patients with nonseminomatous retroperitoneal primary tumors.

High-dose treatment with carboplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory germ cell cancer: a phase I/II study. The German Testicular Cancer Cooperative Study Group.

PURPOSE This trial evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of high-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with refractory or relapsed germ cell cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between August 1989 and September 1992, 74 patients with refractory or recurrent germ-cell tumors received one cycle of escalating doses of carboplatin (1,500 to 2,000 mg/m2), etoposide (1,200 to 2,400 mg/m2), and ifosfamide (0 to 10 g/m2). Before high-dose therapy, two cycles of conventional-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide were administered to assess tumor responsiveness. Seventy-four patients were assessable for toxicity and 68 for response. RESULTS The doses of carboplatin 1,500 mg/m2, etoposide 2,400 mg/m2, and ifosfamide 10 g/m2 appeared to be safe. At this dosage, we treated 20 patients and observed World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 hematotoxicity (100%), nausea (100%), diarrhea (30%), and hepatotoxicity (10%). All patients developed granulocytopenic fever. At carboplatin doses of 1,500 mg/m2, kidney toxicity was mild, with a median maximum creatinine level of 1.4 mg/dL (range, 1.1 to 3.0 mg/dL). However, at carboplatin doses of 1,750 and 2,000 mg/m2, we observed nonacceptable nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. Two (3%) patients died of treatment-related complications. Six patients required hemodialysis, which was temporary in five patients and permanent in one. Objective responses were obtained in 43 of 68 (63%) patients, including 21 (31%) complete remissions (CRs) and 14 (20%) inoperable partial remissions (PRs) with marker normalization. The median observation time of surviving patients was 12 months (range, 2 to 32). The probabilities of overall survival, event-free survival, and the relapse-free survival at 2 years were 44% (SD 8%), 35% (SD 6%), and 67% (SD 9%), respectively. Patients with disease refractory to conventional-dose pretreatment had a poor prognosis, with only one of 23 patients surviving event-free at 7 months after high-dose chemotherapy (HDT). In contrast, 24 of 45 (53.3%) patients with sensitive disease survive event-free with a probability of event-free survival at 2 years of 50% (SD 8%). CONCLUSION High-dose carboplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide plus autologous stem-cell transplantation can be used in refractory and relapsed germ cell cancer with acceptable toxicity, and represents an effective, potentially curative salvage treatment.

Prognostic Factors in Patients With Metastatic Germ Cell Tumors Who Experienced Treatment Failure With Cisplatin-Based First-Line Chemotherapy

PURPOSE To develop a prognostic model in patients with germ cell tumors (GCT) who experience treatment failure with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 1,984 patients with GCT who progressed after at least three cisplatin-based cycles and were treated with cisplatin-based conventional-dose or carboplatin-based high-dose salvage chemotherapy was retrospectively collected from 38 centers/groups worldwide. One thousand five hundred ninety-four (80%) of 1,984 eligible patients were randomly divided into a training set of 1,067 patients (67%) and a validation set of 527 patients (33%). Seminomas were set aside for posthoc analyses. Primary end point was the 2-year progression-free survival after salvage treatment. RESULTS Overall, 990 patients (62%) relapsed and 604 patients (38%) remained relapse free. Histology, primary tumor location, response, and progression-free interval after first-line treatment, as well as levels of alpha fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotrophin, and the presence of liver, bone, or brain metastases at salvage were identified as independent prognostic variables and used to build a prognostic model in the training set. Survival rates in the training and validation set were very similar. The estimated 2-year progression-free survival rates in patients not included in the training set was 75% in very low risk, 51% in low risk, 40% in intermediate risk, 26% in high risk, and only 6% in very high-risk patients. Due to missing values in individual variables, 69 patients could not reliably be classified into one of these categories. CONCLUSION Prognostic variables are important in patients with GCT who experienced treatment failure with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy and can be used to construct a prognostic model to guide salvage strategies.

First-line high-dose chemotherapy compared with standard-dose PEB/VIP chemotherapy in patients with advanced germ cell tumors: A multivariate and matched-pair analysis

PURPOSE To compare first-line high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) with autologous blood stem-cell transplantation to standard-dose chemotherapy (SD-CT) in male patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCTs), a matched-pair analysis was performed within a homogenous group of patients classified as having either Indiana advanced disease or a poor prognosis according to International Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (IGCCCG) criteria. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multivariate analysis was performed that included 147 consecutive patients who had received sequential high-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide (VIP) therapy (HD-CT) in a German multicenter trial between 1993 and 1997 and 309 patients who had been treated with standard-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (PEB) or VIP chemotherapy (SD-CT) within two randomized trials at Indiana University between 1984 and 1992. RESULTS Multivariate analysis demonstrated HD-CT to be significantly superior to SD-CT when adjustments were made for prognostic factors (P =.021). Primary tumor site (mediastinal v retroperitoneal/gonadal, P =.035) and presence of visceral metastases (P =.0004) were shown to be significant prognostic factors for overall survival. On the basis of these factors, as well as on tumor marker levels (good, intermediate, or poor, according to IGCCCG criteria), 146 of 147 HD-CT patients were fully matched to an SD-CT patient. Median follow-up was 21 months (range, 0 to 70 months) for the HD-CT patients and 22 months (range, 0 to 90 months) for the SD-CT patients. Two-year progression-free survival (75% v 59%) and overall survival (82% v 71%) were significantly prolonged in HD-CT patients (P =.0056 and P =.0184, respectively). CONCLUSION The results indicate that first-line HD-CT in patients with poor-prognosis GCT may result in a significant improvement of progression-free and overall survival as compared with SD-CT. Salvage HD-CT seems not to compensate this survival advantage.

Conventional-Dose Versus High-Dose Chemotherapy As First Salvage Treatment in Male Patients With Metastatic Germ Cell Tumors: Evidence From a Large International Database

PURPOSE Conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) and high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) may both be successfully used as salvage treatment for patients with metastatic germ cell tumors (GCTs) who experience progression with first-line treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data on 1,984 patients with GCTs who experienced progression after at least three cisplatin-based cycles and were treated with either cisplatin-based CDCT or carboplatin-based HDCT chemotherapy were collected from 38 centers or groups worldwide. Of 1,984 patients, 1,594 (80%) were eligible, and among the eligible patients, 1,435 (90%) could reliably be classified into one of the following five prognostic categories based on prior prognostic classification: very low (n = 76), low (n = 257), intermediate (n = 646), high (n = 351), and very high risk (n = 105). Within each of the five categories, the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after CDCT and HDCT were compared using the Cox model adjusted for significant distributional differences between important variables. RESULTS Overall, 773 patients received CDCT, and 821 patients received HDCT. Both treatment modalities were used with similar frequencies within each prognostic category. The hazard ratio for PFS was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.51) stratified on prognostic category, and the hazard ratio for OS was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.75), favoring HDCT. These results were consistent within each prognostic category except among low-risk patients, for whom similar OS was observed between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION This retrospective analysis suggests a benefit from HDCT given as intensification of first salvage treatment in male patients with GCTs and emphasizes the need for another prospective randomized trial comparing CDCT to HDCT in this patient population.

Gemcitabine in Patients With Relapsed or Cisplatin-Refractory Testicular Cancer

PURPOSE Despite generally high cure rates in patients with metastatic testicular germ cell tumors, patients with incomplete response to cisplatin-based first-line therapy or with relapsed disease after high-dose salvage chemotherapy have a very poor prognosis. This phase II study evaluates the use of gemcitabine in patients with intensively pretreated or cisplatin-refractory testicular germ cell cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-five patients (median age, 33 years) were enrolled; 31 patients were fully assessable. All patients had metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors; eight patients had extragonadal primary tumors. Twenty patients (63%) had lung metastases, and 12 patients (39%) had liver metastases. The median number of prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy cycles was seven; 22 patients (71%) had received high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation, and 19 patients (61%) had received treatment with paclitaxel. Seventeen patients (54%) were considered refractory or absolutely refractory to chemotherapy. RESULTS Six of 31 assessable patients (19%) responded favorably to gemcitabine, 11 patients (35%) displayed no change, and 14 patients (45%) had disease progression. The median time to treatment failure was 4 months (range, 2 to 9+ months), and the median survival was 6 months (range, 2 to 23 months). Patients received a median of six gemcitabine applications. Ten patients (32%) required dose reductions, mainly owing to hematologic toxicity. Grade 3/4 granulocytopenia occurred in four patients (13%) and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in seven patients (22%). One case of severe sepsis was observed. CONCLUSION Gemcitabine displays antitumor activity in intensively pretreated and refractory germ cell tumors. Responses were observed in approximately 20% of patients, including three of 22 patients after previous high-dose chemotherapy and one of four patients with mediastinal tumors. Gemcitabine may be a reasonable palliative option for intensively pretreated patients and should be further investigated to define its role in the risk-adapted treatment strategies for germ cell tumors.

Single Versus Sequential High-Dose Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Germ Cell Tumors: A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group

PURPOSE To compare single versus sequential high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as first or subsequent salvage treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors (GCTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between November 1999 and November 2004, 230 patients were planned to be recruited in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial comparing one cycle of cisplatin 100 mg/m2, etoposide 375 mg/m2, and ifosfamide 6 g/m2 (VIP) plus three cycles of high-dose carboplatin 1,500 mg/m2 and etoposide 1,500 mg/m2 (CE; arm A) versus three cycles of VIP plus one cycle of high-dose carboplatin 2,200 mg/m2, etoposide 1,800 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 6,400 mg/m2 (CEC; arm B). RESULTS The study was stopped prematurely after recruitment of 216 patients as a result of excess treatment-related mortality in arm B. One hundred eleven (51%) of 216 patients were randomly assigned to sequential HDCT, and 105 (47%) of 216 patients were randomly assigned to single HDCT. Five (2%) of 216 patients had to be excluded because of non-GCT histologies at review. With a median follow-up time of 36 months, 109 (52%) of 211 patients were alive, and 91 (43%) of 211 patients were progression free. At 1 year, event-free, progression-free, and overall survival rates were 40%, 53%, and 80%, respectively, in arm A compared with 37%, 49%, and 61%, respectively, in arm B (P > .05 for all comparisons). Treatment-related deaths, mainly as a result of sepsis and cardiac toxicity, were less frequent in arm A (four of 108 patients, 4%) compared with arm B (16 of 103 patients, 16%; P < .01). CONCLUSION We found no difference in survival probabilities between single HDCT using CE and sequential HDCT using CEC. Sequential HDCT was better tolerated and resulted in fewer treatment-related deaths.

Activity of Oxaliplatin in Patients With Relapsed or Cisplatin-Refractory Germ Cell Cancer: A Study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group

PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin, a diaminocyclohaxane platinum derivative with incomplete cross-resistance to cisplatin in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-two patients with nonseminomatous cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer or relapsed disease after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) plus autologous stem-cell support were treated with single-agent oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 repeated every 4 weeks (group 1; n = 16) or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) given on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle (group 2; n = 16). Patients were pretreated with a median of seven (range, three to 13) cisplatin-containing treatment cycles; 78% had received carboplatin/etoposide-based HDCT before oxaliplatin therapy. Twenty-seven patients (84%) were considered refractory (n = 20; 63%) or absolutely refractory (n = 7; 22%) to cisplatin therapy. RESULTS Overall, four patients achieved a partial remission (13%; 95% confidence interval, 1% to 24%). Two additional patients achieved disease stabilization. All responses were observed in cisplatin-refractory patients, including three who had not responded to previous HDCT. Patients received a median two cycles of oxaliplatin with a median cumulative dose of 350 mg/m(2). Hematologic toxicity was generally mild, with five patients developing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic side effects consisted mainly of nausea/vomiting. One patient developed grade 3 neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION Considering the particularly unfavorable prognostic characteristics of this patient population compared with patients from previous trials for new drugs in germ cell cancer, eg, paclitaxel and gemcitabine, a 13% overall response rate and a 19% response rate in the group treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) seems to be of interest. Oxaliplatin may be a palliative treatment option for this patient population, and evaluation in combination regimens is warranted.

Extragonadal seminoma - an international multicenter analysis of prognostic factors and long term treatment outcome

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the long term outcome of patients with extragonadal seminomatous germ cell tumors (GCT) so that prognostic variables for disease recurrence and patient survival could be identified and to access the efficacy of different treatment modalities.