Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jörg Zumbach is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jörg Zumbach.


Archive | 2003

Influence of Feedback on Distributed Problem Based Learning

Jörg Zumbach; Peter Reimann

This research examines two different kinds of feedback-mechanism to scaffold problem solving as well as interaction in an asynchronous PBL course. An automated feedback mechanism has been used to enhance interaction and group well-being during computer supported collaborative learning. We tracked individual contribution behavior as well as learners’ motivation during collaborative problem-solving by means of an asynchronous communication platform. These data have been used to automatically generate visual aids, providing feedback about group members’ participation as well as motivational clues. A second feedback mechanism has been applied by aggregating learners’ problem solving discourse into a meta-document. This document revealed groups’ problem-solving strategies as well as their progress during different problem solving stages. We examined how this scaffolding methodology based on a group’s own behavior enhanced problem-solving outcomes. Results suggest positive influences of feedback mechanisms on problem-solving as well as motivational parameters.


Instructional Science | 2002

Enhancing learning from hypertext by inducing a goal orientation: Comparing different approaches

Jörg Zumbach; Peter Reimann

As learning from hypertext requires a highdegree of self-monitoring, having a clearlearning goal in mind should enhance learning.Our concern in this study was to investigatethree different kinds of approaches forinducing learning goals: A Tutorial providedexternal and specific learning objectives, aGoal-Based Scenario (GBS) for inducing externaland general learning goals, and a Strategytraining leading to internal goal generation. Ahypertext resource was combined with each ofthese three learning arrangements. The threeconditions were compared regarding learningoutcomes and motivational effects. A total of 60adults participated in our study.Results suggest that GBS students are moremotivated, acquire a better overview and arebetter able to apply their knowledge in anargumentation task. Students in the Tutorialperformed better in fact-relatedknowledge-tests as a result of their directaccomplishment of learning objectives, butfailed to create a coherent overview on thetopic and were less motivated. Participantsthat received a strategy training onself-questioning failed to apply thismeta-cognitive strategy in order to formulatetheir own learning goals when working with thehypertext.


Psychology, Learning and Teaching | 2018

Constructive Alignment in the Field of Educational Psychology: Development and Application of a Questionnaire for Assessing Constructive Alignment

Ines Deibl; Jörg Zumbach; Viola M. Geiger; Christine Neuner

Teaching of Psychology includes a great variety of topics, course formats, and assessment approaches. A central concept that incorporated the interface between teaching goals, instructional methods, and examination modalities is referred to as Constructive Alignment (CA). This model addresses possible designs of teaching to improve students’ learning outcomes as well as enhance their learning experiences, and claims to be applicable independent of disciplinary culture or content. Despite the importance of this approach from an instructional point of view, there is hardly any research, so far, that has been concerned with capturing the three dimensions of CA. As a consequence, the aim of our study was to create an instrument to assess the quality of CA within psychology classes. A questionnaire was designed and was additionally analyzed with regard to students’ judgements about overall course evaluation. The questionnaire was employed in two lectures within the field of educational psychology for teacher training students. Results reveal that overall course evaluation can be predicted by the match between course objectives and instructional methods whereas other course evaluation factors failed as predictors. With a high internal consistency, the instrument provides an alternative or a supplement for traditional course evaluation instruments.


Archive | 2002

Wie beurteilen Studierende CBT-Module? Evaluation von CBT-Programmen in der Chirurgischen Ausbildung

A. Mehrabi; Jörg Zumbach; D. Leisenberg; C. Jahnke; Z. Zachariou; F. Kallinowski

In der Softwareentwicklung, insbesondere im Bereich des computerunterstutzten Lernens, bildet neben der summativen Evaluation die formative Bewertung neu entwickelter Produkte einen essentiellen Bestandteil zur Qualitatssicherung und -Optimierung. In dieser Studie wurde eine solche formative Evaluation durchgefuhrt.


computer supported collaborative learning | 2005

Analyzing and supporting collaboration in cooperative computer-mediated communication

Jörg Zumbach; Jochen Schönemann; Peter Reimann


Computers in Human Behavior | 2011

A closer look on social presence as a causing factor in computer-mediated collaboration

Miriam Weinel; Maria Bannert; Jörg Zumbach; H. Ulrich Hoppe; Nils Malzahn


computer supported collaborative learning | 2002

Multi-dimensional tracking in virtual learning teams: an exploratory study

Jörg Zumbach; Martin Mühlenbrock; Marc Jansen; Peter Reimann; Heinz Ulrich Hoppe


Archive | 2008

Beyond Knowledge: The Legacy of Competence

Jörg Zumbach; Neil H. Schwartz; Tina Seufert; Liesbeth Kester


Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research | 2002

The Use of Video Analysis Software in Behavior Observation Research: Interaction Patterns in Task-oriented Small Groups

Sabine C. Koch; Jörg Zumbach


Archive | 2007

Implicit and explicit measures for analyzing the aggression of computer gamers

Matthias Blümke; Jörg Zumbach

Collaboration


Dive into the Jörg Zumbach's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil H. Schwartz

California State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Heinz Ulrich Hoppe

University of Duisburg-Essen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc Jansen

University of Duisburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge