Jorge Pascual

Minimally invasive endoscopic staging of suspected lung cancer.

CONTEXT In patients with suspected lung cancer, the presence of mediastinal lymph node metastasis is a critical determinant of therapy and prognosis. Invasive staging with pathologic confirmation is recommended. Many methods for staging exist; mediastinoscopy, an invasive procedure requiring general anesthesia, is currently regarded as the diagnostic standard. OBJECTIVE To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3 methods of minimally invasive endoscopic staging (and their combinations): traditional transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA), and transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). In particular, we aimed to compare EBUS-FNA with TBNA. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Invasive staging of the mediastinum among consecutive patients with suspected lung cancer at a US academic medical center from November 2004 through October 2006. INTERVENTION TBNA, EBUS-FNA, and EUS-FNA performed sequentially as a single combined procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Sensitivity for detecting mediastinal lymph node metastases, using pathologic confirmation and 6- to 12-month clinical follow-up as the criterion standard. RESULTS Among 138 patients who met all study criteria, 42 (30%) had malignant lymph nodes. EBUS-FNA was more sensitive than TBNA, detecting 29 (69%) vs 15 (36%) malignant lymph nodes (P = .003). The combination of EUS-FNA and EBUS-FNA (EUS plus EBUS) had higher estimated sensitivity (93% [39/42]; 95% confidence interval, 81%-99%) and negative predictive value (97% [96/99]; 95% confidence interval, 91%-99%) compared with either method alone. EUS plus EBUS also had higher sensitivity and higher negative predictive value for detecting lymph nodes in any mediastinal location and for patients without lymph node enlargement on chest computed tomography. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that EBUS-FNA has higher sensitivity than TBNA and that EUS plus EBUS may allow near-complete minimally invasive mediastinal staging in patients with suspected lung cancer. These results require confirmation in other studies but suggest that EUS plus EBUS may be an alternative approach for mediastinal staging in patients with suspected lung cancer.

Economic analysis of combined endoscopic and endobronchial ultrasound in the evaluation of patients with suspected non-small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer-related death in the United States. This study evaluated the costs of alternative diagnostic evaluations for patients with suspected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Researchers used a cost-minimization model to compare various diagnostic approaches in the evaluation of patients with NSCLC. It was less expensive to use an initial endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) to detect a mediastinal lymph node metastasis (

Resuscitation of intraoperative hypovolemia: A comparison of normal saline and hyperosmotic/ hyperoncotic solutions in swine

18,603 per patient), compared with combined EUS FNA and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) with FNA (

Development of Pulmonary Hypertension After Placement of a Ventriculoatrial Shunt

18,753). The results were sensitive to the prevalence of malignant mediastinal lymph nodes; EUS FNA remained least costly, if the probability of nodal metastases was <32.9%, as would occur in a patient without abnormal lymph nodes on computed tomography (CT). While EUS FNA combined with EBUS FNA was the most economical approach, if the rate of nodal metastases was higher, as would be the case in patients with abnormal lymph nodes on CT. Both of these strategies were less costly than bronchoscopy or mediastinoscopy. The pre-test probability of nodal metastases can determine the most cost-effective testing strategy for evaluation of a patient with NSCLC. Pre-procedure CT may be helpful in assessing probability of mediastinal nodal metastases.

Mediastinal staging of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma by endoscopic and endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.

Background and MethodsWe compared a hypertonic saline-dextran solution (7.5% NaCl/6% dextran-70) with 0.9% NaCl (normal saline) for treatment of intraoperative hypovolemia. Fourteen anesthetized pigs (mean weight 36.3 ± 2.1 kg) underwent thoracotomy, followed by hemorrhage for 1 hr to reduce mean arterial pressure to 45 mm Hg. A continuous infusion of either solution was then initiated and the flow rate was adjusted to restore and maintain aortic blood flow at baseline levels for 2 hrs. ResultsFull resuscitation to initial values of aortic blood flow was achieved with both regimens, but the normal saline group required substantially larger volumes and sodium loads to maintain stable hemodynamic values. Normal saline resuscitation produced increases in right ventricular preload (central venous pressure) and afterload (pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance), resulting in increased right ventricular work. ConclusionsHypertonic saline-dextran solution resuscitation of intraoperative hypovolemia is performed effectively with smaller fluid and sodium loads, and is devoid of the deleterious effects associated with fluid accumulation induced by a conventional isotonic solution regimen.

Fine-needle aspiration of peritumoral lymph nodes in esophageal cancer with endobronchial ultrasound.

The ventriculoatrial shunt (VAS) was developed to control hydrocephalic syndromes effectively. Several complications, however, have been described after the procedure. One of the most serious consequences is the development of severe pulmonary hypertension attributed to multiple and recurrent pulmonary embolization caused by the catheter of the VAS; however, the frequency is exceedingly low. Herein we describe the experience with three patients in whom severe pulmonary hypertension developed after a VAS procedure. In two patients, refractory heart failure developed, an outcome that caused death within a brief period. The third patient underwent atrial thrombectomy and then pulmonary thromboendarterectomy; recovery was complete. Scientific evidence shows that initial embolization predisposes pulmonary vessels to develop further in situ thrombosis; thus, the vascular lung disease progresses despite removal of the embolic source. A review of the literature revealed that in patients with a VAS, pulmonary embolism and pulmonary hypertension were clinically diagnosed in only 0.4% and 0.3% of the cases, respectively, whereas postmortem diagnoses of pulmonary embolism and pulmonary hypertension were established in 59.7% and 6.3%, respectively. These discrepancies point out the difficulty of establishing the diagnosis of these serious pulmonary vascular complications while the patient is alive.

Competencies in Pulmonary Procedures

Mediastinal staging is of vital importance in the treatment planning of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer who do not have distant metastases. Nodal assessment is often a challenge, however, and the limitations of staging methods are well recognized. Noninvasive studies can yield a presumptive clinical stage, but invasive tests are often necessary to determine the status of nodes in the absence of extensive mediastinal infiltration. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration are minimally invasive additions to the staging armamentarium that facilitate nodal biopsy under direct visualization without full anesthesia. In some cases, these procedures offer the opportunity for a patient to receive both a tissue diagnosis and staging in one sitting. While their roles are debated and evolving, their availability is increasing and they are reducing the need for surgical staging. Radiologists contribute to the evaluation of patients who may benefit from these up-and-coming procedures and should become familiar with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.