Jorge Rakela

A 21-year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy

Nine thousand two hundred twelve liver biopsies were performed according to a defined protocol, and data were prospectively recorded to identify risk factors for major bleeding. There were 10 fatal and 22 nonfatal hemorrhages (0.11% and 0.24%, respectively). By comparison with a control group that did not hemorrhage, malignancy, age, sex, and the number of passes were the only predictable risk factors. The risk of fatal hemorrhage in patients with malignancy is estimated to be 0.4%; for nonfatal hemorrhage, 0.57%. In patients undergoing liver biopsy for nonmalignant disease, the risks are 0.04% and 0.16%, respectively.

Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes in the United States: Epidemiology, Pathogenicity, and Response to Interferon Therapy

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been identified as the major cause of post-transfusion non-A, non-B hepatitis [1]. Chronic liver disease occurs in at least 50% of patients with acute HCV infection, and cirrhosis develops in 20% of these patients [2]. The virus has a single-stranded RNA genome that is approximately 10 Kbp long. A comparison of HCV genomic sequences from around the world has shown substantial heterogeneity of nucleotide sequences within several regions of the viral genome [3]. Hepatitis C virus has been classified into multiple strains or genotypes on the basis of the identification of these genomic differences. It has been suggested that the heterogeneity in sequence seen among HCV genotypes may be associated with variant antigenic and biological properties [4]. In addition, outcome of liver disease and rates of response to interferon therapy may vary according to HCV genotype [5, 6]. Therefore, understanding the distribution and properties of HCV genotypes may have important implications for prognosis and therapy. We evaluated the distribution of HCV genotypes in distinct geographic regions of the United States and determined the clinical characteristics of and response to interferon therapy in patients with one of several HCV genotypes. We used the classification system developed by Simmonds and colleagues [7] because it was recently adopted by consensus at the Second International Conference of HCV and Related Viruses (August 1994, San Diego, California). In this system, HCV genotypes are classified into six major genotypes (1 to 6, ordered according to when they were discovered) and 11 subtypes (1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, 3b, 4a, 5a, and 6a). Methods Serum Samples We analyzed serum samples of 208 patients who were positive for antibody to HCV and had chronic liver disease. The samples were retrospectively obtained from four tertiary referral centers in the United States (59 consecutive samples from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; 48 consecutive samples from the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont; 49 consecutive samples from the University of Miami, Miami, Florida; and 52 consecutive samples from the University of Washington Virology Laboratory, Seattle, Washington [this last center provided samples from Washington State, Idaho, Utah, Oregon, and California]). Twenty-nine patients were excluded from the study: Nineteen had no detectable products for DNA sequencing, and 10 had ambiguous sequencing results. The remaining 179 samples were the focus of this study. No clinical information was available on the patients whose samples were obtained from the University of Washington Virology Laboratory; thus, these samples were used only to study the geographic distribution of HCV genotypes. Data on interferon treatment were available for 78 patients from the Mayo Clinic and the University of Vermont. Samples from these two institutions were obtained from patients who had agreed to participate in trials of interferon treatment. Reverse Transcriptase and Polymerase Chain Reaction We selected the direct sequencing technique because it remains the gold standard and the only way to definitively identify all HCV genotypes and subtypes. Hepatitis C virus RNA was extracted from 100-L aliquots of serum after the addition of 1 mL of RNAzol B solution (Biotecx Laboratories, Houston, Texas) (2 mol of guanidinium thiocyanate per L, 12.5 mol of sodium citrate per L, 0.25% N-laroylsarcosine, 0.05 mol of 2-mercaptoethanol per L, 100 mmol of sodium acetate per L, and 50% water-saturated phenol). After the addition of 100 L of chloroform, samples were spun for 15 minutes at 14 000 g and the aqueous phase was extracted. Total RNA was precipitated by the addition of isopropanol and 2 L of glycogen and incubation at 4 C for 45 minutes. An RNA pellet was recovered by centrifugation at 14 0006 g, washed in 1 mL of 70% ethanol solution, dried, and resuspended in 10 L of RNAase-free water (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin). Ribonucleic acid was reverse-transcribed into complementary DNA by using reverse transcriptase and an antisense oligonucleotide primer (5-CGCGGAATTCCTGGTCATAGCCTCCGTGAA-3) in the presence of reverse-transcriptase buffer (100 mmol of tris-HCl per L, 500 mmol of KCl per L, 1% Triton X-100, and a pH of 8.6 at 25 C) (Promega) and 3.0 mmol of magnesium per L. Hepatitis C virus complementary DNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the presence of the sense oligonucleotide primer (5-TGGGGATCCCGTATGATACCCGCTGCTTTGA-3), PCR buffer (500 mmol of KCl per L, 100 mmol of tris-HCl per L, and a pH of 8.3) (Perkins-Elmer-Cetus, Norwalk, New Jersey), 2.0 mmol of magnesium per L, and Amplitaq DNA polymerase (Perkins-Elmer-Cetus). The PCR assay was done in a DNA thermal cycler for 50 cycles (94 C for 1 minute, 58 C for 1 minute, and 72 C for 5 minutes). Products of the PCR assay were analyzed by gel electrophoresis in 3% agarose gel that was stained with ethidium bromide. The appearance of a band 401-base pair was considered a positive result. To avoid and monitor for possible contamination with exogenous sequences during extraction or amplification, extraction of nucleic acid and genomic amplification steps were done in separate laboratories. Ribonucleic acid samples from at least one negative and one positive sample were extracted, subjected to reverse transcription, and amplified in each batch of samples tested by PCR. No false-positive results were obtained in any of the negative controls. Sequencing and Genotyping Each fragment of the PCR product, which was approximately 401 base pairs long, was desalted before undergoing sequencing with a direct column-purification method (Wizard PCR Preps DNA Purification System, Promega). Automated sequencing was done by using a standard Sanger procedure, which involved the incorporation of fluorescein-labeled dideoxynucleotides and detection on an acrylamide gel (ABI model 373 A, Applied Biosystems, Hercules, California). Nucleotide sequences were aligned and compiled with the previously reported sequences by using the Pileup program (Wisconsin Genetic Computer Group, Madison, Wisconsin)[8]. Cluster analysis was done by using the unweighted-pair group mean average, which was included in the program. These methods allowed comparison of a 222-base pair fragment of DNA that was homologous to nucleotide positions 7975 to 8196 in the NS5 region of the prototype virus. Collection of Epidemiologic Data We studied the geographic distribution of the HCV genotypes identified in the blood samples. Data from all samples were combined to define the prevalence of the HCV genotypes in patients with chronic hepatitis C in the United States. When available, age, sex, risk factors for HCV acquisition, and liver histologic findings at the time of presentation were recorded for each patient. Risk factors for acquiring HCV included history of blood transfusion, history of injection drug use, and employment at a health care facility. Liver histologic findings were classified into three groups: mildly active hepatitis (portal inflammation without substantial hepatocyte necrosis), moderately active hepatitis (inflammation with hepatocyte necrosis), and liver cirrhosis. Accurate history of alcohol consumption was not available for many of these patients and thus was not included in the analysis. The investigator who did the genotyping was blinded to the clinical data of patients at the time of analysis. Liver biopsy specimens were independently interpreted at each center. Pathogenicity of Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes To study the possible differences in the pathogenicity of HCV genotypes, we divided patients into two groups: patients with mild hepatitis and patients with severe hepatitis. Mild hepatitis was defined as 1) pretreatment alanine aminotransferase levels that were less than three times the normal level and 2) no cirrhosis seen during examination of the liver biopsy specimen obtained before treatment. Severe hepatitis was defined as pretreatment alanine aminotransferase levels greater than three times the normal level or the presence of liver cirrhosis on pretreatment biopsy. Response to Interferon Seventy-eight patients received an average dose of 3 million U of interferon (interferon- or consensus interferon) for 6 months. Response to interferon was defined as the normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels at the end of therapy. Partial response to interferon (defined as decreased but not completely normal alanine aminotransferase levels) was considered to be a treatment failure. Sustained biochemical response was defined as a normal alanine aminotransferase level 6 months after the discontinuation of interferon treatment. Statistical Analysis We used the rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare continuous variables (such as age) between groups, and we used the Fisher exact test to assess associations in tabular data. Because few patients had genotype 2a, 3, or 4, all tests of association between genotype and other factors are based on data that were collapsed into four groups: genotype 1a, genotype 1b, genotypes 2a and 2b, and genotypes 3 and 4. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between response to interferon and the combined predictors of cirrhosis and genotype. We used the SAS statistical analysis package (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina) for all calculations. Results Geographic Distribution of Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes Hepatitis C virus genotype 1a was present in 104 of 179 (58%) patients with chronic HCV infection; genotype 1b was the second most common genotype encountered (38 of 179 patients [21%]). Genotype 2b was present in 23 patients (13%), and genotype 3a was present in 8 patients (5%). Four patients (2%) had HCV genotype 2a, and 2 (1%) had genotype 4a. Geographic region and distribution of genotypes were not significantly associated (P = 0.18). However, samples obtained from the western United States conta

Morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients undergoing anesthesia and surgery.

Several studies have demonstrated increased morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Cirrhosis is a chronic liver disease, which may affect all body systems. The severity of the disease, assessed by the Child-Pugh classification, has a substantial effect on patient outcome. The extent of surgery and co-morbid conditions also have a major impact. In the past few years, changes have been made in the diagnosis, preoperative preparation, surgical and anesthetic management and perioperative care of patients with liver disease. The aim of this review is to examine whether these changes have resulted in improved perioperative outcomes.

Persistence of hepatitis C virus in patients successfully treated for chronic hepatitis C.

It is unclear whether the current antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection results in complete elimination of the virus, or whether small quantities of virus persist. Our study group comprised 17 patients with chronic HCV who had sustained virological response (SVR) after interferon/ribavirin treatment. Serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected 2 to 3 times at 3‐ to 6‐month intervals starting 40 to 109 months (mean, 64.2 ± 18.5 months) after the end of therapy. In addition, lymphocyte and macrophage cultures were established at each point. In 11 patients, frozen liver tissue samples were available from follow‐up biopsies performed 41 to 98 months (mean, 63.6 ± 16.7 months) after therapy. Presence of HCV RNA was determined by sensitive reverse‐transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and concentration of positive and negative strands was determined by a novel quantitative real‐time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Only 2 of 17 patients remained consistently HCV RNA negative in all analyzed compartments. HCV RNA was detected in macrophages from 11 patients (65%) and in lymphocytes from 7 patients (41%). Viral sequences were also detected in 3 of 11 livers and in sera from 4 patients. Viral replicative forms were found in lymphocytes from 2 and in macrophages from 4 patients. In conclusion, our results suggest that in patients with SVR after therapy, small quantities of HCV RNA may persist in liver or macrophages and lymphocytes for up to 9 years. This continuous viral presence could result in persistence of humoral and cellular immunity for many years after therapy and could present a potential risk for infection reactivation. (HEPATOLOGY 2005;41:106–114.)

Search for Hepatitis C Virus Negative-Strand RNA Sequences and Analysis of Viral Sequences in the Central Nervous System: Evidence of Replication

ABSTRACT Patients with chronic hepatitis C are more likely to have significant changes in their physical and mental well-being than patients with liver disease of other etiology, and hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been occasionally implicated in diseases of the central nervous system. We analyzed the presence of the HCV negative-strand RNA sequence, which is the viral replicative intermediary, in autopsy brain tissue samples from six HCV-infected patients. Negative-strand HCV RNA was searched for by a strand-specific Tth-based reverse transcriptase PCR, and viral sequences amplified from brain tissue and serum were compared by single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis and direct sequencing. HCV RNA negative strands were detected in brain tissue in three patients. In two of these patients, serum- and brain-derived viral sequences were different and classified as belonging to different genotypes. In one of the latter patients, HCV RNA negative strands were detected in lymph node and, while being different from serum-derived sequences, were identical to those present in the brain. The results of the present study suggest that HCV can replicate in the central nervous system, probably in cells of the macrophage/monocyte lineage.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: The MELD impact

The new allocation policy of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) based on the model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) gives candidates with stage T1 or stage T2 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) a priority MELD score beyond their degree of hepatic decompensation. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the new allocation policy on HCC candidates before and after the institution of MELD. The UNOS database was reviewed for all HCC candidates listed between July 1999 and July 2002. The candidates were grouped by two time periods, based on the date of implementation of new allocation policy of February 27, 2002. Pre‐MELD candidates were listed for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) before February 27,2002, and post‐MELD candidates were listed after February 27, 2002. Candidates were compared by incidence of DDLT, time to DDLT, and dropout rate from the waiting list because of clinical deterioration or death, and survival while waiting and after DDLT. Incidence rates calculated for pre‐MELD and post‐MELD periods were expressed in person years. During the study, 2,074 HCC candidates were listed for DDLT in the UNOS database. The DDLT incidence rate was 0.439 transplant/person years pre‐MELD and 1.454 transplant/person years post‐MELD (P < 0.001). The time to DDLT was 2.28 years pre‐MELD and 0.69 years post‐MELD (P < 0.001). The 5‐month dropout rate was 16.5% pre‐MELD and 8.5% post‐MELD (P < 0.001). The 5‐month waiting‐list survival was 90.3% pre‐MELD and 95.7% post‐MELD (P < 0.001). The 5‐month survival after DDLT was similar for both time periods. The new allocation policy has led to an increased incidence rate of DDLT in HCC candidates. Furthermore, the 5‐month dropout rate has decreased significantly. In addition, 5‐month survival while waiting has increased in the post‐MELD period. Thus, the new MELD‐based allocation policy has benefited HCC candidates. (Liver Transpl 2004;10:36–41.)

Clinical intestinal transplantation: new perspectives and immunologic considerations.

Background: Although tacrolimus-based immunosuppression has made intestinal transplantation feasible, the risk of the requisite chronic high-dose treatment has inhibited the widespread use of these procedures. We have examined our 1990–1997 experience to determine whether immunomodulatory strategies to improve outlook could be added to drug treatment. Study Design: Ninety-eight consecutive patients (59 children, 39 adults) with a panoply of indications received 104 allografts under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression: intestine only (n = 37); liver and intestine (n = 50); or multivisceral (n = 17). Of the last 42 patients, 20 received unmodified adjunct donor bone marrow cells; the other 22 were contemporaneous control patients. Results: With a mean followup of 32 ± 26 months (range, 1–86 months), 12 recipients (3 intestine only, 9 composite grafts) are alive with good nutrition beyond the 5-year milestone. Forty-seven (48%) of the total group survive bearing grafts that provide full (91%) or partial (9%) nutrition. Actuarial patient survival at 1 and 5 years (72% and 48%, respectively) was similar with isolated intestinal and composite graft recipients, but the loss rate of grafts from rejection was highest with intestine alone. The best results were in patients between 2 and 18 years of age (68% at 5 years). Adjunct bone marrow did not significantly affect the incidence of graft rejection, B-cell lymphoma, or the rate or severity of graft-versus-host disease. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that longterm rehabilitation similar to that with the other kinds of organ allografts is achievable with all three kinds of intestinal transplant procedures, that the morbidity and mortality is still too high for their widespread application, and that the liver is significantly but marginally protective of concomitantly engrafted intestine. Although none of the endpoints were markedly altered by donor leukocyte augmentation (and chimerism) with bone marrow, establishment of the safety of this adjunct procedure opens the way to further immune modulation strategies that can be added to the augmentation protocol.The advent of tacrolimus allowed clinical intestinal transplantation to become a feasible procedure for patients with irreversible intestinal failure. Over last 5 years, 71 patients underwent intestinal transplantation. Forty-one recipients were children, and 30 recipients were adults. Twenty-five patients received an isolated intestinal graft, 34 patients received a combined liver-intestinal graft, and 12 received a multivisceral graft. The colon was included the intestinal graft in 29 patients. One-year, 2-year, and 4-year actuarial patient survival is 72%, 57%, and 45%, respectively. Our experience has shown that infectious, and immunological problems have caused significant morbidity and mortality. In this paper, we present our clinical experience and overview with intestinal transplantation.

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation with combination of pegylated interferon α2b and ribavirin: An open-label series

Background. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is universal. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RIB) in the treatment of post-OLT HCV recurrence. Methods. Thirty-seven patients with recurrent HCV after OLT were screened and began treatment. Nineteen patients have completed therapy. PEG-IFN was started at a dose of 0.5 &mgr;g/kg per week and titrated toward a maximum dose of 1.5 &mgr;g/kg per week. RIB was started at a dose of 400 mg per day and titrated toward a maximum of 1000 mg per day, as tolerated. Therapy continued for 1 year after HCV replication was undetectable by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and was discontinued if there was no virologic clearance at 48 weeks. Results. Twelve patients (63%) completed the combination regimen. Therapy was discontinued in seven (37%) patients. Seven patients (37%) had undetectable viral load at the end of treatment. Of those, five patients (26%) had sustained viral response 6 months after discontinuation of therapy. Five patients (26%) had no virologic response. Necro-inflammatory score declined from 5.22 to 2.89 (P =0.05) in nonresponders versus 6.8 to 2.6 (P <0.01) in responders. Fibrosis stage did not change in either group. Genotype 1-infected patients had a lower likelihood of attaining end of treatment or sustained viral response (P <0.05 for both). Conclusions. Post-OLT HCV recurrence can be safely treated with PEG-IFN and RIB. Bone marrow toxicity, depression, and rejection are limiting factors that require aggressive management. There was short-term histologic benefit to the use of this regimen, even in those patients without viral clearance.

Comparative incidence of de novo nonlymphoid malignancies after liver transplantation under tacrolimus using surveillance epidemiologic end result data

BACKGROUND An increased incidence of de novo nonlymphoid malignancies has been shown in immunocompromised patients. However, the true risk over time compared to the general population has not been determined. METHODS One thousand consecutive patients were carefully followed for an average of 77.8+/-11.1 (range, 56.3-96.3) months after primary liver transplantation at a single center. All de novo nonlymphoid malignancies were recorded. Each malignancy was compared with a standard Occupational Cohort Mortality Analysis Program population matched for age, sex, and length of follow-up using modified life table technique and surveillance epidemiology end result (SEER) data. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients accounted for de novo malignancies and contributed 4795.3 total person years, a mean+/-SD of 36+/-21 (median, 36; range, 6-74) months after liver transplantation. Twenty-two of these malignancies were skin malignancies including two melanomas. Oropharyngeal cancers (n=7) were found to be 7.6 times higher (P<0.05) and respiratory malignancies (n=8) were 1.7 times higher (P>0.05) compared to the SEER incidence rate. Female reproductive system malignancies including breast cancer (n=3) were 1.9 times lower (P>0.05) and genitourinary malignancies were (n=5) 1.5 times lower (P>0.05) than their matched cohorts. No differences was observed in gastrointestinal malignancies (n=5). There was a significant difference in survival of the patients after diagnosis of malignancy depending on the type of cancer. There were two Kaposis sarcomas, two metastatic unknown primaries, one thyroid, one brain, and one ophthalmic malignancies in the series. Mortality for Kaposis and metastatic disease of unknown primary was 100% within 5 months, while the 1-year mortality for oropharyngeal cancer was 57.1% and that for lung cancers was 62.5%. Long-term survival for skin cancer was highest: 86.4% at 3 years (P=0.015 by log-rank test). CONCLUSION An increased incidence of de novo cancers in the chronically immunocompromised patient demands careful long-term screening protocols which will help to facilitate the diagnosis at an early stage of the disease. This is particularly true for oropharyngeal cancers where the risk is more than 7 times higher compared to SEER incidence data matched for age, sex, and length of follow-up.

Infectivity of hepatic allografts with antibodies to hepatitis B virus

BACKGROUND Since suitable recipients for hepatic allografts from donors with antibodies to hepatitis B virus (HBV) have not been determined, a review of our 7-year experience with donors positive for hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), or both was undertaken. METHODS Recipients of hepatic allografts from donors with antibodies to HBV were identified by a retrospective review of procurement records and screened for HBV infection. RESULTS From January 1, 1990, to January 1, 1997, 2578 liver transplants were performed and 140 (5.4%) recipients received an allograft from a donor with antibodies to HBV. Twenty-five of 48 recipients of a hepatic allograft from a donor positive only for anti-HBs were screened and none developed HBV infection. Twenty-five of 41 naive recipients of a hepatic allograft from an anti-HBc positive donor were screened and 18/25 (72%) developed HBV infection. Four of these 18 naive recipients with HBV infection received an allograft from a donor positive for both anti-HBc and anti-HBs. Seven of 13 anti-HBs-positive recipients of an allograft from an anti-HBc-positive donor were screened and none developed HBV infection. Fifteen of 16 recipients positive only for anti-HBc who received a hepatic allograft from an anti-HBc-positive donor were screened and 2/15 (13%) developed HBV infection. CONCLUSIONS Hepatic allografts from donors positive only for anti-HBs do not transmit HBV infection. Hepatic allografts from anti-HBc-positive donors frequently transmit HBV infection to naive recipients regardless of the donor anti-HBs status, and antiviral prophylaxis may be indicated. Anti-HBs-positive recipients appear resistant to HBV infection after orthotopic liver transplantation with an allograft from an anti-HBc-positive donor. Recipients positive only for anti-HBc infrequently develop HBV infection when transplanted with an allograft from an anti-HBc-positive donor; however, HBV prophylaxis may be justified.