Jørgen Næsdal

Abnormal Intestinal Permeability in Subgroups of Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndromes

OBJECTIVES:Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a heterogeneous condition and defined according to symptoms. Low-grade inflammation has been associated with IBS, particularly that following infection, but whether altered intestinal permeability profiles relate to irritable bowel subtype or onset is uncertain. Our aim was to compare small and large intestinal permeability in various subtypes of IBS to healthy controls.METHODS:Intestinal permeability was measured using 1.8 MBq of 51Cr-EDTA and collecting urine over 24 h; Study 1: patients with diarrhea-predominant postinfectious IBS (N = 15), constipation-predominant IBS (N = 15), and healthy controls (N = 15); Study 2: two groups of diarrhea-predominant IBS (D-IBS), one with a history of onset after acute gastroenteritis (postinfectious) (N = 15) and the other without such a history (nonpostinfectious) (N = 15) both compared with healthy controls (N = 12).RESULTS:Permeability expressed as percentage of total dose excreted in urine (median [inter-quartile range]). Study 1: Proximal small intestinal permeability was increased in postinfectious IBS (0.19 [0.12–0.23]) in contrast to constipated IBS (0.085 [0.043–0.13]) and controls (0.07 [0.035–0.19]) (p = 0.02). IBS patients with eczema, asthma, or hayfever had increased proximal small intestinal permeability compared with IBS patients without atopy (p = 0.02). Study 2: Small intestinal permeability was greater in nonpostinfectious diarrhea-predominant IBS (0.84 [0.69–1.49]) compared with postinfectious IBS (0.43 [0.29–0.63], p = 0.028) or controls (0.27 [0.2–0.39]), p = 0.001).CONCLUSIONS:Small intestinal permeability is frequently abnormal in diarrhea-predominant IBS. Those without a history of infectious onset appear to have a more severe defect.

Prevention of ulcers by esomeprazole in at-risk patients using non-selective NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors

OBJECTIVES:Proton pump inhibitors reduce ulcer recurrence in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users, but their impact in at-risk ulcer-free patients using the current spectrum of prescribed agents has not been clearly defined. We assessed esomeprazole for ulcer prevention in at-risk patients (≥60 yr and/or ulcer history) taking NSAIDs, including COX-2 inhibitors. Such studies are particularly relevant, given that concerns regarding adverse cardiovascular outcomes among COX-2 inhibitor users may prompt re-evaluation of their use.METHODS:We conducted two similar double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter studies; VENUS (United States) and PLUTO (multinational). A total of 844 and 585 patients requiring daily NSAIDs, including COX-2 inhibitors were randomized to receive esomeprazole (20 or 40 mg) or placebo, daily for 6 months.RESULTS:In the VENUS study, the life table estimated proportion of patients who developed ulcers over 6 months (primary variable, intent-to-treat population) was 20.4% on placebo, 5.3% on esomeprazole 20 mg (p < 0.001), and 4.7% on esomeprazole 40 mg (p < 0.0001). In the PLUTO study, the values were 12.3% on placebo, 5.2% with esomeprazole 20 mg (p= 0.018), and 4.4% with esomeprazole 40 mg (p= 0.007). Significant reductions were observed for users of both non-selective NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. Pooled ulcer rates for patients using COX-2 inhibitors (n = 400) were 16.5% on placebo, 0.9% on esomeprazole 20 mg (p < 0.001) and 4.1% on esomeprazole 40 mg (p= 0.002). Esomeprazole was well tolerated and associated with better symptom control than placebo.CONCLUSIONS:For at-risk patients, esomeprazole was effective in preventing ulcers in long-term users of NSAIDs, including COX-2 inhibitors.

Prevalence and incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers during treatment with vascular protective doses of aspirin

Background : Aspirin is valuable for preventing vascular events, but information about ulcer frequency is necessary to inform risk‐benefit decisions in individual patients.

The Visceral Sensitivity Index: development and validation of a gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety scale.

Background : Anxiety related to gastrointestinal sensations, symptoms or the contexts in which these may occur is thought to play a significant role in the pathophysiology as well as in the health outcomes of patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of prednisolone in post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome

Background : Post‐infectious irritable bowel syndrome is associated with increased serotonin‐containing enterochromaffin cells and lymphocytes in rectal biopsies. Animal studies have suggested that steroids reduce the lymphocyte response and suppress some of the post‐infectious changes in neuromuscular function.

An Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Specific Symptom Questionnaire: Development and Validation

Background: No self-assessment instruments are available to assess symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Our aim was to develop a disease-specific symptom questionnaire for use in patients with IBS. Methods: Two-hundred-and-thirty-four patients (77% F) with a mean age of 44 years took part in a psychometric evaluation using the previously validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale modified for use in patients with IBS (GSRS-IBS). This version was tested against several disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires. Items with a high ceiling effect, items that measured a different construct, and items showing high correlation (>0.80) to another item were removed. A confirmatory factor analysis was also performed. Results: The final questionnaire included 13 items depicting problems with satiety, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, constipation and bloating. The internal consistency reliability was high, ranging from 0.74 (pain) to 0.85 (satiety). The associations between similar constructs in the GSRS-IBS and the various HRQL scores confirmed the construct validity. Pain, bloating and diarrhoea were the symptom clusters that impaired HRQL the most. Conclusion: The GSRS-IBS is a short and user-friendly instrument with excellent psychometric properties.BACKGROUND No self-assessment instruments are available to assess symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Our aim was to develop a disease-specific symptom questionnaire for use in patients with IBS. METHODS Two-hundred-and-thirty-four patients (77% F) with a mean age of 44 years took part in a psychometric evaluation using the previously validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale modified for use in patients with IBS (GSRS-IBS). This version was tested against several disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires. Items with a high ceiling effect, items that measured a different construct, and items showing high correlation (>0.80) to another item were removed. A confirmatory factor analysis was also performed. RESULTS The final questionnaire included 13 items depicting problems with satiety, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, constipation and bloating. The internal consistency reliability was high, ranging from 0.74 (pain) to 0.85 (satiety). The associations between similar constructs in the GSRS-IBS and the various HRQL scores confirmed the construct validity. Pain, bloating and diarrhoea were the symptom clusters that impaired HRQL the most. CONCLUSION The GSRS-IBS is a short and user-friendly instrument with excellent psychometric properties.

Characteristics of patients with irritable bowel syndrome recruited from three sources: implications for clinical trials

Variation in the characteristics of irritable bowel syndrome patients recruited for clinical trials from different sources could affect their response and the generalizability of trial results.

Improvements with Esomeprazole in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms Taking Non-Steroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs, Including Selective COX-2 Inhibitors

OBJECTIVES:Upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are common in patients using non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) including selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors and may be acid related. We therefore assessed esomeprazole treatment for upper GI symptoms in these patients.METHODS:A total of 794 and 848 continuous NSAID users, free of gastroduodenal ulcers, erosive esophagitis, and Helicobacter pylori, were enrolled into two identical, multinational, multicenter double-blind studies (NASA1, SPACE1). Moreover, 608 and 556 patients were randomized to receive 4 wk esomeprazole 20 mg, or 40 mg, or placebo once daily. The primary variable was the patient-reported change in the upper GI symptom (pain, discomfort, or burning in the upper abdomen) score on a 7-graded severity scale (0–6) from the 7 days prior to treatment to the last 7 days in the study.RESULTS:Esomeprazole was associated with highly significant symptom improvement compared to placebo. Symptom improvements were 2.30 mean [SD 1.63] on esomeprazole 20 mg and 2.03 [1.56] on esomeprazole 40 mg versus 1.64 [1.57] on placebo in NASA1 and 2.17 [1.34] and 2.12 [1.48] versus 1.56 [1.26], respectively, in SPACE1 (all placebo comparisons at least p < 0.001). Esomeprazole-improved symptoms in patients taking selective COX-2 inhibitors, with changes of 2.21 [1.46] and 1.92 [1.38] versus 1.64 [1.46] in NASA1 and 2.20 [1.26] and 2.24 [1.62] versus 1.58 [1.37] in SPACE1 (all placebo comparisons at least p < 0.05), as well as those on non-selective NSAIDs. Esomeprazole was well tolerated and associated with significant improvements in HRQL.CONCLUSION:Esomeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg improve upper GI symptoms associated with continuous, daily NSAID therapy, including selective COX-2 inhibitors.

NSAID-Associated Adverse Effects and Acid Control Aids to Prevent Them A Review of Current Treatment Options

NSAIDs are central to the clinical management of a wide range of conditions. However, NSAIDs in combination with gastric acid, which has been shown to play a central role in upper gastrointestinal (GI) events, can damage the gastroduodenal mucosa and result in dyspeptic symptoms and peptic lesions such as ulceration.

Pharmacokinetics of [14C] omeprazole in patients with impaired renal function

Pharmacokinetics of [14C] omeprazole and its metabolites were studied after single intravenous and oral doses of 20 and 40 mg, respectively, to 12 patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Blood samples for determination of total radioactivity, omeprazole, OH‐omeprazole, sulfone, and sulfide were taken for 24 hours. Urine was collected over 96 hours for determination of total radioactivity and during the first 24 hours for additional assay of omeprazole and metabolites. The mean systemic availability was 70%. The mean plasma t1/2 of omeprazole was 0.6 hours. Unchanged omeprazole was not measurable in urine. Derived pharmacokinetic constants of intact omeprazole were within the range of those reported in healthy individuals. The accumulated 24‐hour excretion of radioactive metabolites was related significantly to creatinine clearance. The cumulative excretion of total radioactivity in urine over 96 hours in percent of given dose varied between 25% and 83%.