Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Joris Wagenaar is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Joris Wagenaar.


Transportation Science | 2014

Flexible Connections in Pesp Models for Cyclic Passenger Railway Timetabling

Leo G. Kroon; Leon Peeters; Joris Wagenaar; Rob Zuidwijk

In this paper we describe how rolling stock and passenger connections in a cyclic railway timetable can be modeled in a flexible way within the model for the Periodic Event Scheduling Problem (PESP). The PESP model was introduced by Serani and Ukovich (1989). Usually, PESP-models assume that the constraints for rolling stock or passenger connections specify in detail which trains should connect with each other. However, the flexibility described in this paper allows the model to choose which trains should connect with each other in a rolling stock or passenger connection. We express the required number of train compositions in terms of the integer cycle variables of the constraint graph. We also describe an abstract framework, demonstrating that, under certain conditions, the extra flexibility can be modeled purely in terms of PESP constraints. The concept of flexible rolling stock and passenger connections is illustrated by an example based on three intercity lines of Netherlands Railways.


Transportation Science | 2017

Maintenance Appointments in Railway Rolling Stock Rescheduling

Joris Wagenaar; Leo G. Kroon; Marie Schmidt

This paper addresses the Rolling Stock Rescheduling Problem (RSRP), while taking maintenance appointments into account. After a disruption, the rolling stock of the disrupted passenger trains has to be rescheduled in order to restore a feasible rolling stock circulation. Usually, a number of train units have a scheduled maintenance appointment during the day: these appointments must be taken into account while rescheduling the rolling stock. In this paper we propose three Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) models for this purpose. All models are extensions of the Composition model from literature, which does not distinguish individual train units. The Extra Unit Type model adds an additional rolling stock type for each train unit that requires maintenance. The Shadow-Account model keeps track of a shadow account for each train unit that requires maintenance. The Job-Composition model creates a path for each train unit such that the train units that require maintenance are on time for their maintenance appointments. All models are tested on instances of Netherlands Railways (NS). The results show that especially the Shadow-Account model and the Job-Composition model are effectively able to take maintenance appointments into account during real-time rescheduling. It depends on the characteristics of an instance whether the Shadow-Account model or the Job-Composition model performs best.


Computers & Operations Research | 2017

Application of an iterative framework for real-time railway rescheduling

Twan Dollevoet; Dennis Huisman; Leo G. Kroon; Lucas P. Veelenturf; Joris Wagenaar

Since disruptions in railway networks are inevitable, railway operators and infrastructure managers need reliable measures and tools for disruption management. Current literature on railway disruption management focuses most of the time on rescheduling one resource (timetable, rolling stock or crew) at the time. In this research, we describe an iterative framework in which all three resources are considered. The framework applies existing models and algorithms for rescheduling the individual resources. We extensively test our framework on instances from Netherlands Railways and show that schedules which are feasible for all three resources can be obtained within short computation times. This shows that the framework and the existing rescheduling approaches can be of great value in practice.


ERIM report series research in management Erasmus Research Institute of Management | 2015

Maintenance in Railway Rolling Stock Rescheduling for Passenger Railways

Joris Wagenaar; Leo G. Kroon

This paper addresses the Rolling Stock Rescheduling Problem (RSRP), while taking maintenance appointments into account. After a disruption, the rolling stock of passenger trains has to be rescheduled in order to maintain a feasible rolling stock circulation. A limited number of rolling stock units have a scheduled maintenance appointment during the day: these appointments need to be taken into account while rescheduling. In this paper we propose three different models for this. The Extra Unit Type model extends the known Composition model by adding additional rolling stock types for every rolling stock unit that requires maintenance. The Shadow-Account model keeps track of a shadow account for all units that require maintenance. The Job-Composition model is a combination of the Job model and the Composition model, both known in the literature. Paths are created such that maintenance units are on time for their maintenance appointment. All models are tested on instances of Netherlands Railways. The results show that the models are able to efficiently take maintenance appointments into account.


European Journal of Operational Research | 2017

Optimization methods for the Train Unit Shunting Problem

Jørgen Thorlund Haahr; Richard Martin Lusby; Joris Wagenaar

We consider the Train Unit Shunting Problem, an important planning problem for passenger railway operators. This problem entails assigning train units from shunting yards to scheduled train services in such a way that the resulting operations are without conflicts. The problem arises at every shunting yard in the railway network and involves matching train units to arriving and departing train services as well as assigning the selected matchings to appropriate shunting yard tracks. We present an extensive comparison benchmark of multiple solution approaches for this problem, some of which are novel. In particular, we develop a constraint programming formulation, a column generation approach, and a randomized greedy heuristic. We compare and benchmark these approaches with two existing methods, a mixed integer linear program and a two-stage heuristic. The benchmark contains multiple real-life instances provided by the Danish State Railways (DSB) and Netherlands Railways (NS). The results highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the considered approaches.


Transportation Research Part B-methodological | 2014

An overview of recovery models and algorithms for real-time railway rescheduling

Valentina Cacchiani; Dennis Huisman; Martin Philip Kidd; Leo G. Kroon; Paolo Toth; Lucas P. Veelenturf; Joris Wagenaar


Transportation Research Part B-methodological | 2015

Real-time high-speed train rescheduling in case of a complete blockage

Shuguang Zhan; Leo G. Kroon; Lucas P. Veelenturf; Joris Wagenaar


Transportation Research Part E-logistics and Transportation Review | 2016

A comparison of two exact methods for passenger railway rolling stock (re)scheduling

Jørgen Thorlund Haahr; Joris Wagenaar; Lucas P. Veelenturf; Leo G. Kroon


Econometric Institute Research Papers | 2013

An Overview of Recovery Models for Real-time Railway Rescheduling

Valentina Cacchiani; Dennis Huisman; Martin Philip Kidd; Leo G. Kroon; Paolo Toth; Lucas P. Veelenturf; Joris Wagenaar


RailTokyo2015: 6th International Conference on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis, Narashino, Japan, 23-26 March 2015 | 2015

Integrated Decision Support Tools for Disruption Management

Joris Wagenaar; Lucas P. Veelenturf; Paolo Toth; Joaquin Rodriguez; Valentina Cacchiani; Nikola Bešinović; Twan Dollevoet; Rob M.P. Goverde; Leo G. Kroon; M.P. Kidd; Dennis Huisman; Egidio Quaglietta

Collaboration


Dive into the Joris Wagenaar's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leo G. Kroon

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lucas P. Veelenturf

Eindhoven University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dennis Huisman

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jørgen Thorlund Haahr

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Twan Dollevoet

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leon Peeters

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rob Zuidwijk

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard Martin Lusby

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge