José Hurtado

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy use in 426 patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and stent implantation implications for bleeding risk and prognosis.

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to review outcomes in relation to antithrombotic therapy management strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting. BACKGROUND There is limited evidence on the optimal antithrombotic therapy management strategies for patients with AF who undergo PCI with stenting. METHODS We reviewed 426 patients (70.9% men, mean age 71.5 +/- 8.5 years) with AF undergoing PCI with stenting between 2001 and 2006. We recorded clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients, stroke risk factors, and antithrombotic therapy use before PCI and at discharge. Clinical follow-up was performed, and all bleeding episodes, thromboembolism, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (i.e., death, acute myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) were recorded. RESULTS The most commonly associated comorbidities were hypertension (74.5%), diabetes mellitus (40.2%), chronic renal failure (14.9%), and congestive heart failure (26.7%); 80% of patients had >or=2 stroke risk factors. Of the drugs prescribed at discharge, aspirin plus clopidogrel were used in 174 patients (40.8%), whereas 213 patients (50%) were discharged with triple therapy (coumarins, aspirin, and clopidogrel). Complete follow-up was achieved in 87.5% (median 594 days; range 0 to 2,190). The incidence of adverse events was high (36.6%), with major bleeding in 12.3%, thromboembolic events in 4.2%, and MACE in 32.3%. All-cause mortality was high (22.6%). In a multivariate analysis, non-anticoagulation with coumarins increased mortality (17.8% vs. 27.8%; hazard ratio [HR] = 3.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61 to 7.54; p = 0.002) and MACE (26.5% vs. 38.7%; HR = 4.9; 95% CI 2.17 to 11.1; p < 0.01) In a Cox-regression analysis, non-anticoagulation (p < 0.01) and age (p = 0.02) were independent predictors of MACE. CONCLUSIONS Patients with AF undergoing PCI with stenting represent a high-risk population because of age, comorbidities, and presence of stroke risk factors. These patients have a high mortality and MACE rate, which is reduced by anticoagulation therapy.

Exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias and risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) during ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring (typically occurring at rest or during sleep) is associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The prevalence and prognostic significance of ventricular arrhythmias during exercise is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS This was a cohort study, with prospective data collection. We studied 1380 patients, referred to a cardiomyopathy clinic in London, UK [mean age 42 years (SD 15); 62% male; mean follow-up 54 (SD 49) months]. Patients underwent two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography, upright exercise testing, and Holter monitoring. Twenty-seven patients [mean age 40 (SD 14) years (18-64); 22 (81.5%) male] had NSVT (24) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) (3) during exercise. During exercise, 13 (54.2%) had more than one run of NSVT (maximum 5) with a mean heart rate of 221 (SD 48) b.p.m. Patients with exercise NSVT/VF had more severe hypertrophy (22.6 vs. 19.5 mm, P = 0.009) and larger left atria (47.3 vs. 43.7 mm, P = 0.03). Male gender was significantly associated with exercise NSVT/VF [22 (81.5%) vs. 832 (61.5%), P = 0.03]. Eight (29.6%) of the exercise NSVT/VF patients died or had a cardiac event (SD/ICD discharge/transplant) compared with 150 (11.1%) patients without exercise NSVT/VF, P = 0.008. Patients with NSVT/VF had a 3.73-fold increase in risk of SD/ICD discharge (HR 95% CI: 1.61-8.63, P = 0.002). Exercise NSVT alone was associated with a 2.82-fold increased risk (HR 95% CI: 1.02-7.75, P = 0.049). In multivariable analysis with other risk markers, exercise NSVT/VF (but not NSVT alone) was independently associated with an increased risk of SD/ICD [HR 3.14 (95% CI: 1.29-7.61, P = 0.01)]. CONCLUSION Ventricular arrhythmia during symptom limited exercise is rare in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, but is associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death.

Should We Recommend Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Coronary Artery Stenting With a High HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk Score?

Background— Recent European guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation recommend oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, history of previous stroke, vascular disease, age 65–74 years, and sex category [female]) ≥1. The HAS-BLED score (Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile international normalized ratio, Elderly [>65 years], Drugs/alcohol concomitantly) has been suggested to assess bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (score ≥3 indicates high risk of bleeding). Despite the guidelines, this approach has never been tested in a cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. Methods and Results— We studied 590 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention/stenting and CHA2DS2-VASC score >1 (ie, OAC recommended). We compared patients with low-intermediate bleeding risk (HAS-BLED 0–2) and high risk (HAS-BLED ≥3), the relation between CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED, and the benefit and risks of the use of OAC in patients with high bleeding risk. The development of any bleeding episode, thromboembolism, mortality, cardiac events, and the composite major adverse cardiac events (ie, death, acute myocardial infarction, and/or target lesion revascularization) end point was recorded as well as the composite major adverse events (ie, major adverse cardiac events, major bleeding, or thromboembolism) end point at 1-year follow-up. Of the study cohort, 420 (71%) had a HAS-BLED score ≥3, and patients who were on OAC at discharge had lower mortality rate (9.3% versus 20.1%; P<0.01) and major adverse cardiac events (13.0% versus 26.4%; P<0.01) but with a similar major adverse event (20.5% versus 27.6%; P=0.11) and higher major bleeding rate (11.8% versus 4.0%; P<0.01). In a Cox multivariable analysis in patients with HAS-BLED ≥3, predictors of increased death were chronic renal failure and heart failure (both P<0.05), whereas OAC at discharge was associated with a reduced death rate (P<0.01). Predictors of major bleeding were chronic renal failure and the use of drug-eluting stents (both P<0.05). Conclusions— Most patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention/stenting have a high risk for major bleeding (HAS-BLED score ≥3). Even in these patients, OAC improves prognosis in these patients (reduced mortality and major adverse cardiac events) with an increase in major bleeding.

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stent use in patients with atrial fibrillation

AIMS Drug-eluting stents (DES) have never been sufficiently studied in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The latter are considered as a high-risk population with uncertainty over the optimal antithrombotic therapy strategy to prevent stroke, stent thrombosis, and recurrent cardiac ischaemia, balanced against the high risk of haemorrhage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the use of DES vs. bare-metal stents (BMS) in a cohort of patients with AF. METHODS AND RESULTS We reviewed 604 patients with AF who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with stent over a period of 7 years (January 2001-January 2008). After a propensity score selection, we identified two matched cohorts who received DES (n = 207) or BMS (n = 207). Clinical follow-up was performed, and all bleeding episodes, thrombo-embolism, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE; i.e. death, acute myocardial infarction, target vessel failure) were recorded. Complete follow-up was achieved in 95.9% of the cohort (mean: 693 +/- 427 days, median: 564). The incidence density of MACE as well as the incidence of all-cause mortality in both groups was similar. There was a higher incidence of major bleeding in DES group (2.26 vs. 1.19 per 10 000 days of exposure; P = 0.03). In a multivariate analysis, age, chronic AF, chronic renal failure, and non-use of dicoumarin were predictors of MACE and of all-cause mortality. The use of DES was not a predictor of reduced events. CONCLUSION On the basis of this study, the routine use of DES in patients with AF does not seem to be justified. A higher risk of major bleeding with DES in comparison with BMS raises the possibility that DES should be limited to lesions or patients with a high risk of restenosis.

Intervencionismo coronario en lesiones severamente calcificadas mediante aterectomía rotacional y stent liberador de paclitaxel: resultados tras un año de seguimiento

Las lesiones severamente calcificadas dificultan el intervencionismo coronario. La aterectomia rotacional permite tratar estas lesiones y los stents liberadores de paclitaxel (SLP) reducen la reestenosis a largo plazo. Se evaluo retrospectivamente el resultado de la aterectomia rotacional y los SLP en lesiones severamente calcificadas en 50 pacientes consecutivos. Se estudio la mortalidad y la revascularizacion de la lesion tratada tras 1 ano (mediana, 14 meses; intervalo intercuartilico, 8,75-25,5). El 52% eran mayores de 70 anos; el 68%, varones; el 52% tenia sindrome coronario agudo; el 80%, enfermedad multivaso y un 44% recibio abciximab. Hubo 2 muertes intrahospitalarias, 3 en el seguimiento (una cardiaca) y 3 (6%) casos de revascularizacion de la lesion tratada. A 1 ano, la supervivencia libre de muerte cardiaca fue del 94% y la supervivencia libre de revascularizacion de la lesion tratada, del 94%; esto muestra que la estrategia de SLP y aterectomia rotacional en lesiones severamente calcificadas proporciona excelentes resultados.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Heavily Calcified Lesions Using Rotational Atherectomy and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: Outcomes at One Year

Heavily calcified lesions present a challenge for percutaneous coronary intervention. With rotational atherectomy, it is possible to treat these lesions and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) reduce the risk of restenosis over the long term. This retrospective study investigated clinical outcomes with rotational atherectomy and PESs in 50 consecutive patients with heavily calcified lesions. Mortality and target lesion revascularization at 1 year (median, 14 months; interquartile range, 8.75-25.5 months) were recorded. Some 52% of patients were aged over 70 years, 68% were male, 52% had acute coronary syndrome, 80% had multivessel disease and 44% were receiving abciximab. Two patients died in hospital, three died during follow-up (one cardiac death) and 3 (6%) underwent target lesion revascularization. At 1 year, the survival rate free of cardiac death was 94% and the survival rate free of target lesion revascularization was 94%. These findings demonstrate that the combination of rotational atherectomy and PESs gives excellent results in heavily calcified lesions.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with rotational atherectomy for severely calcified unprotected left main: immediate and two-years follow-up results.

Introduction: According to current practice guidelines, coronary bypass surgery is the standard care option for unprotected left main (ULM) stenosis. However, a group of high surgical risk patients who are not eligible for coronary bypass surgery could benefit from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Severe calcification hampers PCI in this setting, and rotational atherectomy (RA) could be of great help. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 40 patients with severely calcified ULM stenosis, not eligible for coronary artery bypass grafting, who underwent RA in our center. Results: Forty patients (mean age, 73 ± 8 years; 26 males) with ULM stenosis were treated with RA. Twenty‐seven (67%) had distal stenosis. The mean number of treated vessels was 2.38 ± 0.74, with a mean lesion length of 30 ± 18 mm. Abciximab was used in 12 (30%) cases and an intra‐aortic balloon pump in three cases. One patient died during the procedure and another two patients died in the first 24 hr after the procedure. The major events registered after the procedure included one significant branch loss, and two minor and one major case of bleeding (the latter requiring transfusion) at the puncture point. After a median of 24.7 (IQR 19.6–34.3) months of follow‐up, 12 cardiac deaths were recorded. Survival free of cardiac death was 71 ± 7% and clinical guided target vessel revascularization 19.3 ± 7% at 2 years. Conclusion: In a group of high surgical risk patients, RA on severely calcified left main stenosis is feasible and, in spite of high mortality rates, could pose the only possible effective treatment.

An Evaluation of the CHADS2 Stroke Risk Score in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization

BACKGROUND There are various schemas designed to stratify the risk of thromboembolism (TE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), of which the CHADS(2) (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 y, diabetes, stroke [doubled]) score is the most widely studied. We evaluated whether the CHADS(2) score was adequate for TE risk stratification while assessing cardiac risk in patients with AF revascularized with coronary artery stents. METHODS We reviewed 604 consecutive patients with AF treated with at least one stent between 2001 and 2008 in relation to TE risk using CHADS(2) score. We stratified our patients with a CHADS(2) score ≤ 1 as low-moderate thromboembolic risk (group 1: n = 193, 32%) and > 1 as high risk (and, hence, requiring anticoagulation; group 2: n = 411, 68%). We determined the benefits and/or risks of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy in both cohorts. RESULTS Completed follow-up was achieved in 90.4% (mean 642.2 days). Group 1 event-free survival was better than group 2 (major adverse cardiovascular events [MACEs], log-rank test P = .03; and death, log-rank test P = .03). In group 1, event-free survival was better on OAC vs non-OAC use (death 5% vs 15%, P = .04; MACE 10% vs 26%, P < .01) with a trend for more major hemorrhages (12% vs 4%, P = .08). Stroke rate was 4.1% per 100 patient-years in patients without OAC therapy and 1.38% in patients on OAC therapy. Group 2 had a lower incidence of death (20% vs 34%, P < .01) and MACE (26% vs 43%, P < .01) among those on OAC therapy on discharge, with a higher incidence of major hemorrhages (18% vs 8%, P < .01). CONCLUSION In a population of patients with AF revascularized with stents, even those with CHADS(2) ≤ 1 should be regarded as being at high risk. OAC should be considered as thromboprophylaxis in patients with AF revascularized with coronary stents.

Aplicación de una puntuación de riesgo coronario (TIMI Risk Score) en una población no seleccionada de pacientes que consultan por dolor torácico en un servicio de urgencias

Introduccion y objetivos Diferentes algoritmos de estratificacion del sindrome coronario agudo (SCA) permiten identificar a los individuos con un mayor riesgo que pueden beneficiarse de tratamientos mas agresivos. Se ha demostrado que el TIMI Risk Score (TRS) es util en pacientes con un riesgo intermedio y alto, pero faltan evidencias acerca de su aplicabilidad clinica en pacientes no seleccionados. El objetivo es comprobar la eficacia del TRS en la estratificacion del riesgo en una poblacion con dolor toracico no seleccionada. Pacientes y metodo Se incluyo a 1.254 pacientes consecutivos que acudieron a urgencias por dolor toracico no traumatico sin ascenso del segmento ST (edad 54 ± 19 anos, 57% varones). Se ingreso a 343 (27%) y se dio de alta a 911 (73%). Se registro la aparicion de eventos cardiacos a los 6 meses. Resultados En el grupo dado de alta desde urgencias, 45 (5,3%) pacientes fueron ingresados durante el seguimiento, 9 (1,1%) recibieron tratamiento de revascularizacion, 5 (0,6%) presentaron un infarto agudo miocardico (IAM) y 2 (0,2%) fallecieron por causa cardiovascular. Los que obtuvieron una mayor puntuacion en el TRS presentaron mas riesgo de presentar el evento combinado muerte, infarto o revascularizacion (riesgo relativo por incremento de unidad = 3,63; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 2,20-6,00; p Conclusiones El TRS es una herramienta eficaz para la estratificacion pronostica de pacientes no seleccionados que consultan por dolor toracico. Permite identificar a los individuos de alto riesgo que se beneficiarian de ingreso hospitalario y tratamiento agresivo precoz.

Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Arteries. Predictors of Mortality and Impact of Cardiogenic Shock

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease may be essential following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, few data are available on the use of emergency PCI in unprotected LMCAs outside of clinical trials. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of in-hospital mortality, its predictors and its association with cardiogenic shock, and long-term outcomes in patients with unprotected LMCA disease who undergo emergency PCI because of AMI. METHODS The study included 71 consecutive patients who underwent emergency angioplasty of the LMCA and who were followed up clinically. RESULTS Overall, 42 patients (59%) had ST-elevation AMI and 47 (66%) had cardiogenic shock or developed it during PCI. Eleven patients (16%) died in the catheterization laboratory and 33 (47%) died during hospitalization. Inhospital mortality was similar in those with and without evidence of ST-segment elevation on ECG (48% vs. 45%; P=1). Multivariate analysis showed that the predictors of in-hospital mortality were cardiogenic shock (odds ratio [OR]=4.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-18) and incomplete revascularization (OR=5.1; 95% CI, 1.0-26). After discharge, 39 patients were followed up for a median of 32 months. Mortality in the first year was 10%. CONCLUSIONS Emergency PCI is a viable therapeutic option for AMI due to unprotected LMCA disease. However, in-hospital mortality is high, regardless of ST-segment elevation, particularly if there is cardiogenic shock or complete revascularization has not been achieved.