José Ibeas

Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study from Spain:

Purpose Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are common among patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis (HD) worldwide. The aim of this study was look into the incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors for CRBSI in four medical centers and Spanish dialysis facilities following a common protocol for insertion and management of tunneled hemodialysis catheters (THCs). Methods. Prospective study including all THCs inserted from September-04 to October-05. Follow-up was from THC insertion to its withdrawal, onset of CRBSI or end of study. Data of all THCs, CRBSI episodes, and catheter complications were collected. A descriptive analysis of CRBSI incidence and etiology and multivariate Cox regression to identify risk factors for CRBSI was performed. Results. A total of 130 THCs in 123 patients were inserted. There were 34 879 catheter-days. Twelve CRBSI in 11 patients with a CRBSI rate of 0.34/1000 catheter-days were recorded. CRBSI was caused by gram-positive coccus in 91.7% of the cases. Vascular cause of renal disease (HR 25.5 CI95% 5.5–117.2), and a previous THC (HR 5.1 CI95% 1.3–19.1) were identified as risk factors for CRBSI. CRBSI were satisfactorily resolved in 83.3% of the cases. Overall mortality was 14.6% (18/123), in two cases (2/11) death occurred within 30 days after CRBSI onset. Conclusions. Although some factors, such as vascular cause of renal disease and previous THC medical history, have been related to the onset of tunneled catheter-related bloodstream infections, the incidence of these bacteremia, mainly produced by gram-positive coccus, is low among hemodialysis patients and the mortality rate is not high.

The impact of access blood flow surveillance on reduction of thrombosis in native arteriovenous fistula: a randomized clinical trial

Purpose The usefulness of access blood flow (QA) measurement is an ongoing controversy. Although all vascular access (VA) clinical guidelines recommend monitoring and surveillance protocols to prevent VA thrombosis, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have failed to consistently show the benefits of QA-based surveillance protocols. We present a 3-year follow-up multicenter, prospective, open-label, controlled RCT, to evaluate the usefulness of QA measurement using Doppler ultrasound (DU) and ultrasound dilution method (UDM), in a prevalent hemodialysis population with native arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Methods Classical monitoring and surveillance methods are applied in all patients, the control group (n = 98) and the QA group (n = 98). Besides this, DU and UDM are performed in the QA group every three months. When QA is under 500 ml/min or there is a >25% decrease in QA the patient goes for fistulography, surgery or close clinical/surveillance observation. Thrombosis rate, assisted primary patency rate, primary patency rate and secondary patency rate are measured. Results After one-year follow-up we found a significant reduction in thrombosis rate (0.022 thrombosis/patient/year at risk in the QA group compared to 0.099 thrombosis/patient/year at risk in the control group [p = 0.030]). Assisted primary patency rate was significantly higher in the QA group than in control AVF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.99; p = 0.030). In the QA group, the numbers unddergoing angioplasty and surgery were higher but with no significant difference in non-assisted primary patency rate (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.72-2.84; p = 0.293). There was a non-significant improvement in secondary patency rate in the QA group (HR 0.510, 95% CI 0.17-1.50; p = 0.207). Conclusions The measurement of QA combining DU and UDM shows a reduction in thrombosis rate and an increased assisted primary patency rate in AVF after one-year follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02111655.

Adding access blood flow surveillance reduces thrombosis and improves arteriovenous fistula patency: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose Stenosis is the main cause of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) failure. It is still unclear whether surveillance based on vascular access blood flow (QA) enhances AVF function and longevity. Methods We conducted a three-year follow-up randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label trial to compare QA-based surveillance and pre-emptive repair of subclinical stenosis with standard monitoring/surveillance techniques in prevalent mature AVFs. AVFs were randomized to either the control group (surveillance based on classic alarm criteria; n = 104) or to the QA group (QA measured quarterly using Doppler ultrasound [M-Turbo®] and ultrasound dilution [Transonic®] added to classic surveillance; n = 103). The criteria for intervention in the QA group were: 25% reduction in QA, QA<500 mL/min or significant stenosis with hemodynamic repercussion (peak systolic velocity [PSV] more than 400 cm/sc or PSV pre-stenosis/stenosis higher than 3). Results At the end of follow-up we observed a significant reduction in the thrombosis rate in the QA group (0.025 thrombosis/patient/year in the QA group vs. 0.086 thrombosis/patient/year in the control group [p = 0.007]). There was a significant improvement in the thrombosis-free patency rate (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11-0.82; p = 0.011) and in the secondary patency rate in the QA group (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.93; p = 0.030), with no differences in the primary patency rate between the groups (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.57-1.61; p = 0.935). There was greater need for a central venous catheter and more hospitalizations associated with vascular access in the control group (p = 0.034/p = 0.029). Total vascular access-related costs were higher in the control group (€227.194 vs. €133.807; p = 0.029). Conclusions QA-based surveillance combining Doppler ultrasound and ultrasound dilution reduces the frequency of thrombosis, is cost effective, and improves thrombosis free and secondary patency in autologous AVF.

Guía Clínica Española del Acceso Vascular para Hemodiálisis

Vascular access for haemodialysis is key in renal patients both due to its associated morbidity and mortality and due to its impact on quality of life. The process, from the creation and maintenance of vascular access to the treatment of its complications, represents a challenge when it comes to decision-making, due to the complexity of the existing disease and the diversity of the specialities involved. With a view to finding a common approach, the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology [S.E.N.], vascular surgery [SEACV], vascular and interventional radiology [SERAM-SERVEI], infectious diseases [SEIMC] and nephrology nursing [SEDEN]), along with the methodological support of the Cochrane Center, has updated the Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis, published in 2005. These guidelines maintain a similar structure, in that they review the evidence without compromising the educational aspects. However, on one hand, they provide an update to methodology development following the guidelines of the GRADE system in order to translate this systematic review of evidence into recommendations that facilitate decision-making in routine clinical practice, and, on the other hand, the guidelines establish quality indicators which make it possible to monitor the quality of healthcare.

Arteriovenous fistula for haemodialysis: The role of surgical experience and vascular access education

he population of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients is ising all over the world.1,2 In 2009, more than 350,000 patients n the United States (US) received in-centre haemodialyis (HD). Vascular access procedures are one of the most ommonly performed surgeries in the US, with approxiately 500,000 procedures performed annually.3 Treating SRD patients cost the US over

Fe de errores de «Guía Clínica Española del Acceso Vascular para Hemodiálisis»

40 billion in public and rivate funds in 2009.4 In Europe, more than 550,000 ESRD atients received renal replacement therapy (RRT) in 2010.5 he prevalence of RRT per million population (p.m.p.) on 1st December 2009 was the highest in Portugal (1507 p.m.p.), elgium, French-speaking (1193 p.m.p.) and Spain, Catalonia 1160 p.m.p.).6 Despite an increase in the number of kideny transplants, hich is the best treatment of ESRD patients, chronic HD is till the main therapy.1 Autologous (native) arteriovenous fisula (AVF) provides the best access to the circulation because f low complication rate, long-term use and lower costs, ompared to arteriovenous graft (AVG) and central venous 1,7,8

Dialysis arteriovenous access monitoring and surveillance according to the 2017 Spanish Guidelines

José Ibeasa,∗, Ramon Roca-Teyb, Joaquín Vallespín c, Teresa Morenod, Guillermo Moñux e, Anna Martí-Monrós f, José Luis del Pozog, Enrique Grussh, Manel Ramírez de Arellano i, Néstor Fontseré j, María Dolores Arenask, José Luis Merino l, José García-Revillom, Pilar Caron, Cristina López-Espada , Antonio Giménez-Gaibar c, Milagros Fernández-Lucas o, Pablo Valdésp, Fidel Fernández-Quesada , Natalia de la Fuenteq, David Hernán r, Patricia Arribas s, María Dolores Sánchez de la Nieta t, María Teresa Martínezu, Ángel Barbaq y por el Grupo Español Multidisciplinar del Acceso Vascular (GEMAV)

Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology in Spain: A snapshot of current situation

The Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology (S.E.N.), vascular surgery (SEACV), interventional radiology (SERAM-SERVEI), infectious diseases (SEIMC), and nephrology nursing (SEDEN)), along with the methodological support of the Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, has developed the Spanish Clinical Guidelines on Vascular Access for Hemodialysis. This article summarizes the main issues from the guideline’s chapter entitled “Monitoring and surveillance of arteriovenous access.” We will analyze the current evidence on conflicting topics such as the value of the flow-based screening methods for the arteriovenous access surveillance or the role of Doppler ultrasound as the imaging exploration to confirm suspected stenosis. In addition, the concept of significant stenosis and the criteria to perform the elective intervention for stenosis were reviewed. The adoption of these guidelines will hopefully translate into a reduced risk of thrombosis and increased patency rates for both arteriovenous fistulas and grafts.

Fibrosis sistémica por gadolinio en insuficiencia renal avanzada

Background: Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology has been a rising field in recent years worldwide. Catheter insertion, renal biopsy, renal ultrasound, and peritoneal dialysis catheter or permanent dialysis catheter insertion are vital to our specialty. At present, many of these procedures are delegated to other specialties, generating long waiting lists and limiting diagnosis and treatment. Methods: An online survey was emailed to all Nephrology departments in Spain. One survey response was allowed per center. Results: Of 195 Nephrology departments, 70 responded (35.8%). Of them, 72.3% (52) had ultrasound equipment, 77.1% insert temporary jugular catheters, and 92.8% femoral. Up to 75.7% (53 centers) perform native renal biopsies, of which 35.8% (19) are real-time ultrasound guided by nephrologists. Transplant kidney biopsies are done in 26 centers, of which 46.1% (12) by nephrologists. Tunneled hemodialysis catheters are inserted in 27 centers (38.5%), peritoneal catheter insertion in 18 (31.6%), and only 2 centers (2.8%) perform arteriovenous fistulae angioplasty. In terms of ultrasound imaging, 20 centers (28.5%) do native renal ultrasound and 16 (22.8%) transplanted kidneys. Of all units 71.4% offer carotid ultrasound to evaluate cardiovascular risk, only in 15 centers (21%) by nephrologists. AVF ultrasound scanning is done in 55.7% (39). Conclusion: Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology is slowly spreading in Spain. It includes basic techniques to our specialty, allowing nephrologists to be more independent, efficient, and reducing waiting times and costs, overall improving patient care. Nowadays, more nephrologists aim to perform them. Therefore, appropriate training on different techniques should be warranted, implementing an official certification and teaching programs.