Jose L. Ochoa-Bayona

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative plasmablastic lymphoma: A single institutional experience and literature review

Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare aggressive B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder. HIV-negative PBL has not been extensively reported. Nine HIV-negative PBL patients evaluated at Moffitt Cancer Center were studied. Eight patients had extranodal diseases. All patients were treated with CHOP or hyper-CVAD. Responses were observed in 8 cases (7 complete, 1 partial responses). Four patients underwent consolidation with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in first complete remission (CR1). At median follow-up of 23.9 months, 7 patients were alive and 5 were disease-free. Aggressive induction chemotherapy and consolidation with autologous HSCT in CR1 might be considered for patients with HIV-negative PBL.

Sirolimus for treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

Acute GVHD (aGVHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic allograft recipients. The best therapy for patients failing to respond, or not tolerating, systemic glucocorticoids remains undefined. We evaluated the efficacy of sirolimus in 34 patients, median age of 49 (23–67) years, with steroid-refractory (n=31) or steroid-intolerant (n=3) aGVHD. aGVHD was diagnosed at a median of 34 (7–1042) days post allografting, and confirmed by biopsy in all cases. Initial aGVHD treatment consisted of prednisone up to 2u2009mg/kg. Sirolimus was initiated at a median of 9 (1–255) days after glucocorticoid initiation. A sirolimus loading dose was administered to 19 (56%) of 34 patients, median 6 (3–8) mg, followed by maintenance of 1–2u2009mg/day to target therapeutic trough levels between 4 and 12u2009ng/ml. Overall response rate was 76%. Fifteen (44%) of 34 patients achieved CR, defined as complete resolution of aGVHD sustained for at least 1 month, after sirolimus initiation without additional immunosuppressive agents. CR was achieved in 11 (42%) of 31 steroid-refractory and 2 (67%) of 3 steroid-intolerant patients. Median OS after initiation of sirolimus was 5.6 months, and 1-year OS was 44% (95% CI: 27–60%). Sirolimus is effective in controlling steroid-refractory aGVHD.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Plasma Cell Leukemia in the Era of Novel Therapies and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Strategies: A Single-Institution Experience

BACKGROUNDnPCL carries a poor prognosis and the optimal management remains unknown.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnTo evaluate the outcome of patients with PCL in the era of novel agents and innovative transplantation strategies, we conducted a review of patients with PCL who were treated at our institution from August 2003 to October 2009. Our primary endpoint was to determine overall survival, which was calculated from time of PCL diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Secondary endpoints included response rates and analyses regarding how the novel agents and presence of adverse cytogenetic analyses affected outcomes.nnnRESULTSnWe identified 25 patients with PCL (13 with primary PCL [pPCL], 12 with secondary PCL [sPCL]) from our institution. Eighteen patients received bortezomib-based regimens, 19 received high-dose melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), and 6 underwent allogeneic HCT. The median overall survival for all patients was 23.6 months. Bortezomib-treated patients had a median survival of 28.4 months vs. 4.0 months for the non-bortezomib-treated group (P < .001).nnnCONCLUSIONSnOur analysis suggests that patients with PCL who were treated with bortezomib and/or allogeneic HCT had improved outcomes.

Bortezomib salvage followed by a Phase I/II study of bortezomib plus high-dose melphalan and tandem autologous transplantation for patients with primary resistant myeloma

We conducted a Phase 1/2 study of bortezomib administered in combination with high‐dose melphalan followed by tandem autologous transplants in patients with primary resistant multiple myeloma. Thirty patients received two cycles of salvage bortezomib followed by stem cell mobilization with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor and harvest. Melphalan 100 mg/m2 per day on two consecutive days was administered, immediately followed by one dose of bortezomib (dose escalation) and stem cell infusion. The median beta 2‐microglobulin was 4·35 mg/l (range: 1·8–11·4); albumin was 37 g/l (range: 3·1–4·9); high‐risk karyotypes were noted in 45% of patients. The maximum planned dose of bortezomib at 1·3 mg/m2 was well tolerated and a formal maximum tolerated dose was not determined. The peak of best overall response (≥partial response) and complete response rates after tandem transplants were 84% and 36%, respectively. With a median follow‐up of 48 months, the median progression‐free survival was 15 [95% confidence interval (CI): 11–21] months and the median overall survival was 35 (95% CI: 22–43) months. Correlative studies demonstrated decreased expression of BRCA2 (P = 0·0072) and FANCF (P = 0·0458) mRNA following bortezomib treatment. Bortezomib combined with high‐dose melphalan is a well‐tolerated conditioning with some activity in patients with resistant myeloma.

Targeted IV busulfan and fludarabine followed by post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation rituximab demonstrate encouraging activity in CD20+ lymphoid malignancies without increased risk of infectious complications

We examined pharmacokinetic-targeted IV busulfan (75–170xa0mg/m2, with target AUC of 3500–6000xa0μmolxa0min) and fludarabine (40xa0mg/m2)xa0×xa04xa0days with rituximab (t-IV Bu/Fluxa0+xa0rituximab) 375xa0mg/m2 on days +1 and +8 followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in 19 patients (median age 56, range 35–68xa0years) with CD20+ lymphoid malignancies. Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 15 and 12xa0days. The cumulative incidence of grade II–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 58% (95% confidence interval, CI 39–85%), and chronic GVHD was 50% (95% CI 28–88%). With a median follow up of 7 (range 1–31)xa0months, overall response was observed in 15, and stable or progressive disease in 4. Overall survival at 1xa0year was 67%. Engraftment, chimerism, and infectious complications did not differ significantly from a contemporaneous non-rituximab containing comparator group. The addition of rituximab 375xa0mg/m2 to t-IV Bu/Flu does not appear to adversely affect engraftment, donor chimerism, or increase the risk of infectious complications.

Phase II Study of CD4+-Guided Pentostatin Lymphodepletion and Pharmacokinetically Targeted Busulfan as Conditioning for Hematopoietic Cell Allografting

One limitation of reduced-intensity preparative regimens is potential for graft failure. We have developed a regimen that targets CD4(+) lymphodepletion to ensure early and durable engraftment. The primary endpoint was achievement of ≥50% CD3(+) donor chimerism by day +28. Forty-two patients (median age, 53 years; range, 29 to 73 years) received pentostatin 4 mg/m(2) i.v. on days -28, -21, and -14 when the CD4(+) cell count was >100 cells/μL and on days -4 and -3 regardless of CD4(+) level. Rituximab 375 mg/m(2) was administered to patients with CD20(+) malignancies on days -21, -14, -7, +1, and +8. Busulfan 200 mg/m(2) i.v. was administered on days -4 and -2 at a dose to target a cumulative AUC dose of 16,000 (±10%) μmol·min/L. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus plus methotrexate in 86% of patients. Donors were matched-related (47%), matched unrelated (43%), or mismatched unrelated (10%). Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (45%) and follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma (14%) were the most common diagnoses. Disease status at initiation of the preparative regimen was complete remission in 22%, partial response in 55%, and stable/progression in 24%. The median percent CD4(+) cell count decrease from baseline (day -28) was 52% to day -21, 66% to day -14, 62% to day -7, and 91% to day 0. At day +28, all 42 patients (100%) had ≥50% CD3(+) donor chimerism. No patient experienced graft failure. Overall response rate was 82% (complete remisson, 67%). The day +100 cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 59% (grade III-IV acute GVHD, 19%), and the 2 year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 69% (moderate/severe, 58%). Nonrelapse mortality was 2% at day +100 and 17% at 2 years. Two-year PFS was 55%, and OS was 68%. This regimen ensures durable engraftment, is effective against persistent disease, and results in relatively low mortality from causes other than relapse.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for consolidation of VGPR or CR for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative approach in patients with multiple myeloma, but its use for consolidation of first remission has not yet been fully explored. Twenty-two myeloma patients with very good partial response (VGPR) or CR received allogeneic peripheral blood grafts as consolidation from HLA-matched donors between 2007 and 2012. Conditioning regimens were fludarabine (30u2009mg/m2 i.v. if with bortezomib and 40u2009mg/m2 i.v. when without bortezomib, × 4 days) plus melphalan (70u2009mg/m2 intravenously × 2 days) with (n=13) or without (n=9) bortezomib (1.3u2009mg/m2). The cumulative incidence of grades II – IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 45% (95% CI: 24–65%) and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD at 2 years was 46% (95% CI: 19–69%). With a median follow-up of 18 (range, 2–61) months, the 2-year PFS estimate is 74.8% (95% CI: 45–90%), which compares favorably with the 52% (95% CI: 35–66%) after autologous HCT for similar patients (a median follow-up of 30 (range, 9–55) months). We are conducting a phase 2 study to assess the efficacy of allogeneic HCT as post-remission therapy.

Pharmacokinetically-targeted BU and fludarabine as conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adults with ALL in first remission

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation offers improved survival in patients with ALL, but with regimens containing TBI, the nonrelapse mortality is 20–40%. Efforts to lessen transplant toxicities by reducing conditioning regimen intensity have led to increased relapse risk. Therefore, there is a need for less toxic regimens that maintain an anti-leukemia effect. We report here a retrospective review of 65 patients with ALL in first remission receiving grafts from allogeneic donors after fludarabine 40u2009mg/m2/day for 4 days and i.v. BU targeted to a median daily area under the concentration–time curve below 6000u2009μmolesu2009min/L. At 2 years after transplantation, OS was 65% (95% confidence interval (CI): 52–77%), relapse-free survival was 61% (95% CI: 48–73%), cumulative incidence of relapse was 26% (95% CI: 17–39%) and cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 14% (95% CI: 8–26%). Age over 35 years, Ph chromosome positivity and minimal residual disease at transplant did not adversely affect outcomes. Pharmacokinetically targeted BU and fludarabine can provide intensive pre-transplant conditioning for adults with ALL in first remission, with promising relapse-free and OS rates.

An open-label phase I/II study of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed myeloma.

We conducted a phase 1/2 trial evaluating the combination of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (CVDD) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). The primary objective of the phase 1 was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of maximum planned dose (MPD) and the phase 2 was to assess the overall response rate. Patients received 6–8 cycles of CVDD at four dose levels. There were no dose‐limiting toxicities. The MPD was cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV on day 1, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 4, 8, 11, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 IV on day 4, and dexamethasone 20 mg orally on the day of and after bortezomib (21‐d cycle). Forty‐nine patients were treated at the MPD of which 22% had high‐risk myeloma. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities included myelosuppression, infection, and fatigue. Overall response and complete response rates were 91% and 26% in standard‐risk, and 100% and 58% in high‐risk cohort, respectively. After a median follow‐up of 34 months, the median progression‐free survival was 31.3 months. The 2‐yr overall survival was 91.1% in the standard‐risk and 88.9% in the high‐risk cohort, respectively. CVDD regimen was well tolerated and was highly active in newly diagnosed MM.

Melphalan Culprit or Confounder in Acute Encephalopathy during Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

We report a case of a female patient with Durie-Salmon stage 3A/ISS stage I IgG kappa multiple myeloma (MM) who developed encephalopathy after high-dose melphalan and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The most common etiologies for encephalopathy such as infection, narcotic medications, metabolic-electrolyte disturbance, stroke, and central nervous system (CNS) hemorrhages were ruled out. The patient recovered from the altered mental status spontaneously. The possibilities of melphalan-induced encephalopathy versus critical-state delirium versus hypercytokinemia induce encephalopathy were contemplated.