Jose Lopez-Sendon

Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND Vitamin K antagonists are highly effective in preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but have several limitations. Apixaban is a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke in a similar population in comparison with aspirin. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind trial, we compared apixaban (at a dose of 5 mg twice daily) with warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) in 18,201 patients with atrial fibrillation and at least one additional risk factor for stroke. The primary outcome was ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. The trial was designed to test for noninferiority, with key secondary objectives of testing for superiority with respect to the primary outcome and to the rates of major bleeding and death from any cause. RESULTS The median duration of follow-up was 1.8 years. The rate of the primary outcome was 1.27% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 1.60% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio with apixaban, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.95; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.01 for superiority). The rate of major bleeding was 2.13% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 3.09% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.80; P<0.001), and the rates of death from any cause were 3.52% and 3.94%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.99; P=0.047). The rate of hemorrhagic stroke was 0.24% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 0.47% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.75; P<0.001), and the rate of ischemic or uncertain type of stroke was 0.97% per year in the apixaban group and 1.05% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.13; P=0.42). CONCLUSIONS In patients with atrial fibrillation, apixaban was superior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism, caused less bleeding, and resulted in lower mortality. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer; ARISTOTLE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00412984.).

Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Non-thrombotic PE does not represent a distinct clinical syndrome. It may be due to a variety of embolic materials and result in a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, making the diagnosis difficult. With the exception of severe air and fat embolism, the haemodynamic consequences of non-thrombotic emboli are usually mild. Treatment is mostly supportive but may differ according to the type of embolic material and clinical severity.

Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary

We thank the authors for raising the interesting discussion regarding the treatment of hypertension in patients with concomitant coronary disease. The J-shaped association between on-treatment blood pressure and risk has been described in longitudinal cohorts of patients with treated hypertension as well as in clinical trial populations, both in on-treatment and control arms. However, it is not absolutely clear that the association is treatmentrelated; in fact, one meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials including data on more than 40 000 patients has shown that the J-shaped relationship between blood pressure and mortality was not related to antihypertensive treatment. In this meta-analysis, noncardiovascular death was inversely related to blood pressure (both systolic and diastolic) in contrast to the J-shaped relationships for cardiovascular and total mortality, leading the authors to hypothesize that poor health conditions leading to low blood pressure and an increased risk of death might in part explain the J-shaped curve. Secondly, as discussed in the full-text version of the guidelines, there is accumulating evidence that blood pressure lowering in the ‘normal’ range is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes in the population with known coronary disease. In the CAMELOT study, patients with coronary disease and mean blood pressure of 129/78 were randomized to enalapril, amlodipine, or placebo. Blood pressure reductions were similar (5/2 mm) in both treatment groups and associated with similar relative reductions in the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, MI, and stroke, although not statistically significant in either group because of the small sample size. An intravascular ultrasound substudy demonstrated a significant inverse correlation between progression of atherosclerosis and blood pressure reduction even in this normal blood pressure range, with the greatest benefit observed in patients whose blood pressure fell below 120/80. Thus, the task force has felt it important, in the absence of unequivocal evidence to the contrary, to preserve consistency between guidelines on prevention and angina with regard to targets for institution of therapy for hypertension in the presence of coronary disease. No lower limit has yet been identified as a definite cutoff beyond which blood pressure should not be lowered further, although, clearly, symptomatic hypotension or postural hypotension will limit aggressive blood pressure lowering in the lower range.

Predictors of major bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)

Aims There have been no large observational studies attempting to identify predictors of major bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), particularly from a multinational perspective. The objective of our study was thus to develop a prediction rule for the identification of patients with ACS at higher risk of major bleeding. Methods and results Data from 24 045 patients from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) were analysed. Factors associated with major bleeding were identified using logistic regression analysis. Predictive models were developed for the overall patient population and for subgroups of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina. The overall incidence of major bleeding was 3.9% (4.8% in patients with STEMI, 4.7% in patients with NSTEMI and 2.3% in patients with unstable angina). Advanced age, female sex, history of bleeding, and renal insufficiency were independently associated with a higher risk of bleeding ( P <0.01). The association remained after adjustment for hospital therapies and performance of invasive procedures. After adjustment for a variety of potential confounders, major bleeding was significantly associated with an increased risk of hospital death (adjusted odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.18, 2.28). Conclusions In routine clinical practice, major bleeding is a relatively frequent non-cardiac complication of contemporary therapy for ACS and it is associated with a poor hospital prognosis. Simple baseline demographic and clinical characteristics identify patients at increased risk of major bleeding.

Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents summarize and evaluate all available evidence with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategy for an individual patient suffering from a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome and the risk benefit ratio of diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no substitutes for textbooks and their legal implications have been discussed previously. Guidelines and recommendations should help physicians to make decisions in their daily practice. However, the ultimate judgement regarding the care of an individual patient must be made by his/her responsible physician(s). The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents can be found on the ESC website (http://www.escardio.org/knowledge/ guidelines/rules). Members of this Task Force were selected by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) to represent all physicians involved with the medical and surgical care of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). A critical evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is performed including assessment of the risk benefit ratio. Estimates of expected health outcomes for society are included, where data exist. The level of evidence and the strength of recommendation of particular treatment options are weighed and graded according to predefined scales, as outlined in Tables 1 and 2. The members of the Task Force have provided disclosure statements of all relationships that might be perceived as real or potential sources of conflicts of interest. These disclosure forms are kept on file at European Heart House, headquarters of the ESC. Any changes in conflict of interest that arose during the writing period were notified to the ESC. The Task Force report received its entire financial support from the ESC and EACTS, without any involvement of the pharmaceutical, device, or surgical industry. ESC and EACTS Committees for Practice Guidelines are responsible for the endorsement process of these joint Guidelines. The finalized document has been approved by all the experts involved in the Task Force, and was submitted to outside specialists selected by both societies for review. The document is revised, and finally approved by ESC and EACTS and subsequently published simultaneously in the European Heart Journal and the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. After publication, dissemination of the Guidelines is of paramount importance. Pocket-sized versions and personal digital assistant-downloadable versions are useful at the point of care. Some surveys have shown that the intended users are sometimes unaware of the existence of guidelines, or simply do not translate them into practice. Thus, implementation programmes are needed because it has been shown that the outcome of disease may be favourably influenced by the thorough application of clinical recommendations.

Apixaban with Antiplatelet Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND Apixaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, may reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events when added to antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial comparing apixaban, at a dose of 5 mg twice daily, with placebo, in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy, in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome and at least two additional risk factors for recurrent ischemic events. RESULTS The trial was terminated prematurely after recruitment of 7392 patients because of an increase in major bleeding events with apixaban in the absence of a counterbalancing reduction in recurrent ischemic events. With a median follow-up of 241 days, the primary outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke occurred in 279 of the 3705 patients (7.5%) assigned to apixaban (13.2 events per 100 patient-years) and in 293 of the 3687 patients (7.9%) assigned to placebo (14.0 events per 100 patient-years) (hazard ratio with apixaban, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.11; P=0.51). The primary safety outcome of major bleeding according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) definition occurred in 46 of the 3673 patients (1.3%) who received at least one dose of apixaban (2.4 events per 100 patient-years) and in 18 of the 3642 patients (0.5%) who received at least one dose of placebo (0.9 events per 100 patient-years) (hazard ratio with apixaban, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.50 to 4.46; P=0.001). A greater number of intracranial and fatal bleeding events occurred with apixaban than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS The addition of apixaban, at a dose of 5 mg twice daily, to antiplatelet therapy in high-risk patients after an acute coronary syndrome increased the number of major bleeding events without a significant reduction in recurrent ischemic events. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer; APPRAISE-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00831441.).

Guidelines for pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery

The American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology are all in the process of completing updated versions of our Guidelines for Perioperative Care. Our respective writing committees are undertaking a careful analysis of all relevant validated studies and always incorporate appropriate new trials and meta-analyses into our evidence review. In the interim, our current joint position is that the initiation of beta blockers in patients who will undergo non-cardiac surgery should not be considered routine, but should be considered carefully by each patients treating physician on a case-by-case basis. Please see the expression of concern which is free to view in Eur Heart J (2013) 34 (44): 3460; doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht431. AAA : abdominal aortic aneurysm ACC : American College of Cardiology ACE : angiotensin-converting enzyme ACS : acute coronary syndrome AHA : American Heart Association AR : aortic regurgitation ARB : angiotensin receptor blocker AS : aortic stenosis AF : atrial fibrillation BBSA : β-blocker in spinal anaesthesia BNP : brain natriuretic peptide CABG : coronary artery bypass grafting CARP : coronary artery revascularization prophylaxis CASS : coronary artery surgery study CI : confidence interval COX-2 : cyclooxygenase-2 COPD : chronic obstructive pulmonary disease CPET : cardiopulmonary exercise testing CPG : Committee for Practice Guidelines CRP : C-reactive protein CT : computed tomography cTnI : cardiac troponin I cTnT : cardiac troponin T CVD : cardiovascular disease DECREASE : Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluating Applying Stress Echo DES : drug-eluting stent DIPOM : Diabetes Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity DSE : dobutamine stress echocardiography ECG : electrocardiography ESC : European Society of Cardiology FEV1 : forced expiratory volume in 1 s FRISC : fast revascularization in instability in coronary disease HR : hazard ratio ICU : intensive care unit IHD : ischaemic heart disease INR : international normalized ratio LMWH : low molecular weight heparin LQTS : long QT syndrome LR : likelihood ratio LV : left ventricular MaVS : metoprolol after surgery MET : metabolic equivalent MI : myocardial infarction MR : mitral regurgitation MRI : magnetic resonance imaging MS : mitral stenosis NICE-SUGAR : normoglycaemia in intensive care evaluation and survival using glucose algorithm regulation NSTEMI : non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction NT-proBNP : N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide NYHA : New York Heart Association OPUS : orbofiban in patients with unstable coronary syndromes OR : odds ratio PaCO2 : mixed expired volume of alveolar and dead space gas PAH : pulmonary arterial hypertension PETCO2 : end-tidal expiratory CO2 pressure PCI : percutaneous coronary intervention PDA : personal digital assistant POISE : PeriOperative ISchaemic Evaluation trial QUO-VADIS : QUinapril On Vascular ACE and Determinants of ISchemia ROC : receiver operating characteristic SD : standard deviation SMVT : sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia SPECT : single photon emission computed tomography SPVT : sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia STEMI : ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction SVT : supraventricular tachycardia SYNTAX : synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery TACTICS : treat angina with aggrastat and determine cost of therapy with an invasive or conservative strategy TIA : transient ischaemic attack TIMI : thrombolysis in myocardial infarction TOE : transoesophageal echocardiography UFH : unfractionated heparin VCO2 : carbon dioxide production VE : minute ventilation VHD : valvular heart disease VKA : vitamin K antagonist VO2 : oxygen consumption VPB : ventricular premature beat VT : ventricular tachycardia Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents aim to present management and recommendations based on the relevant evidence on a particular subject in order to help physicians to select the best possible management strategies for the individual patient suffering from a specific condition, taking into account not only the impact on outcome, but also the risk–benefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no substitutes for textbooks. The legal implications of medical guidelines have been discussed previously.1 A great number of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and also by other organizations or related societies. Because of the impact on clinical practice, quality criteria for development of guidelines have been established in order to make all decisions transparent to the user. The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents can be found on the ESC website in the guidelines section (www.escardio.org). In brief, experts in the field are selected and undertake a comprehensive review of the published evidence for management and/or prevention of a given condition. …

Guidelines for pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery: The task force for preoperative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery of the European society of Cardiology (ESC) and endorsed by the European society of anaesthesiology (ESA)

ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG): Alec Vahanian (Chairperson) (France), Angelo Auricchio (Switzerland), Jeroen J. Bax (The Netherlands), Claudio Ceconi (Italy), Veronica Dean (France), Gerasimos Filippatos (Greece), Christian Funck-Brentano (France), Richard Hobbs (UK), Peter Kearney (Ire

Apixaban, an oral, direct, selective factor Xa inhibitor, in combination with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: results of the Apixaban for Prevention of Acute Ischemic and Safety Events (APPRAISE) trial

Background— After an acute coronary syndrome, patients remain at risk of recurrent events. Apixaban, an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, is a novel anticoagulant that may reduce these events but also poses a risk of bleeding. Methods and Results— Apixaban for Prevention of Acute Ischemic and Safety Events (APPRAISE) was a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Patients (n=1715) with recent ST-elevation or non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were randomized to 6 months of placebo (n=611) or 1 of 4 doses of apixaban: 2.5 mg twice daily (n=317), 10 mg once daily (n=318), 10 mg twice daily (n=248), or 20 mg once daily (n=221). Nearly all patients received aspirin; 76% received clopidogrel. The primary outcome was International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. A secondary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, severe recurrent ischemia, or ischemic stroke. At the recommendation of the Data Monitoring Committee, the 2 higher-dose apixaban arms were discontinued because of excess total bleeding. Compared with placebo, apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 3.48; P=0.09) and 10 mg once daily (hazard ratio, 2.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.31 to 4.61; P=0.005) resulted in a dose-dependent increase in major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 to 1.19; P=0.21) and 10 mg once daily (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 1.04; P=0.07) resulted in lower rates of ischemic events compared with placebo. The increase in bleeding was more pronounced and the reduction in ischemic events was less evident in patients taking aspirin plus clopidogrel than in those taking aspirin alone. Conclusions— We observed a dose-related increase in bleeding and a trend toward a reduction in ischemic events with the addition of apixaban to antiplatelet therapy in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome. The safety and efficacy of apixaban may vary depending on background antiplatelet therapy. Further testing of apixaban in patients at risk of recurrent ischemic events is warranted.

Determinants and prognostic impact of heart failure complicating acute coronary syndromes: observations from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)

Background—Few data are available on the impact of heart failure (HF) across all types of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Methods and Results—The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) is a prospective study of patients hospitalized with ACS. Data from 16 166 patients were analyzed: 13 707 patients without prior HF or cardiogenic shock at presentation were identified. Of these, 1778 (13%) had an admission diagnosis of HF (Killip class II or III). HF on admission was associated with a marked increase in mortality rates during hospitalization (12.0% versus 2.9% [with versus without HF], P <0.0001) and at 6 months after discharge (8.5% versus 2.8%, P <0.0001). Of note, HF increased mortality rates in patients with unstable angina (defined as ACS with normal biochemical markers of necrosis; mortality rates: 6.7% with versus 1.6% without HF at admission, P <0.0001). By logistic regression analysis, admission HF was an independent predictor of hospital death (odds ratio, 2.2; P <0.0001). Admission HF was associated with longer hospital stay and higher readmission rates. Patients with HF had lower rates of catheterization and percutaneous cardiac intervention, and fewer received &bgr;-blockers and statins. Hospital development of HF (versus HF on presentation) was associated with an even higher in-hospital mortality rate (17.8% versus 12.0%, P <0.0001). In patients with HF, in-hospital revascularization was associated with lower 6-month death rates (14.0% versus 23.7%, P <0.0001; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.68, P <0.0001). Conclusions—In this observational registry, heart failure was associated with reduced hospital and 6-month survival across all ACS subsets, including patients with normal markers of necrosis. More aggressive treatment of these patients may be warranted to improve prognosis.